Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育
1v1 English Lesson - Debate Preparation and Execution 1v1 英语课程 - 辩论准备与执行
1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息
Teaching Focus 教学重点
Practicing defining terms in a policy motion (First Speaker role) and engaging in a formal debate.
练习定义政策动议中的术语（第一发言人角色）并参与正式辩论。
Teaching Objectives 教学目标
-
Students will accurately define the key terms within a given debate motion. 学生能够准确定义给定辩论动议中的关键词汇。
-
Students will effectively present arguments and rebuttals in a structured debate format. 学生能够以结构化的辩论形式有效地陈述论点和反驳。
-
Students will demonstrate improved critical thinking when evaluating evidence supporting or refuting a claim. 学生在评估支持或反驳某一主张的证据时，将展示出改进的批判性思维。
2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览
Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配
Student Daily Update & Technical Check: Teacher checks in with students (Mason, Renee, Zoe, Jaden, Chloe), discussing their prior classes (STEAM, Art) and general well-being. Technical issues resolved for Mason.
学生日常更新与技术检查： 教师与学生互动，讨论他们之前的课程（STEAM、艺术）和整体情况。为Mason解决了技术问题。
Defining Policy Motions: Introduction to defining motion terms (e.g., 'Money does not bring happiness', 'Brexit is good for the UK') focusing on the First Speaker's role.
定义政策动议： 介绍如何定义动议中的术语（例如：“金钱不能带来幸福”，“脱欧对英国有利”），重点关注第一发言人的角色。
Debate Topic Assignment and Team Formation: The debate topic is set: 'The pyramids were built by aliens.' Teams are formed: Affirmative (Mason, Jaden, Teacher/Lisa) vs. Negative (Renee, Zoe, Chloe). Students prepare roles (First Speaker, Second Speaker, Rebuttal).
辩论主题分配与组队： 确定辩论主题：“金字塔是由外星人建造的”。组建队伍：正方（Mason、Jaden、教师/Lisa）对反方（Renee、Zoe、Chloe）。学生准备角色（第一发言人、第二发言人、反驳人）。
Evidence Gathering and Strategy Session: Both teams enter breakout rooms to organize arguments. Teacher circulates to guide strategy, emphasizing unique points for each speaker.
证据收集和策略会议： 双方进入分组讨论室组织论点。教师巡视指导策略，强调每位发言人的独特论点。
Formal Debate Execution: The debate proceeds with Mason (Affirmative 1), Renee (Negative 1), Jaden (Affirmative 2), Zoe (Negative 2), Teacher (Affirmative 3), and Chloe (Negative 3/Rebuttal).
正式辩论执行： 辩论进行，发言顺序为 Mason (正方一辩)、Renee (反方一辩)、Jaden (正方二辩)、Zoe (反方二辩)、教师 (正方三辩) 和 Chloe (反方三辩/反驳)。
Feedback and Decision: Teacher provides overall positive feedback, noting the strength of both sides, but ultimately awards the win to the Affirmative team based on the inclusion of expert opinion research.
反馈与裁决： 教师给出整体积极的反馈，指出双方论点都很强，但最终因正方包含了专家意见研究，裁定正方获胜。
Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能
Policy motion, define, Brexit, sustainability, debate, affirmative, negative, rebuttal, cubit, precession, extraterrestrial, artifact, astronaut, quarry, levitation, rebuttal, evidence, scientist.
政策动议，定义，脱欧，可持续性，辩论，正方，反方，反驳，库比特（古代长度单位），岁差（天文现象），地外/外星的，人工制品，宇航员，采石场，悬浮，反驳，证据，科学家。
The necessity of defining terms in debate; Arguments for/against alien involvement in ancient construction, focusing on accuracy, technology, and physical evidence.
辩论中定义术语的必要性；支持/反对外星人参与古代建筑的论点，重点关注精度、技术和物理证据。
Defining abstract concepts, structured argumentation, active listening, rebuttal construction, oral presentation under pressure.
定义抽象概念、结构化论证、积极倾听、反驳构建、压力下的口头陈述。
Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料
-
Video documentary clip on the Great Pyramid's mathematical alignment and proposed alien connection. 关于吉萨大金字塔数学对齐和外星人关联的视频纪录片片段。
-
Whiteboard/Shared screen for motion definition examples. 白板/共享屏幕用于展示动议定义示例。
3. Student Performance Assessment (Mason, Renee, Zoe, Jaden, Chloe (Group Session)) 3. 学生表现评估 (Mason, Renee, Zoe, Jaden, Chloe (Group Session))
Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性
-
All five students participated actively in the debate segment, offering substantial points and engaging in rebuttals. 所有五名学生都积极参与了辩论环节，提出了实质性的观点并参与了反驳。
Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握
-
Students successfully grasped the abstract requirement of defining motion terms before arguing the motion itself. 学生们成功理解了在论证动议本身之前，必须定义动议术语的抽象要求。
Language Output Ability 语言输出能力
Oral: 口语：
-
Mason and Jaden excelled in incorporating researched expert opinions. Renee and Zoe provided strong counterarguments rooted in historical interpretations and lack of physical evidence. Mason和Jaden在结合研究的专家意见方面表现出色。Renee和Zoe提供了基于历史解释和缺乏物理证据的有力反驳。
Written: 书面：
N/A (Focus was primarily oral debate and preparation notes)
不适用（重点是口头辩论和准备笔记）
Student's Strengths 学生的优势
-
Strong preparation: Both teams clearly delineated specific roles and arguments to avoid repetition. 准备充分：两队都明确划分了具体角色和论点，避免了重复。
-
Effective use of evidence: Jaden cited specific authors/experts, and Mason used spatial data (Mars structures). 有效利用证据：Jaden引用了特定的作者/专家，Mason使用了空间数据（火星结构）。
-
Resilience in rebuttal: Negative team effectively countered claims regarding space exploration evidence. 反驳中的韧性：反方团队有效地反驳了关于太空探索证据的主张。
Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面
-
Clarity in defining terms: Mason, as the first speaker, needed slightly more time to clearly establish definitions for 'pyramid' and 'alien'. 术语定义的清晰度：Mason作为第一发言人，需要更多时间清晰地确定“金字塔”和“外星人”的定义。
-
Pacing: The debate proceeded quickly due to time constraints, making it challenging for some students to structure long rebuttals. 节奏：由于时间限制，辩论进行得很快，这对一些学生组织长篇反驳造成了挑战。
4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思
Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性
-
The debate structure effectively tested students' ability to apply the 'defining motion' skill immediately. 辩论结构有效地测试了学生立即应用“定义动议”技能的能力。
-
The topic (Pyramids/Aliens) provided high engagement and motivation for all participants. 主题（金字塔/外星人）为所有参与者提供了高度的参与度和动机。
Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理
-
The teacher managed time strictly, adjusting speaking limits (2 minutes 30 seconds) to fit all speakers. 教师严格控制时间，调整了发言时限（2分30秒），以确保所有发言人都发言。
Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围
Highly energetic, competitive yet supportive. Students showed genuine enthusiasm for the controversial topic.
气氛非常活跃、既有竞争性又互相支持。学生们对这个有争议的话题表现出真正的热情。
Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成
-
Objective 1 (Defining terms) was explicitly practiced by Mason. 目标1（定义术语）由Mason明确练习了。
-
Objective 2 & 3 (Argumentation/Critical Thinking) were achieved through the successful execution of the debate. 目标2和3（论证/批判性思维）通过辩论的成功执行得以实现。
5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议
Teaching Strengths 教学优势
Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：
-
Effective use of content to drive skill practice (linking debate definitions to a fascinating topic). 有效地利用内容来驱动技能练习（将辩论定义与引人入胜的主题联系起来）。
-
Fair judging and detailed feedback, recognizing high-quality arguments from both sides. 公正的裁决和详细的反馈，认可了双方的高质量论点。
Effective Methods: 有效方法：
-
Role-based learning (First Speaker focus) ensured immediate application of the learned skill. 基于角色的学习（第一发言人重点）确保了对所学技能的即时应用。
Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：
-
The teacher noted the significant improvement in the overall standard of debate compared to previous lessons. 教师指出，与之前的课程相比，辩论的整体水平有了显著提高。
Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点
-
Improving handwriting and note-taking skills. 提高书写和记笔记的技能。
Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议
Pronunciation & Reading: 发音与阅读：
-
Mason needs to practice enunciating multi-syllabic words clearly, especially during definitions (e.g., 'manifestly', 'similarity'). Mason需要练习清晰地发音多音节词汇，特别是在定义过程中（例如，'manifestly', 'similarity'）。
Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：
-
All students should practice signposting phrases during their speeches to improve flow (e.g., 'Firstly,' 'In conclusion,' 'My response to speaker X is...'). 所有学生都应在演讲中练习使用指引性短语以改善流畅度（例如，“首先”，“总而言之”，“我对X发言人的回应是……”）。
-
First speakers (Mason and Renee) must allocate at least 30 seconds explicitly to defining each key word, even if they feel rushed. 第一发言人（Mason和Renee）必须至少分配30秒明确定义每个关键词，即使他们感到匆忙。
Critical Thinking/Structure: 批判性思维/结构：
-
For future debates, practice anticipating the other team's key evidence to better prepare rebuttals in advance. 对于未来的辩论，练习预判对方的关键证据，以便提前更好地准备反驳。
Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业
-
Review the definition of a policy motion and practice applying it to three random sentences. 复习政策动议的定义，并练习将其应用于三个随机句子。
-
Research basic handwriting improvement techniques or practice cursive writing (as suggested by the teacher). 研究基本的书写改进技巧或练习草书（如教师所建议）。