Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育
1v1 English Lesson - Debate Skills 1v1 英语课程 - 辩论技巧
1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息
Teaching Focus 教学重点
Mastering the structure and roles in 'Loop Debating,' focusing on teamwork, role switching, and delivering structured arguments for both affirmative and negative sides.
掌握“循环辩论”的结构和角色，重点关注团队合作、角色互换，以及为正反方提供结构化的论点。
Teaching Objectives 教学目标
-
Students will understand and apply the principles of teamwork in a debate context. 学生将理解并在辩论环境中应用团队合作的原则。
-
Students will practice assuming all roles in a debate (Chair, Agree, Disagree, Audience) through the 'Loop Debating' format. 学生将通过“循环辩论”形式练习担任辩论中的所有角色（主席、正方、反方、观众）。
-
Students will develop arguments for and against the motion: 'Pen and paper should be outlawed and replaced with digital products.' 学生将针对“笔和纸应被取缔并用数字产品替代”的动议发展正反方论点。
2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览
Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配
Informal Check-in & Tech Troubleshooting: Greeting students (Chloe, Mason, Jaden, Steven) and resolving audio issues for Mason.
非正式问候与技术排查： 问候学生（Chloe, Mason, Jaden, Steven）并解决Mason的音频问题。
Discussion on Daily Events/Test Experience: Brief discussion about Jaden's tiring math class and Chloe/Mason's day (farm trip for Chloe, test for Mason).
当日活动/考试经历讨论： 简短讨论Jaden疲惫的数学课和Chloe/Mason的日程（Chloe的农场之旅，Mason的考试）。
Lesson Introduction and Teamwork Principles: Teacher introduced the 'Loop Debating' format, emphasizing teamwork principles: prioritizing team interest, role awareness (rebuttal, opening/closing), listening skills, encouragement, and congratulating partners.
课程介绍与团队合作原则讲解： 教师介绍了“循环辩论”形式，强调团队合作原则：优先考虑团队利益、角色意识（反驳、开场/总结）、倾听技巧、鼓励和祝贺伙伴。
Motion Presentation & Initial Thoughts: Motion introduced: 'Pen and paper should be outlawed and replaced with digital products.' Students gave initial arguments (e.g., convenience, eye strain, environmental impact).
动议介绍与初步思考： 介绍动议：“笔和纸应被取缔并用数字产品替代”。学生提出了初步论点（例如，便利性、眼睛疲劳、环境影响）。
Argument Preparation (10 Minutes): Students prepared arguments for both sides (Agree/Disagree) for the debate rotations. Teacher encouraged using research/notes.
论点准备（10分钟）： 学生为辩论轮次准备正反方论点（10分钟）。教师鼓励使用研究/笔记。
Debate Round 1: Jaden (Agree) vs. Steven (Disagree): Mason chaired. Jaden argued for digital replacement (convenience, environment). Steven argued against (data loss, personalization of handwriting). Audience (Chloe, Teacher) voted for Jaden.
辩论第一轮：Jaden (正方) vs. Steven (反方)： Mason担任主席。Jaden主张用数字产品替代（便利性、环境）。Steven反对（数据丢失、书写个性化）。观众（Chloe、教师）投票给Jaden。
辩论第二轮：Mason (正方) vs. Chloe (反方): Steven chaired. Mason argued for digital replacement (environment, ink toxicity). Chloe argued against (quick note-taking necessity, water damage to devices). Audience (Jaden, Teacher) voted for Chloe.
： Steven担任主席。Mason主张用数字产品替代（环境、墨水毒性）。Chloe反对（快速记录的必要性、设备被水损坏）。观众（Jaden、教师）投票给Chloe。
Debate Round 3: Chloe (Agree) vs. Mason (Disagree): Jaden chaired. Chloe focused on recyclability and digital security (passwords). Mason focused on data deletion risk vs. water damage risk. Audience (Teacher, Stephen) voted for Mason.
辩论第三轮：Chloe (正方) vs. Mason (反方)： Jaden担任主席。Chloe侧重于可回收性和数字安全性（密码）。Mason侧重于数据删除风险与水损坏风险的对比。观众（教师、Stephen）投票给Mason。
Feedback and Conclusion: Teacher praised all students for their performance, especially Jaden's use of 'ecosystem' and scientific knowledge, Mason's examples, and Chloe's vocabulary.
反馈与总结： 教师表扬了所有学生的表现，特别是Jaden对“生态系统”和科学知识的运用，Mason的例子和Chloe的词汇运用。
Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能
Outlawed, digital products, chair (verb/noun), loop debating, affirmative, negative, rebuttal, audience, ecosystem, oxygen, convenience, permanent, stumbling, vocabulary, synonym, statistic, waterproof.
取缔，数字产品，主持（动词/名词），循环辩论，正方，反方，反驳，观众，生态系统，氧气，便利性，永久的，犹豫/卡壳，词汇，同义词，统计数据，防水的。
Debate Roles (Chair, Speakers), Team Structure in Debate, Prioritizing Team Points, Utilizing Expert Knowledge, Handling Tie Votes.
辩论角色（主席、发言人），辩论中的团队结构，优先考虑团队论点，利用专家知识，处理平局投票。
Structured argumentation, active listening, role-playing (chairing), time management in speaking, collaboration, persuasive speaking.
结构化论证，积极倾听，角色扮演（主持），发言时间管理，协作，有说服力的口语表达。
Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料
-
Teacher verbal instruction and guidance throughout the debate rotations. 教师在整个辩论轮次中提供的口头指导和引导。
-
Whiteboard/Digital Space used for note-taking and highlighting key points during preparation. 准备期间用于做笔记和强调关键点的白板/数字空间。
3. Student Performance Assessment (Chloe, Mason, Jaden, Steven) 3. 学生表现评估 (Chloe, Mason, Jaden, Steven)
Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性
-
High engagement from all four students, demonstrating willingness to rotate roles and argue both sides. 所有四名学生参与度都很高，表现出轮换角色和为正反双方辩护的意愿。
-
Mason required gentle redirection during the preparation phase when focusing too much on drawing stars. Mason在准备阶段过于关注画星星时，需要老师温和地引导。
Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握
-
Students clearly understood the structure of the 'Loop Debate' and the role switch mechanics. 学生清晰地理解了“循环辩论”的结构和角色切换机制。
-
Good comprehension of how to frame questions to speakers and how the Chair manages the flow. 对如何向发言人提问以及主席如何管理流程的理解良好。
Language Output Ability 语言输出能力
Oral: 口语：
-
Arguments were generally well-structured, especially Jaden's incorporation of external research (Bill Gates, historical context). 论点总体结构良好，特别是Jaden融入了外部研究（比尔·盖茨、历史背景）。
-
Pacing varied; some students spoke slightly too quickly (Chloe), while others demonstrated good control (Steven in Round 2). 语速有变化；有些学生说得稍快（Chloe），而有些则表现出良好的控制力（Steven在第二轮）。
Written: 书面：
N/A (Focus was entirely on oral debate skills and spontaneous argument formulation).
不适用（重点完全在于口头辩论技巧和即兴论点构建）。
Student's Strengths 学生的优势
-
Jaden: Excellent incorporation of external research and terminology (e.g., ecosystem, Bill Gates). Jaden：出色地融入了外部研究和术语（例如，生态系统、比尔·盖茨）。
-
Mason: Effective use of concrete, relatable scenarios to illustrate disadvantages (e.g., deleting homework, water damage). Mason：有效地使用具体、贴切的场景来说明缺点（例如，删除作业、水损坏）。
-
Chloe: Good attempt at addressing security/technical points (passwords, speed of typing vs. handwriting). Chloe：在解决安全/技术问题（密码、打字速度与手写速度）方面表现良好。
-
Steven: Maintained a clear structure, particularly when arguing against the motion in the first round. Steven：保持了清晰的结构，尤其是在第一轮反对动议时。
Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面
-
Refining vocabulary usage; ensuring precise word choice (e.g., 'poisonant' corrected to 'poisonous,' 'disagree' used correctly for voting). 完善词汇使用；确保用词准确（例如，将'poisonant'修正为'poisonous'，正确使用'disagree'进行投票）。
-
Maintaining focus during preparation time (Mason). 在准备时间内保持专注（Mason）。
-
Ensuring arguments are fully developed, especially when interrupted or facing complex questions (Jaden in Round 1 rebuttal). 确保论点得到充分发展，尤其是在被打断或面对复杂问题时（Jaden在第一轮反驳中）。
4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思
Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性
-
The 'Loop Debating' structure was highly effective for ensuring comprehensive participation and role mastery. “循环辩论”结构在确保全面参与和角色掌握方面非常有效。
-
Teacher provided timely scaffolding and clear instructions for chairing and voting procedures. 教师为主持和投票程序提供了及时脚手架和清晰的指导。
Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理
-
The pace was fast, necessitated by the need to complete three full rounds, which kept energy levels high. 节奏很快，这是完成三轮完整辩论所必需的，使学生的精力保持高涨。
-
Teacher managed time well, intervening to move to the next stage promptly after debates or preparation. 教师在辩论或准备结束后都能及时干预，迅速进入下一阶段，时间管理得当。
Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围
Highly energetic, collaborative, and supportive. Students encouraged each other, even when roles switched sides.
气氛非常活跃、协作性强且充满支持。学生们互相鼓励，即使角色互换阵营也一样。
Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成
-
Teamwork principles were integrated and tested immediately through the loop structure. 团队合作原则通过循环结构立即得到整合和检验。
-
All students successfully fulfilled the roles of Chair, Agree, Disagree, and Audience. 所有学生都成功履行了主席、正方、反方和观众的角色。
5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议
Teaching Strengths 教学优势
Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：
-
Innovative use of the 'Loop Debating' format to maximize speaking time and role diversity. 创新性地使用“循环辩论”格式，以最大限度地提高发言时间和角色多样性。
-
Excellent positive reinforcement, specifically praising the incorporation of external facts and strong examples. 出色的正面强化，特别赞扬了外部事实的融入和强有力的例子。
Effective Methods: 有效方法：
-
Clearly mapping out the complex chairing and voting procedures before starting Round 1. 在开始第一轮之前，清晰地规划了复杂的主持和投票程序。
-
Actively guiding the audience on *how* to listen and *when* to ask questions. 积极指导观众*如何*倾听以及*何时*提问。
Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：
-
Mason was commended for being a 'fantastic chair' in the first round. Mason因在第一轮中担任“出色的主席”而受到表扬。
-
Jaden’s commitment to incorporating research noted from previous lessons was highlighted as excellent practice. Jaden在课程中采纳先前课程中提到的研究的做法被强调为极好的实践。
Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点
-
Applying the debate structure learned today to a new, self-selected motion. 将今天学到的辩论结构应用于一个新的、自选的动议。
-
Focusing on advanced rebuttal techniques, using the opposing side's points against them. 专注于高级反驳技巧，利用对方的论点反击。
Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议
Pronunciation & Reading: 发音与阅读：
-
Work on precise word choice, especially ensuring correct usage of formal vocabulary like 'poisonous' instead of 'poisonant'. 注意精确的词汇选择，尤其要确保使用像'poisonous'而不是'poisonant'这样的正式词汇。
-
Practice pacing delivery when speaking under pressure to ensure clarity, even when excited about a point. 在压力下练习控制语速，以确保清晰度，即使在对某个论点感到兴奋时也要如此。
Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：
-
Continue Jaden's excellent habit of integrating researched facts and expert names into arguments. 延续Jaden将研究事实和专家姓名融入论点的优秀习惯。
-
When chairing, ensure that follow-up questions from the audience are directed clearly to the intended speaker. 在担任主席时，确保观众的跟进问题清晰地指向了指定的发言人。
Role Management: 角色管理：
-
For debaters, practice shifting mindset quickly when moving from the Affirmative to the Negative side between rounds. 对于辩手来说，练习在轮次之间从正方迅速转换到反方的心态。
Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业
-
Review notes on the roles of the three speakers in a standard debate structure (First Speaker, Second Speaker, Third Speaker). 复习标准辩论结构中三位发言人（第一、第二、第三发言人）的角色笔记。
-
Prepare three strong arguments supporting and three strong arguments opposing the motion: 'Everyone deserves the same education, think outside their books.' 准备支持和反对动议“每个人都应接受相同的教育，跳出书本思考”的三个有力论据。