Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育
0918 LS04DBA - Introduction to Debate 0918 LS04DBA - 辩论入门
1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息
Teaching Focus 教学重点
Introduction to debate structure, rules, and initial discussion/mini-debate on the topic: 'Is homework a waste of time?'
介绍辩论结构、规则，并围绕主题“家庭作业是浪费时间吗？”进行初步讨论和迷你辩论。
Teaching Objectives 教学目标
-
Students will be able to define what a debate is. 学生将能够定义什么是辩论。
-
Students will practice formulating arguments for and against a motion, regardless of personal belief. 学生将练习针对某一动议构建支持和反对的论点，无论其个人立场如何。
-
Students will practice adhering to time limits (1.5 minutes) in a formal debate setting. 学生将练习在正式辩论环境中遵守时间限制（1.5分钟）。
2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览
Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配
Student Check-in & Greetings: Teacher greets students (Alex, Victor, Jamie, Bruce, Valerie, Alice) individually, checking on their day and brief background context (e.g., Victor traveling home, Jamie having homework).
学生签到与问候： 教师单独问候学生（Alex, Victor, Jamie, Bruce, Valerie, Alice），了解他们当天的情况和简要背景。
Introduction to Debating: Teacher asks Alice and Victor to define debate. Teacher explains structure (motion, agree/disagree, building three reasons, no personal attacks, judging criteria). Technical issues with video sound are managed.
辩论介绍： 教师请Alice和Victor定义辩论。教师解释结构（动议、同意/不同意、构建三个理由、无个人攻击、评判标准）。管理了视频声音的技术问题。
Video Clip & Discussion: School Uniforms: Watching a short clip on school uniforms; brief class discussion ensues where students practice making points against/for the motion, testing their ability to argue on both sides.
视频片段与讨论：校服： 观看一个关于校服的短片；随后进行简短的课堂讨论，学生练习提出赞成/反对动议的观点，测试他们双方辩论的能力。
Debate Structure & Rules Review: Teacher outlines the debate process: topic, teams (3v3), preparation time, presentation time (building from 1.5 min to 3 min), affirmative team speaks first, roles of listening and teamwork.
辩论结构与规则回顾： 教师概述辩论流程：主题、队伍（3v3）、准备时间、陈述时间（从1.5分钟增加到3分钟）、正方先发言、倾听和团队合作的角色。
Topic Introduction & Initial Brainstorming: Topic set: 'Is homework a waste of time?'. Students brainstorm initial pros (learning reinforcement, independence) and cons (time away from activities, confusion if misunderstood). Statistics on homework hours vs. educational outcomes are briefly shown.
主题介绍与初步头脑风暴： 主题确定：“家庭作业是浪费时间吗？”。学生们初步头脑风暴了赞成（学习巩固、独立性）和反对（占用活动时间、误解时会造成困惑）的观点。简要展示了家庭作业时长与教育成果的统计数据。
Team Formation & Preparation in Breakout Rooms: Students randomly assigned to teams (Affirmative/Yes: Alex, Alice, Bruce; Negative/No: Victor, Jamie, Valerie). Teacher rotates between rooms, guiding teams to divide roles and develop unique arguments to avoid repetition.
分组与在分会场准备： 学生被随机分配到小组（正方/赞成：Alex, Alice, Bruce；反方/反对：Victor, Jamie, Valerie）。教师在各组之间轮换，指导他们分配角色并发展独特论点，避免重复。
Mini-Debate Execution and Conclusion: Teacher sets rules for speaking (1.5 min, no interrupting). Debate proceeds: Bruce vs. Victor, Alex vs. Valerie, Alice vs. Jamie. Teacher praises effort, especially for those arguing against their personal view. Negative team is declared the winner based on providing more reasons/examples.
迷你辩论执行与总结： 教师设定发言规则（1.5分钟，不得打断）。辩论进行：Bruce对Victor，Alex对Valerie，Alice对Jamie。教师表扬了大家的努力，特别是那些为不赞成的立场辩论的学生。反方因提供了更多理由和例子而被宣布获胜。
Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能
Motion, debate, affirmative, negative, personal attacks, arguments, bored, distract, independent, self-discipline, organizational skills, well-being, smarter, intelligent.
动议, 辩论, 正方, 反方, 人身攻击, 论点, 无聊, 分心, 独立, 自律, 组织能力, 福祉/健康, 更聪明, 更聪明/有智慧。
The structure of a formal debate (Affirmative vs. Negative); The importance of developing distinct supporting points within a team; Arguing effectively on a side one does not personally agree with.
正式辩论的结构（正方与反方）；团队内部发展不同支持论点的重要性；有效地为自己不完全同意的一方进行辩论。
Formulating structured arguments (Firstly, Secondly, Lastly), public speaking under pressure, active listening (to teammates and opponents), time management.
构建结构化论点（首先、其次、最后），压力下的公开演讲，积极倾听（队友和对手），时间管理。
Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料
-
Video clip demonstrating a debate on school uniforms. 展示关于校服辩论的视频片段。
-
Statistical graph comparing homework hours across different countries (China, UK, Finland, etc.). 比较不同国家（中国、英国、芬兰等）家庭作业时长的统计图表。
-
Debate preparation template structure (In my opinion... because firstly, secondly...). 辩论准备模板结构（依我看……因为首先、其次……）。
3. Student Performance Assessment (Alex, Victor, Jamie, Bruce, Valerie, Alice) 3. 学生表现评估 (Alex, Victor, Jamie, Bruce, Valerie, Alice)
Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性
-
All students actively participated in the initial Q&A and the subsequent team preparation discussions. 所有学生都积极参与了最初的问答和随后的团队准备讨论。
-
Students demonstrated strong teamwork skills by helping teammates find unique arguments (e.g., Victor and Jamie helping Valerie). 学生通过帮助队友找到独特的论点（如Victor和Jamie帮助Valerie）展示了强大的团队合作能力。
Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握
-
Students grasped the core concept of debate: having differing opinions and providing reasons. 学生们理解了辩论的核心概念：持有不同意见并提供理由。
-
New debaters (Jamie, Alex, Bruce, Valerie) successfully transitioned to arguing a position they initially disagreed with. 新辩手（Jamie, Alex, Bruce, Valerie）成功过渡到为他们最初不同意的立场辩护。
Language Output Ability 语言输出能力
Oral: 口语：
-
Most students maintained composure during their 1.5-minute speeches, though some occasionally rushed. 大多数学生在1.5分钟的演讲中保持了镇定，尽管有些人偶尔语速过快。
-
Students used good structural phrases like 'Firstly,' 'Secondly,' and 'In my opinion...' 学生们使用了良好的结构性短语，如“首先”、“其次”和“依我看……”
Written: 书面：
N/A (Focus was oral preparation and delivery)
不适用（重点是口头准备和陈述）
Student's Strengths 学生的优势
-
Alice provided a sophisticated argument focusing on mental health and student well-being. Alice提出了一个复杂的论点，侧重于心理健康和学生福祉。
-
Victor provided clear, structured points (firstly, secondly, lastly) for the negative side. Victor为反方提供了清晰、结构化的论点（首先、其次、最后）。
-
Jamie was quick to identify and focus on the concept of 'responsibility' for the negative team. Jamie迅速为反方确定并集中于“责任”这一概念。
-
Valerie effectively countered arguments with examples (e.g., college admissions, addiction prevention). Valerie用例子（例如，大学录取、预防成瘾）有效地反驳了论点。
Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面
-
Several students need to work on slowing down their speaking pace to ensure clarity, especially under pressure. 一些学生需要努力放慢语速，以确保在压力下表达清晰。
-
For some students, the transition to arguing against their personal belief needs more practice to sound convincing. 对于一些学生来说，过渡到为自己不相信的立场辩护需要更多练习才能听起来令人信服。
-
Ensuring that individual team members' arguments are distinct and do not overlap. 确保团队成员的个人论点是独特的，不相互重叠。
4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思
Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性
-
The introduction using existing students (Alice/Victor) as initial experts was highly effective. 使用现有学生（Alice/Victor）作为初始专家来介绍辩论的方式非常有效。
-
The immediate application of the concept through a real debate (even if short) solidified learning quickly. 通过一个真实的辩论（即使很短）立即应用所学概念，极快地巩固了学习效果。
-
The process of assigning students to opposing sides was handled well, normalizing the concept of arguing different views. 将学生分配到对立阵营的过程处理得当，使辩论不同观点的概念正常化。
Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理
-
The initial introduction phase was thorough but long; however, the introduction of the debate itself sped up the pace significantly. 最初的介绍阶段很详尽但耗时较长；然而，辩论本身的引入大大加快了课程节奏。
-
Time management during the preparation phase was strictly enforced (3 minutes), which is appropriate for a first lesson. 准备阶段的时间管理执行严格（3分钟），这对于第一课来说是合适的。
Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围
Energetic, engaging, and highly supportive, especially when students were struggling with the unexpected debate roles.
充满活力、引人入胜且高度支持性，尤其是在学生对意料之外的辩论角色感到不适应时。
Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成
-
Objective 1 met: Students defined debate by participating in the initial explanation. 目标1达成：学生通过参与初步解释定义了辩论。
-
Objective 2 met: All students argued for/against the motion in the mini-debate. 目标2达成：所有学生在迷你辩论中都为动议进行了正反方辩论。
-
Objective 3 partially met: Students practiced the 1.5-minute limit, though consistency needs monitoring. 目标3部分达成：学生练习了1.5分钟的限制，但需要持续关注一致性。
5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议
Teaching Strengths 教学优势
Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：
-
Excellent facilitation of the unexpected role assignments, framing it as a key part of debating training. 极佳地引导了意外的角色分配，将其定位为辩论训练的关键部分。
-
The teacher provided positive and specific feedback immediately after each speaker, linking performance back to debating concepts. 教师在每位发言者之后立即提供了积极和具体的反馈，将表现与辩论概念联系起来。
Effective Methods: 有效方法：
-
Using a topic highly relevant to students (homework) to immediately engage them. 使用与学生高度相关的主题（家庭作业）立即吸引他们。
-
Forcing collaboration in breakout rooms where students had to divide unique responsibilities. 强制要求学生在分会场内协作，让他们必须分配独特的职责。
Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：
-
The teacher strongly praised Alice for successfully debating a side she didn't agree with. 教师高度赞扬Alice成功地为她不赞成的立场进行了辩论。
-
The summary recognized the effort of the losing team, reinforcing that argument quality matters more than winning. 总结中肯定了失败团队的努力，强化了论点质量比获胜更重要的观念。
Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点
-
Full execution of the 1.5-minute debate rounds under stricter time management. 在更严格的时间管理下，完整执行1.5分钟的辩论环节。
-
Developing targeted rebuttal skills based on hearing the opponent's initial speeches. 根据对手的初步发言，发展有针对性的反驳技巧。
Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议
Pronunciation & Reading: 发音与阅读：
-
Encourage students to practice articulating the end sounds of words, as some sentences ended abruptly or mumbled slightly. 鼓励学生练习清晰地发出演讲的尾音，因为有些句子结尾显得突然或有点含糊不清。
Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：
-
When giving structured speech outlines (Firstly, Secondly), remind students to pause briefly after each transition word. 在给出结构性发言大纲（首先、其次）时，提醒学生在每个过渡词后短暂地停顿一下。
-
Practice using rhetorical questions effectively to engage the audience during the 1.5-minute speaking slots. 练习在1.5分钟的发言时间内有效使用反问句来吸引听众。
Debate Strategy: 辩论策略：
-
For the next session, ensure preparation time is used to write down key sentences or rebuttal points, not just broad topics. 在下一次课程中，确保准备时间用于写下关键句子或反驳要点，而不仅仅是广泛的主题。
Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业
-
Students should briefly prepare 3 key talking points (with one example each) for next week's topic: 'Teacher is the best job'. 学生应简要准备下周主题“教师是最好的工作”的3个关键论点（并附带一个例子）。