Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育
1v1 English Lesson - Rebuttal Practice 1v1 英语课程 - 反驳练习
1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息
Teaching Focus 教学重点
Practicing structured rebuttal by first addressing and summarizing the opponent's point before presenting a counter-argument.
通过首先阐述和总结对手的论点，然后提出反驳意见，来练习结构化的反驳技巧。
Teaching Objectives 教学目标
-
Students will be able to articulate the difference between public speaking and debating. 学生能够阐述公开演讲和辩论之间的区别。
-
Students will practice structured rebuttal techniques, ensuring they address the opponent's specific point. 学生将练习结构化的反驳技巧，确保他们能够针对对手的具体论点进行回应。
-
Students will actively participate in a mock debate demonstrating their understanding of rebuttal. 学生将积极参与模拟辩论，展示他们对反驳技巧的理解。
2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览
Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配
Casual Conversation & Weekend Recap: Teacher and students discuss their Thanksgiving break and recent movie/book interests (e.g., Zootopia 2, The Christmas Sausages).
开场寒暄与周末回顾： 教师与学生讨论感恩节假期以及最近对电影/书籍的兴趣（例如：《疯狂动物城2》、《圣诞香肠》）。
Defining Public Speaking vs. Debating: Clarifying the core differences: public speaking is presenting opinions; debating is arguing/fighting with words.
定义公开演讲与辩论： 阐明核心区别：公开演讲是陈述观点；辩论是用言语争论/对抗。
Explaining the Rebuttal Structure: Teaching the required structure: 1. State one sentence of the opponent's argument. 2. Explain why it is wrong.
介绍反驳结构： 教授结构要求：1. 用一句话陈述对手的论点。2. 解释其错误之处。
Guided Rebuttal Practice (Teacher vs. Student): Practice rounds on topics like banning plastic bags, banning school attendance, and mandatory book-to-movie adaptations.
引导式反驳练习（师生对抗）： 就禁止塑料袋、禁止上学和书籍必须改编成电影等话题进行练习轮次。
Student vs. Student Practice Rounds: Students debate topics like 'We should all go to space' and 'We should ban all cars in the city center,' focusing on addressing the previous speaker's point.
学生间对抗练习轮次： 学生就“我们都应该去太空”和“我们应该禁止市中心所有汽车”等话题进行辩论，重点是回应前一位发言者的论点。
Formal Debate: E-textbooks vs. Paper Books: A 12-minute debate where students argue for e-textbooks against the teacher arguing for paper books, practicing structured rebuttal turns.
正式辩论：电子教科书 vs. 纸质教科书： 一场12分钟的辩论，学生支持电子教科书，教师支持纸质教科书，练习结构化的反驳轮次。
Feedback and Next Topic Introduction: Reviewing performance, awarding 'Rebutler of the Day,' and introducing next week's motion.
总结与下一步介绍： 回顾表现，颁发“当日最佳反驳者”奖，并介绍下周的辩题。
Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能
Rebuttal, Affirmative, Negative, Chairperson, Dissolve, Compost, Zootopia, Wicked, E-textbook, Digital, Sustainable, Crumbly, Planetary (Uranus mentioned contextually)
反驳, 正方, 反方, 主席, 分解, 堆肥, 疯狂动物城, 魔法坏女巫, 电子教科书, 数字, 可持续的, 劣质的, 行星的（上下文提到天王星）
The structural necessity of addressing an opponent's argument before counter-arguing; Technology vs. Tradition in education.
反驳前必须先回应对手论点的结构性要求；教育中的科技与传统的对比。
Active listening, summarizing opponent's points, structured argumentation, spontaneous verbal response.
积极倾听、总结对手论点、结构化论证、即时口头回应。
Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料
-
Whiteboard/Screen for displaying useful rebuttal phrases. 白板/屏幕用于展示有用的反驳短语。
-
Timer for managing debate segments. 计时器用于管理辩论环节。
3. Student Performance Assessment (Daniel, Three, Hannah) 3. 学生表现评估 (Daniel, Three, Hannah)
Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性
-
All three students (Daniel, Three, Hannah) were highly engaged throughout the practice and formal debate. 所有三名学生（Daniel, Three, Hannah）在整个练习和正式辩论中都高度参与。
-
Students were responsive when prompted to argue against a specific point made by another speaker. 当被要求反驳另一位发言者的特定观点时，学生反应积极。
Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握
-
Students demonstrated strong conceptual understanding of the difference between debating and public speaking. 学生对辩论和公开演讲的区别表现出很强的概念理解力。
-
The structured rehearsal successfully helped students articulate how to begin a rebuttal (addressing the previous speaker). 结构化排练成功地帮助学生阐明了如何开始反驳（回应前一位发言者）。
Language Output Ability 语言输出能力
Oral: 口语：
-
Fluency was generally high, especially during the practice rounds. 流利度普遍较高，尤其是在练习环节。
-
Students occasionally spoke over each other during spontaneous moments, though they self-corrected during formal debate stages. 学生在即兴时刻偶尔会互相打断，尽管他们在正式辩论阶段会自我纠正。
Written: 书面：
N/A (Focus was purely oral performance and interaction).
不适用（重点完全是口头表现和互动）。
Student's Strengths 学生的优势
-
Daniel provided detailed counter-arguments, particularly strong on the functional durability of paper books vs. electronic devices. Daniel 提供了详细的反驳论据，尤其在纸质书相对于电子设备的耐用性方面表现出色。
-
Three showed good abstract thinking, particularly regarding technology control features in e-textbooks. Three 展现了良好的抽象思维能力，特别是在电子教科书的技术控制功能方面。
-
Hannah was awarded 'Rebutler of the Day' for her effective rebuttals and quick application of structural rules. Hannah 因其有效的反驳和对结构规则的快速应用而被评为“当日最佳反驳者”。
Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面
-
All students need consistent practice in explicitly naming the speaker they are rebutting (e.g., 'Teacher Lisa said...', 'Speaker Three argued...'). 所有学生都需要持续练习明确指出他们正在反驳的发言者（例如：“Lisa老师说……”，“三号发言者认为……”）。
-
Managing speaking time evenly across all debate members. 在所有辩论成员中平均分配发言时间。
4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思
Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性
-
The step-by-step guided practice effectively broke down the complex skill of rebuttal. 循序渐进的引导练习有效地分解了反驳这一复杂技能。
-
The formal debate provided a high-stakes, realistic application of the learned skills. 正式辩论为所学技能提供了一个高风险、真实的实战应用场景。
Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理
-
The pace was fast and energetic, perhaps slightly too fast during the initial Q&A, but the formal debate timing (12 minutes) was manageable. 节奏快且充满活力，初始问答环节可能稍快，但正式辩论的时间（12分钟）是可控的。
-
Teacher intervention was timely to stop students from interrupting or going off-topic (e.g., the bug discussion). 教师及时干预，阻止学生打断或偏离主题（例如关于虫子的讨论）。
Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围
Engaging, competitive yet supportive, and enthusiastic, especially when discussing modern media like movies and books.
参与度高、竞争性强但相互支持、充满热情，尤其是在讨论电影和书籍等现代媒体时。
Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成
-
Students successfully distinguished between debate and public speaking. 学生成功区分了辩论和公开演讲。
-
Students significantly improved in applying the 'address then argue' structure during the latter half of the lesson. 在课程后半段，学生在应用“先回应后论证”的结构方面取得了显著进步。
5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议
Teaching Strengths 教学优势
Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：
-
Excellent use of real-time, relatable motions (e.g., E-textbooks) to maintain student interest. 出色地使用贴近生活、相关的辩题（例如电子教科书）来维持学生的兴趣。
-
Clear modeling of the correct rebuttal format by the teacher during guided practice. 教师在引导练习中清晰地示范了正确的反驳格式。
Effective Methods: 有效方法：
-
Phased approach: Definition -> Guided Practice -> Student Competition. 分阶段教学方法：定义 -> 引导练习 -> 学生竞争。
-
Immediate, positive reinforcement and the 'Rebutler of the Day' award. 即时、积极的强化反馈和“当日最佳反驳者”奖。
Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：
-
Teacher praised the students' teamwork and quick adaptation to the debate rules. 教师称赞了学生们的团队合作以及对辩论规则的快速适应。
Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点
-
Applying formal rebuttal structure in a context where students must argue against teacher-provided points. 在学生必须反驳教师提供的论点的情境中，应用正式的反驳结构。
Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议
Pronunciation & Reading: 发音与阅读：
-
Daniel, continue practicing clear articulation when switching between complex sentences to maintain pace without rushing. Daniel，继续练习在复杂的句子间切换时保持清晰的发音，以便在不急促的情况下维持语速。
Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：
-
Students must verbally attribute the point they are refuting (e.g., 'Speaker Hannah stated X, and we disagree because Y'). 学生必须口头说明他们正在反驳的论点（例如：“Hannah发言人说X，我们不同意，因为Y”）。
-
When rebutting, aim to deliver a concise point and then immediately pass the floor, avoiding long monologues that might lose the audience's focus. 反驳时，力求提出一个简洁的观点，然后立即将发言权交给对方，避免冗长的独白，以免分散听众的注意力。
Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业
-
Research the motion for next week: 'Should children be banned from earning money by selling items to schoolmates?' Prepare initial arguments for both Agree and Disagree sides. 研究下周的辩题：“学生是否应被禁止向同学出售物品赚钱？”为正方和反方准备初步论点。
-
Review the list of useful rebuttal phrases provided on the board during the lesson. 复习课程中在板上提供的有用的反驳短语列表。