Hi hello, hello. We've got some new people. Hi, Charlotte. Hello, how are you? I'm great. You're you. I'm not too bad. Thank you, Charlotte. And Charlotte, I think is is this your Celine? Are you two twins? Oh, Yeah, you look alive. Hi, Celine. How are you? Are you okay? Oh, you're on mute, Celine. You're on mute. Sulwe can't hear you. Hey, I'm Celine. Are you okay? Yes. Oh, twins. My brother and my sister are twins. Yeah, I grew up with twins. And how old are you? Charlotte and Celine? We are, we are eight years old. Almost nine. Just a few more months. Wow, I missame t shirts and everything. I love it. Well, welcome, welcome, welcome, welcome up. We're so pleased to have you with us. And then we've got lemon. Hi, lemon. How are you today? Oh, you're on mute, lemon. You're on mute. Oh, I. Said, I'll get mum to help. Oh, we still can't hear you. Okay, they're just talking that out. Oh, dear. Oh, and Alex is just popped in. Hi, Alex, even care to you? Hi. Hi. How are you? Fine. You're fine. Well, we've got Charlotte and Celine with us today. Alex, they're joining us. And lemon, I don't know if we we can't hear you and think you're sorting it out. So that's actually fine. Let me know. Lemon, when when you've got the microphone. Yeah, we'll start, but just let us know because we can't hear you at the moment. Lemon, Yeah, you're on mute. Yeah, we can probably hear me. We can't hear you right now. Yeah. So hopefully once you figured it out, we'll say hello. Yeah but welcome, welcome, everybody. Welcome. Today, death todoe's debate. It's all about different styles of debating. Yeah so different ways we can debate. So Alex, who can we debate with. Who could we debate with? Who do you think who can we have a debate with? Charlotte knows. What do you think, Charlotte? I think we could debate with anyone. Anyone could debate with anyone, unless they don't know how to speak, unless they turn, how to speak, end. Oh, I love we can hear you now. How are you, namon? Are you good? Yes, yes, I'm lemon. Who else could we debate for it? Who. Else to face with lemon. No no who can we debate with Celine to complete debate with pretty inted. I think I think I mean, I agree with Charlotte but that the regaris chief for bosay that except except for the ones cannot speak and and the words that you not want to speak with you do not to that argument was done excellent. So people who don't want to have a debate, isn't it? Yeah, absolutely. Okay. So we've got family, we've got friends. Who else can we debate with? Alex, we've got family, we've got friends. Who else can we debate with? Other people. Other people. Yeah people you have people with different views. Excellent. Yeah. What else? Who else could we debate with? Lemon, who else can we debate with? Who else can we debate with? Do you think teachers? Do you think parents? Do you think government? Like who else can we debate with? Lemon teachers? Well done. Yeah. We could have a play with teachers. Well, then, ought to be fantastic. Look at these books. I can see Charlotte and Celine. Do you like Olympus? The chronicles of Olympus? Arenyou. Like philosophy. That's a really cool book. And then you've got Plato there. I can see painoh. Well, well, that's cute. I already made a little paragraph about Hades and Pluto. They the same person, but in different form than this grewhen, this Roman. Very well done. Well, you never know, we might need that at some point. So we also can debate in parliament, okay? So we can debate in a big room called the Oxford style, okay? And what happens here is we have one person on the agree, the yes side and one person on the no side. Okay, we're gonna na have a look at this government and opposition. Okay, here we go. British parliamentary debate is the style of debate modeled after the traditions of the British parliament. The motion, which is what we call the topic that is being debated, is stated in the format this house, dot, dot, dot. For example, this house would ban phones, or this house believes that food should be free. These can be abbreviated as thw or thbt. There are no limits on what the motion can be, so debaters could be debating anything from law and justice to economics or art. There are two sides, government and opposition. Government supports the motion and opposition opposes it. There are four teams of two, two teams on each side. Each team is assigned to a position. There's opening government, opening opposition, closing government and closing opposition. Each speaker also has a name, an opening government. We have the Prime Minister and the deputy Prime Minister in opening opposition. We have the leader of opposition and the deputy leader of opposition in the closing government. We have the member of government and the government whip in closing opposition, we have the member of opposition and the opposition width. The order that the speakers speak in is Prime Minister, leader of opposition, deputy Prime Minister, deputy leader of opposition, member of government, member of opposition, government whip and Opposition Whip. Only one of the four teams will win, meaning that teams that argue on the same side are still competing against each other. The first, second, third and fourth place are decided by one or more judges. The head judge is called the chair and the other judges are called panelists. Prior to the debate, teams are randomly assigned to their positions. Sometimes the motion is released in advance, and sometimes it is revealed just before the debate. In the second case, teams only have 15 minutes to prepare their arguments, and speakers in each team can only confer with each other, not with anyone from the other teams. Digital devices and access to the Internet are also not allowed during prep time. During the debate, each speaker has seven minutes to speak. The opening government defines the motion, provides arguments for their side, and the second speaker rebuts arguments made by the other side. The opening opposition rebuts the opening government's arguments, and then they provide arguments for their side. The closing government provides further arguments in favor of the motion that are different from, but consistent with, arguments made by the opening government. The second speaker then summarizes the entire debate on behalf of the government side. The closing opposition provides further arguments against the motion that are different from, but consistent with, arguments made by the opening opposition. The second speaker then summarizes the entire debate on behalf of the opposition side. The first and last minutes of each speech is known as protected time. During this time, no points of information can be offered. Pois are short statements or questions that the opposite sign can use to challenge the speaker. These can't be more than 15s each. If a debater wants to give a poi, they will stand up and give an indication, such as extending a hand forward or saying point of information. It is up to the speaker delivering the speech to decide whether or not to accept the poi. If the poi is rejected, the debater who offered it should sit down immediately. Although they don't have to, speakers are strongly encouraged to accept at least one poi during their speech. Now you've learned the basics of how a British parliamentary debate works. But bp isn't the only style debate there is. Check out our videos on the other styles, such as public forum, world school style, and Canadian national debate format. Also visit our website for a free trial debate. Cokay, so this is quite a complicated way of debating for law, for rules, okay? And used in the uk. So Alex, how many teams do they have then in body 14 teams? Well done. Excellent. And why have we got 14 teams, Celine? But why have we got 14? Oh, you're on mute, Celine. You're probably answering me beautifully, but I can't hear you. Yeah, there we go. Why have you got four teams? I'm not I'm not really sure, but I think it's because I think it's because so they I can have the first place in second place, in third place. Yeah, well done. Yeah. And equally, then we've got an opening government. So they talk about the motion. Then we've got what's the opposition, the no team that says, no, this didn't happen. Then we have a closing statement. This means they argue, so opening government and then we've got opening opposition. Say yes team, no team argue against the yes team, yes team argue against the no team, and then the no team argue against the yes team. Okay. So it makes it fair in parliament. Otherwise, Yeah this team might be talking about something very different to this team. So that's why we have four in there. Charlotte, what do you think the government might be talking about? What do you think they might think about if you're a mute? For a big government, like a country, maybe. Did we talk about laws or like a little more or something? They might talk about rules. Salana, barmother and lemon, what kind of laws or rules do you think they might talk about? I see. Do you think they talk about food? Do you think they talk about schools? Do you think they talk about health? Schools, so I they put talk about schools ulls, Yeah and what might they talk whthat, they talk about Celine gone on. Oh, you're on mute, saline. I think they talk about me too. See that again, nice and loud for me, Celine, to sing me too. I said, maybe they will talk about money. Money, yes, money would be perhaps something they talk about. Alex, what do you get else? Do you think they might debate? Booyeabsolutely how food is getting in or out of the country. Yeah, Charlotte, what do you think? I think they talk about the quality of things too, like some people, some manufacturers just make it very bad, but it looks like it's good and they sell it for high prices. Oh yes, exactly. Making sure our goods are okay. They're safe. Walton. Walton lewalton Alex Walton Celine, Walton Charlotte. Okay, so a Stein of debate. If we've got time at the end, I will show you a real debate. Okay, someone actually debating real so think about some real life debating. So skills we will need. Yeah, we need to make sure that we understand our point that it is relevant. Okay? That means that we stick to our point. If it's about school, we don't then talk about the swimming pool. Yeah, because that's nothing to do with school. So if we're talking about something to do with school, we would not talk about the swimming pool weonly talk about school. So make sure we stay in the topic. Think about evidence. Yeah. Have you got an example to give me a personal example. Have you got an expert that you can talk about? Yeah. Don't necessarily think only about your person or views of Celine and Charlotte. You can debate on a side you don't agree with. Once you've got your side, you must debate on that side. You can't switch sides, okay? Because sometimes in debating, we debate on a side that we don't always agree with. Okay, but that's part of the skill. Think about both sides of an argument. Yeah rebuttal. When people are speaking, we shouldn't be wandering off. We should be listening, writing notes, thinking of questions to ask. Yes, Charlotte, it's like if we don't listen, we don't know how to like like like argue back. We don't have argue that excellent when I find myself buying the holes in their argument. Very well done, Charlotte. If Alex says, Oh, I think school should be banned because there's not free school, dincharlotte could turn on, say, well, that's not a reason. Sel, we go to school anyway. Yeah. So we can make sure we're listening. Yes. Sleeve, what are you going to say? Yes, Celine. You're on mute, Celine. We can't. Yeah. I think it's funny when you're debating with someone and so and that person is not listening to and when debates back, when you're she debates back, what happens is he or she is not on your topic 100% or the other side loses because they can't make a rebuttal because they're not listening, because they're not able to ask questions or make it make another point. Yeah. So it's really important speak clearly. We sometimes talk like this and then it's really Boand then no one can understand anything that you were thinking. So talk good. Our motion today is we want to speak clearly address everyone fixes you can up and we don't want we do not want it to be fast. Okay as I can't hear it. Yeah nice and loud as well. Yeah. So today it's going to be do you have to win to be successful? And Alex, I'm coming to you first. What do you think? Alex? I don't think you need to win to be successful. You think you do need to win to be successful. Why? I think we don't need to win to be successful. I never said, okay, we need we to be successful. When did I say that? Oh, what's apologies, Alex. Like misheard you. What why do you think we don't need to be successful to win? Don't. Need be we don't need to win to be successful, not what we're around. Oh, yes. Go on, Alex. Why why do you think this. Since being successful can be the same, because if your point is to make fun, when if you bid, when are you successful? Because it's your own point. Maybe you didn't win, but you still have fun. If you had fun, it's worth it. And why do you think it's still worth it even though you didn't win but you had fun? Why is that still worth it, Alex? Because what's the point of really. Oh, that's a really good question. What is the point of winning? I suppose it's fun, but if you stay fun and you don't win, it's still worth it, isn't it? Because they still have fun? Oh, okay. Well, let's see if anyone agrees with you. Alex, Celine, do you agree? Do you disagree? I agree. And I think I think that. If we want to be successful, we don't need the wing like because I went to to racing Spartan and if I didn't win first place, I am still successful. I'm cto finish the race as shing finishing the race was just as successful. Interesting point, Celine. And I like the fact that you sort of back Alexa Leman. What do you think? You had your hand up. What do you think, Leman? Do you agree with Alex? Do you agree with Celine? I think what what is the process not. You through that the process? And why is the process so important, do you think? Why is it so important? Why is it better than winwhy? Taking part is better than winning. What do you think, Leman? Why is taking part better than winning? For example. Well, test about test when it comes to test, Yeah, what do you think? Why do you think taking part is just as good as do you learn things on test regardless if you win? Yeah. Next. What can we do? Lemon? It's very good. So maybe have. A chat with maybe have a think about that answer we to think about this question. Why is taking part better than winning? Okay, but at the moment we can hear your mama new, but it's it's making a feedback sound. Keep talking when your mosorting and it's hard to hear anything. So maybe have a chat and then I'll come back to you. Okay, so Charth, what do you think? Do you agree with Celine and Alex or as do you have a different view? What do you think, Charlotte? What what do you think? Do you think we have to win? Do you think we have to win to be successful? Oh, okay. What do you to be successful? Liking the design process, it's it's like that if you make something and you think it's really good, but you didn't win the contest of building it, but you still are successful to make your invention work. So it's all about what we could do with it. Yes, absolutely fantastic. Okay. So lemon, why do you think it's better taking part than winning? I because we the is it because it's fun or is it because it helps us, do you think lemon? I. It's not problem, we can learn. Helps us to what do you think Clemen helps us to learn, helps us have fun or helps us be better? Lemon, excellent. Helps us be better. Nice thought. Okay. Weldone, Alex Weldon, Celine Weldon, shright, so our big task of today is debating. Now I've got feeling your whole on the no team. We're all on the negatives. Could do something a little bit different today. Yeah. Some help with your debates. Okay. In 2018, the England National Football team were at the World Cup semifinal. However, they didn't win. They were heartbroken. Yeah, England was heartbroken. They did not win, but they were seen as heroes to England Yeah because they deemed that they were a success even though they didn't win, because it was still amazing that they were in the World Cup sei final. Okay, so maybe something to think about as an example for your debate today. Yeah, maybe you can think of your own examples where you didn't win, but you were still able to be really good. Yeah, you're still able to be fantastic. Yes, Charlotte, like. Oh, you've gone on mute. Chathere we go in. Spartan is like that. Although I didn't get first place, but I'm very close to first place. I got 20 out of 900 more kids. Wow. And I also want to tell you that selling got first. Oh, wow. She when to forget your sister. And is this the game fso first place? And it was still Yeah and it was still a success, wasn't it? Yeah, well done, Charlotte. Nice story. Alex. Have you ever done something and not come first but still been successful? Yes, but let's kind of remember, I'm not sure where is one. Like I'm sure it's best, but there is also another one, but I do know what say because it isn't quite finished. That's okay. Tell us the one that has finished, Alex. Tell us the first one. Actually, second one has finished. It's just a dequit. Okay? So tell us about it, Alex, why tell us you didn't win, but why was it still successful? This time in I'm trachef, okay? Chess but I don't know how to describe it in English. I got pretty high levels, but I didn't win at the last one when I didn't win, but when I said it wasn't finished because when I and I need to do I need to get the craft. So I cried, okay, so but you went, we call it a league, Alex. What you're talking about competition league. So great you got high up, but didn't quite win, but still learn something. Yeah, still successful. I can't play jpat ball. So for you to do that, it's amazing. Okay, nice story. Alex lemon, can you remember a time when you were successful even though you didn't win? Is perfect. We just. Ourselves do my ourselves self so we practice. Yeah, we're practice to be better. Yeah at Lemen. Is there a time where you didn't win but weren't successful? So again, that's okay. Maybe have a thing, Clement, for your debate. Maybe have a think about that. But well, don't no one is perfect. We've got broceline. Where is Celine? God, where is your sister? Gonchla? She's disappeared. She's left a pifive. Oh, parenough shebe back age. You'll be back. She can share tomorrow. Charlotte just shared her, doesn't she? Lover and Alex, you've shared it for Charlotte. She and okay, so here we are. First thought, you don't get anywhere by being nice to others, and failure is not an option. If you're going to do something, youbetter know that you're going to succeed before you do it. Otherwise, it's a waste of time. Why bother applying for jobs if you know someone betapplying? Why take part in a sporting event where teams you are playing are better than you? Winning is about success. You cannot be successful unless you win. I'll avoid any situation if I know I won't. Come on. Okay, hands up if we agree with this well actually thumbs up if we agree with this statement. Oh thumbs down if we do not agree with this statement. Okay, Alex is big thumbs down. I can see Charlottes charlottejust gonna had Oh gijohn has got a big thumbs down. What do you think lemon? Do you think? Yes, you think no. What do you think? Big thms down lemon thinyes I want to hear this labut why do you agree? You agree? Why do you agree? And why do you disagree? Sometimes. It's very noisand. We can't. Quite hear you. Very, very noisy where you are. We can't hear you. Lemon, so I disagree. And why do you disagree? Lemon. Maybe. Have a yet. Let's bring Alex. And Alex, why do you disagree? And the the point of successful is it by being not anywhere else. But if you said your point is running, then may be it, but you're still successful. You try your best and it's not a waste of time. You can still wear and calfun. So the point of winhas fun. But if you do not think when you get angry, then what's important? Well, I think it is about that. Yeah if the only thing you're doing is to win, then you're not gonna to enjoy it because you're just gonna to focus on winning. But if you're having fun, and I love this, Alex, this is a great point. Trying your best. Isn't that the most important thing? I love this answer. Charlotte, why do you disagree? Why do you not think this person is correct? It's like I was like, because it's using so much like negative whereit won't sound very persuasive. Oh, you think they're too negative in their argument. Be interesting. You don't get anywhere. And that's interesting. Why do you think negative arguments aren't going to be persuasive, Charlotte? Why is a negative argument just rubbish? It's like. It's very negative. You get a kind of feeling that it's negative and you don't want to listen to it because it's too negative. Very well done. If it's too negative, it's only talking about the bad points of it all. They can say no good points. Well, I don't want na listen to the negative of it. No, I want you to persuade me what to sound exciting. I'm lein. Why do you disagree with him? Why do you disagree with him? Yes, we can't. I'm so surprised we can't hear you. There's two people speaking and we can't hear you. Leain, so it's very difficult. It's cancelling each other out. So we can't hear you. So what are you saying? Lemon, maybe we can't success, success. But maybe we can't be successful if we win time yet. Maybe we need to fail sometimes to be successful. Yeah. So we could try again, learn our mistakes. Waldon lemon, Waldon Alex, Waldon Charlotte. Okay, we've got another point of view, though. A positive outlook and enthusiasm is just as important as the desire to win. Even if we don't succeed immediately, we can take failure as an opportunity to learn and improve for next time. It could be a World Cup semifinal or a job interview. The logic is the same. You can be successful even if you don't win. Reflect on what went well and ask yourself, what can you do next time? Put those steps into action. That's real success and the winning will come. Mm, who agreed with this one? Thumbs up if you agree with this one. Oh Yeah, I agree with this one. Oh Yeah. Yes. What you think? Yes. And we know why. Could you already talked about why? And so today we are going to be doing something a tiny bit different. Remember, for Celine and Charlotte who are joining us today, we do not interrupt when we are doing our speeches. You can ask a question at the end. We want to make sure that you are listening. You can make notes if you want to. And I will also open the floor at the end for the audience to ask some questions. And we won't be having a chairperson today because I said we're doing something different, but the chairperson will be milif. We need anyone. Okay. Remember, we're going to be talking slowly today. You are all going to be on the negative team. How do you do you have to win to be successful? No. And what's gonna to happen is, is I'm gonna to be on the affirmative team. I'm gonna to say, yes, we do need to be successful. And what I'm going to do is I'm going to bring bring Alex down, for example, and Alex will have prepared a little speech for himself, and Alex will speak his speech. And then I am going na ask you questions. Okay? And I'm going to try and rebuttle you all right. And then lemon, Celine and Charlotte, you're going to decide who won. Was it me over here or was it abx? I will not be sad if you choose Alex. Okay? Just say you're aware you can pick whoever you want. Does not matter. The teacher does not have to win. Okay? I want you guys to win it. All right? So we'll pick each side. Yes, Alex and I. So again, I wthe cheese identified one to cut. You want to choose which ones you want to choose, whether you want to be on this side or this side, you can choose Alex I'll rebuttle you either side when you get that choice hundreof you I didn't say I want to change the team Oh okay so we're not on teams today Alex you're going to be fighting for yourselves so I'm gonna to give you five minutes okay to think about what you're going to say okay so you'll have time for repair now I know you're probably already say nice and second yes you can be the second one Alex that's fine let's do Charlottes gonna go first then we'll have lemon then Oh no then we'll have Alex then we'll have lemon then we'll have Celine because Celines just come back so I'm going to put some of these notes on the board for useline to help you so we're all you're sort of all on this bit Yeah and you can use this example as well if you want to five minutes to prepare you will speak for one minute one minute 30 okay and you're fighting against the teacher today. Okay, five minutes. Now think about it. Think what we're going to say. Remember, in my opinion, Yeah, I think firstly, secondly, in conclusion, think of those examples. Chartte, you gave me a great example. Alex, think about your example. Lemon, think about your idea of no one is perfect. Celine, maybe talk about although you came first place in Spartan, did it matter that Charlotte came second? Yeah. Was it still was it still a good experience? Okay, so you can use those to help you Yeah five, four minutes and then we're gonna all have a go. It's exciting. I hope you all win, but I am going to be asking some tough questions just so you know Yeah. And it's fine to just think it's fine to write. Writing notes is really good when you display your writing. Bin? Three minutes. So we'll have Charlotte be speaking first, then Alex, then lemon, and then Celine. Remember, when people are speaking, you are still in it because you are going to fight. And do not worry, if you do not win does not make you bad. It's just what happens with debating, okay? Because I'm sure you're all going to be amazing. Two minutes. 我说呀好。我知道我已经思考好呀,我是个好友,还有1分钟30 40秒。对,还需要一分钟三。钟。Nice that one minute and we're going to name this the debating of beat the teacher. She's very hard to do teachers. The I think you're going to be very good, Alex. You're very good at rebuttals. So I think you're going you're going to be a tough one to beat today. I think I was sneaky feeling all of you are going to be really sed out. But so we learn how to do it first one, but I didn't know how to rebetter tle it back, but you, okay. My negativity. Alex, are you okay? Lemon, you're just letting me know you're finished. Okay. First care. Okay. Music, right. Reminder, reminder that Charlotte is the first to speak. Then it will be Alex, then it will be lemon, then it will be Seline. Okay? Also eight reminder, the three that are listening, you will vote. Okay? Now while also do for you, for anyone that's struggling, I'm sure you're all and like found it super fine. But just in case what I'm going to do is I'm also going to grab these for us just so that if you get a little stuck you can use these to help you. Okay, so let's take all this away for a moment. Okay, and then there should be on the board. Here we go. So this is for the disagree. Is there some notes there for us? And then we've also got some of the agree as well although none of you are doing that side so I wouldn't worry too much about this. Okay so let's put ourselves back up onto here chartte are you ready you going to go finished? Hey, are you ready to beat the teacher Charlotte? So you'll have a minute and a half to speak and then I'm gonna to ask you some questions trying to rebuttle you Yeah but that I'll put a timer on for that as well. Won't be rbutattling for ages, you a kceline. I then understand. I share the limma and Alex on the same thing and you're going the other team, you, Selena, all on the same. You're all fighting individually today. So no teams today. So Selena, doesn't matter which one you are fighting for. Yeah, they get to vote. So you all vote now between me and Charlotte. So either I will win, Charlotte will win. Okay, right, here we go. We're going to put a minute and a half on the clock for you. Charlotte. Are you ready? Yes. Okay. Your time. Charlotte starts nap. In my opinion, you don't need to win to be successful like in a race. If you don't get first but you try your best, it's still successful. Although you might be in last place, but do not worry, learn from your mistakes and go again. That is successful. If you win, it's also successful. But if you don't win, if you don't get first place of something, it's is still successful if you try your best. But I still think it isn't successful when you didn't try your best. But still, you don't need to win to be successful. Like in races, if you try your best, you're still successful in any kind of races or different kind of arguments about anything are still successful if you try your best. Well done, Charlotte. Very well done. Okay, Charlotte, thank you very much for your debate. And you talked about races and that it was okay not to win them. But isn't the whole point of a race to win? It is, but but you can still be successful, unless like you can still be successful by trying your best, although the point is to win at. If you win, it's okay and you don't need your win. In a lot of people, only one will win. It's very hard to get it. So you don't need to win to be successful. Okay, understood. Thank you. Thank you very much, Charlotte. Your answer was beautiful. Okay, you okay Alex. Hey, it's just I to know don't team go first. But we're not doing that today. Alex. You guys are putting your debate and I am simply asking some questions. So don't worry, I'm not debating today. We're doing something a bit different. Alex. Yeah, it is because you all agree. It's really hard for you to get anyone to be on the affirmative team today. Okay, right, Celine, Alex, lemon, do we think that my question was better or do we think Charlot's debate was better? Who do we think should win? Right? Hands up for me. No, it wasn't a very good rebuttal, was it? Hands up for Charlotte. Yeah, I think, Charlotte, I start asking questions. Charlotte, because you were rebutffling so well. I mean, I had no hope, wasn't it? Okay, are we ready? Alex, are you okay? Leman, do you have a question? Your next after. Alex, you'll be next. Did you have a question? Okay. No, right. Okay. Wonderful. Right. Alex, are you ready? Okay, good time. Look, it starts now. I don't think you need to win to be successful because at the point it's that you set itself. But if you set it to win, if is try the best, but it didn't win. When you try the best, you are still successful. It did need to be you don't need to win to be successful. And when you win, sometimes maybe you're not successful, maybe you didn't get your point. You then need to win in order to be successful. And it it doesn't mean each time you win you are successful. Maybe sometimes they just need to rufor once in order to learn more. Alex, you there. Okay, right? Alex, I've got quesfor you okay. But you talked about it being successful, you don't need to win, but why then bother doing a competition if you're not gonna to win it? Isn't it pointless? Isn't a point quotition. Maybe the point is to win, but let's still have fun, a competition and also for fun. If you have all your heard in winning, then what's a point since you only think about winning and you think about nothing. So it's no fact at but a point of competition. Maybe it is to win, but it's also to get fun. Okay, okay, okay. But why but why is it better to do anything but win? I mean, I mean, when we come to competitions or we come to doing a test, aren't we better if we're able to succeed in our test and get a better job? Maybe it is better, but in order to succeed, you don't need to win to succeed. Even if you don't win, you can find another path. Maybe it is best to win, but you don't need to win to be successful. I see. Thank you very much, Alex, for your answers to my questions. Okay, Celine, Charlotte and lemon, do you think that my questions sort of changed your mind and I weren't anyone for me? Oh, Leon saying maybe if I got one point guess isokay. Anyone for Alex? Well said. Alex and Lemos everis very ated twice. Amazing. Welded Alex are totally deserved. Alex, your debating is getting better. Yeah. Your rebuttals Alex, are fantastic. Welthat eleven, are you ready? It's lemons. Turn now, guys. So lemon, are you ready? Me reset that for you. Are you ready? Lemon? Your time. Lemon starts now. We have a lot of games on the road to success. Sometimes we can't get the. Results and sauwe work hardly. When there are success, there are. For this. 你不well done,done. So, lemon, you said about working hard. So we don't say work, hardly. We say work hard. And isn't it easier, though, to win? Lemon, wouldn't it just be better to win than work hard? No. Why are you? Because it would be easier. I don't need to work hard. It's easier, isn't it? Yes. So it's winning better than working hard. Or do you think working hard is better than winning? We party, but can we can we can. Harwell, you can say if we can achieve more if we work. Properso, it never say work. We never say that. Yeah, because that means you don't work. Yeah, I hardly work. Work. So you can say we can achieve more if we work hard. Well done. Leman. Okay. Celine, Charlotte, Alex, who's voting for my question? No one. No one. There's no one. Ammon, no one who's waiting for who thinks lemons e mercongratulations, let's make and today. Okay, last one of today's letter. Celine, are you ready? Celine, yes, go on, Celine. Six, if you won twenties, a race with 1000 people, it's standard success. You didn't wanbut. That's a practice, right? So that's a successful practice, but not a win. If you win, that's good too with the practice. Next time you might win and the practice will be successful. And also. Competition. If you win, that is good, but if you don't win, is awyou can learn from your mistakes, and it will be successful. If next time you do not make those mistakes and you learn from your mistakes, it's still successful. You can also be successful in some other things, like maybe a test. You can be successful by reaching your own goal, maybe 80% up or like 90% up. You don't need it to get 100. Well done, Celine. Okay, Celine, you just talked there about better grades. But if I have better grades, if I'm successful by win, then I'll get a better job. Or Tiso, why would I not be successful if I want. If you want, of course, you can be successful. If you want, you can work hard. And if you win, that's better too. Also, that's the same. Okay? So you just talked about this idea of winning, and you said, but is a prticing when we praren't we supposed to lead to winning? Aren't we only successful in a race if I win it? No, it can be a successful practice. Okay? So it could be, yes, but isn't competition all about winning? You know, if I don't get a medal, then I can't prove that I was successful in my race coming fifth. Is it winning a race coming fifth? Is losing. A competition is about winning, but it isn't. If you lose, it is still successful, not a successful practice. And next time you might win. And winning is also successful too. Okay. Okay. Thank you very much. Seline, okay. Should we vote? Teacher Lisa's rebutstle, did I win? Did I change your minds? No one. Not a single vote. Celine, not one single vote for anyone. He's going vceline, I think I'm very versely. That was very good for butling. Alex, which one? You vote for? Celine, you vote for Celine, Charlotte, I think Alex is got to end up. Well done. Celine, congratulations. So not one single vote for teacher. Lisa, not one. Not one for me. I didn't change any with why and rather you all did an amazing, amazing. John, yes. Alex, I can believe it. And you all did. Absolutely incredible. Next week, the more you have, the happier you are. Think about that. Do need more waldenwaldon Charlotte Waldon, Alex Waldon Leman, yes, Alex, what would you like to say to end today? Are we just waving goodbye? Alex? Just waving goodbye. Well done. Alyou are incredible. Everyone made huge successes today. Lemon, your best. Your best today. Yeah. Well, don, Celine, thank you, Charlotte and Celine for joining us. You were amazing. Thank you, Alex. Thank you, Lebert, see you next time. Bye.
处理时间: 29208 秒 | 字符数: 36,705
AI分析
完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
"header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
"course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
"course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
"course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Debate Styles and Success Definition",
"course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 辩论风格与成功定义",
"course_name_en": "1010 LS05DBA",
"course_name_cn": "课程 1010 LS05DBA",
"course_topic_en": "Debating Styles (British Parliamentary Focus) and Defining Success",
"course_topic_cn": "辩论风格(英式议会辩论重点)与成功定义",
"course_date_en": "Not specified in transcript",
"course_date_cn": "未在文本中指定",
"student_name": "Charlotte, Celine, Alex, Lemon (Group Setting)",
"teaching_focus_en": "Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate structure and practicing arguing a predefined stance on the motion: 'Do you have to win to be successful?'",
"teaching_focus_cn": "介绍英式议会辩论结构,并练习就动议“你必须赢才能成功吗?”来论证预设立场。",
"teaching_objectives": [
{
"en": "Understand the basic structure and roles in British Parliamentary Debate (BP).",
"cn": "理解英式议会辩论 (BP) 的基本结构和角色。"
},
{
"en": "Practice formulating arguments and rebuttals related to the motion.",
"cn": "练习就动议形成论点和反驳。"
},
{
"en": "Engage in individual speaking practice under time constraints.",
"cn": "在时间限制下进行个人演讲练习。"
}
],
"timeline_activities": [
{
"time": "Start",
"title_en": "Greetings and Student Check-in",
"title_cn": "问候与学生情况核查",
"description_en": "Teacher greeted new students (Charlotte, Celine) and checked in with existing students (Alex, Lemon). Technical issues (mute) were addressed.",
"description_cn": "老师问候新学生(Charlotte, Celine),并与现有学生(Alex, Lemon)交流。解决了技术问题(静音)。"
},
{
"time": "0:08:00 - 0:14:00",
"title_en": "Brainstorming Debate Partners",
"title_cn": "头脑风暴辩论对象",
"description_en": "Discussion on who students can debate with (anyone, except those who don't know how to speak or don't want to).",
"description_cn": "讨论学生可以和谁辩论(任何人,除非他们不会说话或不想辩论)。"
},
{
"time": "0:14:00 - 0:30:00",
"title_en": "Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate (BP)",
"title_cn": "英式议会辩论 (BP) 介绍",
"description_en": "Detailed explanation of BP format: motion structure, government\/opposition sides, roles (PM, LO, DPM, DLO, MG, MO, GW, OW), speaking order, protected time, and Points of Information (POIs).",
"description_cn": "详细解释 BP 格式:动议结构、政府\/反对党阵营、角色(首相、反对党领袖等)、发言顺序、受保护时间以及信息点 (POI)。"
},
{
"time": "0:30:00 - 0:43:00",
"title_en": "Discussion on Necessary Debate Skills",
"title_cn": "辩论所需技能讨论",
"description_en": "Discussed sticking to relevance, using evidence, considering both sides, rebuttal, speaking clearly, and avoiding excessive speed.",
"description_cn": "讨论了保持相关性、使用证据、考虑双方、反驳、清晰说话和避免语速过快等技能。"
},
{
"time": "0:43:00 - 1:15:00",
"title_en": "Debate Segment 1: Defining Success (Negative Stance)",
"title_cn": "辩论环节一:定义成功(否定立场)",
"description_en": "Motion: 'Do you have to win to be successful?' Students took the negative stance. Initial discussion focused on fun\/process vs. winning.",
"description_cn": "动议:“你必须赢才能成功吗?”学生采取否定立场。初步讨论集中在乐趣\/过程与获胜的对比上。"
},
{
"time": "1:15:00 - 1:40:00",
"title_en": "Formal Individual Speeches & Teacher Rebuttal",
"title_cn": "正式个人陈述与教师反驳",
"description_en": "Students (Charlotte, Alex, Lemon, Celine) gave individual speeches (1-1.5 mins) against the teacher (affirmative stance). Teacher rebutted each speech.",
"description_cn": "学生(Charlotte, Alex, Lemon, Celine)进行了个人陈述(1-1.5分钟),反驳教师(正方立场)。老师对每个发言进行了反驳。"
},
{
"time": "1:40:00 - End",
"title_en": "Voting and Conclusion",
"title_cn": "投票与总结",
"description_en": "Students voted on whether the teacher's rebuttals were persuasive (all voted against the teacher). Teacher praised performance and set up next week's focus.",
"description_cn": "学生投票决定教师的反驳是否令人信服(所有人都投票反对老师)。老师称赞了表现,并确定了下周的重点。"
}
],
"vocabulary_en": "Debate, Motion, Government, Opposition, Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, Rebuttal, Point of Information (POI), Protected Time, Successful, Practice, Evidence, Relevant",
"vocabulary_cn": "辩论, 动议, 政府方, 反对党, 首相, 反对党领袖, 反驳, 信息点 (POI), 受保护时间, 成功的, 练习, 证据, 相关的",
"concepts_en": "British Parliamentary Debate Roles and Procedures; Success defined by process\/effort vs. outcome\/winning.",
"concepts_cn": "英式议会辩论的角色和程序;成功定义为过程\/努力 vs. 结果\/获胜。",
"skills_practiced_en": "Active listening, note-taking during speeches, structured argumentation, spontaneous rebuttal (through Q&A), speaking clearly and pacing.",
"skills_practiced_cn": "积极倾听、演讲中记笔记、结构化论证、即兴反驳(通过问答)、清晰表达和控制语速。",
"teaching_resources": [
{
"en": "Verbal explanation of BP rules.",
"cn": "对 BP 规则的口头解释。"
},
{
"en": "Visual aids on the board for key BP roles (implied).",
"cn": "用于关键 BP 角色的板书视觉辅助(隐含)。"
},
{
"en": "Prepared positive and negative statements regarding the motion for student reference.",
"cn": "关于动议的正反方陈述准备材料供学生参考。"
}
],
"participation_assessment": [
{
"en": "High engagement, with all four students contributing significantly to discussions and individual speeches.",
"cn": "参与度很高,四名学生都在讨论和个人陈述中做出了重要贡献。"
},
{
"en": "Students actively asked for clarification and engaged with the teacher's rebuttal questions.",
"cn": "学生积极要求澄清,并回应了老师的反驳提问。"
}
],
"comprehension_assessment": [
{
"en": "Students grasped the core concept of the BP format (Government vs. Opposition, roles) after the explanation.",
"cn": "学生在解释后掌握了 BP 格式的核心概念(政府方与反对党、角色)。"
},
{
"en": "Students successfully applied the concept to the motion, articulating nuanced views on 'success'.",
"cn": "学生成功地将概念应用于动议,阐述了关于‘成功’的细微差别观点。"
}
],
"oral_assessment": [
{
"en": "Clarity of speech generally good, though some students struggled with volume\/microphone issues (Celine, Lemon).",
"cn": "口语清晰度总体良好,尽管有些学生遇到了音量\/麦克风问题(Celine, Lemon)。"
},
{
"en": "Alex showed strong improvement in structuring arguments and direct rebuttal.",
"cn": "Alex 在构建论点和直接反驳方面表现出明显进步。"
}
],
"written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Focus was primarily on oral debate practice)",
"written_assessment_cn": "不适用(重点主要在口头辩论练习上)",
"student_strengths": [
{
"en": "Charlotte: Strong ability to articulate a position clearly and use personal analogies (races\/Spartan).",
"cn": "Charlotte:能够清晰阐述立场和使用个人类比(比赛\/斯巴达)的能力很强。"
},
{
"en": "Alex: Showed excellent critical thinking and direct rebuttal skills during Q&A sessions.",
"cn": "Alex:在问答环节中展现了出色的批判性思维和直接反驳能力。"
},
{
"en": "Celine: Provided a well-structured argument linking practice and incremental success (reaching goals).",
"cn": "Celine:提出了结构良好的论点,将练习与渐进式成功(达成目标)联系起来。"
},
{
"en": "Lemon: Focused effectively on the importance of the process and learning.",
"cn": "Lemon:有效地关注了过程和学习的重要性。"
}
],
"improvement_areas": [
{
"en": "Maintaining consistent microphone connection and volume (for students experiencing technical difficulties).",
"cn": "保持稳定的麦克风连接和音量(针对遇到技术困难的学生)。"
},
{
"en": "Adhering strictly to the 'no interruption' rule during formal speeches (especially for new students).",
"cn": "在正式演讲中严格遵守“不打断”规则(尤其是对新学生)。"
},
{
"en": "Ensuring correct grammar usage during speech (e.g., 'work hard' vs. 'work hardly').",
"cn": "确保演讲中正确的语法使用(例如,'work hard' 而不是 'work hardly')。"
}
],
"teaching_effectiveness": [
{
"en": "The modified debate format (individual defense against the teacher) was highly engaging for all students.",
"cn": "修改后的辩论形式(个人对抗老师)极大地吸引了所有学生。"
},
{
"en": "The teacher effectively explained complex BP mechanics in an accessible way.",
"cn": "老师有效地以易于理解的方式解释了复杂的 BP 机制。"
}
],
"pace_management": [
{
"en": "The initial explanation phase was detailed, but the pacing adjusted well for the practical debate segment.",
"cn": "初始解释阶段很详细,但在实际辩论环节中节奏调整得当。"
},
{
"en": "Preparation time (5 minutes) seemed adequate for students to structure their short arguments.",
"cn": "准备时间(5分钟)似乎足以让学生构建他们的简短论点。"
}
],
"classroom_atmosphere_en": "Positive, energetic, and highly interactive. Students were supportive of each other, even when disagreeing on the topic.",
"classroom_atmosphere_cn": "积极、充满活力且高度互动。学生之间互相支持,即使在主题上存在分歧也是如此。",
"objective_achievement": [
{
"en": "Students successfully participated in a structured argument simulation, meeting the practical objective.",
"cn": "学生成功地参与了结构化的论证模拟,达到了实践目标。"
},
{
"en": "The introduction to BP terminology was covered, though the full complexity of BP was postponed.",
"cn": "BP 术语已介绍,但 BP 的全部复杂性被推迟了。"
}
],
"teaching_strengths": {
"identified_strengths": [
{
"en": "Creative adaptation of the lesson to overcome team selection issues by having students argue individually against the teacher.",
"cn": "通过让学生单独对抗老师,创造性地调整了课程,以克服团队选择问题。"
},
{
"en": "Strong modeling of rebuttal, especially by asking challenging follow-up questions.",
"cn": "强大的反驳示范,特别是通过提出具有挑战性的后续问题。"
}
],
"effective_methods": [
{
"en": "Using a real-world analogy (England Football Team) to illustrate 'success without winning'.",
"cn": "使用现实生活中的类比(英格兰足球队)来说明“没有获胜的成功”。"
},
{
"en": "Allowing students to vote on the success of the teacher's rebuttal, reinforcing the judging aspect of debate.",
"cn": "允许学生对教师反驳的成功与否进行投票,加强辩论的评判方面。"
}
],
"positive_feedback": [
{
"en": "The teacher noted the high quality of student arguments, stating that 'not one single vote' was for her rebuttal.",
"cn": "老师指出学生论点的质量很高,并提到“没有一票”投给了她的反驳。"
}
]
},
"specific_suggestions": [
{
"icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
"category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
"category_cn": "发音与阅读",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "For Lemon and Celine, please ensure consistent microphone positioning to avoid intermittent sound feedback or being muted.",
"cn": "对于 Lemon 和 Celine,请确保麦克风定位一致,以避免声音间歇性反馈或被静音。"
},
{
"en": "Review correct adverb usage, specifically practicing 'work hard' instead of 'work hardly'.",
"cn": "复习正确的副词用法,特别是练习使用 'work hard' 而不是 'work hardly'。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-comments",
"category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
"category_cn": "口语与交流",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "All students should practice structuring their 1-minute speeches using clear signposting (e.g., 'Firstly,' 'In conclusion').",
"cn": "所有学生都应练习使用清晰的引导词(例如,“首先”,“总而言之”)来构建他们的 1 分钟演讲。"
},
{
"en": "Newcomers (Charlotte, Celine) should focus on observing the 'protected time' rule and refraining from interrupting during formal speeches.",
"cn": "新加入的学生 (Charlotte, Celine) 应专注于观察“受保护时间”规则,并在正式演讲中克制打断行为。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-gavel",
"category_en": "Debate Technique",
"category_cn": "辩论技巧",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Next time, explicitly practice giving and accepting Points of Information (POIs) to enhance engagement during speeches.",
"cn": "下次练习时,明确练习提出和接受信息点 (POI),以增强演讲过程中的互动性。"
}
]
}
],
"next_focus": [
{
"en": "Applying the BP structure to a new motion, potentially assigning explicit roles (Gov\/Opp).",
"cn": "将 BP 结构应用于新的动议,并可能分配明确的角色(政府\/反对党)。"
},
{
"en": "Focusing on 'More' vs. 'Less' arguments and strategic rebuttal.",
"cn": "重点关注“更多”与“更少”的论点以及战略性反驳。"
}
],
"homework_resources": [
{
"en": "Research one famous historical debate and identify the main arguments used by each side.",
"cn": "研究一次著名的历史辩论,并确定每一方的论点。"
},
{
"en": "Prepare a short 1-minute argument for the motion: 'The more you have, the happier you are.' (For next week).",
"cn": "为动议“你拥有的越多,你就越幸福”准备一个简短的 1 分钟论点。(用于下周)。"
}
]
}