Bridging British Education Virtual Academy 伦桥国际教育
1v1 English Lesson - Debate Practice on Banning Cars in City Centers 1v1 英语课程 - 关于在市中心禁车的辩论练习
1. Course Basic Information 1. 课程基本信息
Teaching Focus 教学重点
Reviewing the role and function of the third speaker in a debate; practicing rebuttal skills and applying them to a formal debate motion.
复习辩论中第三发言人的角色和职能；练习反驳技巧并将其应用于正式辩论议题。
Teaching Objectives 教学目标
-
Students can define the role and responsibilities of the third speaker. 学生能够定义第三发言人的角色和职责。
-
Students can effectively rebut opposing arguments during the debate practice. 学生能够在辩论练习中有效地反驳对立论点。
-
Students can collaborate as a team during the formal debate. 学生能够在正式辩论中作为团队进行协作。
2. Course Content Overview 2. 课程内容概览
Main Teaching Activities and Time Allocation 主要教学活动和时间分配
Christmas Vacation Sharing: Teacher and students shared experiences about Christmas breaks, including Hannah's trip to Macau for fencing competitions and gifts received by Daniel and Three.
圣诞假期分享： 师生分享圣诞假期的经历，包括Hannah去澳门参加击剑比赛和Daniel、Three收到的礼物。
Third Speaker Role Review: Reviewing the function of the third speaker: summarizing team opinion, rebutting final opposition points, and reinforcing the team's main arguments.
第三发言人角色回顾： 回顾第三发言人的功能：总结团队观点，反驳对手的最后论点，并加强团队的主要论据。
Mini-Debate Rebuttal Practice: Quick rebuttals on motions: 'Homework should be banned' and 'Plastic should be banned'.
迷你辩论反驳练习： 针对“作业应该被禁止”和“塑料应该被禁止”的快速反驳练习。
Formal Debate Setup and Preparation: Introducing the motion: 'Cars should be banned in city centers.' Watching a teacher opinion video. Assigning affirmative (Teacher) vs. negative (Daniel, Hannah, Three) teams. 8 minutes of preparation time.
正式辩论设置与准备： 介绍议题：“我们应该禁止汽车进入市中心”。观看教师观点的视频。分配正方（老师）与反方（Daniel, Hannah, Three）。8分钟准备时间。
Formal Debate: Banning Cars in City Centers: Teacher (Affirmative) presented opening arguments. Students (Negative: Three, Daniel, Hannah) presented their rebuttals and points. Teacher posed questions.
正式辩论：禁止汽车进入市中心： 老师（正方）陈述开场论点。学生（反方：Three, Daniel, Hannah）陈述反驳和观点。老师提出问题。
Wrap-up and Next Topic Introduction: Praising teamwork. Introducing the next debate topic: 'Should every child have to join a sports club or team?'
总结和下一步计划： 表扬团队合作。介绍下一个辩论主题：“每个孩子都应该加入体育俱乐部或团队吗？”
Language Knowledge and Skills 语言知识与技能
rebuttal, motion, congestion, emission, sustainable transport, zero net, fumes, inefficient, impractical, pedestrian, affirm/affirmative, yield
反驳，议题/动议，拥堵，排放，可持续交通，净零排放，烟雾/气体，效率低下的，不切实际的，行人，正方，（辩论）让出/结束陈述
The role of the third speaker (summary and final rebuttal); Argumentation structure (proposing points and counter-arguments); The balance between environmental concerns (pollution) and practical necessities (transportation, business) in urban planning.
第三发言人的角色（总结和最后反驳）；论证结构（提出论点和反论点）；城市规划中环境问题（污染）与实际需求（交通、商业）之间的平衡。
Formal debate speaking, critical listening, immediate rebuttal formulation, teamwork coordination, persuasive language use.
正式辩论口语表达、批判性倾听、即时反驳构建、团队协作协调、说服性语言运用。
Teaching Resources and Materials 教学资源与材料
-
Teacher-created debate structure outline (Third Speaker duties). 老师创建的辩论结构大纲（第三发言人职责）。
-
Video clips showing various teacher opinions on banning city center cars. 展示不同教师对禁止市中心汽车看法的视频片段。
3. Student Performance Assessment (Daniel, Hannah, Three) 3. 学生表现评估 (Daniel, Hannah, Three)
Participation and Activeness 参与度和积极性
-
All three students participated actively in the informal drills and the formal debate. 三名学生在非正式练习和正式辩论中都积极参与了。
-
Teamwork among Daniel, Hannah, and Three was excellent, coordinating points effectively. Daniel、Hannah和Three之间的团队合作非常出色，有效地协调了论点。
Language Comprehension and Mastery 语言理解和掌握
-
Students demonstrated good understanding of the third speaker's role, particularly in summarizing and reinforcing points. 学生们很好地理解了第三发言人的角色，尤其是在总结和加强论点方面。
-
Students grasped the core arguments for and against banning cars, showing analytical thinking. 学生们抓住了禁止汽车的核心正反方论点，展现了分析性思维。
Language Output Ability 语言输出能力
Oral: 口语：
-
Three presented clear opening points for the negative team, though concluding statements need more formality. Three为反方提出了清晰的开场论点，但结束陈述需要更正式。
-
Daniel made strong, logical points regarding economic impact (shops closing) and suggested an alternative (electric cars). Daniel就经济影响（商店关闭）提出了有力、合乎逻辑的论点，并提出了替代方案（电动汽车）。
-
Hannah provided good supporting arguments focusing on electric cars and practicality of carrying large items. Hannah提供了关于电动汽车和携带大件物品实用性的良好支持论点。
Written: 书面：
N/A (Focus was oral debate execution and preparation notes visible in the recording)
不适用（重点是口头辩论的执行和录音中可见的准备笔记）
Student's Strengths 学生的优势
-
Strong teamwork and support among the three negative speakers. 三位反方发言人之间展现了强大的团队合作和互相支持。
-
Ability to listen actively and use opponent's points against them (Daniel's successful rebuttal on city center definition). 能够积极倾听并利用对手的论点反击（Daniel成功反驳了市中心定义的论点）。
-
Practical counter-arguments regarding transport costs and accessibility (Three and Daniel). 关于交通成本和可达性的实用反论点（Three和Daniel）。
Areas for Improvement 需要改进的方面
-
Formal concluding phrases (e.g., 'In conclusion,' 'I yield the floor') need consistent use. 正式的结束语（例如“总之”、“我将时间交给主席”）需要持续使用。
-
Need to integrate teammates' points more explicitly when speaking (as a third speaker, or generally). 需要在发言时更明确地整合队友的观点（作为第三发言人或总体上）。
-
Managing speed and pacing during high-pressure debate segments. 管理高压辩论环节中的语速和节奏。
4. Teaching Reflection 4. 教学反思
Effectiveness of Teaching Methods 教学方法的有效性
-
The practice drills effectively primed students for rebuttal thinking. 练习环节有效地为学生进入反驳思维做好了准备。
-
The motion 'Banning cars in city centers' generated rich, relevant arguments from students. “禁止汽车进入市中心”的议题激发了学生们丰富且相关的论点。
-
The interactive Q&A session was highly effective in assessing listening skills. 互动问答环节对于评估学生的听力技能非常有效。
Teaching Pace and Time Management 教学节奏和时间管理
-
The pace was fast, especially during the transition from preparation to formal debate, causing some minor stress/confusion during the setup. 节奏很快，尤其是在从准备到正式辩论的过渡期间，在设置阶段造成了一些轻微的压力/混乱。
-
The Q&A pace was well managed, allowing for thoughtful responses. 问答环节的节奏管理得当，为深思熟虑的回答留出了时间。
Classroom Interaction and Atmosphere 课堂互动和氛围
Energetic, supportive, and competitive, especially during the team preparation phase and the formal debate.
充满活力、支持性和竞争性，尤其是在团队准备阶段和正式辩论期间。
Achievement of Teaching Objectives 教学目标的达成
-
Objective 1 (Third Speaker Role) achieved through theory review and practice. 目标1（第三发言人角色）通过理论回顾和练习得以实现。
-
Objective 2 (Effective Rebuttal) achieved, highlighted by Daniel's successful concession-winning rebuttal. 目标2（有效反驳）得以实现，通过Daniel成功赢得让步的反驳突出体现。
-
Objective 3 (Teamwork) strongly achieved; the negative team worked very well together. 目标3（团队合作）得到有力实现；反方团队合作得非常好。
5. Subsequent Teaching Suggestions 5. 后续教学建议
Teaching Strengths 教学优势
Identified Strengths: 识别的优势：
-
Excellent modeling of the third speaker's summary/rebuttal structure. 对第三发言人的总结/反驳结构的优秀示范。
-
Effective use of video/external materials (teacher opinions) to stimulate critical thinking before the debate. 有效利用视频/外部材料（教师观点）来激发辩论前的批判性思维。
Effective Methods: 有效方法：
-
Immediate, low-stakes practice drills following theory instruction. 理论教学后立即进行低风险的练习演练。
-
Granting a key concession to the opposing team based on a strong argument, which served as excellent positive reinforcement for the student's skill. 根据强有力的论点向对手方做出关键性让步，这对学生的技能起到了极好的正面强化作用。
Positive Feedback: 正面反馈：
-
The teacher clearly praised the students' teamwork, recognizing their collaborative effort. 老师明确表扬了学生的团队合作，肯定了他们的协作努力。
-
High level of engagement shown by Daniel, Hannah, and Three throughout the session. Daniel、Hannah和Three在整个课程中都表现出了高度的参与度。
Next Teaching Focus 下一步教学重点
-
Students taking more responsibility for leading parts of the lesson/debate next week. 下周学生需要承担更多领导课程/辩论部分的责任。
-
Exploring both sides (affirmative and negative) of the next topic: 'Should every child have to join a sports club or team?' 探索下一个议题的正反两方面观点：“每个孩子都应该加入体育俱乐部或团队吗？”
Specific Suggestions for Student's Needs 针对学生需求的具体建议
Debate Protocol & Conclusion: 辩论规程与结论：
-
When concluding a speaking turn (especially as the final speaker in a team), use formal phrases like 'In conclusion,' 'Finally,' or 'I yield back to the chair' instead of 'I'm done.' 在结束发言时（尤其是作为团队的最后一位发言人时），使用“In conclusion”（总之）、“Finally”（最后）或“I yield back to the chair”（我将时间交还给主席）等正式短语，而不是“I'm done”（我完了）。
Speaking & Communication: 口语与交流：
-
Practice explicitly referencing teammates' points using phrases like 'As my teammate [Name] mentioned...' to reinforce team argument coherence. 练习使用“正如我的队友[姓名]所提到的……”等短语明确提及队友的观点，以加强团队论点的连贯性。
Recommended Supplementary Learning Resources or Homework 推荐的补充学习资源或家庭作业
-
Prepare initial arguments (two for, two against) for the motion: 'Should every child have to join a sports club or team?' 为下一议题“每个孩子都应该加入体育俱乐部或团队吗？”准备初步论点（正反各两个）。