Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育
UIE-LS04DB-B Lesson Summary UIE-LS04DB-B 课程总结
1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息
Teaching Focus 教学重点
Introduction to persuasive devices, application in a structured debate format, and differentiating between fact and opinion.
介绍说服性技巧，并在结构化辩论中应用，区分事实与观点。
Teaching Objectives 教学目标
-
Students will be able to identify and use various persuasive devices (e.g., examples, expert opinions, evidence, rhetorical questions). 学生能够识别并使用各种说服性技巧（例如：举例、专家意见、证据、反问句）。
-
Students will practice applying persuasive language in a structured debate. 学生将练习在结构化辩论中应用说服性语言。
-
New student (Claire) will be integrated into the class structure and reassured about the debate process. 新学生（Claire）将被融入课堂结构，并对辩论流程感到安心。
2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览
Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配
Welcome and Student Check-in: Greeting students, welcoming new student Claire, and brief discussion about the New Year.
欢迎和学生问候： 问候学生，欢迎新同学Claire，并简短讨论新年情况。
Introduction to Persuasive Language Techniques: Teacher prompts students for techniques to persuade an audience, leading to identification of examples, expert opinions, good vocabulary, evidence, and logic.
说服性语言技巧介绍： 老师引导学生说出说服听众的技巧，引出识别例子、专家意见、好词汇、证据和逻辑等方法。
Fact vs. Opinion Practice: Reviewing persuasive starters and practicing distinguishing between facts and opinions, introducing repetition and emotive language.
事实与观点练习： 复习说服性开场白，练习区分事实和观点，并介绍重复和情感语言的使用。
Debate Topic Exploration (Video Analysis): Watching a video comparing traditional vs. digital art, followed by whole-class discussion on the pros and cons of each.
辩论主题探讨（视频分析）： 观看对比传统艺术和数字艺术的视频，随后进行全班讨论，探究各自的优缺点。
Team Formation and Speaker Assignment: Assigning students to Affirmative (Digital Art) and Negative (Classical Painting) teams, determining speaking order, and initial preparation.
分组与发言人分配： 将学生分配到正方（数字艺术）和反方（古典画作）队伍，确定发言顺序和初步准备。
Breakout Preparation and Peer Coaching: Teams meet in breakout rooms to finalize arguments and confirm speaking roles (Chairing role assigned to Zoe for Round 1).
分组准备与同伴指导： 队伍进入分房确定最终论点和发言角色（Zoe被指派担任第一轮主席）。
Structured Debate Round 1: The debate takes place with Mason and George arguing for the affirmative, and Chloe and Renee arguing for the negative. Zoe chairs.
结构化辩论第一轮： 辩论进行，正方为Mason和George，反方为Chloe和Renee。Zoe担任主席。
Verdict, Feedback, and Wrap-up: Zoe and teacher deliver the verdict (Affirmative wins). Detailed positive feedback is given to all speakers, highlighting effective use of persuasive devices. Preview of next week's topic.
裁决、反馈与总结： Zoe和老师宣布裁决（正方获胜）。对所有发言者提供详细的正面反馈，强调说服性技巧的有效使用。预告下周主题。
Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能
Debate, persuasive language, rhetorical question, evidence, expert opinion, logic, tangible, texture, undo button, layers, shareability, accessible, versatile, forbid, condemn, imperative.
辩论，说服性语言，反问句，证据，专家意见，逻辑，有形的，纹理，撤销按钮，图层，可分享性，易于获取的，多功能的，禁止，谴责，必要的/必须的。
Persuasion techniques, Fact vs. Opinion, The value of traditional art versus digital art, Role of the Debate Chair.
说服技巧，事实与观点，传统艺术与数字艺术的价值，辩论主席的角色。
Argument construction, rebuttal, active listening, public speaking, using evidence to support claims, managing timing in debates, chairing a debate.
构建论点，反驳，积极倾听，公开演讲，使用证据支持论点，管理辩论时间，主持辩论。
Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料
-
Video comparing Traditional Art vs. Digital Art (Focusing on 5 key differences for each). 对比传统艺术与数字艺术的视频（侧重于各自的5个关键区别）。
-
Whiteboard/Slide notes listing persuasive devices (Examples, Evidence, Logic, etc.). 白板/幻灯片上列出的说服性技巧清单（例子、证据、逻辑等）。
3. Student Performance Assessment (Zoe, Claire, Chloe, Renee, George, Mason) 3. 学生表现评估 (Zoe, Claire, Chloe, Renee, George, Mason)
Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性
-
High overall engagement, with students actively contributing ideas during the initial brainstorming session. 整体参与度高，学生在初始头脑风暴环节积极贡献想法。
-
All named students (except possibly the new student in the discussion phase) actively participated in the preparation and debate. 所有点名的学生（除讨论阶段的新学生外）都积极参与了准备和辩论。
Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握
-
Students demonstrated strong comprehension of persuasive techniques by successfully applying them in their arguments. 学生通过在论证中成功应用说服技巧，表现出对这些技巧的深刻理解。
-
The distinction between fact and opinion was generally understood, although the debate itself required nuanced application of both. 事实与观点的区别总体上被理解，尽管辩论本身要求对两者进行细致的应用。
Language Output Ability 语言输出能力
Oral: 口语：
-
Mason and George delivered clear, structured opening and rebuttal speeches, using specific persuasive elements. Mason和George清晰、有条理地进行了开篇陈词和反驳，使用了具体的说服性元素。
-
Chloe and Renee effectively utilized emotive language and rhetorical questions, showing improvement in structured argumentation. Chloe和Renee有效地运用了情感语言和反问句，结构化论证能力有所提高。
Written: 书面：
N/A (Focus was on oral debate performance and idea generation).
不适用（重点是口头辩论表现和观点生成）。
Student's Strengths 学生的优势
-
George: Excellent rebuttal skills, effectively integrating expert opinion and logic. George：出色的反驳技巧，有效融入了专家意见和逻辑。
-
Renee: Strong grasp of persuasive devices, particularly the effective use of a rhetorical question to conclude her speech. Renee：对说服性技巧掌握牢固，特别是巧妙地在演讲结尾使用了一个反问句。
-
Zoe: Excellent performance as Chair, maintaining time limits and managing the flow of the debate clearly. Zoe：作为主席表现出色，清晰地控制了时间并管理了辩论流程。
Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面
-
Claire needs immediate support to catch up on debate structure, as she was unsure about participating initially. Claire需要立即获得支持以跟上辩论结构，因为她最初对参与感到不确定。
-
Speakers need to ensure their arguments are distinct and do not overlap significantly with other team members' points. 发言者需要确保他们的论点是明确的，并且与其他团队成员的观点没有显著重叠。
4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思
Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性
-
The use of a video resource effectively introduced complex material and generated robust initial discussion. 使用视频资源有效地引入了复杂材料并产生了强劲的初步讨论。
-
The structured setup (time limits, specific speaker roles) guided students toward producing higher-quality debate performances. 结构化的设置（时间限制、特定的发言角色）引导学生产生了更高质量的辩论表现。
Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理
-
The pacing was generally good, moving quickly through the content introduction to allow ample time for debate preparation and execution. 节奏总体良好，快速通过内容介绍，为辩论准备和执行留出了充足的时间。
-
The teacher maintained control over timing during the formal speeches, utilizing the Chair (Zoe) effectively. 老师在正式发言期间很好地控制了时间，有效地利用了主席（Zoe）。
Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围
Highly engaged, supportive, and intellectually stimulating. Students felt comfortable expressing nuanced opinions, even when undecided.
高度投入、支持性和智力刺激。学生即使在犹豫不决时，也感到可以舒适地表达细微的观点。
Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成
-
Objective 1 achieved: Students demonstrated use of persuasive devices throughout the debate. 目标1达成：学生在整个辩论中都展示了对说服技巧的运用。
-
Objective 2 achieved: A full round of structured debate was successfully executed. 目标2达成：成功执行了一整轮结构化辩论。
5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议
Teaching Strengths 教学优势
Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：
-
Effective use of student examples (e.g., Renee's rhetorical question) to reinforce theoretical concepts. 有效利用学生的例子（例如Renee的反问句）来巩固理论概念。
-
Skillful integration of a new student (Claire) into the debate teams with minimal disruption. 熟练地将新学生（Claire）整合到辩论队伍中，干扰极小。
Effective Methods: 有效方法：
-
Using student-led discussion to generate the list of persuasive devices rather than simply lecturing. 使用学生主导的讨论来生成说服性技巧列表，而不是单纯地讲授。
-
Assigning Zoe the role of Chair early ensured smooth management of the formal debate segment. 及早分配Zoe主席角色，确保了正式辩论环节的流畅管理。
Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：
-
The teacher acknowledged and praised the difficulty of taking a side in such a balanced topic. 老师承认并赞扬在这个平衡的主题中选择立场的难度。
-
Positive reinforcement for using specific techniques (like Renee's rhetorical question and Chloe's personal experience). 对使用特定技巧（如Renee的反问句和Chloe的个人经历）给予了积极肯定。
Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点
-
Analyzing moral dilemmas and ethical decision-making under pressure (e.g., Saving a cat vs. a 10 million pound painting). 分析压力下的道德困境和伦理决策（例如：拯救猫还是拯救价值1000万英镑的画作）。
-
Further practice with the role of the Chair in maintaining strict time control and fairness. 进一步练习主席的角色，以保持严格的时间控制和公平性。
Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议
Pronunciation & Reading: 发音与阅读：
-
Encourage new student Claire to practice speaking more frequently in informal settings before the next formal debate. 鼓励新学生Claire在下一次正式辩论前，在非正式场合更多地练习口语。
Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：
-
Remind students to explicitly state which persuasive device they are using when making a key point (e.g., 'Using expert opinion, I argue that...'). 提醒学生在提出关键论点时明确指出他们正在使用哪种说服技巧（例如：“使用专家意见，我认为……”）。
-
For debaters, ensure arguments remain distinct across speakers; check for overlap between Mason/George and Chloe/Renee's intended points. 对于辩手，确保发言者之间的论点保持独立；检查Mason/George和Chloe/Renee的预定观点是否存在重叠。
Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业
-
Reflect on the gallery fire dilemma: write down your final decision and one key reason supporting it. 反思画廊火灾的困境：写下你的最终决定和一个支持它的关键原因。