Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育

1v1 English Lesson - 1017 LS05DBA 1v1 英语课程 - 1017 LS05DBA

1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息

Course Name: Debate Preparation and Practice 课程名称： 辩论准备与实践

Topic: The More We Have, The Happier We Are (Debate) 主题： 我们拥有的越多，我们就越快乐吗 (辩论)

Date: Recorded Date (Approximate) 日期： 录音日期（估算）

Student: Alex 学生： Alex

Teaching Focus 教学重点

Practicing formal debate structure, developing arguments (for and against), and sustained speaking time (aiming for 3 minutes).

练习正式辩论结构，发展正反方论点，并进行持续的长时间发言（目标3分钟）。

Teaching Objectives 教学目标

Review the structure of a formal debate (Affirmative/Negative speakers, definition, rebuttal). 复习正式辩论的结构（正方/反方发言人、定义、反驳）。
Develop and articulate arguments for both sides of the motion: 'The more we have, the happier we are'. 围绕辩题“我们拥有的越多，我们就越快乐吗”发展和阐述正反方论点。
Significantly increase sustained speaking time during the debate (target 3 minutes). 显著增加辩论中的持续发言时间（目标3分钟）。

2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览

Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配

Warm-up & Casual Conversation: Discussion about student's favorite video game (Minecraft) and reasons for liking it.

热身与日常对话： 讨论学生最喜欢的电子游戏（Minecraft）及其喜爱的原因。

Debate Structure Review: Review of formal debate setup, speaker roles, timekeeping, and the concept of rebuttal.

辩论结构回顾： 回顾正式辩论的设置、发言人角色、时间控制和反驳（Rebuttal）的概念。

Motion Analysis & Argument Generation (Pro/Con): Exploring the topic 'The more we have, the happier we are' from both perspectives, focusing on needs vs. wants, greed, comfort, and relationships.

辩题分析与论点生成（正/反方）： 从正反两方面探讨“我们拥有的越多，我们就越快乐吗”这一主题，重点关注需求与欲望、贪婪、舒适度和人际关系。

Preparation Time (Round 1): Teacher set a 3-minute preparation time for the first debate, emphasizing structure and examples.

第一轮准备时间： 教师设定了第一轮辩论的3分钟准备时间，强调结构和举例。

Formal Debate Round 1 (Negative Side): Student (Alex) argued the Negative side, delivering a sustained 3-minute speech.

第一轮正式辩论（反方）： 学生（Alex）代表反方发言，成功进行了持续3分钟的陈述。

Rebuttal Practice (Round 1): Teacher rebutted the student's points, and the student practiced rebutting the teacher's points.

第一轮反驳练习： 教师反驳学生的观点，学生练习反驳教师的观点。

Quick Fire Rebuttal Tennis (Round 2): Fast-paced exchange of short arguments and rebuttals, testing responsiveness.

快速反驳网球（第二轮）： 快速的短句论点和反驳交替进行，测试学生的反应速度。

Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能

Vocabulary:
Rebuttal, affirmative, negative, opposition, adjudicator, timekeeper, topic, motion, definition, greedy, complacent, stress, charity, choice.

词汇：
反驳，正方，反方，反对方，裁判，计时员，议题，动议，定义，贪婪的，自满的，压力，慈善，选择。

Concepts:
Formal debate structure; the philosophical arguments surrounding materialism and happiness; the difference between 'too much' (uncountable) and 'too many' (countable).

概念：
正式辩论结构；关于物质主义与幸福的哲学论点；'too much'（不可数）和 'too many'（可数）的区别。

Skills Practiced:
Sustained speech delivery, structuring arguments logically, active listening for rebuttal opportunities, adapting speaking speed for persuasive effect.

练习技能：
持续发言能力，逻辑性地构建论点，积极倾听以寻找反驳机会，为说服效果调整语速。

Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料

Whiteboard/visual aids illustrating debate setup. 说明辩论设置的白板/视觉辅助工具。
Pre-prepared argument structure outlines for reference. 预先准备的论证结构大纲，供参考。

3. Student Performance Assessment (Alex) 3. 学生表现评估 (Alex)

Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性

Excellent engagement, especially during the argument generation phase and the rebuttal tennis. 参与度极佳，特别是在论点生成阶段和反驳网球环节。

Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握

Demonstrated full understanding of the debate roles and structure after the review. 复习后，对辩论角色和结构表现出完全理解。

Language Output Ability 语言输出能力

Oral: 口语：

Successfully achieved and sustained the 3-minute speaking goal in Round 1. Articulation improved significantly when presenting his main arguments. 第一轮成功达到并保持了3分钟的发言目标。在陈述主要论点时，表达清晰度显著提高。

Written: 书面：

N/A (Focus on oral performance)

不适用（重点在于口头表现）

Student's Strengths 学生的优势

Exceptional ability to think on his feet and deliver strong rebuttals. 临场反应能力极强，能够提供有力的反驳。
Willingness to argue the less preferred side (Negative) convincingly. 愿意令人信服地为不那么倾向的一方（反方）进行辩护。
Greatly improved sustained speaking time, reaching 3 minutes. 持续发言时间大大提高，达到了3分钟。

Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面

Grammar precision, specifically using 'too much' instead of 'too many' when referring to uncountable nouns like 'money'. 语法准确性，特别是在指代如“金钱”等不可数名词时，应使用 'too much' 而非 'too many'。
Incorporating expert opinions and broader vocabulary into arguments for higher-level debates. 在辩论中融入专家观点和更广泛的词汇，以达到更高水平。

4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思

Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性

Highly effective. The structured debate activity immediately engaged the student and pushed his speaking limits. 非常有效。结构化的辩论活动立即吸引了学生，并挑战了他的发言极限。

Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理

Pacing was well managed, allowing sufficient time for deep discussion before moving to the fast-paced rebuttal tennis. 节奏管理得当，在进入快节奏的反驳网球之前，留出了充足的时间进行深入讨论。

Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围

Energetic, supportive, and challenging. The teacher created a safe space for Alex to take risks in his speaking.

精力充沛、支持性强且富有挑战性。老师为Alex创造了一个安全的空间，鼓励他在口语表达上冒险尝试。

Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成

All main objectives were met, with the 3-minute speaking target successfully achieved. 所有主要目标均已达成，特别是3分钟的持续发言目标成功实现。

5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议

Teaching Strengths 教学优势

Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：

Excellent adaptation of lesson plan based on student interest (Minecraft chat leading into philosophical discussion). 根据学生的兴趣（从Minecraft聊天自然过渡到哲学讨论）对课程计划进行了出色的调整。
Effective use of debate formats (formal speech vs. 'rebuttal tennis') to test different skills. 有效利用了辩论形式（正式陈述与“反驳网球”），以测试不同的技能。

Effective Methods: 有效方法：

Pushing the student to argue both sides of an issue, developing critical thinking. 鼓励学生从正反两方面为同一议题辩护，培养批判性思维。
Providing immediate, specific, and positive feedback on debate performance. 对辩论表现提供即时、具体且积极的反馈。

Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：

Teacher stated Alex's rebuttal skills were 'incredible' and this was his 'best debate yet'. 老师评价Alex的反驳技巧是“不可思议的”，并称这是他“迄今为止最好的辩论”。

Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点

Integrating external evidence, expert opinions, and more sophisticated examples into arguments to deepen the content. 将外部证据、专家观点和更复杂的例子融入论点中，以深化论证内容。
Exploring longer debate formats (e.g., 5-minute speeches) to further extend stamina. 探索更长时间的辩论形式（例如5分钟演讲），以进一步延长耐力。

Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议

Pronunciation & Reading: 发音与阅读：

Focus on countable vs. uncountable nouns when discussing quantities, specifically practicing 'too much money' vs. 'too many things'. 在讨论数量时，重点关注可数与不可数名词，特别是练习使用 'too much money' 而非 'too many things' 的用法。

Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：

In future long speeches, aim to vary sentence structure more frequently to maintain engagement. 在未来的长篇演讲中，努力更频繁地变化句式结构，以保持听众的参与度。
Practice structuring arguments by clearly signaling transitions: 'My first reason is...', 'Secondly...', 'In conclusion...'. 练习通过清晰的信号词来构建论点：‘我的第一个理由是……’、‘其次……’、‘总而言之……’。

Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业

Review the provided debate structures and attempt to write out the full argument structure for the negative side, focusing on using 'too much/too many' correctly. 复习提供的辩论结构，尝试写出反方的完整论点结构，重点确保 'too much/too many' 的用法正确。
Find one short, simple article about the benefits of minimalism or charity, and identify one 'expert opinion' statement to use in the next debate. 找一篇关于极简主义或慈善益处的简短简单文章，并找出一条可以在下次辩论中使用的‘专家观点’陈述。