Wait. Hi, Alex, you okay? Hi. How are you today, Alex? I'm today. You're good today. Yes, fine. Oh, and what are you eating? Alex, what's that? Looks delicious. What you see, is it like a cookie? Is it sweet? Is it sugary? You know, my mom says it's Chinese bread. Not nice. So is it sweet? Is it like sugar? Or is it savory with no sugar? No, she should recall this. A savory. If you say to someone, a savory treat. Yeah. So it's quite nice to say that like a savory treat. And then if it's a sweet treat, like a cake, you say sweet treat, what looks delicious? Did you buy it or make it? Oh, you bought it all lovely. And if you just come back from school. Well, Alex, guess what it's like in the uk at the moment? Night. It's not night. It's morning. It's morning here. But something happened overnight. I'm going to share it with you. Hang on, something happened overnight in the uk that was very exciting. Oh, hang on, let's pull this up. Going to bring it up for us and you can. Took it last night. Can't get the video up, unfortunately, but I can get the picture. And last night, I'm stuck in my house. I am Alex can't get out of my house today because, Oh, no, it will let me view it. We're got to make it into a ped because of the snow that's been going on. Yeah. All right. I'm going to show you some sunnow. Mean, I don't think it's the best picture I ever could have taken, but it's a picture nonetheless, right? When I see any pictures, I'm going just to load one up. Just needed to change its ball map. It's doing it now. It's a very big file. Not sure why it's made it a bigger file than it is. Okay. It's just loading Alex, just not pretty fast. Because a pdf makes it very large. There we go, converting. Okay, it's converting and we can show you my snow, although I haven't built a snowman yet. So this was last night, not this morning because we we're now in the morning and some of it's now melted, but I can't move about. No, I guess it's a morning for me. It's not a morning for it's nighttime for you, isn't it? X, have you got snow? Have you got weary? I really get no, you don't be very rare. Yes. I've only seen snow two times in my life. Wow, only twice. So we have it January only little bit. So we don't have big, big snow. We're not like a Canada, but we have a little bit of snow. And here we are. There's my house. Yesterday snow was coming down. It was like a blizzard, Alex. It was lots of snow all coming down, and then it was all getting thick on the ground. Yeah, this is my little street. And look at that. All the snow whnever cool, but it's all gone this morning. It's started to rain this morning, and now it's all sort of gone, which is really sad. Amazing it, right today, we are looking at manners. So one of the things about winning a debate is our manokay, our body language. And a good debating manner shows that you've got confidence and that you're convincing. Okay. What we don't want is I agree that plastic should be banned because Yeah, I think it's a like like a bad thing to do. We want you to be up looking center, looking at the judges delivering your speeches. Okay? So we want a strong stance a lot of the time that candidates will stand Yeah to deliver their speeches. So they will stand it. They will have their speech in front of them and they will deliver to the room. Okay, if you're online debating, which has been happening quite a lot, online debating, then you may sit like you are now, Alex, just making sure your whole face is in the screen and are sitting upfront. Now, why do you think we need a good posture, Alex? Why do we need to sit up properly, do you think, well, why can't we sit like that? What's not good about this in a debate? What do you mean? One? So why can't when I'm doing my debate? And why why is this not a good way of delivering your debate? Why, why, why sitting up like this better than today? I want to tell you that I disagree with cars being banned in the city. Why is this not good? Alex, why wouldn't you win if I'm like this? Because like when you are like this, I don't think you are saying this and you don't sound very convincing. Very well done. If you don't have a good posture, that's what we call it posture, then they won't think you are convincing. They won't think you care. Yeah, Alex, what's wrong with this one? Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Today I think that gold cars should be banned from the city center. Yeah, that's what I think. Why is this one not good? Alex? Why is this bad? It sounds uncertain. Yes, well done. It sounds uncertain. It looks unlike you don't care. So we want to sit up like this. Yeah we want everyone to see our faces. We want everyone to hear what we're saying. We want everybody to feel super confident in what we're talking about. So here we have some positions. Okay, what's wrong with this girl here? He's looking on the ground. She's looking like this, I believe. Is she uncertain? Very this what's wrong with this guy? This girl thing looks like he with pockets, he, my kids not caring about it. He's a bit too relaxed, isn't it? Yeah, it looks a bit too relaxed. What's wrong with her? He looks like she don't care about it. He does said to win with it. He don't really care about anything. She's running away, isn't she? She's moving well. We don't need people moving. We can't see who you are or what you did. What's wrong with this guy? He looks too uncertain. He looks too uncertain, doesn't he? He looks like he's shaking a little bit. Yeah, he doesn't look very confident at all well than Alex. So Nope, Nope, Nope. And Nope, none of these are the correct posture. We've got slouch. We can't hear you. You're walking around the stage hands in pockets is rubbish. Yeah, we don't want this. So how does that? It seems obvious, but it isn't. You need to stand with hip width apart. You should be comfortable. You should relax your muscles. Yeah if you're having an online debate, Yeah we've got to think about the way that we are in the screen. Okay. What's wrong with this one? Looks he isn't looking at you. Well done. What's wrong with this one? She's showing, right? She's not. So what's wrong with this one? A paper he's holding Brock his face? Yes. Blocking his face, isn't it? Yes, absolutely. So none of these again, correct? So we want to be sitting in the right place, that we are relaxed and don't forget to smile. Make sure you're looking straight into the camera. We want you at the right distance, kind of how I am at the moment. They want you to make sure people can see your face and that maybe if you want to use your hands for gestures, you can, but we don't need this or this or this or this or this, because we can't hear you or see you. It's okay to have notes, but don't hold the notes like this. The notes like this are rubbish. I cannot see you. I cannot see your face. I haven't got a clue about your expressions. I don't know if you're sad or happy, so always have them like this. I can still see your face. You can still see your notes. You can look down. You can look up me. Yeah so it's very important. And every debater will have some notes for them. Okay? You can't debate without notes. If you hold your notes up to your face, your voice will be muffled. It's not a good look or good to hear. I contact Alex. Look at your audience. They are who you are talking to. So look slightly above the audience and scan every now and again, pick a different person, speak to, because that's really important, okay? And the more you practice your speech, the more confidence you will have, which is why you need to write your speeches or your notes, okay? Hold your head up high, make your voice clear and loud. This will not do in a debate because no one can hear what you're saying. Yeah and we don't want it too loud that I'm like, no, please stop talking. It's got to be the right level, okay? So we're going to practice with this line, the quick round fox jumps over the lazy dog. Okay? So we're going to practice it, Alice, because we don't want the quick Brown dog dumps of the lazy dog. We don't want that big Brown fox jumps over the lazy box dog, and we don't want the quick Brown fox jups over the lazy dog. Okay? So we want it nice. So the quick Brown fox jumps over the lazy dookay Alex, can you give that line a go? Go Alex, did you say the quick Brown fox jumped over a lazy clock? Ck, but yes, well done. Exactly. Okay, so did Alex do it for me once morning? Your you said dog not dog? Okay. Inside of the g dog world, there we are dog instead of dog. Dog. Okay. So Alex, doesn't matter how I've done it, I want you to practice it. So I want you to be in your relaxed. I want you to be in your debating position. I want you to use your debating voice and I want you to say the the answer. So we wouldn't sit like that. We would sit nicely, wouldn't we? Okay, right. Alex, try the line for me, please. A quick bang fox drum silver with azy dog. Okay, too fast, too fast stomachs. And we've got our arms for the quick Brown. The lady zy dog, too fast, too fast. Arms by your side, and Alex, the quick fox jumps over lazy dog. Okay, nice. So we try it this way. Now Alex, the quick Brown fox, jumps over the lazy dog. Talk to everyone. Looks like there are fox jumps over a zy dog. Well done, Alex. Our head too much. We're practicing how we're going to do debating and we wouldn't do this. This is not, we would not do this, this so this would be too confusing. Reverly, okay, so to do once more, Alex, but wants to do it. I want you to listen. And now please, Alex, I want you to do it for me as if you are in the debate, the quick Brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Okay, off you go, Alex. The quick one fox jumps over. Lady dog, well done, Alex. Beautiful, beautiful. Yeah looking at everyone sitting up straight, being clear and loud as you can. Yeah and if you speak too fast, no one hears you. If you speak too slow, no one's really listening. Okay? So you've got to find that right place and the right speed. Okay? If you only speak to one person in the audience, everyone else thinks you forgot about them. So when you're practicing your speech, do it in front of a mirror. Yeah, see how you're holding yourself. Look at how you're looking at your pieces of paper. And we're going to be looking at this with our practice today. Is science better than art? Okay. So let's have a little think about some of these questions. Okay, so what do we mean by science then, Alex? What is science? Chemical reaction? And I mystery, just answer chemical reactions, a machine part I, what do you call science? Science is when you build, when you try to understand things and build new things that can help you and stthings and when you need things to help you. Okay, so science, obviously, chemistry, physics, earth, stars, animals, environment. So is science important yet? This computer communication and how do we see a time and how we make iron our houses and light and even fire and the stars. What does earth look like? Nearly everything you see right now is all science. Yeah, exactly. But when we think about, we obviously have all these ideas of science, everything to do with science. Yeah. Animals, like I say, stars, the planet. We need it for medicine, we need it for materials. But is science better than art? Do you think science is a better subject than art? Science is basically art science. Yes. Since when you are building a building science? But what does a burning requirewhat should it do? Would it? What should we do? It's art. But when a building art science tells you, if you face with, would it collapse or would it stand straight up or would be dangerous? And a lot of other friends, you use art. When you are using chemical reactions, you can use art. What the cover and cover makes a different cover. It is also art, but is also. What kind of things can make water flow? You can dine potle and everything. And robots, how best can robots go? It's also art and how robots do and how do it make arm, and it's a science. So science is basically art in some ways, and art is science in some ways. Okay? So they kind of work hand in hand. But which one the debate today is which one do you think is better and why? If you only have a science and then, then it will be bad. No one would design your buildings. No one would design a computer. What if it is a random shape? Then how can we get it? How would the screen show? Would this show a lot of my same picture? And if you have art and new science, then you see what kind of disaster that is. Thinking about art, we can define its painting, photography, digital art, architecture, sculpture, music, film. We can have cartoons. We might have tv. That's all art. If I took away video games and television and music and paintings and photography and only left science, would you really miss it? Now since art is basically creativity, science needs creativity. Science is creativity, but it need but art is creativity. Science need art. When you are building a building in science, but a building itself is creativity, you need art, music and other stuff. Alex. So Green and everything, but it's hard. Okay, so Alex, we've understood the building concept. You've got a great answer for this one. I want you to think about something else, though. At the moment you've got one reason, and I'm not sure where you stand yet. Do you think science or do you think art is better? Which one do you think is better? I know you understand that they might, they are with each other, but which one do you think is better and why? And not just buildings. If I took away games, if video games, if I took away tv, if I took away film, if I took away photography, if I took away digital art, if I took away museums, if I took away paintings, if I took away crafts, would that be worse than me taking away animal study? If I took away human study, if I took away environmental study, which one would be worse if I took it out of society? Would we? Is science better and art is a luxury? Or is art better and science ences a bonus? Which one do you think is better? A sort of stand ds in the middle. So I want I know you stay in the middle, but you are going to have to fight on one side or the other, Alex. So I want to hear your thoughts. Why do you think maybe art might be better than science? Or why do you think science might be better than art? So if I took all science away, would that be okay? If I took all science, where could I live? Would I be okay without science? No. But without science, nee or things that you can make with art would disapair. Without science discipline, things would take part, would disappear. Let's leave it there for a second. Alex, okay. If I took art and entertainment away, would we still live? Yes, we'll soon Alex. Alex, just leaving it for a minute, just said to me, we could survive without Alex as this. Alex, listen, please. 1s. So we can live without art. Yeah. So we can live without art, but we can't live without science. So which one is better then science? It's also a plus. Sk, without science you can't have art paintings in paper deeper. You need science and buildings and everything you need. Art is basically made by science. So without science, you can't make any art. So you might as well choose science. Since if you choose the art, when science disapair, art would disappear as well. So if you have my two ice queens, would you choose to give them the or would you each one? So I would choose like eating one part. And I think science is more gotten than art, right? Perfect, Alex. Now we've got our debate. Well done. That was gorgeous. Yeah. So it's this you've got to think about. Yeah what would life be without science? Yeah would life be done? Would it be boring? Would it be rubbish without science? Would you really struggle without a video game, without tv, without film? But however, if I take science away, the planet may not survive. Animals may not survive. We won't understand space. We won't understand gravity. We won't understand materials for art. So in some way, science is better than art, potentially. Yeah. This booit doesn't matter which side you are on, but you've got to think which one is better. You might say both are great. Both have their uses, both are important. However, which one is better? That's all we're asking. Yeah, which one is better? So let's think also about what if there's no science in the world anymore? What could happen? What could happen if I took all science away? What could happen to the world? There will be no art, no creativity, and there will be no buildings, nowhere to live. New art, let's say it will be viexact same life as an animal. Did it westill live, Alex, if we didn't understand science? I don't think so. No, because you wouldn't have any medicine Yeah we wouldn't understand how the human body works. We wouldn't understand space, we wouldn't understand gravity. We wouldn't understand how the world works. We wouldn't get that it's round. We wouldn't understand oxygen. We wouldn't understand anything, would we? And what if there was no art in the world anymore, though? What if I took away everything, film, tv, music? What would the world feel like without art? It will be great, great, great ay nothing in it and nothing wrong. Won't be happy and it will be like super, super, super boring. In. My part, I was super, super bored. I would rather be asleep, nor feeling it when feeling it, but youstill be alive. So it's still better when visitscience, since if you all science, it would be the same as we all art, since, firstly, you can't see art or fair science. And secondly, without science, you can't understand art. So arenit's basically another sign of science, the felt science. There isn't any art, but felt art with still science. So I think, do you think the world would be very sad without art facts? Do you think the world would be a very sad place about art? Why? Why do you think the world would struggle if it didn't have art in it? Tv, art is basically creativity. If you play games and everything, it's all created up. If you took out away, how would you play? And with the comic books, it's very boring enough of him to brighten it up. No good mood. Even if you want to have a good mood, how can you with nothing to be good about and what would be my food for? Yeah fun. But if you don't have any fun, is it? Then it's boring. And if you get mad, where is definitely comforfort you so well, the struggle without out but science will it would be newer and even won't no what art is you struggle very, very, very much to so I think science is behiven art, but art is still very, very important like this. The fact is I think I will struggle a bit. Yeah having your book, isn't it? Having your enterwell? It's entertainment isn't Alex? It's this idea of entertainment that we can have. Yeah beautiful arwaldon. Alex, okay, much better. Now we've got this idea of what we're critically thinking about here. So let's have a look at some of these, Alex. So agreeing science makes people's lives more convenient. Science is the fundamental driving force for the development of human production. Science can keep people rational, logical thinking about the right things in life. On the don't agree side, though, Alex R. Provides people with spiritual sustenance. It makes us feel good. Without art, the human spirit will be in a state of emptiness, would probably be quite sad, don't understand our emotions. Works and drawing of art make human civilization PaaS from generation to generation, so people can put history into drawings. If we didn't have that, then we wouldn't understand what other people have gone through. Yeah. Okay, Alex. Well, let's get our debates ready, shall we? So is art better? Is sorry, sorry. Is art better? Is science better than art? Okay. So Alex, which side would you like to be? Would you like to agree that science is better than art? Or would you like to disagree that science is better than art? It would agree. Okay key and I am going to and I am going to disagree. Okay, amazing, right? So Alex, I'm gonna to give you your pen. I'm gonna give us a few moments. We're not gonna to read the book when you're into preparing our debate. We're going to make a very good point for my debate though, Alex. Okay, we're just going to do a few minutes because I know Alex youlike to sort of present what you've already been talking about, but just to give you a chance to get your debate ready. Remember, lady, good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Machair and worthy opponent today. I believe that firstly, secondly, for example, wait to think of an example today Alex Yeah thirdly and then in conclusion practicing your conclusions. Okay, so Alex are gonna pop three minutes onto this board for us to prepare. I need to prepare as well because I don't know which side was gonna to be on so we're going to three minutes for preparing and then we're going to do our debate. Okay so our three minutes Alex starts now I'm going to give you your pen so you can make any notes you want to or want to highlight anything on the board and I'm going to get my debate ready. Oh I think you're going to be a tough one to beat today. Think of that example, Alex. That's the next stage for you, making your debates even stronger by examples or expert opinions. Let's not just move the board around, okay? You can do it with your pen and piece of paper then have a think we're not just gonna to change colors and move boards around Yeah gonna to use this time to prepare Yeah think about an expert opinion. Maybe think about an example you're going to use. I'm to sit on the staff bar anytime you've got two minutes. Alex, I want you to be preparing. You can you can sit on the sofphone and think about it. But I do we need to prepare your debate, Alex. We should be writing up our debates. Okay? We can do it together. If you find that if you want to do it together, that's absolutely fine. But we do want na make sure that you're gonna to be using this. I want you to think of an example Alex, that is your next challenge. Yeah I want you to think have you got an expert opinion you could be using? Okay. Okay, one minute. Kind find物不your Alex,in your debate you can say you can say artist is important, but what you're debating is is that science is better. Not saying art isn't important, and you're not saying art isn't a good thing. You're saying science is just better. You can still say all your things about art, but it just is that science is better. Okay, Alex, let's get this debate underway. Okay, Alex, you'll be going first as you are the affirmative team. Today's debate is science better than art? Our affirmative team is speaker Alex. Our negative team is speaker Lisa. Alex, you have up to three minutes to make your argument. Alex, your time starts now. An affirmative team. I strongly believe that science is better than art because firstly, that make life comfortable. And if people are comfortable, they have time to make car. But if where people are struggling, would they make hard? No. Secondly, science make a nation strong. And if. When if a nation isn't safe, when would people have time to make art? If we aren't happy, we can't make art. And third, we art is basically science, since without science can you make art? When you are making a painting, what you need, you need wood and paper. How do you make paper? You need science to make paper. And we are making a sculpture. How do you get? So do you put it in the hand? You need to make a pickax. And how do you make a pickaxe? You need science to make a pickaxe as well. And a lot of other things. Like when you are building a house. It's art, but No Why? And everything is all science before science can make concrete. No. So I strongly agree with motion, but science is better art. In conclusion, I think science is better than art. Thank you very much, speaker Alex. Okay, our negative speaker and Lisa will now address the room. Okay. Good morning, everyone. I do not agree with speaker Alex that science is better than art. Art is something, as Alex said, that we need to be able to create buildings. And while science is an important part of that, and we acknowledge that as the negative team, art is too important in our lives compared to science. Art helps people show their feelings. For example, when someone feels sad, they can listen to music or paint a picture. This can make them feel calm and happy, which is much more than a discovery of a new star in the sky. Art also brings people together. People from different countries or different languages that can't communicate with each other can enjoy the same song or movie, or learn a different language through song. An expert also agrees. A famous art teacher says that art helps people understand their emotions and relaxes their mind. This is so important for mental health, much more than any medicine or discovery or planet or animal research that science can do. Art is easy. Art is fun. Science is useful. Of course it helps our planet, but art makes life beautiful. Surely I would rather alive with art than a life with science. Without art, life would be so boring. As our speaker Alex has said earlier on today, tv and games and films and art is so creative to live in an imagination. I would not want to live in a world without that. Science and art are both important. Yes, one is better than the other. However, I believe artists. Thank you for listening. I now open the floor to any reverthor questions. Okay, speak, Alex. He said that art is creativity and it's fun, and it helps people to relawax, and it's good for mental health. But without science, can you really have art? Well, art is basically science. When you are playing video games and tv, for example, do you play video games and tv? What they need to do them to make tv and a video game? You also need science. Without science, art would be did like when you want to do a painting. You don't have to paint the painting, and you don't have paint wash, because painint brush and paint is also siland paper is also so whixing things in need to make a drawing, but you have none of them. So how you make a drawing and when you could do a lot, park in a day, music and helping you relarelax, but without science, how do you know what is good for you and what is bad for you? And the things you do with royou also need science. Without any science, you can't do those things. So what good would you do? Okay, so I'm going to address your first opinion there, Alex, about the fact that art can't happen without science. And we, the negative team, do agree with this. We do agree that art would be very difficult without science. However, I do still stand by the idea that art is better than science, because without being able to express our emotions, without being able to see joy in crafting, just doing science all day can equally be as boring. Thinking about maths and thinking about scientific discoveries, nothing happens quickly in a scientific field, but art can be creative and fun and collaborative. You can make pictures or work with a team to create interesting designs or events. I we on the negative team completely agree that without science, art couldn't happen. But I still believe that art is much more expressive and therefore it is better than science. What we would like to ask, Alex, is you talked about this buildings, you talked about these ideas of sciences here to help us live and survive. However, do you think science is as interesting as art as can it be as emotional as art? Yeah, okay, you can be. If active influence can be emotional, too, science. Also have real of discovering a new thing. I personally you like science because we a lot of cretivity. And you can create stuff watching a volcano spring ay a bigquid. And it works just like a real volcano. It's fun. You can and it's, you can also make medicine. It can help you and it can make your life span longer. You can live much longer to enjoy much more fun things. But if you have art a your wife spwill shorfor. People in asicient time, a wispan of 30 is like old, but my grandpa isn't too old, but he's also 70. He's own, but he's 70 now. And I know people that are nearly hundred with. Years old and you said art is creative and it is fun. You can make games, but all bit wouldn't exist without science. And if you want to do it, but you can't because there any science help you to do it. You need science to do art. Art won't exist without science. And in science discover what is fun. And when you do art to read what you want. Isn't it the same as science, all things they do with art, nearly more than half of it exists because of science. With science, how can you do art? And while we think these are excellent points to bring to us on the negative team and something to really think about here, and I'm sure the audience and Madam Chair here will agree that those are very good arguments for science. And our main point here today, though, is that it brings people together. Art, science, not all the time. Not everyone believes in science. Not everyone believes in the discoveries that being made. We are doing space travel, which is very costly. Yet someone drawing a on a piece of paper, or drawing on the street in chalk, or making a song that doesn't require science that can be made with our voices, can be a great way for people to feel happy and for people to be together, to listen to each other, to be part of a choir. Science doesn't always allow us to speak in different languages to each other, but art can, and art is very important for communication. And do you not think that having creativity and music and tv programs and movies is a better way to connect with people around the world? You said you said movies and tv and lots of other things like paper and my communication. But is all bit is part of science, part of science. How can you do with things? Can you draw with your science? You have pen isn't have pink tv. You need lots of materials, wires and motherboard. How can you do that with science? And even song, a simple song you can do with a voice, but how to admire it? What way does it work? It sometimes also requires science. And for everyone to listen to such things, you need to be at ease. But without science, the world will be in danger. Animals, runin and forests grow in two cities. How can be people at ease? Man, no one would listen to art because we are too busy except capfor animals and doing things. But we aren't at easy enough to enjoy art, to do art. So I strongly believe that science is better than art. Okay. Thank you very much, speaker Alex. The negative team rests their case off. Aththat was amazing. We yield to the affirmative team. I think your point was very, very well made. And Alex, absolutely fantastic. There was not once that you stumbled and I actually gave you a really hard time. Yeah, you came back. No, you've said this, but it isn't right. You've said this, but this isn't right. You've said this and this isn't right. Yeah, your speech was fantastic. Okay? Once you found that balance between going, right, I could survive without art, but I can't survive without science, your debate started Yeah you started to think really critically about how art could not happen, how all of this music and film and stuff couldn't happen if we didn't have science. And therefore it makes science that little bit better, doesn't it? Yeah. So I totally agree with you, Alex. You've convinced me today, even though I'm a big art lover. Very, very well done, Alex. As I say, other things to have thought about today is another way of this debate is you could have thought about the idea that art was more fun or science was more fun. Experiments are more fun. Some people are much more into art or science. Something you said at the beginning though, Alex, there was definitely two arguments to this. And I think the biggest thing that definitely came out of today is both are important and I have heard that and you are correct, both of these are an important part of our life, aren't they? Yeah important reason. Weldone Alex, some things are gonna to pop on here for you. Okay, some brilliant stuff. Yeah, you are thinking critically, which is great to hear. Hey, you are excellent at active listening and rebutattling. Yeah, this is strong, very strong. Yeah you have some good points and make clear statements. All right. And Alex, I'm also really impressed pressed with some of your vocabulary. Even if you're not sure of the word you try. Okay, so that's really good for you. Things for us to now get to that next level of debating, Alex. Okay, expert opinion. Okay, maybe research for our next debate. Think about expert opinions. Think about 21 or two examples that you can put in. I would like you to reach four minutes of your debating. Yeah, we're hitting three at the moment, which is fantastic, but I'd like us to try and get to this four now. Okay? I also, Alex, want you to build your conclusions a little. We might revisit that next week just to remind ourselves of conclusions. We want strong conclusions. Your openings though, are brilliant. Okay, so we've got critical thinking, excellent active listening and rebuttal. Good points. Clear statement vocabulary. Was speaking for three minutes. Great openings, great address, also great manners today. Alex, things to improve. Okay, next, things to improve. Expert opinion. One or two examples in your debates, four minutes. Now want you to get to four minutes in your debating and conclusions. Okay? So I'm going to put on two, reach four. Okay, so, right, Alex, that sound ounded like a fair deal. I think you can do it. Why? I, so I want you to reach for these goals. Alex, Yeah I want you to add expert opinions in your debates now. I want you to think of one or two examples in your debates. I want you to be speaking for four minutes and I want you to think about your conclusions. I want you to make them stronger. All this, Alex, is perfect. I don't want you to change it. Yeah, this is really good. This is what you're achieving. Yeah. Well done, Alex. You've done an amazing job next week. Have a look. Football is paid too much. Have a look. See if they are paid a bit too much. And Alex, this can be arrange. Think about those that are amateur football players, so people who aren't famous and then maybe think about famous football players. Yeah think about people that work for the footballers as well. And well than I actually you've done an amazing job. I'm going to take a little picture of all of this work that you've done as well so you can have that to see how incredible your critical thinking was today. Alex, have a wonderful week. Yeah, very proud of you. You've done an amazing job. And I will see you next time. Thanks, Alex. Bye. Alex. Have a wonderful week. Bye.
处理时间: 29171 秒 | 字符数: 34,944
AI分析
完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
"header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
"course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
"course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
"course_subtitle_en": "1v1 Debate Practice - Science vs. Art",
"course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 辩论练习 - 科学与艺术的比较",
"course_name_en": "0109 LS05DBA",
"course_name_cn": "0109 LS05DBA",
"course_topic_en": "Debating Manners and Topic: Is Science Better Than Art?",
"course_topic_cn": "辩论礼仪和主题:科学是否比艺术更重要?",
"course_date_en": "N\/A",
"course_date_cn": "未提供",
"student_name": "Alex",
"teaching_focus_en": "Practicing debate structure, delivery (posture, eye contact, voice projection), and critical thinking on the topic 'Science vs. Art'.",
"teaching_focus_cn": "练习辩论结构、表达(姿势、眼神交流、声音投射)以及对“科学与艺术”主题的批判性思维。",
"teaching_objectives": [
{
"en": "Review and practice proper debating posture and body language.",
"cn": "复习和练习正确的辩论姿势和肢体语言。"
},
{
"en": "Develop arguments for the debate topic: Science is better than Art.",
"cn": "为辩论主题“科学优于艺术”发展论点。"
},
{
"en": "Improve active listening and rebuttal skills during the debate.",
"cn": "提高辩论中的积极倾听和反驳能力。"
}
],
"timeline_activities": [
{
"time": "Initial Chat",
"title_en": "Casual Conversation & Weather Check",
"title_cn": "闲聊与天气问候",
"description_en": "Teacher checks in with Alex, discusses Alex's snack (Chinese bread), and shares news about snow in the UK.",
"description_cn": "教师问候亚历克斯,讨论亚历克斯的零食(中式面包),并分享英国下雪的新闻。"
},
{
"time": "Manners Instruction",
"title_en": "Debate Posture and Delivery Instruction",
"title_cn": "辩论姿势和表达教学",
"description_en": "Detailed instruction on good debating posture (sitting\/standing), eye contact, voice projection, and note-holding techniques, contrasting good vs. bad examples.",
"description_cn": "详细讲解良好的辩论姿势(坐姿\/站姿)、眼神交流、声音投射和笔记持有技巧,对比好与坏的例子。"
},
{
"time": "Pronunciation Practice",
"title_en": "Tongue Twister Practice",
"title_cn": "绕口令练习",
"description_en": "Practice saying the pangram 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog' focusing on clarity, speed, and pronunciation (e.g., 'dog' vs 'dock').",
"description_cn": "练习说全字母句“The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog”,重点关注清晰度、语速和发音(例如'dog'与'dock')。"
},
{
"time": "Debate Content Discussion",
"title_en": "Exploring Science vs. Art Concepts",
"title_cn": "探讨科学与艺术的概念",
"description_en": "Class discusses the definitions and impacts of science and art, exploring the inherent connection between the two fields.",
"description_cn": "课堂讨论科学和艺术的定义和影响,探索这两个领域之间固有的联系。"
},
{
"time": "Debate Preparation",
"title_en": "Argument Structuring and Practice",
"title_cn": "论点构建与准备",
"description_en": "Alex chooses to argue 'Science is better than Art'. Three minutes are given for preparation, focusing on structuring opening statements and finding examples.",
"description_cn": "亚历克斯选择支持“科学优于艺术”。给予三分钟准备时间,重点构建开场陈述并寻找例证。"
},
{
"time": "Formal Debate",
"title_en": "Debate Execution: Science vs. Art",
"title_cn": "正式辩论:科学优于艺术",
"description_en": "Alex presents the affirmative case (Science is better), followed by the teacher's rebuttal (Negative case). Cross-examination follows.",
"description_cn": "亚历克斯陈述正方立场(科学更优),随后是教师的反驳(反方立场)。随后进行质询。"
},
{
"time": "Feedback and Wrap-up",
"title_en": "Post-Debate Assessment and Next Steps",
"title_cn": "辩论后评估和后续步骤",
"description_en": "Teacher praises Alex's critical thinking, active listening, and rebuttal skills, setting goals for the next debate (4 minutes duration, expert opinions\/examples, stronger conclusions).",
"description_cn": "教师赞扬亚历克斯的批判性思维、积极倾听和反驳能力,并为下一场辩论设定目标(4分钟时长、专家意见\/例证、更强的结论)。"
}
],
"vocabulary_en": "Savory, sugary, posture, convincing, slouch, uncertain, muffled, gestures, debate, affirmative, negative, rebuttal, spiritual sustenance, creativity.",
"vocabulary_cn": "咸味的,含糖的,姿势,有说服力的,佝偻,不确定的,声音含糊的,手势,辩论,正方,反方,反驳,精神食粮,创造力。",
"concepts_en": "Debate structure (opening, points, conclusion), Effective presentation skills (mannerisms), Interdependence of Science and Art.",
"concepts_cn": "辩论结构(开场、论点、结论),有效的表达技巧(仪态),科学与艺术的相互依存性。",
"skills_practiced_en": "Formal debating, spontaneous rebuttal, self-correction during practice, defining complex terms.",
"skills_practiced_cn": "正式辩论,即兴反驳,练习中的自我修正,定义复杂术语。",
"teaching_resources": [
{
"en": "Visual aids demonstrating good\/bad debate posture.",
"cn": "展示良好\/不良辩论姿势的视觉辅助材料。"
},
{
"en": "The debate prompt: Is science better than art?",
"cn": "辩论提示:科学是否比艺术更重要?"
}
],
"participation_assessment": [
{
"en": "High engagement, especially during the debate preparation and execution phases.",
"cn": "参与度很高,尤其是在辩论准备和执行阶段。"
},
{
"en": "Responded well to challenging questions and corrections during practice.",
"cn": "对练习中的挑战性问题和更正反应良好。"
}
],
"comprehension_assessment": [
{
"en": "Demonstrated strong comprehension of the debate topic, acknowledging the interplay between science and art.",
"cn": "对辩论主题理解深刻,承认科学与艺术之间的相互作用。"
},
{
"en": "Successfully argued that survival relies more fundamentally on science than on art.",
"cn": "成功论证了生存更根本上依赖于科学而非艺术。"
}
],
"oral_assessment": [
{
"en": "Voice projection improved significantly during practice, becoming clear and loud when required.",
"cn": "声音投射在练习中显著改善,在需要时变得清晰响亮。"
},
{
"en": "Maintained conversational fluency, though speaking pace varied; corrected during practice to slow down.",
"cn": "保持了对话的流畅性,但语速有所波动;在练习中被提醒放慢速度。"
}
],
"written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Notes were brief during the short preparation time.)",
"written_assessment_cn": "未提供(准备时间短,笔记简略。)",
"student_strengths": [
{
"en": "Excellent active listening and rapid rebuttal skills.",
"cn": "出色的积极倾听和快速反驳能力。"
},
{
"en": "Strong critical thinking demonstrated by exploring the nuances of the topic.",
"cn": "通过探索主题的细微差别展示了强大的批判性思维。"
},
{
"en": "Good control over the debate structure once established, with strong opening statements.",
"cn": "一旦建立结构,对辩论结构有很好的控制力,开场陈述有力。"
},
{
"en": "Willingness to attempt complex vocabulary.",
"cn": "愿意尝试使用复杂的词汇。"
}
],
"improvement_areas": [
{
"en": "Need to incorporate formal 'expert opinions' or concrete examples consistently into arguments.",
"cn": "需要在论点中持续融入正式的“专家意见”或具体例证。"
},
{
"en": "Extend speech duration to meet the four-minute target.",
"cn": "需要将发言时间延长到四分钟的目标。"
},
{
"en": "Strengthen the concluding statement to summarize and reinforce the main stance effectively.",
"cn": "需要加强结论部分,以有效总结和强化主要立场。"
}
],
"teaching_effectiveness": [
{
"en": "The focus on physical mannerisms immediately translated into better delivery during the practice rounds.",
"cn": "对身体仪态的关注立即转化为练习回合中更好的表达。"
},
{
"en": "The interactive debate format successfully stimulated deep critical thinking from the student.",
"cn": "互动式辩论形式成功激发了学生深入的批判性思维。"
}
],
"pace_management": [
{
"en": "Pacing during direct instruction was sometimes too fast for Alex, requiring repetition.",
"cn": "直接教学时的语速有时对亚历克斯来说太快,需要重复。"
},
{
"en": "Alex's initial debate delivery was too fast; pace correction was necessary.",
"cn": "亚历克斯最初的辩论语速过快;需要进行语速纠正。"
}
],
"classroom_atmosphere_en": "Energetic, supportive, and highly focused, especially during the debate segment.",
"classroom_atmosphere_cn": "充满活力、支持性和高度专注,尤其是在辩论环节。",
"objective_achievement": [
{
"en": "Posture and mannerisms were addressed and practiced successfully.",
"cn": "姿势和仪态得到了成功的关注和练习。"
},
{
"en": "Alex developed a strong, coherent case for the debate topic.",
"cn": "亚历克斯为辩论主题发展了一个有力、连贯的论点。"
},
{
"en": "Rebuttal skills were clearly demonstrated and effective.",
"cn": "反驳技能得到明显展示且有效。"
}
],
"teaching_strengths": {
"identified_strengths": [
{
"en": "Effective use of visual contrast (good vs. bad posture examples) for instruction.",
"cn": "有效利用视觉对比(好与坏的姿势示例)进行教学。"
},
{
"en": "Ability to challenge the student's reasoning effectively during the debate, prompting deeper thought.",
"cn": "在辩论中有效挑战学生的推理,促使其进行更深层次的思考。"
}
],
"effective_methods": [
{
"en": "Immediate application of posture rules to the pronunciation practice line.",
"cn": "立即将姿势规则应用于绕口令练习中。"
},
{
"en": "Providing structured feedback focusing on specific, measurable goals for the next session.",
"cn": "提供有针对性的反馈,重点关注下一节课的具体、可衡量的目标。"
}
],
"positive_feedback": [
{
"en": "Teacher explicitly stated being convinced by Alex's final argument for science.",
"cn": "老师明确表示被亚历克斯关于科学的最终论点所说服。"
},
{
"en": "High praise for Alex's consistency in critical thinking throughout the debate.",
"cn": "高度赞扬亚历克斯在整个辩论过程中表现出的批判性思维的一致性。"
}
]
},
"specific_suggestions": [
{
"icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
"category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
"category_cn": "发音与阅读",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Continue focusing on clear articulation, ensuring final consonant sounds ('dog' vs 'dock') are distinct.",
"cn": "继续关注清晰的发音,确保末尾辅音(如'dog' vs 'dock')清晰可辨。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-comments",
"category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
"category_cn": "口语与交流",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Practice controlling speaking pace to maintain audience engagement and clarity.",
"cn": "练习控制语速,以保持听众的参与度和清晰度。"
},
{
"en": "Incorporate one or two concrete examples or expert opinions into the opening 2-3 main points.",
"cn": "将一到两个具体的例证或专家意见融入开场的前2-3个主要论点中。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-balance-scale",
"category_en": "Debate Structure",
"category_cn": "辩论结构",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Develop stronger, summary-focused conclusions that clearly restate the debate's central claim.",
"cn": "构建更强有力的总结性结论,清晰地重申辩论的核心主张。"
}
]
}
],
"next_focus": [
{
"en": "Increasing debate speaking time to four minutes.",
"cn": "将辩论发言时间增加到四分钟。"
},
{
"en": "Integrating specific examples and expert opinions into arguments.",
"cn": "将具体的例证和专家意见整合到论点中。"
},
{
"en": "Strengthening debate conclusions.",
"cn": "加强辩论的结论部分。"
}
],
"homework_resources": [
{
"en": "Research the debate topic: 'Football players are paid too much,' considering amateur vs. professional wages and staff compensation.",
"cn": "研究辩题:“足球运动员的薪水是否过高”,考虑业余与职业球员的薪酬以及工作人员的报酬。"
}
]
}