Hi, Anne. Hi, George. Hi Jerry, hi mou. The platform wouldn't let me in. And how are you, George? Good. Are you good today? Yeah, what have you been up to today, George? 欧阳,我错了。Today I was. Which school did you play video games? I had music class again and I practiced my dance move, dance, dance move for my tennis show. Oh, amazing. What dance do you like? George? Are you a street dancer? Or like what kind of dance do you do? No, the teacher the teacher will. Like say what it does. That's accordi used to be a professional dancer and a professional actress. I used to tour around the world doing different dance shows. So I love dance. Yeah some very talented people in dance as well. Well done geand. How are you today? I had a sing class. You, we've got a dancer. We've got a singer. Oh my goodness. And what did you sing in singing class today? We seen some English songs always. Is you doing some English songs, like popular English songs or old fashioned English songs? I think it's popular. Popular. Okay, so you're doing some popular. Oh, I love this. This is really cool. Hi, Jerry. How are you today? I'm good. You're good today on what? Have you been up Tuesday? Have you been dancing and singing? No, I was going to school today. Just a school today, a normal day for Jerry. And that's okay. Dube, Yeah, we did all have to be dthe second singing moo, how are you? Mou? Mou, you're got in space. I don't know if you know, but you've gone to, you've gone moo, you're not, you're not on the earth. Are you okay? Yeah what planets are you visiting there? Mmu, I don't know me. I know Sattin. We've got Sattin with the ring. Look, okay. And how have you been today? Momu, have you had a good day? Yeah, Yeah. Oh, that's what I like to hear. I like to hear everyone one's had a nice day. Weldon. Jerry Weldon moving be well today, guys, we are going to be thinking about affirmative cases. So sort of what we kind of agree with, okay? How to be a sort of a first speaker, how to be on on a team, on the affirmative team, okay? So if we are on the agree team, the affirmative team, then we need to think about how do we develop this affirmative case. To give you a chance to practice today, we might change the motion, okay, because we might find it easier to change our motion slightly, which is fine to do. So today we're gonna to be thinking about a should debate. So when we're thinking of a should debate, we're thinking about a problem, okay? We're thinking about something that's wrong, all right? That we need to be fixed. And we're putting this case to maybe the government or our schools or to a group of friends or to work. Maybe we might use this in a work setting as well. And this idea that there is a problem that needs to be fixed, we need to change it. So we've got to think about a problem. We've got to think about a plan, and we've got to think about our points. Okay, what's the problem? What would you like me to do to fix it? Who do you want involved and points? Why? Yeah. How will your plan be good? Why is this problem a problem? So step one, a problem. Okay? We've got to think about what's wrong in the world and why it needs to be changed. So we've got one here. We should ban all plastic bags. Why annwhat is the problem with plastic bags? The if you throw the plastic bags through the ocean, the sea animals will like sometimes they will die either 100%. So we've got this idea that we've got this problem with ocean, the sea life. Yeah, well done, exnal George. What else is a problem with plastic bags? It will be a waste Yeah it's going to be a waste because it's plastic and plastic is hard to be. Hard hard to beat like. Her to be her to be something else again, recycled. Yes, George, it's going to be hard to recycle plastic. It's very difficult to recycle. Practice stic. Well then momu, what else is the problem with a plastic bag? You're on mute, muo. You've come back to earth, but you're on mute. I think that we couldn't use plastic bags because plastic bags it's hard to recycle recycle and that if we use plastic plaplastic. Bags that is very not healthy to our body, not healthy for ourselves. Okay, so a new one in there, not healthy for ourselves. Maybe we eat the fish that eat the plastic. Remember that, Jerry. What else is the problem with plastic bags? The plastic bags will make like those plants and those animals can't have a good place to live or something. Yeah because we tend to litter them, don't we? But but be honest, especially here, we tend to find a lot of litter on our streets and they tend to be plastic bags unfortunately. Okay, some good ideas all round. Excellent job. Okay, so let's all together, we are going to think about putting together our first part of our speech here as the affirmative team. Because when you're the first speaker, you will be the first person that talks about the motion. You can write your debate out, unlike the negative speakers or unlike your second or third affirmative speaker. Agree speaker, because you have to be rebutattling other people. Whereas as the first speaker with the motion, with a should debate, you can come with your speech ready. So we need to define it. We need to state what we're talking about. So we're going to use things like this. We're going to say, well, actually, George, what do I need to say first in my speech? Who do I need to say hello to or good evening to? The chair first and then the audience. And do you remember who else? Yes, yes, Jerry. Worthy opponent, a worthy opponents, excellent. And moom, what do I need to say? They, I need to tell us about our motions. Do I need to say what the motion is? Don't I? So what is our motion here for our agree team? Oh, you're on mute, Mimi. I think. It is that how the chair what your question is excellent. And what is our question today? Well done, Mimi. What is our question today, annn or what is our statement? There is the house bag. We a of bags perfect. Very, very well done. Okay, Jerry, I now need to define some terms in here. What do I mean by ban? What do we mean by ban? What as a team do we think ban means? Ban en, what does Ben here? What does ban mean? I want to ban an all plastic bags. Oh, they don't have any classistic bag by the use of web band. Well done. We want to get rid of all plastic bags in the world. And George, what is a plastic bag? What plastic bag are we talking about here? Unlike the ones that are plastic and it is their light. Should we say the world and plastic bag that can be recycled or plastic bags in the world and plastic bag means means ones that can't be recycled? Yeah, we're okay with the recycled plastic bags, aren't we? But we're not okay with the unrecyclable plastic bags. Okay, so here we have it. We have our first part of our speech. Jerry, can you read the first part of our affirmative speech, please? What's wrong in the world and why it need to to think. Can you see this? Chot, Jerry, so can you read our first part? So can you read our first part of our debate? Good evening here. Audience, audience and worthy, worthy opponents. Today, the affirmative team will be putting forward the motion that we should ban all plastic bags by the use of the world world. Ben, we want to get rid of all plastic bag in the world. And plastic bag means what? Means? Ones that cannot be recycle. Very well done. Thank you very much. Jerry, very nice. So add, I needed to change once to ones, didn't I? I type that rog and well done eagle eye. Okay, so we've got our first we've as a team we have now just written the first part of our speech now I need to think about the plan. Okay, so when I'm thinking about my first like again reiterating this is for the first speaker, okay. Your other speakers can't read. They can only do notes which we'll be looking at in the next couple of lessons. So our plan now we need to think about how we're going to fix this problem. So plastic bags are bad for the environment and they will kill will wildlife. Okay, momu, what should I do then? How am I going to ban it? What am I gonna to ask someone to do? How am I going to ban plastic baso? What am I going to do about it? Well, we can't hear you, Mimi. There we go. Okay, what could we do to ban plastic packs? We can, 嗯。We can get throw plastic bags so we can get through all so we can collect, we can collect the plastic bags that have been thrown away. Okay? So we could do that. We could clean up. George, what else could we do to ban plastic bags? We could say something to the president and put a lore in yes. Now you're talking okay. What could be the punishment for this lore, George? What could happen if someone uses a plastic bag or someone chucks a plastic bag or doesn't use it responsibly? What could the what could that law be? What could happen to them? Do you think prison, do you think a fine, do you think pay money, do you think just stop making them? Make it some and if they if they still use plastic bags and throw them, Thwing them away, maybe theyum need to pay money. They need to pay money. This is a gorgeous idea. Yeah, this is really gonna to stop people using that. Okay, so this is a good plan that we're thinking about. Okay, annwhat, could you think about for a plan, what other things could we do to ban them? What else could we ask in our speech? Like ask the police or other people to see who throws the plastic bag. And if we found that guy, we can like take he or her to. To the jail for for one to two days. Oh, okay. So not a long stint in jail, but just something enough to know that it was bad. Okay, Jerry, have you got any other kind of plans that we could do for this? Like stop making them and if make them if the if there are still some plastic bag, we need to like use fire to clean it. Oh, so if there are still plastic bags, we need to get rid of them completely. Okay, I will say though, Jerry, burning them can be very, very bad for the environment. Yeah burning toxic fumes come out of them and go into the air. That's why we can't really burn plastic, but maybe we could just do one day of burning it and then it would be gone, wouldn't it? And then maybe we could just not use them again. So that could be an option and get rid of all the plastic bags. What about if we made sure that all plastic bags were recycled? I could be a good plan, isn't it? Yeah. So any bags, any bags we do have, we should recycle into other cloth bags or clothes. You can use plastic for clothes these days as well. Okay, okay. Some good ideas from all of you, weldone. Let's put this then into our debate. Okay, so we need to put this into our debate. So and let's start with you. What could we say then? What could we say in our next sentence? So let's use some signposting. So firstly, we believe that and what plan, which plan should we talk about first? So firstly, we believe that we should. We should. Pick up the plastic bags who aren't in the rubbish can and put it in it to not in the rubbish can or we'll say the rubbish bin and collect them up from the streets. Okay, love this annthis is a really good one. Okay, George, we could say then secondly, what else could we put them? Secondly, our next plan we're offering. 嗯。Secondly, if. Who might we want to ask, whose help might we want to ask for? The president and what are we asking the president for? President for making rules for an I'm not using plastic bags and not making plastic bags any more, plastic bags for the public. Excellent, George. Fantastic. Okay, Jerry. Thirdly. Thirdly, I think that. The plastic bags can be reduced like to to. You make it to can be recycled, like making to be some models or like some clothes or some other things, not just using one time. We can use it a lot of time. Did more than once. Okay, excellent, Jerry. And then momu, what can we put as our fourth? Probably we've got a fourth. We can say fourth thly. Have a look up. These are all here for you, mumo. What else could we have? What about the police? What about this harshness of using the bags? What do you think, moo mo? We can't hear you if you're because you're on mute. Firstly, we think like to ask you to. The pilots or the other people to see who threw the plastic bags. And if we find them, we can take her or he to the jail for one or two days. Take her or him to the jail one or two. The look at this. Okay, George, can you read the second part then of our debate? Jerry, red office, but can you read the second part for us? Let's here if it makes sense for us as a team. Firstly, we believe that we should pick up the plastic bags, which are not the in the rubbish bin and collect them for the up front, the street. Secondly, we want to ask the president, president for making rules and not making any more plastic plastic bags for the public. Certainly, we think the plastic bags can be recycled to that they can be recycled to make some into some into some moclosings or other things, not just using one time, but using it for more than once. Firstly, we could like to ask you if the police or other people to see who throws the plastic bag. And if we find them, we can take you or her, not her or him, to jail for one or two days. Well done, guys. Beautifully read, George. Absolutely fantastic. So guys, we've managed now to think about our first address saying, good morning. Good evening. We've also then defined our motion. We have now given our plan. This is what we would like to happen using signposting. Shry, are you called. Jerry now looks like a marshmallow covered in in in his lovelies. Pink banker, you look very cozy, Jerry. It's called here this snow here, guys, we've got snow in the uk for the first time in a long time. So it's very cold here too. So I don't blame you, Jerry. Get get warm. Okay, now we need to think about our points, our arguments. We need to justify why we think this. So this goes back to those ideas of why it's a problem, okay, which is what you wrote in the beginning, or this idea, if we do not follow this plan, then more animals in the ocean are going to die from eating plastic. We also eat fish from the sea. And so we ourselves are eating the plastic they have eaten from the ocean. If we do not change this problem, then it is going to damage the environment, okay, and litter our streets. And then we want to have our in conclusion, Yeah in conclusion, I believe that we need to ban plastic bags as it is causing environmental problems and is affecting our health. Okay. Thank you for listening. So in this address now, you have created together a good morning, good evening, an opening. You have defined a motion. You've told us what the motion is. You've then told us what this word means, what you mean by this word. Then you've given me a plan, all of your signposting, firstly, secondly, thirdly, Fourthly. Then you've given me all the reasons why, the points, what will happen if you don't follow this plan, what will happen if you don't solve this problem? And then a conclusion, reiterating our point, making our point clear to the judges, to our chair, to our audience. Okay? And you're going to be using this today. I'm going to leave this on the board because you can use this in creating your arguments today, all right? Because everybody's going to be arguing on the affirmative side. We might change the motion because the motion is quite hard to argue a negative on an affirmative. So we might change the motion slightly. Okay. So what do we need to think about first? Jerwhen, we're thinking about our debate on an affirmative team on an agree case problem. Great, Anne. What do we need to think of next? We need to think about. What? What you plan, the plan? Yeah what are we going to do about it? What's the plan? And then, George, what do we need to think about. On the point again, points of the argument, the point of the argument, why are you arguing this? What will happen if you don't follow the plan? What happens if you don't solve this problem? Yeah. And that's a big thing. And it's very important to be on that affirmative case Yeah to understand all of the step three s mumi we can't see. So I don't know if you're there or not there. So just let us know when you've managed to get back into class. Okay, so today's topic, parents should be punished for their children's mistakes. Okay, something that we're going to be talking about today. So before I hear your opinion, let's have a little look at this video. Should parents be responsible for their children's actions? This will teach you to never shot plift again, kid. Dad, mom, lock him up. Goodbye. Huh? What's going on? Are they in there? Why? To pay for your crime? But it was my fault. My parents didn't do anything. We raised you like this son. You didn't know any better. No, I'm responsible. It should be me in there. No, we're responsible. It's our fault. Should parents be responsible for their children's actions? A powerful video, isn't it? So George and Jerry, let's have a little conversation. So what do you think, George? Do you think that parents should be punished? So he's stolen the bread. He made the mistake. But is it the parents fault? Ultimately, should they be punished for his mistake? What do you think? Yes and no. Okay, why why yes first then George, let's talk about why yes. Yes, because they I didn't say no when the kid did bad things. Okay? So yes, as they didn't say no to the child when they did bad things, okay. And why no, why do you think maybe it isn't the parent's fault? It because it is the children made the mistake. Okay. Okay. So kind of exactly how I think most people are going feel about this today on the umoo moon. Well, we can't hear you. I think I think it's a parent fault because the parent he. Is you went out, you came back game at. Yeah and she or he she or he give your life if you and that should be your parent is then that then will very love you that so if we got fathat our is our parents so it's parent fault as parents much so you think it's a responsibility because the parents must teach the children. Jerry, what do you think? I think it's no because of that is two days faeven the the those host parents teach them, maybe they will still, maybe they will still do the things that's not good that parents tell them, but they they still do the bad things. Okay, why do you why do you think that, Jerry, I think this is a good point. Why do you think that? Why do you think that even though parents will teach their children, children could still go on and do bad things? Why do you think that, Jerry? Because some some of those kids didn't listen to their parents. Okay. And and do you think there are just some children that find it more difficult to listen to their parents? Or Anne, I suppose, what do you think? Do you think that parents should be punished for their children's mistakes if they steal or if they're bullies? Do you think it's the parents fault or do you think it's the child's fault? I think it's the child. I think it's a the parents didn't didn't teach their kids to steal or do anything. It's the kids who want to steal. They didn't teach their children to say, okay, but George, what if I've got a bad parent? Not all parents are great, right? What if I've got a bad parent? What if this what if this child did learn how to steal from their parents? What if they were just copying their parents and what they were doing? Do you then think it may be, is the parents fault, or is this still the child? Could a child still learn not to do that? Oh, me saying parents, what do you think, George, if the parents stel, and then the child steals? Oh, go on, both. Me, what do you think, George? Both? And why think both, George? Because the parents the parents did it and not teach children to do that and if the children learn it, but but but he or she knows it's a bad thing and they shouldn't do it. Oh, okay, so there are other, I suppose there's other people teaching them, isn't it? Not just the parents teaching them. Okay, Jerry, what do you think? I think it's still the children's fall because their parents cannot like to make them do something. Only the children can make their to do something. Even those that parents did the bad things, they can learn from other good, other good adults, not even not their parents, other good. Okay, could you give me an example, Jerry, of some of those good adults? Like I didn't steal any things and very healthy and didn't like eunhealthy things. Hey, yes. What are the good adults? That's a good point, Jerry. What are the good adults are in the children's life? Who else teachadult teaches children? Is it just parents? And they can look and they can learn from the videos, videos, friends, teachers. Yeah. So not children don't just have birth. If you are living in a house where your parents are constantly doing mistakes or constantly doing bad things, that is quite difficult for a child to decide what is good and what is bad, right? And momu, you're talking that it's the parent's responsibility. Parents should be punished for what their children do. Do you think it depends on what age you are? Does it depend if you're 16 years old, say, is that still the parent's responsibility? Or do you think it's at a certain age? I think that 18 years afterwards, your parenisn't your parenfood because that times you're already an adult that your is yourselves and your parents t couldn't help you. Okay, that's a really good point, isn't it? Okay, so you think all the way up to 18 your parents should be punished for those mistakes. And George, listening to ane Jerry momu, which side do you think you're more on now? Do you think more? Yes. Or do you think more? No. Yes, you're more. Yes. Moo o, what do you think? George, you were? Yes and no. Jerry and Anna, no. Mumu's, yes. George, where are you? Do you think? Yes. Do you think no? Which one do you agree with more, George? No. You now with no Jerry and Anne have convinced you over in the no category. Well, guys, let's have a look at some of these really nice discussion. Well done. I'm bringing more bringing more examples to the table is really great. Yeah thinking about those other aspects of that debate today. Okay. So I just want to put some here agreeing with it. It is a parent's responsibility is the parents fault because if the parents discipline their kids properly, the kids will behave and follow the rules in society. At home, children should get respect and love from their parents. Yeah, we should feel safe. But some children don't feel safe. Some are led by bad examples. They're they're bullied at home. Yeah, they don't have a nice home life. And that leads them to doing bad things. Children are innocent theyjust probably what their parents do. I know, look at that. Children at home, even for good intentions, children might think violence can solve problems. If you're always hitting or smacking, maybe then you're always going to think that's okay, right? But we if we don't agree, maybe we've got to think. Children make mistakes because their minds are not developed. Yeah they don't know what they're doing. Parents can teach kids right or wrong, but some children still make bad decisions. Some children can't control their emotions or what they do. No kid is the same. Yeah so how are parents expected to teach their children right from wrong if some personalities, some ways that children are ungood? Yeah so thinking about those aspects today, okay, we're not gonna to have long to prepare today because we've already done banning plastic. So we're going to be utilizing our time to think about parents should be punished for their children's mistakes. Now I know where mumu is. Mumu is agreeing wholeheartedly with this statement. Mumu is on the affirmative team. And I know that Jerry and annn, you are very much on the negative team, so you will definitely participate on the negative team. Okay. And what we'll do is George, so George, are you happy to fight on the affirmative team? Are you happy to give that one a go? Or you feeling really that you're not very comfortable. Not comfortable, yes. What we saying? Yeah. Okay, so youprefer to go on the negative team. Yeah yes, okay, right, we'll pop you there. So then momu, I will come down and make the numbers up in your affirmative team today. Okay? So guys, what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna give you a few minutes to think about, I'm gonna go back to that page. You've got all of those notes, okay? And I want you to think about your debate and I want you to think about using this kind of structure so you can I'll leave on the board during the debate as well so you can see that. All right, Jerry, you will go first in the negative team, then it will be annn. And then George mumu, you will speak first on the affirmative team. So you will open our debate today and I will go second. All right. We're not gonna to have a huge amount of time. We are going to give you guys five minutes to get your debates ready. Okay. Are you ready? I've got to get my own debate ready now. Okay, your five minutes to prepare begins now. We'll be speaking for two minutes. I will not. I will only speak for one to make it fair. Okay, a teacher, can you the, can you put us to another classroom? Would you like to go to a breakout room just for four minutes? Absolutely I can. Okay, alright, let's do mumu singing here. Okay, right. Okay, moo moo, let's think what points are you going to make mu. Oh, you're on mute, mumi can't, can't. What they are doing now, they are talking in their negative themumu. So they're talking about the negative points. So what are we you going to say? What are you going to say? Mumu, what do you want to talk about in your affirmative. So, mumu, what do you want to say in your affirmative? Can you give me a pyes? I can give you a pen. Go on. But which points are going to make momu? So I know not to make the same points, so I want you to discuss it with me. Okay, it is the parent's fault as the parent is responsible for the child. Your parents love you a lot and they should learn and we should put and children should learn from them. Yeah so and children should learn from them. They can learn from other good adults. Yes, or put other good adults. Other good adults, such as who do you think these good adults are, mmo? Yeah such as who who's the other good adults? Who else? Guides children. I don't know. Oh, teachers mmo, should we say teachers? Yeah, Yeah. Okay. Should we put this down here then? So we should we put it into here? Because you're going to be the first speaker. So good evening, chair, audience and worthy opponents. Today, the affirmative team will put forward the motion that parents should be punished. Teacher, yes, this time, if the time is up, you can you that have those polbecause? I didn't write up. I didn't write, so I want you to. So it's fine. Momu, so here I am. I'm going write. I'm going write it here for you. Yeah. So by the word, so what do you mean by punish? What do you think the punishment should be then? Mumu, if it's the parents, but what punishment should they have? Go to the police should have to go to jail at the police station instead of their children. Okay? Okay, okay, so let's pull this down here. So I'm just going to make a copy of this. Excellent. So let's put that for your debate down here. Okay. And then you're going to say firstly, so we can put this down here, can't we? Firstly. So firstly, it's the parenfault as the parent or parenfault, let's make sure we've got this right. Parents fault as the parent is responsible for the child. Your parents love you a lot and children should learn from them, okay? Secondly, they can also learn from other good adults. Okay. What's going to be a third point, mmu? Third point, my else Steven parents. We'll get everyone in in a second. What else do we think children are innocent? Yes. So what should we say? Children are innocent. We will. I have copy, Jerry. So you write all of this that we speak. I want to like this the, which do you guys want to need to go to the I, this? Children so quickly mumi should we put in a quick? Should we put in a quick here an example. So why how are children innocent mumi for example, children are innocent because okay. Because that parent was their parent if there was 18 years old. But why are children innocent? Mumu that for example, children are innocent. Because why are children so innocent? Why are they good regardless? Why do you think it's the parents fault, not the children's fault? Why are children innocent? Because children is parent is their parents that parents need to be a good for their children because children of parents as because children need parents to be good to them for them to learn. And why do we think that children are innocent? Though? Maybe may, why do you think a child is innocent? That means that they're good. They do not think bad. Why do you think a child is innocent? Don't suggest their parents was their parent and there was just Yeah so parents you think that children just do what parents want them to do? Okay, and then we're going to thank you at the end. Okay, so momu you can have this I'll leave this on the board for you when you're speaking. Okay, well done momu. It's gonna to be a good debate isn't it right? I've got to go put my parents children copy parents children up until 18 are the parents responsibility. Okay so I'll talk about that moo okay, I'm just gonna to check on these guys are gonna bring them through hello gang we've got about 30s they're gonna to bring everyone back right here we go Anne's coming through George is coming through Jerry's coming through yes. Okay, right. I'm going to leave these things up on the board here just for anyone that wants some of those sliequally. When you come down to speak, if you need it on a particular slide or you need to move the slides, that's absolutely fine. Do what you need to do to be able to get through your debate. Okay, momo, you are going be opening our debate today. So momu on our affirmative team will be our debate. Mou, your time, which will be two minutes today is our speaking time guest George. Oh, I would not be. Can you turn up at the first slide of the of the negative? Can I write out the first line of the negative team for you? I can't put it on the strah. The first slide of the negative team is that we're were asking Yeah, yes, I can. Absolutely, George. Okay. Boo moo. Our debate today, parents should be punished for their children's mistakes. Affirmative. Speaker moo, your time starts now. Evening chair audience, and was today the affirmative team will be put forward the motion that parents should be punished for their children mistake by the puniish. We think that parents should have to go to the jail at the police station instead of the children. Firstly, is the parent faus, the parent is sible for the child. Your parents love you a lot, and children should learn from them. Secondly, they can learn from other good adults, such as teacher. Thirdly, child are innonotions and will copy what their parents do. For example, children are innocent because children need parents to be good to them, for them to learn. Children are in motion tion because they just do what their parents want them to do. Inclusion, the parents need to go to the jail for their children's mistake. Thank you. Thank you very much. Speak movery. Nice structure. Well done. Okay, our first speaker for the negative team is Jerry. Good evening, speaker Jerry. Speaker Jerry, I'm going to reset our timer of two minutes for our speakers today. Speaker Jerry, your time starts now. Look, okay. Good evening. Aand gentlemen, chair. Should we start again for you during. Teacher, what is how to, well, how to say this word? Audience. Audience, okay, okay, Jerry. Good evening, lady and gentlemen. Chair, an audience and worthy opponent. I am the first speaker of negative team. We believe that. The. The children we we believe parents shouldn't be punished for their children's mistake. Firstly, that children has their own mind. They didn't just like learn from their parents. Even sometimes their parents didn't tell them what is good, what is bad. Sometimes they were still do the right things, not the bad things. And if sometimes secondly, the children has didn't like just doing the things that their parents want them to do and their their parents sometimes teach them the bad things, but they can still learn from other ways, like learn from the videos, learn from other adults, like teachers or some other adult. Thirdly, that. Children make mistakes. On their mind are not divisible, probably in my in conclusion, I believe that we need to ban. We shouldn't, we should. Parents shouldn't be punished for their children. It's mistake. Well done. Speaker Jerry. Well done. Very brave. Jerry, you try to pack a lot into that speech, which was an improvement, okay, on bringing as much as you could and it did pay off, okay? May not be felt like it was flow, but I could see you were really trying to put some x information into this and negative. Speaker Jerry, very well done. Okay. Oh, affirmative speaker me, she's coming down. Here we go. I'm only going to have one minute. Okay? Affirmative speaker Lisa, good evening, everyone. Negative speaker Jerry has just spoken about children having responsibility for their own actions. We here on the affirmative team absolutely disagree with this due to the fact that parents are the influence for our children. Children copy what our parents do. Jerry talked about this idea that children are aware of their own mistakes and that it's hard to change someone's personality or behavior, but parents are responsible for ensuring that our children understand what is right and what is wrong. They must make sure that they are punishing their children in order for them to understand the mistakes that they are making so they don't make them in society. They should make sure that they are taking responsibility for their children up until they are 18 years of age. In conclusion, I believe that parents are to blame for their children's misbehavior. Okay, George, you are up next, our negative speaker. So George? Yes, Sam. Your anperoh, you're next to you. Oh, sorry, sorry, Anne didn't realize. Apologies. Apologies. I didn't realize youhad a conversation. Okay, so negative speaker Anne, your time starts now. Good evening, chair teacher. I can't see it. Oh, okay. You need to be there. Good evening, chair. Dance and words, opinions today. The team will be putting forward to the motion that parents shouldn't be be punished for the children's mistake. Firstly. The parents gave children good. The, the parents teach our kids right and wrong. But sometimes the children will choose a bad point, bad decision. They might not mean to, or they might regret it. But children need to learn from it. The phad, nothing to do with it. We wish we could be, and we wish we could. We can control children at their time. Secondly, because children, sometimes they didn't learn from their parents, good or bad, sometimes they learn from other people. And so if they learn from other people back, it isn't it isn't parents fault. So in conclusion, the parents wouldn't go to jail for their children. Mistasake, thank you. Okay, thank you very much. Negative speaker. Nice debate, nice structure. Okay, our final negative speaker is George who's gonna be closing our debate today at negative speaker. George, your time starts now. The a parents should not be punished for the chos's mistakes. First, the children made the mistakes and other parents. Second, the children might have learned it from other adults and other parents. I'm certainly they might not mean or they might regret it, but children need to learn from it. The parent had nothing to do with it. We wish we could. We can't control children all the time. I'm in conclusion, I believe, I believe that I'm parents should not be punished for the children's mistakes. Very well done, George. Absolutely fantastic. Well done all of you. Okay, you took this affirmative team. I know the negative team had to change that into a negative speech, but you addressed people today. You were brave at thinking about more than just one reason. All of your speeches were much improved. They were so strong. Tiny things I've put I've put in here. Wow, wow. Amazing. Nice structure. Loved it. So I've been writing, scribbling all over my bepaper today. And some things for all of you to think about them. These slides are great to use. Okay? And I do want you to use them, but just be mindful that Anne and George you use the same slide. Okay? So if you are gonna use the slide, just make sure you're not saying using the same slide Yeah maybe with three of you, one ders one, one ders two, one ders three and you think of your own arguments, okay? So just be mindful of that when you're working in a team. It was strong, nice vocabulary and what's amazing about this class is you didn't just do one debate today. You worked together to make two debates. You didn't critically think about one topic, you critically thought about two. You engage, you discuss, you all bring something Yeah to the discussions. And you are so polite in the way that you disagree with each other. It's a fantastic way of debating. Yeah winners today. We are the negative team welder, negative team. And George and Jerry, fantastic momu. Best debate you've done so far though. Okay, so don't take that them winning as anything short of you. Amazing stay as well. A Welden annweldon mumu Weldon George Weldon Jerry, next week. Have a look. A look. We'll do next week. Children should choose what they want to learn in school. Have a little thing. Thank you so, so much. You are all absolutely amazing. Have a wonderful week, guys. Well done. Thanks. Momms and dads in the background. Bye.
处理时间: 29138 秒 | 字符数: 37,932
AI分析
完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
"header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
"course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
"course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
"course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Debate Skills Practice",
"course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 辩论技巧练习",
"course_name_en": "1119 LS03DBA",
"course_name_cn": "课程 1119 LS03DBA",
"course_topic_en": "Affirmative Case Development & Debate on Parental Responsibility",
"course_topic_cn": "肯定陈述构建与“父母是否应为子女错误负责”的辩论",
"course_date_en": "Date not specified, inferred from context",
"course_date_cn": "日期未明确说明",
"student_name": "Anne, George, Jerry, Mou (Mumu)",
"teaching_focus_en": "Developing the structure of an affirmative debate speech (Problem, Plan, Points) and applying it to a 'should debate' motion.",
"teaching_focus_cn": "构建肯定辩论演讲的结构(问题、计划、论点),并将其应用于一个“应该辩论”的动议。",
"teaching_objectives": [
{
"en": "To understand and construct the three main parts of an affirmative case (Problem, Plan, Points).",
"cn": "理解并构建肯定辩论案例的三个主要部分(问题、计划、论点)。"
},
{
"en": "To practice defining terms within the debate motion.",
"cn": "练习界定辩论动议中的术语。"
},
{
"en": "To engage in a structured debate on the topic: 'Parents should be punished for their children's mistakes.'",
"cn": "就“父母是否应为子女的错误负责”这一议题进行结构化辩论。"
}
],
"timeline_activities": [
{
"time": "Initial Check-in",
"title_en": "Student Updates & Greetings",
"title_cn": "学生近况分享与问候",
"description_en": "Teacher checks in with students (George's dance practice, Anne's singing class, Jerry's school day, Mou's 'planet' situation).",
"description_cn": "教师与学生互动(George的舞蹈练习,Anne的声乐课,Jerry的学校生活,Mou的“星球”状态)。"
},
{
"time": "Main Lesson Start",
"title_en": "Introduction to Affirmative Case Structure",
"title_cn": "肯定陈述结构介绍",
"description_en": "Teacher introduces the structure of an affirmative debate case: Problem, Plan, Points.",
"description_cn": "教师介绍肯定辩论案例的结构:问题、计划、论点。"
},
{
"time": "Activity 1",
"title_en": "Brainstorming Problems for 'Ban All Plastic Bags' Motion",
"title_cn": "为“禁止所有塑料袋”动议集思广益问题点",
"description_en": "Students list problems associated with plastic bags (ocean life, waste, recycling difficulty, health).",
"description_cn": "学生列出与塑料袋相关的问题(海洋生物、浪费、回收困难、健康)。"
},
{
"time": "Activity 2",
"title_en": "Structuring the Affirmative Speech (Part 1)",
"title_cn": "构建肯定演讲(第一部分)",
"description_en": "Students practice structuring the opening: greetings, stating the motion, defining key terms ('ban', 'plastic bag'). Jerry reads the drafted opening.",
"description_cn": "学生练习构建开场白:问候、陈述动议、定义关键术语(“禁止”、“塑料袋”)。Jerry朗读了起草的开场白。"
},
{
"time": "Activity 3",
"title_en": "Developing the Plan for 'Ban All Plastic Bags'",
"title_cn": "为“禁止所有塑料袋”动议制定计划",
"description_en": "Students suggest plans to fix the problem (cleaning up, enacting laws\/fines, recycling into new materials). The plan is structured using signposting (Firstly, Secondly, etc.).",
"description_cn": "学生提出解决问题的计划(清理、制定法律\/罚款、回收成新材料)。计划使用提示语(首先、其次等)构建。"
},
{
"time": "Activity 4",
"title_en": "Introducing the New Motion and Initial Opinions",
"title_cn": "引入新动议并初步表达观点",
"description_en": "The topic changes to: 'Parents should be punished for their children's mistakes.' Students discuss initial 'Yes\/No' stances after watching a related video.",
"description_cn": "话题转为:“父母应为子女的错误负责”。学生在观看相关视频后讨论初步的“是\/否”立场。"
},
{
"time": "Activity 5",
"title_en": "Team Allocation and Preparation",
"title_cn": "队伍分配与准备",
"description_en": "Students are allocated to Affirmative (Mou, Teacher) and Negative (Jerry, Anne, George) teams. Mou and the teacher prepare the Affirmative case structure.",
"description_cn": "学生被分配到肯定队(Mou、老师)和否定队(Jerry、Anne、George)。Mou和老师准备肯定方的案例结构。"
},
{
"time": "Activity 6",
"title_en": "Debate Performance",
"title_cn": "辩论表现",
"description_en": "Four rounds of speeches occur: Mou (Affirmative Opener), Jerry (Negative Opener), Anne (Negative Rebuttal\/Point), George (Negative Closer). Teacher steps in for one affirmative speech.",
"description_cn": "进行了四轮演讲:Mou(肯定方开篇)、Jerry(否定方开篇)、Anne(否定方反驳\/论点)、George(否定方总结)。老师参与了一段肯定方演讲。"
},
{
"time": "Closing",
"title_en": "Feedback and Next Steps",
"title_cn": "总结与后续计划",
"description_en": "Teacher provides positive feedback on structure, vocabulary, and critical thinking across two debates. Next week's topic is introduced.",
"description_cn": "教师对涉及两个辩论的结构、词汇和批判性思维给予了积极反馈。介绍了下周的话题。"
}
],
"vocabulary_en": "Affirmative case, Motion, Rebuttal, Signposting, Litter, Recycle, Punish, Fine, Jail, Innocent, Responsible, Debate, Audience, Worthy Opponent, Define, Litter.",
"vocabulary_cn": "肯定案例, 动议, 反驳, 提示语\/衔接词, 乱扔, 回收, 惩罚, 罚款, 监狱, 无辜的, 负责任的, 辩论, 观众, 尊敬的对手, 定义, 乱扔垃圾。",
"concepts_en": "Structure of a formal debate (Problem-Plan-Points), Defining terms is crucial for clarity, Parental responsibility vs. individual accountability, Critical thinking in argumentation.",
"concepts_cn": "正式辩论的结构(问题-计划-论点),清晰界定术语的重要性,父母责任与个人责任的权衡,论证中的批判性思维。",
"skills_practiced_en": "Structuring argumentation, Public speaking (Debate format), Terminology definition, Teamwork in debate preparation, Expressing and defending opinions.",
"skills_practiced_cn": "构建论点、公开演讲(辩论格式)、术语定义、辩论准备中的团队合作、表达和捍卫观点。",
"teaching_resources": [
{
"en": "Whiteboard\/Screen notes for debate structure (Problem, Plan, Points)",
"cn": "用于记录辩论结构(问题、计划、论点)的白板\/屏幕笔记"
},
{
"en": "Video clip on parental responsibility for children's actions",
"cn": "关于父母对其子女行为的责任的视频片段"
}
],
"participation_assessment": [
{
"en": "All four students actively contributed ideas during the brainstorming and discussion phases.",
"cn": "所有四名学生在头脑风暴和讨论阶段都积极贡献了想法。"
},
{
"en": "Students actively managed team allocation and decided on their roles for the debate.",
"cn": "学生积极管理了团队分配并决定了他们在辩论中的角色。"
}
],
"comprehension_assessment": [
{
"en": "Students demonstrated a solid grasp of the P-P-P structure required for the affirmative team.",
"cn": "学生们对肯定方所必需的 P-P-P 结构表现出扎实的理解。"
},
{
"en": "Students could pivot quickly from the first motion (plastic bags) to the second (parental responsibility).",
"cn": "学生能够迅速从第一个动议(塑料袋)转换到第二个动议(父母责任)。"
}
],
"oral_assessment": [
{
"en": "Mou delivered a structured opening speech, though pronunciation challenges were present.",
"cn": "Mou 进行了结构化的开场演讲,尽管存在一些发音上的挑战。"
},
{
"en": "Jerry and Anne showed bravery and tried to incorporate many points into their limited speaking time.",
"cn": "Jerry 和 Anne 表现出勇气,并试图在有限的时间内纳入尽可能多的论点。"
},
{
"en": "George delivered a concise closing summary for the negative team.",
"cn": "George 为否定方提供了一个简洁的总结陈词。"
}
],
"written_assessment_en": "The teacher provided comprehensive written scaffolding on the board for Mou's affirmative speech, which Mou utilized effectively.",
"written_assessment_cn": "老师在白板上为 Mou 的肯定方演讲提供了全面的书面脚手架,Mou 进行了有效利用。",
"student_strengths": [
{
"en": "Excellent teamwork and politeness, even when disagreeing.",
"cn": "出色的团队合作和礼貌,即使在意见不合时也是如此。"
},
{
"en": "Mou demonstrated strong structural adherence during the debate preparation.",
"cn": "Mou 在辩论准备过程中表现出对结构的强烈遵守。"
},
{
"en": "All students engaged in critical thinking, considering various angles of the complex parental responsibility topic.",
"cn": "所有学生都参与了批判性思维,考虑了复杂“父母责任”主题的各个角度。"
}
],
"improvement_areas": [
{
"en": "Fluency and pace during prepared speeches for some students.",
"cn": "部分学生在准备好的演讲中的流畅度和语速。"
},
{
"en": "Ensuring unique arguments when working in a team (not repeating the exact same points, as noted by the teacher).",
"cn": "确保团队合作时论点不重复(如老师指出的,不要使用完全相同的论点)。"
}
],
"teaching_effectiveness": [
{
"en": "Highly effective in teaching debate structure through immediate application.",
"cn": "通过即时应用教授辩论结构非常有效。"
},
{
"en": "The transition between the two distinct topics was managed well, maximizing instructional time.",
"cn": "两个不同主题之间的转换管理得当,最大限度地利用了教学时间。"
}
],
"pace_management": [
{
"en": "The pacing was rapid, covering the foundation of a debate case and executing a full debate within the session.",
"cn": "节奏很快,在课程时间内涵盖了辩论案例的基础并执行了完整的辩论。"
},
{
"en": "Adequate time was provided for preparation, although the debate itself moved quickly.",
"cn": "为准备提供了充足的时间,尽管辩论本身进行得很快。"
}
],
"classroom_atmosphere_en": "Engaged, supportive, and academically rigorous, with a noticeable sense of collaboration.",
"classroom_atmosphere_cn": "投入、支持性强且学术严谨,具有明显的协作感。",
"objective_achievement": [
{
"en": "Objective 1 (P-P-P structure) was clearly taught and practiced with the first motion.",
"cn": "第一个动议清晰地教授并练习了目标1(P-P-P结构)。"
},
{
"en": "Objective 3 (Debate) was successfully executed, allowing students to utilize the learned structure.",
"cn": "成功执行了目标3(辩论),使学生能够利用所学的结构。"
}
],
"teaching_strengths": {
"identified_strengths": [
{
"en": "Excellent scaffolding and on-the-spot note-taking for Mou's affirmative speech.",
"cn": "为 Mou 的肯定方演讲提供了出色的脚手架和即时笔记记录。"
},
{
"en": "Effective use of a video to introduce a complex ethical debate topic.",
"cn": "有效利用视频引入了一个复杂的伦理辩论主题。"
}
],
"effective_methods": [
{
"en": "Using a review topic (plastic bags) to build the P-P-P structure before applying it to the main debate.",
"cn": "使用复习主题(塑料袋)来构建 P-P-P 结构,然后将其应用于主要辩论。"
},
{
"en": "Clear team assignment based on initial student opinions, maximizing engagement.",
"cn": "根据学生初步观点进行清晰的团队分配,最大化参与度。"
}
],
"positive_feedback": [
{
"en": "The teacher praised the students for engaging in two separate debates in one session.",
"cn": "老师表扬了学生在一个课时内完成了两次独立的辩论。"
},
{
"en": "Positive reinforcement on the students' polite manner when disagreeing.",
"cn": "对学生在不同意见时表现出的礼貌态度给予了积极的肯定。"
}
]
},
"specific_suggestions": [
{
"icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
"category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
"category_cn": "发音与阅读",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Jerry, practice fluent reading by focusing on connecting words smoothly, especially when delivering long points.",
"cn": "Jerry,通过专注于平滑连接单词来练习流畅阅读,尤其是在陈述长论点时。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-comments",
"category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
"category_cn": "口语与交流",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Anne, try to project your voice slightly more when speaking to ensure all parts of your argument are clearly heard.",
"cn": "Anne,在发言时尝试稍微提高音量,以确保你的论点的所有部分都能清晰听到。"
},
{
"en": "All students: When preparing for team debates, ensure each member brings a unique argument\/angle to avoid repetition.",
"cn": "所有学生:在准备团队辩论时,确保每位成员都带来独特的论点\/角度,以避免重复。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-brain",
"category_en": "Debate Structure\/Content",
"category_cn": "辩论结构\/内容",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "George, next time, clearly state which part of the speech you are currently presenting (e.g., 'My final point is...').",
"cn": "George,下次发言时,请清晰说明你目前正在陈述的是演讲的哪一部分(例如:“我的最后一点是……”)。"
}
]
}
],
"next_focus": [
{
"en": "Preparing for a debate on the motion: 'Children should choose what they want to learn in school.'",
"cn": "为动议:“孩子应该选择他们在学校想学什么”进行辩论准备。"
}
],
"homework_resources": [
{
"en": "Think about both affirmative and negative arguments for the topic: 'Children should choose what they want to learn in school.'",
"cn": "为主题“孩子应该选择他们在学校想学什么”思考肯定和否定的论点。"
}
]
}