1201 UIE-LS01DB-A

已完成

创建时间: 2026-01-13 03:19:31

更新时间: 2026-01-13 03:52:10

源文件: f0.mp4

文件大小: 0.00 MB

字数统计: 42,328 字

标签:
暂无标签
处理统计

STT耗时: 29108 秒

分析耗时: 11 秒

处理流程
文件上传 完成

文件名: f0.mp4
大小: 0.00 MB

试听当前项目录音
URL直链 f0.mp4
时长: 检测中...
视频加载中,请稍候... (来自外部URL,可能需要较长时间)
语音识别 (STT)
完成
Hi Daniel, you hi. Hi. How you Daniel? I'm good. Yeah. What have you been up to this week? What been doing? Say that again. Yeah. What have you been up to this week? What have you been doing this week? I had a five day weekend thanksgiving. Watch. You've had a five day weekend. Wow. Yes, start a Thursday. Start of Thursday was for thanksgiving. And five day you and five day. It was also Monday. So today didn't went to school. What have you done in your five day, Daniel? What have you done for thanhave? You done anything for thanksgiving on Thursday and Friday? I want out. Out. I went out to a hotel with some classmates and, and and then on Thursday I had a ten. No, not Thursday. On Saturday I, I got A, I had a tennis lesson. And then on, I mean on sati mean on Sunday I had and I, I on Sunday, I think I did nothing. Nothing that it's very busy. I can't see you and, and, and then, and then I want to watch a movie. What? Maybe movie? Maybe zoutopia two. You wattopia two. Was it good? Yes. Was it Oh my goodness, I want to see this. I am so excited to see this Daniel was it as good as the first? A much better. Oh was it it was better than the Oh okay, I'm gonna have to go watch this now Daniel I'm gonna have to go and watch this tonight now that you've put it into my mind. It's good. Okay. Have you seen wicked yet? Anyone? Has anyone watwicked? Was it not released? What do you mean? Oh, so there's a movie. Do you make it? There's a movie at the moment that's really big or wicked the musical. I don't know if anybody's been watching that at all. I don't even know that background. He's going different background because he wants one, three and the three. What you been up to this week? Have you had a five day weekend? I don't think so. Great. Have you had a five day weekend? Yeah, no. What have you been up to this week? Then? Three, you tell us what you've been up to. No, let's see. I've been up to reading books, reading a book. What book? What book have you been reading? Three. Listen, what is this? The Christmas sorrich. You guys have got the best taste in reading and books and films. Look at that. I love this. The Christmas saus. Is that bwho's that bi don't know what he is? Yeah. Who wrote it through? Flitcher. Three. I know Tom Fletcher. So I, he's just written Paddington the musical. I know this is what I'm reading at the moment. And if you can see it, I'm reading something called time wararf in the Roman road, which is quite cool. It's all about going back in time. I can't. I think it will just diststop. I'm afraid I didn't think it will actually let me get it closer. Yeah, because as far as I can, sorry, I'm trying three, but it just do I know it's gone. So I can't. When I put it close, it does that. I think I think you're screwing a little buzzy. It goes buzzy. If I get it closer, this is as close as I can get it. But it's about roaming. He goes and travelling and he ends up back in time. Change the background. I can't. I can't three. I can't change my background. It's too messy for me to change. Rocan, I just installed it. Good to see. And I don't want to change the background. I gonna say I can't change your background, right? We're welcome. I don't want Hannah made sure come. I'm sure shejoin us. So today is all about rebutling. I know you guys are very good at rebutattling. We're gonna be rebutattling today. And Daniel, what's the difference, do you think, between debating and public speaking? Public speaking is is like not debating. It's talking. It's talking to the audience about your opinions and the and if the audience doesn't like your opinion, they don't shout out. The public speaking is just is just saying about your your opinion and not arguing. Very well done. And then and then debate is arguing like this mouth. And then and then they fight with the words. They fight, they fight. That's a good way of describing it, Daniel. Actually fighting with the word. And what's the point of public speaking? Menthree, why do I need to have a public? Why do I need to listen to a public speaker? Because because you if you you don't listen to them, you might not have any idea what it was talking about Yeah. So so maybe you get some ideas in the in speaking too. Very good. Yeah we're going to have this idea, aren't we, of making sure that we can be heard and Daniel, why do we debate? We debate because we want the others, because we want the others to to. We we probably want others to think about your opinion and maybe change their minds. And I mean, that's what I think change their minds exactly. Oh, we're changing a new law. If you're in a certain country where you can't just decide a law, then they do have to debate it in the house of parliament. Or if you're having a disagreement with a friend, you do need to learn to listen to each other's point of view to be able to find maybe a solution to a problem. Yeah, well done Daniel. I'm perfect. And today is all about rebuttle Yeah and thinking about effective ways to rebuttle. Here's Hannah. Hi Hannah, you okay Hannah. Oh okay, we're just gonna we'll leave you to already Hannah. So rebuttal is responding to what the team on the other side of the topic has said and explaining why they are wrong. Okay, so our first step to rebutattling is we need to give one sentence of the other person's argument. Okay. So Daniel, I'm going bring you down for a moment. So Daniel, we're going to have a little I'm going to ask you, what is your opinion on banning plastic bags? Can you give me one thing in a debate? But you might say. We should ban plastic bags because because are they are fed to the environment and people always throw them everywhere. And and and and if they throw it everywhere, nature cannot cannot like dissolve it instead of food food litter, nature can make it into compost or something, but plastic is very hard for them to to dissolve. Okay, brilliant. All right. So this is this idea of banning plastic bags. Daniels made his point. Yes, we should. I'm not gonna rebuttle him. But the first thing I've got to do is I've got to address the point. Otherwise, the chairperson, the examiners, the audience, I've got clue what you are rebutckling. So I can say affirmative. Speaker Daniel talked about banning plastic bags due to environment and finding a more environmentally way of getting rid of plastic bags. However we do that, we do not have an alternative for plastic bags that are as good. We also can not change the way that people use their plastic bags. I've taken Daniel's point, I've addressed Daniel's point and then I've argued, okay, but you must address the point that you are arguing. Otherwise Daniel wins because the chairperson has no idea what you're talking about. Okay? So we've got to be really careful. Thank you Daniel. Okay, so Hannah, I'm gonna to give you we should ban all students going to school. What do you think Hannah? Oh, no. No, because because at first like students students need knowledge, then they can, they need to go to school for knowledge and also for fun, like they have fun in school too. And firstly, this and secondly, they have new p or other class to make the class fun and they can learn some other knowledge from those class also. Okay, thank you very much. Okay, I'm going to come down and I'm going to rebuttle you now. So Hannah, on the affirm, on the negative team on this side, on the negative team stated that we need knowledge and therefore going to school is our way of getting knowledge, plus that it is fun. However, we on the affirmative team believe that not all students benefit from a school. Some students thrive at home as they find it actually quite scary and not fun at all. So I took Hanna's point. I made clear what I was rebutattling and then I gave my opinion. Okay, well, and Hannah, right. Three. Our next one I'm gonna to give you is what I do for three. All books should be made into movies. Hmm, do you think three? No I think no. Okay, tell me why because the books you can imagine and maybe in movies, for example, there's a rocket in the book, there's this book about a super cool rocket and you can in the book you can imagine a rocket as the which big super cool one, the one you really like, I really want. But in the movie, it it it it made you lose your imagination. Hey, thank you very much. Very much. The rois small and the very well done three fantastic. And so the affirmative team acknowledges three's point about the rocket and the idea that we may have imagined it differently to the movie. However, we wholeheartedly disagree, as we believe that if it's a good enough book, then everyone will be thinking about the same imaginative way and therefore we will be able to make a visual spectacular on our screens. For example, Harry Potter's Hogwarts. No one is disappointed by the visual they've created for Hogwarts School of witchcraft and wisidry. Therefore, all books could be turned into movies. Okay, again, taking three's very good point, but then using it for my rebuttal. Okay, well done. So we're going to practice this now with you guys going a bit head to head. So Daniel and Hannah are going to go get each other for the first round. Okay, so the motion, Daniel, you're going to be on the agree side of this motion. And Hannah, you're going to be on the disagree side for this one. And our motion here is going to be something very simple like we we should all go to space. Okay, Daniel, what do you think we've got you on the agrees for this one. So just a point. I have a good size. It's impossible. We should all go to space. Think about what we could learn in space. Space is great. This is impossible. Okay, three looks up for the challenge. So let's do it. Three, you've got a good you've found like it's a great idea. So three, give it your point. Yeah, you can you can in space you actually in space. There's really cool thing about space that you can float around and it's really fun. Amazing, right Hannah, okay, so hang on, hang on, wait piamazing, thank you very much. We could have pizza parties, right? Hannah, and even though there are some full like cakes and stuff net these crummy you can't eat in space. No you can also eat chicken and eggs and bad like some, most of the food we on earth we can eat them. Chilin space like also the view from the space is super good. Okay, so Hannah, before you make your rebuttal you must state which statement of threes you were disagreeing with. Three said we disagree because so off you go. Hannah, I want you to disagree with three but I want you to make clear which argument you're disagreeing with. We said that we could have, we could have pizza party on the space but like we're like when we, we we we should can't not do that because because when if we had a big pizza party we could not use, we could not make other people on earth to go to space, then the space, like for example, the moon, it will be too smart to fit in. Which what if you will say, what if we fibut? It's okay because because then even though we don't have enough pizzas for everyone and a pizza or a pizza party, we cannot have a pizza party because why do we have a pizza party on moon? It makes nonsense. Well done. I think three wants to be back. Tle you okay, you said the moon is too small. Well, how about we all live on your your Uranus? Everyone can living their own. But no, no, no, three, we're not gonna go there. Not gonna go there. No, no, no. Well done, Hannah. After that, I think Hanna, you've won that round. Well done. Well done. Okay. Yes, Daniel. Okay, okay, it's just okay, right? Okay, it's okay. We're gonna to do the next one right? Hannah stays on because she was the winner. So Hannah stays on in this round. Our next motion. Daniel, you will now disagree with what Hannah says. Hannah, you agree motion is going to be we should ban all all cars in the city center. Okay, what do you think Hannah, what do you mean by city center? So like a town centre or a city, so like where you live, like there's lots of cars, we should maybe ban them. Okay, what do you think, Hannah? Easy peasy. I think so. So so cars should be bad in the city center because because we can put them. Like we can put them. We can like eliminate cars because they're too so which we can use. We can we can eliminate cars and make more easier transport mations, which is, for example, air, make more airports and more airplanes, or like we can use also a sitrains and trains which are faster than cars, which are also more useful. And you can many people can use them more cause there are more of them and you can, many people can use it. Not only one. Well done, Hannah. Okay, Daniel, how are you going to rebuttle? Hannah, but, but if but if we Daniel, make it clear. Daniel, make it clear that you watch point you are rebutattling Hannah stated. Hannah said, however, I disagree because I, Hanah said that can we, we can eliminate cars that make easier transportation, for example, make more airplanes and train, which are faster than cars. But I disagree because if we want to go to a very, very short distance, we, we, we, my. Okay, continue. But if we want to go very short distances, like go to the local library or something, like airplanes are too, just too fast and and and the airplanes are and if we use more airplanes, maybe the maybe that, what was it going to say? Listen, tell me, airplanes are are are not safer than cars. And may, and some people are afraid of buying airplanes and many people are plain sick and also train sick sick and and can also be car sick also. So it's you're the rest that's not good brain also and also I'm not finished. Okay, let's go back to Daniel. Let him finish. Okay and and if we just spend our cars, then the many car companies work loads and many people cannot make, and the car company people cannot make money and and maybe if we use airplanes, we we need to, we need to the with the the like the airplane maybe we need to, we need to give money to we need to pay to pay to the airport or something. Welcome. Well done. And Daniel, right, let's put it over otherwise because we've got to make sure that these are snappy. Okay, so Hannah, what's your rebuttal to Daniel? What's your response? If they are like nawe can we can just walk to them. If you said this nare is so there we can walk to them not use trantations. And if you scarthere also you might not try and be a car like car car park and you if no, you find a car park you might haven't found A A place to park okay well done spot well done Hannah I the question we're not gonna have a chance to do our main debate I know Hannah but we've got otherwise we're not gonna get round to our main debate today. Well done okay great example there Daniel using what Hannah said and then creating it. Hannah then felt compelled to argue you back because she didn't agree with you and then Daniel, you wanted to add more onto there. This is what we want for our rebuttal. Remember rebutling is you make a point and throw it over. Make a point and throw it over. Do not make a long point. Your team won't remember it. Yeah that's the problem if we're when we're in the rebuttal stages, okay, as we saw that, don't interrupt each other but be careful that you're not over talking it because that can be a problem in here as well. Daniel well dyou wthat round okay Daniel stays on and three now has a charso. We're gonna to do one more before our big debate today because we're gonna to use all these skills. Hannah, I would like you to pick what you think this motion should be. What do you think this motion should be, Hannah? But I want to beat a chair. Actually, you can absolutely. I think we could have chair. Hannah, okay. So what motion can we create? Hannah? Our motion is. Do we do we need to do we need to have extra homework for extra lessons? Oh, that's a good what isn't it? Your extra homework for extra lessso Daniel's going to be saying yes because you're now on the agree team. Daniel three, yes. Like maybe this is a question. We need a motion, not a question. Well, like maybe we aching it to like like we need okay, absolutely. I guess yes. Okay, you start us off. Okay, okay, welcome to our our debate agreto your start your time start now. Okay, thank you. And first we need to have extra homework for extra classes because extra classes mean extra extra knowledge in your brain that has to be reviewed. So every class I'm almost every class we have homework and extra classes that need homework. She has give you homework because those extra classes give you extra extra knowledge and then you need to review the extra knowledge in the extra homework. Okay next okay, I mean, you disagree. Okay, a great speaker. Your times, your time is a disagrespeaker. Your time starts now. I don't think we should have extra fsible three, three. Daniel said Daniel. Daniel said that the extra homework can give us extra knowledge, but the homework is just the homework is just a review of the things we've learned in this class and doing the homework. We don't need to do the extra homework because because we already learn them and we already know them, so we don't have to do them. And also and also and also if we did do them, maybe some children some children think it's too easy. And since they already have known them and they think it's too easy and they don't want to do it, no, they want to do it. Okay, Daniel. Okay. Okay. Are there any questions? I question. No, okay, ask I, she said, she said that, she said that children, she said, she said that the children, the children, I think is too easy and don't want to do it, but if it's too easy, then theydo it very quick. So, so why don't they just do it very quick? They just have, because because they will do it very quick, because they will do it very quick. They think they will just do it so quick, they don't even najust wasting the time doing it. So maybe they just go off and play without any, like, amazing. Well done, Hannah. Are you rewarding it too? Okay, now let's vote. We're going to vote. Oh, how does go wrong? She wants to vote. Okay, right, let's vote. Okay. Who wants for this? We speak. Who will for the disagree speaker? Well done three. You want question question aniel. What do you mean by this hand? Oh, so you can see my hand, Daniel, because if you do that, I can't really see. So I just do that so you can see my hand. That's all it is. Nothing special, Daniel. It's nothing special. You all ₩1. Well done all of you. Daniel won that debate when he was on the disagree three. One has ers on the disagree. Hannah, you won yours on the disagree so you're rebutttling on the negative side is sometimes easier as you can see on the negative than the affirmative. We don't need to do that page because we've done our own okay, that that was just an example but we've actually managed to do it in a much better way. Here are some useful phrases we can use when we are rebutttling. Yeah that points t's not Yeah it is unimportant because Yeah so I'm gonna to put that onto the board today as well. So today we're gonna to be looking at in the current technological generation, scshould use e textbooks rather than paper books. Three, can you start us off today? What do you think about this? I don't really understand what is is no, what we're talking about is eBooks are things that you find on like your phone, a laptop and iPad, maybe a kindle, where it's all digital. So the book is on your phone and you can read it on your phone. And we're talking about whether we think this is better, which everyone should just have an eBook, an e textbook, like an e maths book, an e English book, an e science book, rather than taking all these books, paper books, to school every day. So what do you that is lots of books, especially when you get sito school. So what do you think? Me. Me, please. Hey, Hannah. Yes, absolutely. If you've got an idea, Hannah, please start us off. I think yes, because Dan, if it's on your phone, you don't need to bring all your huge textbooks and you only need a phone. And when you want it, you can open it and you can burn it to school and that's it. And you don't need to use all your energy to just bring those books back home and bring those books here to school. And then whatever you lose, like those things es, you can make them, like you can make if you sing, it's small, it's small and you might go back. You'll go bad to your eyes. You can make a bigger like a nightbat or Yeah an iPad and you can put the iPad into the school bag and it's also not not not 1:00a.m.my not like like not happier than all of those textbooks. Okay, but guess three more ana, I agree with I agree with Hannah. Okay. And why? Because because the mohansays is like the laptop is lighter and I really have that problem at schools the books because the on Monday like today after I have to bring all the books, I have to school and that's way heavier than or just one little iPad or one little phone. You could forget a book. I could forget to bring one, but if it's on my eBook, maybe I'm gonna be, I can't ever say I've forgotten a book. You can't ever forget, can you? Yes, you so forget maybe you could forget your book and you can not, you can always not forget your your book on your phone because it's always, but if it's not on rty mind, forget it. It's on an e textbook. You can never forget a yes, three. Well, I also think the e textbook is good because, well, you cannot, well, you just have to be, you just. Book on your the book, take the book off your desk, put it in your desk. Take out another book and put it on your desk. It's just wasting your playtime. Okay, Daniel, what do you think? I also agreed because guys, I also have that very particular problem susaid because because every day when my mom or every time my mom picks me up and I hand her to school bag, she says, Oh my goodness, this is so heavy and stuff. And then I also sometimes think it is heavy because at the end of the year, or or at the end of, I mean, at the end of the year, the end of the school year, they had a spring, all of our stuff in their cubbies, and I need to stuff them all in my in my school bag. And almost 90% of them is paper and my school supplies. And and that time it was really heavy. And if you if you use a laptop, you could you could just use the books in the in the laptop and and and and also laptop can read the books out loud. And Yeah and also they can hold many books. And and if you take one book, it can only hold one book. And and if you take many books, it is also heavy. And if you take only one book, it could also be very big and heavy. Okay, sweet, excellent. Okay. So the book about that is well, why we should bring laptop books, because the laof books can be a lot easier and they can just help you. Maybe sometimes some place you don't understand, they can you can check on those book, those layour laptop and see what does that mean? And you know Yeah and maybe and book will turn yellow and old and some of your writings might fall W up. And but the laptop book won't Yeah, never never. Yes, Daniel. And but sometimes if you put them very old and the certainly union need them, they might have a book lies. And they're really disgusting. And they crawl all over your books and they sometimes eat up paper and it's really disgusting. And for and for girls and people who don't like books, they freak out. And if you use a laptop, and if you use a laptop, they will have they will have bugs in it, okay? And they will grow light or they will get, it's not good. We're not we're not discussing bugs, are we today, right? Yes. Okay. The could be book like it could destroy the book, okay, there are those issues. Books can be old. However, guys, if I give you all an eBook in class, are you going to be more distracted. No, we can, we can, we can eliminate all the fun things we can use. So take away the fun out. Okay? Because what if you've still got a game on there? That's okay. We eliminated. I said, so come on. Three. Sorry, Hannah, don't don't talk over three. So three, go on. We have this class where we use computers, and those computers are very special. There's this ultra computer that can control all the computers in the one classroom. So if we can program those e books like that, e have books like that, that's a really good idea, couldn't it? And maybe the teacher has the the master eBook and that eBook can controls all the eBook. So on the and evil, the teacher can see which children is doing what. So they could all be programmed so that the teacher could still see what you're what you're browsing programs to see what you are are looking at in that would be a very good solution. Three yes, Daniel. And and sometimes you sometimes you need to and you need to read a book from outside your country, or even outside your continent. And you have, and if you use the paper version, you have to fly all the way to that place where they sell the books and then buy the book and then come back. And that will probably take a lot of days. And if you use a laptop, you could just poop online and then buy it, and then you could just sweit and your home sitting down and you don't even go on a plane, but you don't have to go and buy the book abroad. You can just get the book abroad delivered to you, right? Like I could still buy that online and get the book delivered to me. So I don't, I don't. But if it's delivered to you, it was also take a lot of time. It is online that would miss. Guys. Guys, we're not talking over each other. If we want to say something, please raise your hand. Yes, Daniel. Okay, I will take that point. That is a good point to have. Yes, three. I also want because once I deliver a bunny monkey comic and it's because it was had to be shipped all the way from England, I waited for over, I think half a year to wait for the book to get. And if you do the book and if you book by the in textbook online, you can just read it whatever ever you want and don't need, it's a lot easier. Okay. And Hannah, well done. Three. Hannah, do you think though not everyone can afford an e book, not everyone can afford a tablet or an iPad or a phone or a laptop? They can use money from bank. And when they have the, they put it back, which then they can use it. And so everyone can afford it because they can all use the bank. And if the bank don't have money, you can, you can use everyone like, the like, the like full can get poor ones. So charity, so maybe charity Yeah parand rich riches people can give the more money to the poor ones. Okay, well done. Okay. Last two thoughts before we get into our debate. Daniel, what's your last thought? You all had already Daniel to your mute sorry I had to meet you. Go on Daniel say again alright and e books stay with well was I going to say again when let me just think about it. Okay what do you think, Daniel? Let's go to three okay so well, we'll come back to you Daniel going through I don't thing Hannah said Hanna. Meant that the e textbook, some people can afford them, that Hanna can say they could be a the there could be a solution by like renting. They can also at school, we can have have those school e textbook where the school per bed provides and some poor children that couldn't afford them can go using them. It's a school. You think it's a schoolresponsibility. That's a good point. Daniel, what were you going to say if you've not remembered your thought? If the and the E X can also be very useful because you can not only, you can not only read books and also maybe check the weather, or maybe the and the e textbook can and have an AI then and read a book. And if there's a word that you don't know, you could just go to the the word English word app and then and then check it. And if you're reading a paper book, there's a word and you you don't know, and you don't know how to, and you don't know how to say it. And then you have to, and then you have to go to your laptop and now and open your laptop, and then go find the app. And then if you use the laptop, it, you you are already on the laptop, and you could just go and some books, some m, you text tbooks, you can also like you you Press the word and then it could just tell you what it means and then it could also say it and then also after you read a book they maybe can take take a quiz or something and and if you don't use etexbooks you use irregular books so they won't have built in quizzes. Okay, yes. Okay Daniel, save some of it for the debate. Well done. Excellent job. Okay, right. So I feel like all three of you are probably wanting to debate on the agree side. Yes. So we student that is going to be what we're going do. We're going to do slightly differently. What's gonna happen this okay? Because I am going to make my point. Well you're going make your point actually one of is gonna to go first then I am going to make my first argument and then I'm going to hand it back over to your team you will address my point you will say teacher Lisa said and we disagree because then I will make another point and then the next person will rebuttle my point then I will make my final point and then you will make your final rebuttle okay so we are remember clear make sure you address what point you are rebutattling me on okay we're going to go straight into it because I think you've got more than enough ideas on the board to help you. There are some rebuttal sentences over here write down the idea so I can read them under under debate you can read we're gonna leave we're gonna leave this up Daniel so you'll be able to see this page completely but we're gonna go straight in to our debate and our timing is going to work a little differently because we're going put twelve minutes onto our clock. Please beware that every single person needs to speak, so don't keep all that time for yourself, okay? It needs to be quite quick. So welcome to today's teacher v student debate and our motion today. In the current technological generation, school should use e textbooks rather than paper books. Our speakers on the affirmative team today are three, Hannah and Daniel. Three will go first. Hannah is our second speaker and Daniel is our third speaker today. On the negative teacher side is teacher Lisa, who will be arguing against ettextbooks and will be fighting for paper books today. So, ladies and gentlemen, chairperson, and where thy opponents? Today we are discussing the motion. In the current technological generation, school should use e textbooks rather than paper perbooks. The negative team will go first to make their first address. Their first address is to three. Our time and our debate is now in session. Ladies, gentlemen, today I strongly disagree with the idea that e textbooks are better than paper books. Speaker three, firstly, I would like to state paper books are easier to use for learning. When students read from a physical book, their eyes don't get tired from screens. There are no notifications, and they can focus better. Students show that many students understand and remember information more clearly when reading on paper. Over to you, speaker three. Well, they can have these special tablets that can now won't let them eyes hurt so badly. And you said that there eyes maybe maybe there won't be so like like focused and maybe our teacher can can control them and take them minds off those video games they're planning to play and focus them on their their their classes. Okay. Thank you very much. Speaker three. Thank you very much. Speaker three. While we acknowledge your ideas about eyesight, we would say that actually the point is not always completely. And paper books have been bound to help eyesight much better than eBooks. Secondly, speaker Hannah, we come to you now. Paperbooks do not rely on technology. E textbook need charge devices, good WiFi, expensive equipment that can break if a battery dies or the screen freezes. The learning is going to stop. This does not happen with paper perbooks. A paperbook will always work anytime and anywhere. But like shthat, they don't need it, like they don't need battery. Some special devices don't need battery. Paper book can rip. Yeah and the paper book what if they rip it and what if they what if they rip it and also if they rip it or write on it they it's gonna to be messy and bad but but when you is the electric device it will not be bad because because when you cannot write on it only with your head or a drawing machine like that and it's not broken not it's not very easy to broken and not write down because because we don't need many things. We don't need many things to make and also it's not it's not just it's not just very expensive. Hey, thank you very much, speaker Hannah. We now take our address to speaker Daniel. Our third point here over on the negative team is paper books are healthier for students. Long hours staring at screens can cause headaches, eye strain or sleep and paperbooks give our brains and eyes a rest from constant digital use. But both of them are looking at looking at things that are close to you, and both of them can hurt your eyes. And even though even though laptops can hurt your eyes more, some laptops are designed for not hurting your eyes and your eyes. And you can also, and also, and also paper books, paper books. You might have many paper books and you might lost them, or maybe they get devoured by book lies or something. And, and, and, and textbook or laptops, they won't, they won't get easily missing because they're, they are one thing and all the books are packed in it. And also, if you miss them, maybe you could, you could use your phone. They call them and they, they make the ringing sound. And you can, you can, you can find some with your ears. And also, book calies don't grow on the the, on the textbooks. I mean, their book lies. They don't eat laptops. And also, and also, and also books maybe get ripped and and books cannot read themselves. But on laptops, special devices can read the books out loud. And if you do something, and if you write something wrong on your book with a pen, on a paper book with a pen, you cannot erase it. Unlike the books in the the textbook, if you write something wrong, you can't erase it. Thank you very much, speaker Daniel. Thanks you to speaker Daniel. Okay. So and we want to address as speaker Hannah again, please. We want to raise the point that paper books feel more personal and enjoyable. Speaker Daniel, there was talking about how they can easily rip, but it doesn't take away our enjoyment of these books. Many students like highlighting keynotes. Speaker Daniel talked about making these notes on digital, but actually we can highlight better. So and turning real pages, seeing their progress, you know paperbooks create a physical connection to learning and e textbooks simply can't match it. What do you say to this speaker? Hannah? It's okay because sometimes, as my said, I we have a pat, we can use the pen to write on it and also we can highlight it because because we have the service right now and we if we do this, you can also highlight it more. Well, okay, thank you very much speaking, Anna. And now I'd like to address speaker three. Three, we feel like paper perbooks are reliable and long lasting. They don't need updates, passwords or devices. A score can keep a textbook for for many years, making it cheaper, more sustainable in the long run and also ensuring that even poorer schools can continue learning e textbooks. Won't they just mean that people can't afford it and also that schools aren't able to provide these e textbooks for every student and niclike our school, we have those ranking like we have this this like selling market and we we sell old stuff and the selling market. We rent half of our money to those poor schools. Yeah, we have care that and that solves the problem. We've been donating for a thousand or so dollars. Okay. Thank you very much. Three, Daniel, could you please make your final address on the subject? What do you mean by the final advice verse on the subject? So I would like you to make your final point, please, Daniel. Okay. But but but paper paper books can but paper books and. A paper books can get old and they can get really old and maybe the pages will get, I don't know, ripped or something and then they get turned yellow and disgusting. And maybe sometimes the paper books, they they also they also can they also can burn because paper books are made of paper and paper can burn. And if you accidentally put a match on the paperbook, it will, it will it will easily burn. Unlike some protective laptops, they won't. Alsa laptop. It's also made of paper. Thank you very much, Daniel. Three, can you make your final address? Your final points to this debate today in my final Press is. That we should bschool books and use rather E X books because ex books are a lot easier to use and they can also do do tons of things that paper books can cannot do. Well done. Three. Fantastic. And then Hannah, can you make your final address your final point on this subject today? So so these books, eBooks can do very well and they use many things. So which you can put many apps on it. And it's only a small thing like a dipad or thing. And they are bigger to put and more and easy. Like these e textbooks can be more convenient. I done anything else. Hanup, well done. Okay. Well done Daniel. Well done. Doing well. You got agree, agree, agree, agree. Daniel three and Hannah, wonderful, wonderful teamwork today. Each of you did not drop a question. I made that debate of mine much harder. I use much bigger vocabulary today. And all three of you answered, no, this is incorrect because no, I don't believe this because no, this is not okay because Yeah, it was absolutely fantastic to hear you all talking. And there was a moment between three and Hannah, which was excellent. Hannah was sort of like, I'm talking about this. And then three was like, Oh, and krip and hanand. Yeah, Yeah, Yeah. That's also part of it. And sometimes you could be passing notes to each other. You can write things on the board that help your teammates talk about this. You need to talk about this. Yeah we do can see it. Dyou can see it. Yeah, I know. But in a real like as in like when you're in a formal debate, Hannah, that they would be able to see it, not that it will make any difference while you're practicing and learning. I will never use or what you guys have put for notes for each other against you. Okay? These addresses were good. These rebuttals were good. Just remember to state what argument teacher Lisa said, Daniel said, three said, Hannah said. Clear what they said before you debate it. Remember in a big, big big debate you would have to make that clear for the chairperson. Otherwise you won't get the point because we won't know what you're talking about. We don't know what point because somebody could have said a whole speech and you're gonna to have to say teacher Lisa's second point is what I want to talk about first. Okay, yes, three. You're on mute three. You are we got air mute. Can you write on the board and the disagree team stinks? Well, yes, when when you've got disagreeing and agreeting, Yeah, they will be able to see you, won't 't they? But I it's a shame we don't actually have the chat box, but yes, obviously you can they can see you for inteams. We don't. So at Weldon Daniel Weldon three, Weldon Hannah, I would say you've definitely beat the teacher today. I think you guys have done an amazing and awesome job. I've got one more trophy to hand out today, and that is called the debbater of the day. So we get to vote today. You cannot vote for yourself. That's not allowed. So no voting for yourself. So who thinks the rebuti got to call it the rebutler of the day? Who thinks the rebutler of the day was Daniel. Okay, Oh, 33's given you a point. Okay, who thinks the rebuttle of the day was three? Oh, Hannah? Okay, who thinks the rebutler of the day was Hannah? Daniel okay, always got me my vote then. So my vois going to be the winner of the list. Three also put Hannahh. So Hanna's got two. Well, donhannah, you are our Butler of the day. You all did a fabulous job as always. And it's so wonderful to hear you discussing when I give you ideas and I say, what about this? You're like, no, no, no, I think it's this. It's really clear you have your thoughts and your opinions on it. And it's wonderful to hear you thinking outside the box. Yeah just make sure when you're rebattling that you pose what you disagree and then Chuit back to the other team. Don't give them too much, otherwise they can't remember what you said. All right. Next week, children should be banned for earning money from their schoolmates. We're talking here. What if your schomaate is selling snacks or is selling selling photographs or something? Yeah. Or what if a classmate was saying, I'll swap a chocolate bar for a packet of crisps? All right. So think about this. Do you think children should be allowed to wear money by selling stuff in school? Or should it be banned completely? Or does it show that they've got some three things banned? Well, I love to find out next week roaway. So think about even good at Yeah, I don't even go that so it means fingers have fun out. Oh, okay. Well, we can have that. So Daniel, what we mean is let's listen. Listen, Daniel's not sure what the motion is. So let's just make sure that Daniel feels like he's got time to research the motion. So Daniel, what we mean, how they're cute. Hannah and Daniel, what we mean is, is sometimes children bring in snacks and then they try and sell them to their classmates. Tempea chsp tempea chocolate bar. They might bring them in from home and then students are being able to take your dinner money because you're buying snacks of them. And should that be allowed or should it be banned? Should we not allow that to school or not? That's what we've got to think about. Yeah have a research. Three half and half Hanna's got stickers ready to sell us. Ten being a sticker from Anna. Hi on 1s. 1s. Have a wonderful week guys enjoy and I'll see you you can have the I'll see you next time well done new three amazing job bye. 好啦。
处理时间: 29108 秒 | 字符数: 42,328
AI分析 完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
    "header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
    "course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
    "course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
    "course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Rebuttal Practice",
    "course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 反驳练习",
    "course_name_en": "UIE-LS01DB-A",
    "course_name_cn": "UIE-LS01DB-A",
    "course_topic_en": "Debating Skills: Rebuttal Techniques",
    "course_topic_cn": "辩论技巧:反驳技巧",
    "course_date_en": "Not Specified",
    "course_date_cn": "未指定",
    "student_name": "Daniel, Three, Hannah",
    "teaching_focus_en": "Practicing structured rebuttal by first addressing and summarizing the opponent's point before presenting a counter-argument.",
    "teaching_focus_cn": "通过首先阐述和总结对手的论点,然后提出反驳意见,来练习结构化的反驳技巧。",
    "teaching_objectives": [
        {
            "en": "Students will be able to articulate the difference between public speaking and debating.",
            "cn": "学生能够阐述公开演讲和辩论之间的区别。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students will practice structured rebuttal techniques, ensuring they address the opponent's specific point.",
            "cn": "学生将练习结构化的反驳技巧,确保他们能够针对对手的具体论点进行回应。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students will actively participate in a mock debate demonstrating their understanding of rebuttal.",
            "cn": "学生将积极参与模拟辩论,展示他们对反驳技巧的理解。"
        }
    ],
    "timeline_activities": [
        {
            "time": "Initial Check-in",
            "title_en": "Casual Conversation & Weekend Recap",
            "title_cn": "开场寒暄与周末回顾",
            "description_en": "Teacher and students discuss their Thanksgiving break and recent movie\/book interests (e.g., Zootopia 2, The Christmas Sausages).",
            "description_cn": "教师与学生讨论感恩节假期以及最近对电影\/书籍的兴趣(例如:《疯狂动物城2》、《圣诞香肠》)。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Defining Debate Terms",
            "title_en": "Defining Public Speaking vs. Debating",
            "title_cn": "定义公开演讲与辩论",
            "description_en": "Clarifying the core differences: public speaking is presenting opinions; debating is arguing\/fighting with words.",
            "description_cn": "阐明核心区别:公开演讲是陈述观点;辩论是用言语争论\/对抗。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Introduction to Rebuttal",
            "title_en": "Explaining the Rebuttal Structure",
            "title_cn": "介绍反驳结构",
            "description_en": "Teaching the required structure: 1. State one sentence of the opponent's argument. 2. Explain why it is wrong.",
            "description_cn": "教授结构要求:1. 用一句话陈述对手的论点。2. 解释其错误之处。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Guided Practice Rounds",
            "title_en": "Guided Rebuttal Practice (Teacher vs. Student)",
            "title_cn": "引导式反驳练习(师生对抗)",
            "description_en": "Practice rounds on topics like banning plastic bags, banning school attendance, and mandatory book-to-movie adaptations.",
            "description_cn": "就禁止塑料袋、禁止上学和书籍必须改编成电影等话题进行练习轮次。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Head-to-Head Practice",
            "title_en": "Student vs. Student Practice Rounds",
            "title_cn": "学生间对抗练习轮次",
            "description_en": "Students debate topics like 'We should all go to space' and 'We should ban all cars in the city center,' focusing on addressing the previous speaker's point.",
            "description_cn": "学生就“我们都应该去太空”和“我们应该禁止市中心所有汽车”等话题进行辩论,重点是回应前一位发言者的论点。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Main Debate Session",
            "title_en": "Formal Debate: E-textbooks vs. Paper Books",
            "title_cn": "正式辩论:电子教科书 vs. 纸质教科书",
            "description_en": "A 12-minute debate where students argue for e-textbooks against the teacher arguing for paper books, practicing structured rebuttal turns.",
            "description_cn": "一场12分钟的辩论,学生支持电子教科书,教师支持纸质教科书,练习结构化的反驳轮次。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Wrap-up and Next Steps",
            "title_en": "Feedback and Next Topic Introduction",
            "title_cn": "总结与下一步介绍",
            "description_en": "Reviewing performance, awarding 'Rebutler of the Day,' and introducing next week's motion.",
            "description_cn": "回顾表现,颁发“当日最佳反驳者”奖,并介绍下周的辩题。"
        }
    ],
    "vocabulary_en": "Rebuttal, Affirmative, Negative, Chairperson, Dissolve, Compost, Zootopia, Wicked, E-textbook, Digital, Sustainable, Crumbly, Planetary (Uranus mentioned contextually)",
    "vocabulary_cn": "反驳, 正方, 反方, 主席, 分解, 堆肥, 疯狂动物城, 魔法坏女巫, 电子教科书, 数字, 可持续的, 劣质的, 行星的(上下文提到天王星)",
    "concepts_en": "The structural necessity of addressing an opponent's argument before counter-arguing; Technology vs. Tradition in education.",
    "concepts_cn": "反驳前必须先回应对手论点的结构性要求;教育中的科技与传统的对比。",
    "skills_practiced_en": "Active listening, summarizing opponent's points, structured argumentation, spontaneous verbal response.",
    "skills_practiced_cn": "积极倾听、总结对手论点、结构化论证、即时口头回应。",
    "teaching_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Whiteboard\/Screen for displaying useful rebuttal phrases.",
            "cn": "白板\/屏幕用于展示有用的反驳短语。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Timer for managing debate segments.",
            "cn": "计时器用于管理辩论环节。"
        }
    ],
    "participation_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "All three students (Daniel, Three, Hannah) were highly engaged throughout the practice and formal debate.",
            "cn": "所有三名学生(Daniel, Three, Hannah)在整个练习和正式辩论中都高度参与。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students were responsive when prompted to argue against a specific point made by another speaker.",
            "cn": "当被要求反驳另一位发言者的特定观点时,学生反应积极。"
        }
    ],
    "comprehension_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Students demonstrated strong conceptual understanding of the difference between debating and public speaking.",
            "cn": "学生对辩论和公开演讲的区别表现出很强的概念理解力。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The structured rehearsal successfully helped students articulate how to begin a rebuttal (addressing the previous speaker).",
            "cn": "结构化排练成功地帮助学生阐明了如何开始反驳(回应前一位发言者)。"
        }
    ],
    "oral_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Fluency was generally high, especially during the practice rounds.",
            "cn": "流利度普遍较高,尤其是在练习环节。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students occasionally spoke over each other during spontaneous moments, though they self-corrected during formal debate stages.",
            "cn": "学生在即兴时刻偶尔会互相打断,尽管他们在正式辩论阶段会自我纠正。"
        }
    ],
    "written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Focus was purely oral performance and interaction).",
    "written_assessment_cn": "不适用(重点完全是口头表现和互动)。",
    "student_strengths": [
        {
            "en": "Daniel provided detailed counter-arguments, particularly strong on the functional durability of paper books vs. electronic devices.",
            "cn": "Daniel 提供了详细的反驳论据,尤其在纸质书相对于电子设备的耐用性方面表现出色。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Three showed good abstract thinking, particularly regarding technology control features in e-textbooks.",
            "cn": "Three 展现了良好的抽象思维能力,特别是在电子教科书的技术控制功能方面。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Hannah was awarded 'Rebutler of the Day' for her effective rebuttals and quick application of structural rules.",
            "cn": "Hannah 因其有效的反驳和对结构规则的快速应用而被评为“当日最佳反驳者”。"
        }
    ],
    "improvement_areas": [
        {
            "en": "All students need consistent practice in explicitly naming the speaker they are rebutting (e.g., 'Teacher Lisa said...', 'Speaker Three argued...').",
            "cn": "所有学生都需要持续练习明确指出他们正在反驳的发言者(例如:“Lisa老师说……”,“三号发言者认为……”)。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Managing speaking time evenly across all debate members.",
            "cn": "在所有辩论成员中平均分配发言时间。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_effectiveness": [
        {
            "en": "The step-by-step guided practice effectively broke down the complex skill of rebuttal.",
            "cn": "循序渐进的引导练习有效地分解了反驳这一复杂技能。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The formal debate provided a high-stakes, realistic application of the learned skills.",
            "cn": "正式辩论为所学技能提供了一个高风险、真实的实战应用场景。"
        }
    ],
    "pace_management": [
        {
            "en": "The pace was fast and energetic, perhaps slightly too fast during the initial Q&A, but the formal debate timing (12 minutes) was manageable.",
            "cn": "节奏快且充满活力,初始问答环节可能稍快,但正式辩论的时间(12分钟)是可控的。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Teacher intervention was timely to stop students from interrupting or going off-topic (e.g., the bug discussion).",
            "cn": "教师及时干预,阻止学生打断或偏离主题(例如关于虫子的讨论)。"
        }
    ],
    "classroom_atmosphere_en": "Engaging, competitive yet supportive, and enthusiastic, especially when discussing modern media like movies and books.",
    "classroom_atmosphere_cn": "参与度高、竞争性强但相互支持、充满热情,尤其是在讨论电影和书籍等现代媒体时。",
    "objective_achievement": [
        {
            "en": "Students successfully distinguished between debate and public speaking.",
            "cn": "学生成功区分了辩论和公开演讲。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students significantly improved in applying the 'address then argue' structure during the latter half of the lesson.",
            "cn": "在课程后半段,学生在应用“先回应后论证”的结构方面取得了显著进步。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_strengths": {
        "identified_strengths": [
            {
                "en": "Excellent use of real-time, relatable motions (e.g., E-textbooks) to maintain student interest.",
                "cn": "出色地使用贴近生活、相关的辩题(例如电子教科书)来维持学生的兴趣。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Clear modeling of the correct rebuttal format by the teacher during guided practice.",
                "cn": "教师在引导练习中清晰地示范了正确的反驳格式。"
            }
        ],
        "effective_methods": [
            {
                "en": "Phased approach: Definition -> Guided Practice -> Student Competition.",
                "cn": "分阶段教学方法:定义 -> 引导练习 -> 学生竞争。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Immediate, positive reinforcement and the 'Rebutler of the Day' award.",
                "cn": "即时、积极的强化反馈和“当日最佳反驳者”奖。"
            }
        ],
        "positive_feedback": [
            {
                "en": "Teacher praised the students' teamwork and quick adaptation to the debate rules.",
                "cn": "教师称赞了学生们的团队合作以及对辩论规则的快速适应。"
            }
        ]
    },
    "specific_suggestions": [
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
            "category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
            "category_cn": "发音与阅读",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Daniel, continue practicing clear articulation when switching between complex sentences to maintain pace without rushing.",
                    "cn": "Daniel,继续练习在复杂的句子间切换时保持清晰的发音,以便在不急促的情况下维持语速。"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-comments",
            "category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
            "category_cn": "口语与交流",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Students must verbally attribute the point they are refuting (e.g., 'Speaker Hannah stated X, and we disagree because Y').",
                    "cn": "学生必须口头说明他们正在反驳的论点(例如:“Hannah发言人说X,我们不同意,因为Y”)。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "When rebutting, aim to deliver a concise point and then immediately pass the floor, avoiding long monologues that might lose the audience's focus.",
                    "cn": "反驳时,力求提出一个简洁的观点,然后立即将发言权交给对方,避免冗长的独白,以免分散听众的注意力。"
                }
            ]
        }
    ],
    "next_focus": [
        {
            "en": "Applying formal rebuttal structure in a context where students must argue against teacher-provided points.",
            "cn": "在学生必须反驳教师提供的论点的情境中,应用正式的反驳结构。"
        }
    ],
    "homework_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Research the motion for next week: 'Should children be banned from earning money by selling items to schoolmates?' Prepare initial arguments for both Agree and Disagree sides.",
            "cn": "研究下周的辩题:“学生是否应被禁止向同学出售物品赚钱?”为正方和反方准备初步论点。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Review the list of useful rebuttal phrases provided on the board during the lesson.",
            "cn": "复习课程中在板上提供的有用的反驳短语列表。"
        }
    ]
}
处理时间: 11 秒
HTML报告 完成

生成时间: 2026-01-13 03:52:10

查看报告 下载报告
返回列表