1022 LS03DBA

已完成

创建时间: 2026-01-23 06:22:22

更新时间: 2026-01-23 06:33:05

源文件: f0.mp4

文件大小: 0.00 MB

字数统计: 37,343 字

标签:
暂无标签
处理统计

STT耗时: 28972 秒

分析耗时: 13 秒

处理流程
文件上传 完成

文件名: f0.mp4
大小: 0.00 MB

试听当前项目录音
URL直链 f0.mp4
时长: 检测中...
视频加载中,请稍候... (来自外部URL,可能需要较长时间)
语音识别 (STT)
完成
Hello hi how you. I'm great today. You're great today. Hi, moo. What have you been up to today? Al, today I went to school and I played tennis. You played tennis. Did you win? Yes did you how many how many sets did you do? Two, the two sets, were you playing against friends, classmates or a team? Classmates, classmates? Well, congratulations. I love a bit of tennis, although I'm more badminton. The racket for tennis is very heavy. It's a very heavy racket for tennis, whereas badminton's light. Hi, George. How are you? Oh, you're on mute, George. I can't hear you. Oh, well, no, I can't hear you now. I can lip read, but I can't hear. Yeah. It still says no microphone. Hello, mumi. Why you thought that? George, if you need you, my muslimind, Hey, there we are. George, how are you today, George? Good. Yeah. What did you do today? Did you go to school? Did you do any video games? I went to school and. Learn Chinese and English, Chinese and English today, were they good lessons? Yeah, Yeah. Do you like learning, George? I love, do you like learning fun subjects, George? Yeah. Are there some subjects you don't like? Okay, okay. You're allowed to like certain subjects are not like me, okay ay. Yes, how are you today, Mimi? It's very great. Because of today, we will school go to a autumn trip. We go to the song qling儿童中心。Was that? Is it a place? Was it a museum? Sounds really cool. Wow. So you had a good day. And we know a lot of things like we know song ling who is built this school. Oh wow. It was like a History Day. So you learn all of my history today. That's really cool. Yes. And in下午we go to the play a playground and play some。That place is a place we can play it called空城, the place you can play like a playground. Yes. That sounds really, really fun. I'd like to go as well. Well, wonder where George has gone anyway, where we'll start. George can enjoy it again. Right? Today we are thinking about different styles of debating. Okay? We're thinking about British parliament debate, public forum debate, world school debating, and Oxford style debating. Okay, we're going to have a look at some videos to start today to have a look at all these different styles of debating. So we're gonna to look first at world schools debate. Okay, so this is the style we're gonna to have a look at. So here we go. World school style, or wss, is the most popular style of debate internationally. It is used in the world championships and is the dominant format in multiple national circuits around the world. There are two sides called proposition and opposition. The proposition side supports the motion, which is the topic being debated, while the opposition side is against it. There is one team on each side. Teams are made up of three to five members, but only three individuals may participate in any given round. This means that the lineup can rotate. Think of it like having bench players during soccer. They're still part of the team, but they sit out some matches. The speakers are referred to as the first, second, third, and reply speakers of each side. The first proposition speaker defines the motion, then outlines their side of the debate and provides two to three constructive arguments. The first opposition speaker outlines their side of the debate, rebuts the proposition speaker's arguments, and provides two to three constructive arguments for the opposition side. The second speakers of both sides rebut the other sides arguments, provide one to two constructive arguments for their respective sides, and then defends their team's previous arguments. The third speakers refute their opponent's arguments and explain ined why their own team's arguments prevail. The third speaker may also provide new examples and information to clarify their team's previous arguments. The final two speeches of the debate are the reply speeches. These are delivered by the first or second speakers of each team and start with the opposition side. In this speech, the speaker kers summarized the entire debate in points of claache. The first six speeches are eight minutes long, and the reply speeches are four minutes long. World school style debate can be either prepared or impromptu. In tournaments, there is a mix of prepared and impromptu rounds. The winner is determined by an odd number of judges who will evaluate on content, style and strategy. Another feature of the debate is the point of information, or poi. Pois are short statements or questions that the opposite side can use to challenge the speaker. These can't be more than 15s each. Pois also can't be given during the protected time, which is the first and last minute of a speech. If a debater wants to give a poi, they will stand up and give an indication, such as extending a hand forward or saying point of information. It is up to the speaker delivering the speech to decide whether or not to accept the poi. If the poi is rejected, the debater who offered it should sit down immediately. Although they don't have to, speakers are strongly encouraged to accept at least one poi during their speech. Now you've learned the basics of how world school style debate works, but wss isn't the only style debate there is. Check our videos on the so let's go back to here very quickly. So this is the main thing we want to remember with the world competition debating. Okay, so there we go. So what happens? First speaker motion makes a point. Then the opposition do the same. Eight minutes. Don't worry, we're not at eight minutes yet. You'll not be expected to do eight minutes yet. That would be amazing, but not yet. Second speaker arguments, opposition speaks. Third speaker arguments, opposition speaks. Conclusion, final. The first or second speaker summarizes, says everything about the debate quickly. And then the the affirmative, the agreeting, the yes team will give their speech. And this is how it happens in competitions. Okay? So everybody knows how to do this one when they get to top top level of debating. Okay, George, why do you think we have to go? Yes, team, no team. Yes, team, no team. Yes, team, no team. Why do we need to do that? Why can't we just have all agree, all this gree, why do I need to swap over. What do you mean? Why do you think we don't just go agree, agree, agree, disagree, disagree, disagree? Why do we have agree team, disagree team, agree team, disagree team, agree team, disagree team? Why do we do it like that? Because if I'm just first to the. To to opposition one or the unoposite one. And take and take. Maybe they will I do after the all of the pothe team, the posite no, the speaker will think the opposite team is unoposite team, but they've got different opinions. Yeah and we call it moo moo because you've got your hand up. What do they need to be able to do? Eat after every speech? Think if one opposition speaker says that his or she's options and the yes speaker says and speakers will think, Oh, that I know what you going to do and I can do just just from. You. So I guess so the estor estcan easily win. Well done. So that's not fair. We need to be fair. So we need to one. Yes, why not fair? Well done. Maybe me because if if everyone on the agree team set their point, that's a lot. And then all the agree team, the agree teams arguments be the only ones we remember. So we must have agree, disagree, agree, disagree, agree, disagree. And what else might the other team want to do after a speaker has spoken? Maybe. It wants to. Like think some reasons to abate with the, we'll say it. Yes. Well, tin, I might want to rebuttle, the affirmative team may say something. And then as the opposite team is the disagree team, I might want to tell you why you're wrong in my speech. I wanna might want to change my speech. If everybody talks one after the other on the same team, then the other team won't remember and can't rebuttle you. They can't say, excuse me, sorry, George, what you've just said was wrong. Yeah, I wanna make my point. So that's why we have to swap over constantly, okay? Otherwise, we can't really remember what you said. And I can't fight you. I can't argue with you because your point has gone and I can't remember it. Okay? So it's so important that we have agrethen. Disagree, agree, disagree. Okay, and well done. Nice thoughts going. So let's have a look at our next one. This one is British parliament. Here we go. British parliamentary debate is the style of debate modeled after the traditions of the British parliament. The motion, which is what we call the topic that is being debated, is stated in the format this house dot dot. For example, this house would ban phones, or this house believes that food should be free. These can be abbreviated as thw or thbt. There are no limits on what the motion can be. So debaters could be debating anything from law and justice to economics or art. There are two sides, government and opposition. Government supports the motion, and opposition opposes it. There are four teams of two, two teams on each side. Each team is assigned to a position. There's opening government, opening opposition, closing government and closing opposition. Each speaker also has a name, an opening government, we have the Prime Minister and the deputy Prime Minister. In opening opposition, we have the leader of opposition and the deputy leader of opposition. In the closing government, we have the member of government and the government whip. In closing opposition, we have the member of opposition and the opposition. Wip, the order that the speaspeak in is Prime Minister, leader of opposition, deputy Prime Minister, deputy leader of opposition, member of government, member of opposition, government whip and Opposition Whip. Only one of the four teams will win, meaning that teams that argue on the same side are still competing against each other. The first, second, third and fourth place are decided by one or more judges. The head judge is called the chair and the other judges are called panelists. Prior to the debate, teams are randomly assigned to their positions. Sometimes the motion is released in advance, and sometimes it is revealed just before the debate. In the second case, teams only have 15 minutes to prepare their arguments, and speakers in each team can only confer with each other, not with anyone from the other teams. Digital devices and access to the Internet are also not allowed during prep time. During the debate, each speaker has seven minutes to speak. The opening government defines the motion, provides arguments for their side, and the second speaker rebuts arguments made by the other side. The opening opposition rebutts the opening government's arguments, and then they provide arguments for their side. The closing government provides further arguments in favor of the motion that are different from, but consistent with, arguments made by the opening government. The second speaker then summarizes the entire debate on behalf of the government side. The closing opposition provides further arguments against the motion that are different from, but consistent with, arguments made by the opening opposition. The second speaker then summarizes the entire debate on behalf of the opposition side. So guys, let's go back to this image here. So something to say, if you have time to prepare your debate, then you can use laptops, Internet research, expert opinion, parents, maybe you've interviewed friends, but if you are in a debate at the competition, they will give you an envelope, they will give you the motion, and then you cannot use any research. Okay? So you have both styles of debates, okay? In this debate there are four teams, team one, team two, team three, team four, okay? And they have to argue against each other, okay? And this is what we call parliament. And parliament, government law is done in this country and you can watch it on tv in this country every Friday. You can watch on television the debate in the houses of parliament. And we see this every Friday if we want. You don't have to watch it. Okay? So Anne, why do you think they have four teams? So why is there not just two teams here? Why do they have four teams? Because they need one. First two teams who debate and the next two teams, they this is the other team is wrong. Why? And the other team said this team is wrong. Why? Very well done. Yeah, they are sort of furthering the argument. Okay, however, these two teams opening government, closing government are on the same side, but they can't confer Yeah they can't talk to each other. Yeah they they won't know that. They have to make change their debate depending on what the other team have said. That's really difficult. Yeah, well done. Now and George, why do you think it's important that the government debates? Why do you think this is an important thing to do? Oh, you're on mute. We can't hear you. I bet it's a good answer, though. If so, it's a very bad thing. And. And some other people says yes, and some of the people says no. The government needs to figure that out and they can use the ate to solve it. Yeah have very, very, very well done doin our country. Each town, each city has its own person that debates in government. So we tell them we hate something. They take that to London and debate it. Okay? That's how our country works. All right? So it's really important. Yeah, it's a great way of finding out whether it's a yes or no. Yeah. Well, o, what do you think can be really difficult when debating in this way? What's difficult about this debate? Think difficult is because we need to be 14 and we need the we need to just 11. You need to listen to others ideas and you need to text others ideas. Well done. You've got to remember what they're all saying. That's a very nice desk, George. It's a very lovely desk. Should we turn it round? Well done. Well done. We move. Okay, right. Our last style here is the Oxford style. So here we go. The Oxford style format works like this. There is one stated resolution. It's called emotion. One side argues for emotion. The other side argues against that motion. They can interrupt each other during those sections. But then there is a time for rebuttal. And finally, a closing summary statement. That style requires the candidates to go in deep, to develop their ideas, to defend their positions, to attack their opponent's positions. But it's all about substance. Is it even possible to learn about a candidate's policies in a two minute statement and a 30s rebuttal? We voters deserve better. These are long debates, and they are used when we are voting for presidents, for prime ministers, the laws, for competitions. Okay? And they will prepare, they will research, they will prepare long speeches. You have three chairs. Well, this is the chairman. Hello, chairman. Then we have three people who can vote, but in this audience can vote as well. And the audience are listening. We're not going to watch all eleven minutes. I do want you to see a debate in action. This is the affirmative team. Here we go. The motion is, this house believes social media corrupts human interactions. And I now look to Jack Simmons, Standing Committee, Lady Margaret Hall, to open a case for proposition, so that there is the chair tells us our motion and asks the speaker to come up. Thank you, Mr President and thank you for having me as one of your guest speakers this evening. I would like to start by saying that I am most certainly not against social media. Any one of my friends or followers will tell you that I am certainly not averse to the semi regular Instagram post, Facebook upload or even SnapChat story. Perhaps even more importantly, as an Australian student, social media allows me to effortlessly stay in contact with my friends and family around the world. More importantly still, social media acts as a positive implication for many people living in developing countries, and some of the world's largest social media companies are at the heart of these positive changes. Facebookinternet dot org, for example, has given Internet access to over 25 million people around the world who have been able to reap the many benefits that the Internet provides. These people live in countries ranging from Kenya to Colombia, and the program is only in its first two years. Social media gives a voice to the people. It allows us to fight for what we believe in. It keeps people safe, and it allows us to create a movement in the name of what we think is right. But the fact of the matter is that the motion put before the house tonight is not about the benefits of social media. It is not about whether or not the Internet is good or bad. The motion put before us tonight is about the impact that social media can have on our interactions, on our relationships and on each and every one of our lives on a deeply personal level. Okay, moo, what do we notice about the way he is speaking? We know that he is speaking. Yes. Yeah. And how is he speaking? Is he speaking like this and telling us all the information that he needs to tell us really quickly? Because we need to make sure that we've got a lot of time in how is he speaking slowly? Because if he speak like you so fast, the I won't hear clearly. People won't hear it. I'm not going to hear what he's saying, George. What about the way he's looking at the audience? Why? How is he presenting it? He is. Looking at the audience, why is that a good thing to do when debating? Because when you're debating, you don't look at the. The people sitting down there, you won't, are you? And maybe you won't get respected. Well, I think that's a great word, George. Yes. Why? Because they think that you are not polite, tunot polite, but also it's it's going to make people want to listen to you, right? Because if I'm like this and momove and George, if I deliver my big debate by this, okay. And I say, I think that social media is a really bad thing. I can't see anything. Yeah using your hands, using your face. Yeah I want you to agree with me. I'm trying to persuade you. I want you to agree. So I need to show you as well. Yeah, respect. I like that, George. That word up. Respect. And what do you think is the most important thing that these people, the chair, those are sitting, those that are in the audience, what's the most important job they have? What do they need to do? Oh, you're on mute. They need to, they need to know that what is saying, what is saying, these people done this person, and what might I need to do? But you need to write. How is he doing? Excellent. Why also might I be writing? Why else might bobe listening? You need to listen. Is he right? Excellent. I might want to ask him a question. I might forget what he said through his whole speech. I can go back and I can be like, I made a note. I didn't agree with that, or I did agree with that. You, as an audience, have to vote. You've got to be listening. Yeah, well done mmo, George. And and fantastic. Yeah. Okay. Well, debbaters, we've seen lots of different debates today, lots of styles for us to practice. Also other styles we will do that will practice the skills. Okay, that won't quite feel like we're doing a well debate, but we'll be practicing those skills. So we've looked all these as been going along right today. Do you have to win to be successful? And let's hear from you first. Do you think you have to win to be successful? I don't think so. Because if you if you it's no matter. The matter is what you feel about it. Okay. What do we want to get out of it? What do we want to feel? We want to feel like. How do we want to feel if we don't win? Yeah. How might we feel if we don't win? We could feel disappointed. But what else could we feel if we don't win? We can feel that it's okay. When we lost, we last. Next time we'll do better. Excellent. So we want we want to strive to be better. That's a really good, good idea. George. Agree with Anne. Disagree with Anne. What do you think. No, because if you are not successful, you could still have fun if we are not six and do you think that's important? Yeah, okay. When do you think this is important? What kind of things can I have fun losing in? When could I still have fun? My youth think you tried your best. You have to do all best. Okay? Sports. Maybe you're thinking about sports, couldn't we? And muu, what do you think you agree with George and Anne? Or do you think something different? You're on mute mimo. We can't hear you, mimo, Hey. Come on, I agree with that because we, I think we don't need to rain. We just need to be yourself and to better than the last one, and you will get to win some day. Itwin someday. Okay, so so we learn from our mistakes, right? But but guys, guys, right. I'm sorry, but if I'm race, okay, I'm in a running race, I'm in a sacack race, I'm in a an Olympic race and I lose, then I'm not successful, am I? Because the whole point of being in a race is for me to win, isn't it? Oh, George, come, mm. No because you. Because you can still like what you did and are. Fun. I'm in a race, though, George. Is it the point to win? Why do you think it can still be helpful? Why do you think it can still be fun, even if I didn't win it? If you didn't, if you didn't, when it use, you still could improve. I could do better next time maybe. Okay, that's a good point. Momu. What do you think? I think that we don't win. It's fine because I say it a loose is I think loose can be very helpful to our next race because if this race you win, then you maybe some people can be very. Just. Very thhi. I'm in my class, I'm the greatest people, I'm am very great. So you need to listen to me and if you lose, you can be a great and great. You can PaaS the next of people. So Oh, we can be helpful to others if we lose and have to learn how to win. Oh, that's a good point as well as it. And what do you think? Okay, man, if I'm doing a test though, okay, an examination, don't I have to do well, then I have to win that exam to be able to get a better job, to be get able to get a better career, a better education, then I need to do well. Like I can't, I can't fail my exams. You can do your best and if you lose, you, you you cannot care because those make you want to learn. And and lose is not it's not because it's not the same that you your life is losing. It's just this test. Lose. Maybe next time you will win. Hey, so we can learn from, okay, I'm hearing this, learning from our mistakes, all that. Okay, wonderful. Let's not think about the other side. Why can winning be successful? What can be successful about winning? Let's put some ideas to start. So winning can help people to achieve their potenals. Do you think that is correct? Do you think winning can help people get somewhere faster? No, no one thinsays maybe right. George, why do you think maybe. Because sometimes you can. Note what your the that and improve and improve on a yes, if I'm in a competition and I know I'm really good at chess and I know I can win then I'm gonna to win the next one I'm gonna to be in a bigger competition I might like might win more money I might become a professional chess player. So winning at times can mean successful okay and what do you think winning can help people get to their their job, that their their favorite job? Winning can mean I can pick what job I want. Maybe sometimes, if your task is good enough, you can choose the school or your work. Okay, that seems like a positive for winning here, getting to choose your education, getting to choose your job. Okay, okay, okay. And winning mumu can make me confident, can make me feel good. Isn't that important? No, Oh no, why mumi? Why is that not important? Because if you lose, you maybe can got just. Not very good jobs, but you can still get jobs and if you do very well, you maybe can do a better job even if you okay. So but I will say that winning can make us confident, okay, can make us feel good about ourselves at times. Yeah. Okay, nice discussions. Well done with right. I've got a feeling all of you want to be on the disagree team to on the disagree of this today so we're going to have to do my randomizer to work out who's gonna to join me on the affirmative team. Okay, so let's get my randomizer out. So make it fair. Okay here we go. Right we ready wish your sunluck here we go ou okay I'm going to do it three times. An and well that wasn't very helpful was it? Everybody's name game and Yeah, let's try this again. So H H H H O blah and George, it's just it's just not gonna it's just giving me everybody say what am we going do? Oh no, Oh dear, we may right okay, I know what we're gonna do mimu can you give me a number between 16? 44George, can you give me a number between 16? That's not four? Do, did you say? 55 and an what number you picking? Three. Okay, right here we go. Ready? Six, I'll two. 44 miu mimo, which side would you like to go on? Negative. You want to go on in. Of course you want to go on the negative side. Okay, let's see if he's going get the next choice. Six, four, four. It's lots of falls coming out today. Mumi, did you make this into your dice? Did you? Five. George, you get the vote next. Where would you like to go? Affirmative or negative? Affirmative. You want to go? Firmative, George wants come with me. Do you say me negative and you get to be with me though? We're gonna make a great deal. Okay, so Anne will go on to the affirmative team with me. Okay, so what's gonna happen is we're gonna have the first speaker which will be myself. I'll open today's debate. Okay? And then mumu you will speak and then George then and you will speak and then George you will speak. Okay, so I'm going to give us all about four minutes, okay, to get our speeches ready. Mou and George, would you like some time to talk to each other? Should we talk tweeter? Okay, only in English name momu. I am still hearing, I can still find out. Okay, I can still see you. All right, let's pick into the baup and you only have four minutes. We don't have a huge amount of time today because we've had so many different varieties to learn today. So annyou're gonna stay in here with me. George and mumu gonna go chat. Okay, I'm going to go set them up then an and I'll be back. But we're going to talk about our strategy as well, right? Hello, I'm not staying. Don't worry. So there's yours. Think about who's going to speak about what. Yeah. Okay. Your time is on. I'll be back in English only. Thank you, please. And what we're going to talk about, what should we talk about? Okay. Should we have a look at our notes? Sorry. And it made you really big. Should we have a look on notes we have? Okay. So we haven't got a huge amount, but we can still talk, can't we? Let's have a little should we use a bit of research together quickly? Have a look. So okay, winning is a chance to be successful. Why let's put it in. Let's what see sa. Okay, right, here we go. So we've got increases confidence. Okay, why do you think it increases confidence? What can we say? Because in my opinion, winning is successful. We say winning means means we are successful. Okay. Are so saying first because first because. When if you win, you you can feel like you're very good. And next time you have very, should we say confidence? Yeah confidence to win. Future challenges. Okay, future change. What else would you like to talk about? We've got reinforces skills that means like we can practice our skills, motivates us. We've also got gets us the right job and we can learn quicker. Which other one would you like to talk about you that if you had a test to choose a job or a school, if you if you wind, you can choose what you want to learn or what you want to do and then you you will sometimes if you choose a good job or school, you have you you will be sometimes you can be famous, a good school and could even even be famous and have success that way. Oh, Yeah, excellent. I love that. Okay, right. What should I talk about annn? Let's think about I'm gonna just check on the other group. I'll be back, okay? How we doing? I just love that. Good. Okay, I'll be back. Okay, wonderful. So what shall I talk about? Annso, we don't talk about the same things, shall I? Oh, should I talk about the. It's a positive. It makes us feel good if we win. Shall I talk about that? Yeah. It makes us feel good to win something. And then and then it motivates us, motivates us to keep going. Okay. And what other points shall I make? Annwhat else do you think would be good for our team to talk about. Should we think about something they might say that we could rebuttle, that we know we could rebuttle. They're going to talk, aren't they, about losing races and it being successful? Should we say, like, but the whole point of a race is to win it. We don't enter a race to lose, do we? Not at professional level. So should we say something like at times we need to win, like at the Olympics to be successful for our country? Shall I talk about that? I think that's a good argument. Yes. A country and a country they fight and you need to win for the country and our country we are trying to win to showcase our talent. Yeah. Getting the gold medal, the biggest thing, isn't it? Otherwise, why are we doing the Olympics? Yeah. Okay, right. I feel like we've got it. And do you want to take a picture or anything of your debate here that we've written? Yeah joit before I send everybody in, and I will quickly make a note of what I'm going to talk about as well. It makes us feel good to win something, then motivates PaaS at times. We need to win like the Olympics. Okay, should we grab them? We'll bring them all in back again. Pwhat, how are we doing? Okay, I'm going to bring us all back together. We're about to do our debate. Here we go. Hey wow mome and George I hope you worked well together. I need to cover up mine and an's discussions okay so you're gonna have mimoo, we're gonna have George, you're gonna put two minutes I'm not going to speak for two minutes I will speak for less let's speak quicker okay and think quickly as well because it's my language okay so yes George so will I speak at the last one if if that's what you and mumu have decided, have you decided which order you would speak? Okay okay okay okay so miwe'll go first George will go I'll go first then momu, then Anne, then George Yeah okay I will also packack to chair as best I can okay right I will only have a minute and 20s I speak faster that I can think quite a bit quicker as well okay so it's only fair that I don't speak as long. Alright, okay. Kido, welcome today's debate. Our motion today is do you have to win to be successful? Speaker Lisa on the affirmative team, your time now starts. Good evening. Welcome to today's debate on do you have to win to be successful? And here with my fellow teammates, annn, we do believe that yes, you do in certain circumstances, need to win to be successful. Firstly, it makes us feel good. We're able to feel confident that we've done something right, that we're able to be good at something, a subject, an activity, and therefore, it motivates us to do better next time. It makes us want to continue. If you're always losing, it doesn't motivate you to keep doing the task. Secondly, at certain times, like sporting events of things like the Olympics, all Olympians are working towards winning a gold, silver or bronze medal. Without these medals, we cannot not show our Olympic brilliance against other countries, and therefore, winning is the only way to be successful. When you win, you get to be an Olympian forever, and therefore, we believe that winning is the only way to be successful. Thank you for listening. Okay, thank you very much, speaker Lisa. We are now going to the negative team for speaker mumu. Speaker mumu, your two minutes begins now. Everybody, good evening. Welcome to our debate. And I think we if you losing, you couldn't be scared or that's not successful because firstly, it doesn't matter if you don't. It's about how we feels about it and what we have learned. Seconyou can still be successful ful even if you didn't win the race. And this is my reason. Thank you, everybody. Thank you very much. Speaker mumu, we're now going back to the affirmative team over to our speaker Anne, and you now have two minutes to rebuttle mumu. In in my, in my opinion, I think that winning means successful. First, because if you win, you you can feel good and next time you will have confidence. Secondly, that if you, if you exactly, if, if you, if you have a competition for for a future challenge, you, if you are go, if you went, you can choose that your work or your school. Sometimes, if you choose a good work or a good school, you sometimes can be famous. Isn't that good? This is my opinion. Thank you. Thank you very much. Speaker Anne. We are now going over to our final speaker today of George on the negative team. George, your two minutes begins now. You're on mute, George. Your bill? There we are, George. Your time. I think you don't need to win to be successful. Firstly, you are not. He's been interrupted in this debate kind. Firstly, if you are not successful, you will you still have funds. Secondly, if you win successful, you will be too proud and think you are the best. So when you really race with people who are really good at in your loops because you are too proud, in conclusion, I think you don't need to win to be successful. Thank you very much, speaker George. And we are going to slightly open. I'm just going to go into my chair position. I'm just now going to ask for some of the speakers in today to answer some questions, furthering their debate. And momu, you talked about this idea of that we can practice or losing can also mean we have fun. Can you explain why losing can also be a successful thing for us? Why is losing also a good idea? Plus, I think losing is a good idea that if you today lose and you have some. You have some take you don't know that you know now so if you the next test you write this thing and you can write right that you can get weight. So I think if you this one don't win that's no problem. Hey, thank you very much. Speaker muo and speaker Anne, a question for you. You talked a really good example today about the extreme positives of choosing your school. Do you think being winning means we can get better jobs? Do you think if we win, annwe can get better jobs and more money? What do you think, Ken? Oh, you're on mute. You're sit on mute. I think it's something going with the ondear sound. You're on mute, Dan. We can't hear you. It just says you can't hear you and e, we can't hear you. There we go, right? Go on. If you need to choose a school or job, you, you you have to do a test. And if your tests were very good, you can choose what you want to do or what you want to learn. And if you are good at this thing, some you can be a person who is doing that or a person who is very famous. Okay, thank you very much. And finally to speak, George. My final question today, George and George, can you give me an example of a time when not winning was a good life lesson? Yes, because it teaches you not to be too proud. Or. It teaches you that under there are. People that is more a better than you. Yeah it teaches us to be balanced to learn what we're good at and what we're not good at. Okay, thank you very much. We've come to the miwe always saw your hand but we have come to the end of our time. Well done guys. Wow. And you were able to do your chaering. Okay, so we're now gonna quickly vote. Do you have to win to be successful? Did the affirmative team change your minds? So who is voting for the affirmative team today? Hands up for the affirmative team. Oh, hands up for the negative team. If you think the negative tea's argument, it's the right argument. Doesn't mean our argument was Banan, just means that maybe their argument was right. Yeah, I'm kind of going with the negative team was right. Well, the negative team today, Yeah, I think it was an easier argument was there. It was a hard argument for us. And well done very, very, very quickly. And moo, nice address, nice presentation, nice teamwork. Expand your answers now. Momu, I'm going to talk next week about examples. Okay, I want you to get examples. Your into your speeches, you were clear. You were not too quick. It was beautiful. And I loved your example. I loved you talking about the extreme positive safor. You, I want to think about expert opinions now. We'll talk about that next week. George. Nice preparation again. Nice teamwork. Everyone's nice teamwork. And bless you out to work with the teacher. That can be hard. So well done, Anne. Nice teamwork. George. Yeah, nice reasons, nice arguments. I want you to expand your examples as well. Every single question was answered brilliantly. Yeah, I am so proud of all of you. Well, well done. Excellent debating. Best debate yet. I dyou okay, next week. The more you have, the happier you are. Think about reasons. Think about two or three reasons for both sides of the argument. Okay, you will be chairing next week as well. Okay, so lots of new things to learn. Modern don moo me, modern Don George, modern don Anne. Have a wonderful week. Well, the new superstars. I'll see you soon. Bye.
处理时间: 28972 秒 | 字符数: 37,343
AI分析 完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
    "header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
    "course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
    "course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
    "course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Debating Styles Introduction",
    "course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 辩论风格介绍",
    "course_name_en": "1022 LS03DBA",
    "course_name_cn": "1022 LS03DBA 课程",
    "course_topic_en": "Introduction to Debate Styles (WSS, BP, Oxford)",
    "course_topic_cn": "辩论风格介绍 (WSS, BP, 牛津式)",
    "course_date_en": "Date not specified in transcript",
    "course_date_cn": "日期未在文本中明确提及",
    "student_name": "Mimu, George, Anne (Implied participation)",
    "teaching_focus_en": "Introduction and comparison of World Schools Style (WSS), British Parliamentary (BP), and Oxford Style debating formats, followed by a practice debate on 'Do you have to win to be successful?'.",
    "teaching_focus_cn": "介绍和比较世界学校风格 (WSS)、英国议会式 (BP) 和牛津式辩论赛的格式,随后进行关于“你必须获胜才能成功吗?”的模拟辩论。",
    "teaching_objectives": [
        {
            "en": "To introduce the main structural components of WSS, BP, and Oxford debating styles.",
            "cn": "介绍世界学校风格、英国议会式和牛津式辩论赛的主要结构组成部分。"
        },
        {
            "en": "To practice active listening and argument structure through a short practice debate.",
            "cn": "通过简短的模拟辩论练习积极倾听和论点构建。"
        },
        {
            "en": "To understand the importance of structure (e.g., alternating teams) in effective argumentation.",
            "cn": "理解结构(例如,交替的队伍)对有效论证的重要性。"
        }
    ],
    "timeline_activities": [
        {
            "time": "Start",
            "title_en": "Warm-up and Student Updates",
            "title_cn": "热身与学生近况分享",
            "description_en": "Teacher checks in with Mimu and George about their day; initial technical difficulty with George.",
            "description_cn": "教师与Mimu和George交流他们一天的活动;George最初出现技术问题。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Segment 1",
            "title_en": "World Schools Style (WSS) Introduction",
            "title_cn": "世界学校风格 (WSS) 介绍",
            "description_en": "Video\/lecture segment explaining WSS structure (Proposition\/Opposition, speaker roles, POIs, timing).",
            "description_cn": "视频\/讲解环节,解释WSS结构(正方\/反方、发言人角色、信息质询(POI)、时间控制)。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Discussion 1",
            "title_en": "Discussion on Debate Structure Fairness",
            "title_cn": "关于辩论结构公平性的讨论",
            "description_en": "Teacher probes students on why teams must alternate (agree\/disagree) rather than speaking sequentially.",
            "description_cn": "教师引导学生讨论为什么队伍必须交替发言(同意\/不同意),而不是按顺序发言。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Segment 2",
            "title_en": "British Parliamentary (BP) Introduction",
            "title_cn": "英国议会式 (BP) 介绍",
            "description_en": "Explanation of BP format (4 teams, 8 speaker roles, THW\/THBT motion format, prep time).",
            "description_cn": "解释BP格式(4队、8个发言人角色、THW\/THBT动议格式、准备时间)。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Segment 3",
            "title_en": "Oxford Style Introduction",
            "title_cn": "牛津式介绍",
            "description_en": "Brief overview of Oxford style, emphasizing depth, substance, and audience voting.",
            "description_cn": "牛津式简介,强调深度、实质内容和观众投票。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Discussion 2",
            "title_en": "Debating Success vs. Winning",
            "title_cn": "辩论中的成功与获胜的讨论",
            "description_en": "Class discusses whether winning is essential for success, focusing on learning, effort, and motivation.",
            "description_cn": "班级讨论获胜是否是成功的必要条件,重点关注学习、努力和动力。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Practice Debate Setup",
            "title_en": "Team Formation and Preparation",
            "title_cn": "队伍组建和准备",
            "description_en": "Motion set: 'Do you have to win to be successful?'. Teams formed (Affirmative: Teacher, Anne; Negative: Mimu, George). Students prepare for 4 minutes.",
            "description_cn": "动议确定:'你必须获胜才能成功吗?'。队伍组成(正方:老师、Anne;反方:Mimu、George)。学生准备4分钟。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Practice Debate Execution",
            "title_en": "Mock Debate & Q&A",
            "title_cn": "模拟辩论与问答",
            "description_en": "Teacher chairs the debate (Affirmative speaks first, then Negative, then Rebuttal, then Final Summary). Followed by Points of Information (teacher acts as judge).",
            "description_cn": "教师担任主席进行辩论(正方先发言,然后反方,然后反驳,最后总结)。随后进行信息质询(老师充当评委)。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Conclusion",
            "title_en": "Feedback and Wrap-up",
            "title_cn": "反馈与总结",
            "description_en": "Teacher provides positive feedback on teamwork and structure; sets homework focusing on generating arguments.",
            "description_cn": "教师对团队合作和结构给出积极反馈;布置作业,重点是生成论点。"
        }
    ],
    "vocabulary_en": "Motion, Proposition, Opposition, Constructive arguments, Rebuttal, Reply speeches, Point of Information (POI), Protected time, British Parliament, Government, Opening Government, Opening Opposition, Closing Government, Closing Opposition, Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, Chairman, Panelists, Resolution.",
    "vocabulary_cn": "动议 (Motion),正方 (Proposition),反方 (Opposition),建设性论点,反驳 (Rebuttal),总结陈词 (Reply speeches),信息质询 (Point of Information, POI),保护时间 (Protected time),英国议会式,政府方,开篇政府,开篇反对,结束政府,结束反对,首相,反对党领袖,主席 (Chair),评委 (Panelists),决议 (Resolution)。",
    "concepts_en": "Debate structure comparison (WSS vs BP vs Oxford); The necessity of alternating teams for fair rebuttal; Defining success beyond winning; Persuasive speaking techniques (eye contact, gesturing).",
    "concepts_cn": "辩论结构对比(WSS vs BP vs 牛津式);为确保公平反驳而交替发言的必要性;将成功定义超越获胜;说服性演讲技巧(眼神交流、手势)。",
    "skills_practiced_en": "Listening for structure and content, formulating constructive arguments, developing rebuttal points, spontaneous speaking under time constraints, basic chairing duties.",
    "skills_practiced_cn": "听取结构和内容,构建建设性论点,形成反驳观点,在时间限制下的即兴发言,基础的主席职责。",
    "teaching_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Video\/text explanation of World Schools Style debate rules.",
            "cn": "关于世界学校风格辩论规则的视频\/文本解释。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Video\/text explanation of British Parliamentary debate rules.",
            "cn": "关于英国议会式辩论规则的视频\/文本解释。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Video\/text explanation of Oxford Style debate rules.",
            "cn": "关于牛津式辩论规则的视频\/文本解释。"
        }
    ],
    "participation_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "High engagement from all three students (Mimu, George, Anne) during the preparation and debate phases.",
            "cn": "所有三名学生(Mimu、George、Anne)在准备和辩论阶段都表现出高度参与。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students actively contributed ideas during group strategy sessions.",
            "cn": "学生在小组策略会议中积极贡献了想法。"
        }
    ],
    "comprehension_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Students grasped the core difference between the three debate styles, particularly the speaker roles and team structures.",
            "cn": "学生理解了这三种辩论风格的核心区别,特别是发言人角色和团队结构。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The philosophical discussion about 'winning vs. success' showed deeper engagement with the topic.",
            "cn": "关于“获胜与成功”的哲学讨论显示了对主题更深层次的参与。"
        }
    ],
    "oral_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Mimu and Anne delivered structured arguments during the debate, although Anne occasionally struggled with fluency and reverting to simpler sentence structures.",
            "cn": "Mimu和Anne在辩论中提供了结构化的论点,尽管Anne偶尔在流利度和回归简单句式方面遇到困难。"
        },
        {
            "en": "George showed good reasoning but struggled significantly with unmuting and maintaining consistent speaking volume\/clarity.",
            "cn": "George展示了良好的推理能力,但在解除静音和保持一致的音量\/清晰度方面遇到很大困难。"
        }
    ],
    "written_assessment_en": "N\/A (No formal written component observed in the transcript)",
    "written_assessment_cn": "不适用(文本中未观察到正式的书面环节)",
    "student_strengths": [
        {
            "en": "Strong teamwork demonstrated during the preparation phase, especially in coordinating arguments.",
            "cn": "在准备阶段展现出强大的团队合作能力,特别是在协调论点方面。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Ability to articulate nuanced philosophical positions (e.g., learning from failure).",
            "cn": "能够阐述细微的哲学立场(例如,从失败中学习)。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Good note-taking and referencing during the practice debate (Anne's and teacher's notes).",
            "cn": "在模拟辩论中良好的笔记和引用能力(Anne和老师的笔记)。"
        }
    ],
    "improvement_areas": [
        {
            "en": "Fluency and pace control during spontaneous speech (especially Anne and Mimu).",
            "cn": "即兴演讲的流利度和语速控制(特别是Anne和Mimu)。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Technical proficiency (George's microphone issues).",
            "cn": "技术熟练度(George的麦克风问题)。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Expanding examples beyond generalities to include expert opinions or data (as requested by the teacher).",
            "cn": "将例子从泛泛而谈扩展到包括专家意见或数据(如老师所要求)。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_effectiveness": [
        {
            "en": "The use of video\/lecture segments followed immediately by practical application (the debate) was highly effective for learning complex structures.",
            "cn": "使用视频\/讲解片段后立即进行实际应用(辩论)的方法对于学习复杂结构非常有效。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The teacher managed the transition between instruction and practice seamlessly.",
            "cn": "老师无缝地管理了教学和练习之间的过渡。"
        }
    ],
    "pace_management": [
        {
            "en": "The pace was initially slow during content delivery but accelerated appropriately during the short preparation window for the debate.",
            "cn": "内容传授阶段的节奏最初较慢,但在辩论的简短准备窗口期内加速得当。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The final Q&A session was concise, allowing time for the closing feedback.",
            "cn": "最后的问答环节简洁明了,为最后的反馈留出了时间。"
        }
    ],
    "classroom_atmosphere_en": "Engaging, supportive, and dynamic, with clear positive reinforcement from the teacher, particularly regarding teamwork.",
    "classroom_atmosphere_cn": "参与性强、支持性强且充满活力,教师给予了明确的积极强化,尤其是在团队合作方面。",
    "objective_achievement": [
        {
            "en": "Students were introduced to the three debate styles.",
            "cn": "学生们接触了这三种辩论风格。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students successfully participated in a structured debate format, applying new structural concepts.",
            "cn": "学生成功地参与了结构化的辩论形式,应用了新的结构概念。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_strengths": {
        "identified_strengths": [
            {
                "en": "Excellent scaffolding from theoretical knowledge (WSS\/BP\/Oxford) directly into a practical, timed debate.",
                "cn": "从理论知识(WSS\/BP\/牛津式)到实际、有时限的辩论的绝佳脚手架式教学。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Skillful management of group dynamics during team preparation, ensuring focus and fairness.",
                "cn": "熟练地管理团队准备期间的小组动态,确保专注和公平。"
            }
        ],
        "effective_methods": [
            {
                "en": "Probing questions ('Why do we need to swap over?') to elicit reasoning from students about underlying debate principles.",
                "cn": "通过探究性问题('我们为什么要交替发言?')引导学生说出对辩论基本原则的理解。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Teacher modeling the chair\/judge role effectively during the Q&A section.",
                "cn": "教师在问答环节有效地模拟了主席\/评委的角色。"
            }
        ],
        "positive_feedback": [
            {
                "en": "Teacher praised the 'fantastic teamwork' and the quality of arguments generated in a short time.",
                "cn": "老师称赞了‘出色的团队合作’以及在短时间内产生的论点质量。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Positive reinforcement regarding complex ideas like learning from loss and the importance of respect in speaking.",
                "cn": "对学习从失败中汲取教训和演讲中尊重的重要性等复杂概念给予了积极肯定。"
            }
        ]
    },
    "specific_suggestions": [
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
            "category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
            "category_cn": "发音与阅读",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Students need to practice speaking at a consistent, clear pace, especially when under pressure, to ensure clarity.",
                    "cn": "学生需要练习在压力下保持一致、清晰的语速,以确保表达清晰。"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-comments",
            "category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
            "category_cn": "口语与交流",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Mimu and Anne: Focus on expanding simple statements into more complex, fully developed arguments by incorporating supporting evidence.",
                    "cn": "Mimu和Anne:专注于通过纳入支持性证据,将简单的陈述扩展成更复杂、更充分发展的论点。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "George: Work on resolving technical microphone issues to ensure full participation without interruption.",
                    "cn": "George:解决技术麦克风问题,确保无障碍充分参与。"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-brain",
            "category_en": "Content & Strategy",
            "category_cn": "内容与策略",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Next time, focus on structuring arguments around 2-3 distinct, well-supported 'reasons' (as requested by the teacher).",
                    "cn": "下次重点是将论点围绕2-3个截然不同、有充分支持的‘理由’来构建(如老师所要求)。"
                }
            ]
        }
    ],
    "next_focus": [
        {
            "en": "Developing robust supporting examples and evidence, including researching and integrating expert opinions for future debates.",
            "cn": "发展可靠的支持性例子和证据,包括研究并将专家意见融入未来的辩论中。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Practicing the specific roles within the BP format (e.g., PM, LO, Whips) in a structured manner.",
            "cn": "结构化地练习英国议会式中的具体角色(例如,首相、反对党领袖、Whips)。"
        }
    ],
    "homework_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Prepare 2-3 strong reasons supporting 'Winning means success' AND 2-3 strong reasons supporting 'Winning does not mean success', to be used in the next session.",
            "cn": "准备2-3个强有力的理由支持“获胜意味着成功”,以及2-3个强有力的理由支持“获胜不意味着成功”,供下次课程使用。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Find one example of a public figure who achieved success without winning a major competition (e.g., in education or career).",
            "cn": "找出一个在没有赢得重大比赛的情况下取得成功的公众人物(例如在教育或职业方面)的例子。"
        }
    ]
}
处理时间: 13 秒
HTML报告 完成

生成时间: 2026-01-23 06:33:05

查看报告 下载报告
返回列表