Hello hi Mason. How you. It is actually a normal day today. We just have school, and it is and it is absolutely very boring. But you do look like you're in space right now, Matson. So maybe going to space could make it more exciting today. Why was it so boring, Mason? Because we have a lot of math craand and a lot of Chinese class, I think. And I actually do not really like some Chinese class. So I think that was really good. You do like, and why don't you like Chinese classes? Isn't it full of history and exciting things? No, no, it's full of words. I to memorize the words, and I like you write them done and totally like crazy. Oh my goodness, say I tried to learn Chinese and it's you guys. It's such a hard language. I mean, it's impressive that you can speak here writing it. I'm like, what is this? I've never been able to grasp it, so I find it quite interesting, I think. Okay, well, that's really cool, Mason. Well, I'm sorry about a boring day and je did on top of the world again. How are you today, Jaden? The normal hustle ling hustle ling been cthat the school going to school is exhausting. It's Yeah it's the first day of school until when we get to the school gages jam pack with students. Juda, would you like it if it was just you? Would you prefer it if it was just a school of you and your friends rather than everyone else? No things the other people could give a sense of competition Oh Yeah, that's Yeah that is actually Oh okay selling ling a bustling I love that word that still a best ssive exhaustion of school hi Stephen, how are you today? I'm fine. Yeah. Have you have you been to school? Yeah. Do you you had a holiday to new all three of you. Do you have a holiday last week? We have eight day holdid you do anything? Did you go away or did you stay? Stay? We were. Yes, I went to zjang. Why is that in in China? Oh, yes, it's it's a place in China. Did you have a nice time? Did you have a nice time? Few, it's good. They've been an awful time of your holiday. That would be horrible. I'm not sure if Chloe's joined today, she might still be on her holidays or just recovering from it. So we'll begin. If it becomes uneven, I will debate as well today. Or we might do what is known as the chair game, which Stephen all know quite well, and we might all get a chance to be the chair. So we'll see how it goes depending on our discussion today. So today's lesson we're learning about different ways of seeing the world and how the clash between them is behind many debates. Yeah the world is obviously seen so many different things. So I wanted to think first of all about people should be able to hire whoever they want for a job. Two, of course, the government should provide free health care in education. Of course, anyone should be allowed to live in any country they want. So we're going to be thinking about these to start with. Okay. So think about when you think about something is absolutely try and see the assumptions behind it. So for example, Chloe, say what are the assumptions? But hi, high Chloe. I got very excited. How are you today, Chloe? Are you okay? Yeah, Yeah. Yeah, in't quite good. Ever been at school? Yeah, Yeah. What did you learn today? Mason learned Chinese and wasn't happy about it. If Mason had a boring day at school, did you have a better day at school? I'm fine because I've. I need to write a story about monsters, like an English class monsters. That's really cool. And what was your story about the monster? What monster did you create? The teacher told us it deserve really needs to be really a monster. So I just written, the monster is like bugs, monstrous bugs. I like this although I hate bugs, I would hate that story. That would be such a scary story. I won't want to read it. He's scathe vote and Chloe you've we've just started we're going to be looking at whether we agree or disagree, okay with some of these ideas about the way we see the world because that's why we debate, right? Because we all see the world slightly differently. So we're thinking about what are the assumptions behind the of courses. So of course, people should be able to hire whomever they want for a job. So let's think about this, Jaden. Why does this idea of, of course, this assumption, why can this be dangerous sometimes when we're thinking. It's to. You are too are too. Not knowing what you are saying and you not you're not sure. It's not the truth. It's only your imagination. You imagine this is percent, 100% belongs to you. Assumptions are the root of most problems. When we assume something, we think something is correct, but we have no fact. We've not thought about it. We've not debated it. We've not had a critical thinking. We've just decided it's an assumption. I assume my best friend is mad at me when they're not. Yeah, of course, my best friend is always mad at me. How do you know? Did they say that? No. Well, this not fact then. So sometimes, especially when we're debating around the world, we can assume something. And that's why we need debating, because sometimes you might have a few jden that might be different to my view, and what you tell me could change my mind. And that's okay. And when we debate, you need to give a example of why you to the Yeah examples prove it. Yeah just because someone disagree, and I have changed my mind many times, I can be in a debate and think, Yeah, that team did better because actually they've done a really good research and actually I think their debate is better than mine. So sometimes we can have that and that's a really good part of debating as well as knowing when someone else's argument might be better than us because it doesn't mean we fail. It just means they've changed my mind about a topic. And that's a good thing. I like my mind being changed every night. What a jder. So let's think about this one then, Steven. Of course, people should be able to hire whomever they want for their job. Do you agree? Do you disagree? I agree. Okay. And why do you agree? Because if people want want for a job, they they must. This job end will will do the job very well. So hire them is a good choice. Okay, take your point. However, what if I am a manager at a shop and I've decided to hire my friend who isn't skilled for the job, but I want na hire them for the job because they're my friend and I want them to work with me? Your friend but your friend doesn't wasn't able to do this job and just you want. A his to do this job, but maybe he. He don't like this job. So thought it's it's okay. So should I still hire them or should I not hire them if I don't think they're good for the job? I only want them there is because they're my friend. No. So Stephen has now been convinced to my side because Stephen in that no you basically said no, I shouldn't hire you everyone because the can't just hire my friend. I tricked you Steve and I tricked you, mesa. What do you think? I also disagree, but I promise it is not because you're on that side. I think they're like, I think I like in this, like if you, I think I have friends. I like I hire one of my best friends and the other friends thini am not fair. So so like we will maybe have a fight or like, are you, but it will be not good. And also, and also like I disagree because I because I like in the same situation, I have a lot of friends and I hire a friend, but that friend is my bad friend, but if he he or she is not a good worker, and there are a lot like efriends, I like and they are very good waters and like they do things like pretty better, and but I do not hire them, so it will also be not fair. So I disagree. Okay, a hego point makes sense, but I am now the owner of my business, and I have people that are interviewing three people, interviewing this person. They've all decided they want to promote bill because bilhas been in the company for ten years. But I want to promote someone. I want to get someone new because I think it's good for morale. I think it's good for business. I think it's good for new employees. So shouldn't I, as the owner of the business, get the choice of who I have in my job? No, but like you know that bill is a good water, but like if you choose another person, like maybe maybe like another person is not a girl worker and you will lose money. Well, that Mason you didn't sign, you involve my trick. Okay, Jaden, what about you? Agree or disagree? Well, I think that I still will just disagree, but have a totally different example. For instance. If you hired the the branch where your family members, you may well and there are your cousins, have a strong relationship with you, it's not fair. It's like in a simple a volume one or two, it's that why the world isn't there. Is there out there all the whole world, there are lots of people on which have more experience than your the person who are going to be hired. So why not choose them and choose a inexperienced worker where who perhaps will make mistakes all over and learn and earn so much money that he or she did not deserve. Okay. So again, I hear what the saying because I do understand that that having family in is difficult. But then again, as an owner of a business, if I've got a family business, I want it to be run by my family. I want to hand it down to my children. I want to be able to choose who I would like to work for me. And I trust my family members more than I trust an outsider. So surely I should be able to choose whether it's a family or friend that works for my company, because maybe I trust them more, but surely there are someone else in the world that could be better than family members. And your family members could not have been properly trained in a few field business, though. I disagree. Okay. Well, then, Jaden, you may stay where you are. You were not my, your mind was not swayed clearly. Loe, what do you think? Hi. I actually also disagreeing because like actually if you want to have a friend or a person in your family to go to your company, then if they had a problem and then they don't know how to how to just work it out and then you need to help a lot of them and then you would be really busy and then there would be more problems for a company. Okay, nice point, Chloe. Nice point from jden's as well. You've actually sort of giving us more detail from jadens points. It's great to use your teammates options and then expand on them. It's a great way of debating. Again, che, it's my business, right? And if I own it and I am the the the top manager, surely I should be able to choose who I want around me. I don't trust people from outside. I can make less money if I have to pay somebody who's gonna to moan about pay and salary. Whermy family, they're gonna to work whatever time they want because they're gonna na want na hang out with me because I'm their family member. So I'm gonna to get more hours from them. I'm going na be able to pay them less. I'm going to be able to see them more often, and I'm going to be able to trust them more, right? No, because actually you can see them where wherever you can see, like in your house and then wherever you want to see them. And then there are just social acts also. You can see them. And then if if they don't want to go in your company, you can't just really let them go in your company. I can't force them. Well, well, did all of you. I feel like I've lost. I don't feel like I've won this argument, and I tricked Stephen over to the disagree side. So I certainly should win. Teacher. Win, teacher. We win because we learn from Steven things and hundred percent what happened? Jaden, Yeah, 100. But I could have got some of you to come over to the agree side. My goal here was to try and change your minds backwards and forwards. The idea that your minds could be changed like quite easily. But actually it is something about that, Jaden, though I convinced you from the first one, I convinced you by pulling Steven over. And I changed all your minds, didn't I? So it's really, you can see the power because then I couldn't get it back because I'd already pulled Stephen over to my side. Had already made Stevens argument seem like it wasn't the right argument. Drusteven mistayou've learned it from a, well, you didn't make a mistake. Stephen made a very good point, but essentially, yes, Stevens mind was changed. And that's something that can happen. You can be in a debate and realize, Oh, I've actually let the debating team win because they've been able to change my mind because the argument was really good. And the reality is this argument was always going to end up as a disagree because it's very hard to argue. Yeah, but well done all of you. And thank you, Stephen. It was very brave for me to go first. And I picked Steven because Stephens 's known me for a lot longer. So I knew that Steven would be alright, right, if I picked him. But as you can see, I convinced you from the first. But then I could not convince you back. I couldn't persuade you, had already persuaded you. By making Stephen, I'd already proven that I could change one person's mind. Therefore, all of you followed him. So also think about that as well. Sometimes do we follow people or are we making our own debates? Something to also think about. So main said, Yeah, I'm not here because I just want to agree with you. I'm also here because I've got another point to make. So freedom to what you want to do is more important than freedom from unfair treatment. Okay, our next one, of course, the government should provide free health care and education. Okay, Chloe, what do you think? Five speed. They I agree because. The government, if the people in the country or the city have some health care problems, they might need, they might don't have money, and then they needed help. And then if they don't have money, then how can they be healthy? And then they would, there would be more problems in there. So healthy. Mjaden, I want to disagree with chlove's point. Why is Chloe's point not an, of course. Why, why could, how could we see it in a different way? Wow. A. The government perhaps can't have enough money things you know there are lots of money there's lots of people including whole world million but the government couldn't you can't rely on the government to provide you of the government needs to give in the salaries to the workers too and might pay for some elementary schools things facilities so the you can't rely on the government for everything it could help you step by step. Okay, so we've got chorie saying yes, it should be because we need that health. We need people to be healthy. We need to be able to access care but jade and say no Mason, who's convinced you more? You going with Chloe? Are you going with Jaden? Wasn't expecting that. Okay. Yeah. Because first I I've got like like I think if the government gives every people health care, then it will spend a lot of money. And if you spend a lot of money, the tax will raise and and and unlike the people who works need to pay more and they will become more poor and poor. So like this is a cycle and they keeps and keeps on. So I think government should not have health care, or more specifically, I think the government should only give a little health care and education. Oh, interesting, Stephen, what do you think? Do you think Mason's is a good, compelling argument? Or is it Chloe, we should have health thcare. No, we shouldn't. It costs too much money. Where are you? Stephen? I agree with Chloe. Oh, okay. We've got a standoff. We've got two versus two. Okay, Stephen, why do you agree with Chloe? Because some some poor people can't afford the money to to rescue their health problem, but the free health care will make the poor people. Doesn't have, have the health problem and be healthy, and they will not, they will live longer and the free education. The free education makes makes more people learn the knowledge and will not there will not be some people that don't know anything. Okay, nice points from both of you here, Steve en, I like the fact that you also remember about that educational aspect of it. The uk has free education unless you pay private who can pay to go to school if you want to where their smaller classes. Yeah, better resources, better technology, but we have free health care. America does not. But what I'm going to say to you about this one, neither of you are right or wrong because that's the part of debating America has better healthcare. They look after when you pay for your health care, you get better health care. You get treated better, you get more advancements. In the uk, we've got long waiting lists. We are not of as advanced. We've got a lot of striking. We've got a lot of bad hospitals, bad conditions, but it's free. Yeah. So but everybody can access it. Anyone can get healthcare, anyone can go to a and e, anyone can go and have a surgery but here here some there are some exhospitals Oh, at in the uk yes, you can pay for private hospitals here. Yes, you absolutely can but not a lot of people do because why would you? It's free, but it puts a lot of pressure on the healthcare system. Whereas in America, paying for it is very expensive, very, very expensive. But their health care is probably better overall. But the problem is, is uk probably have more people saved every day than the American people do because the uk looks after anyone that walks through the door. So a bit of a challenge, right between both. Both of those arguments are correct and what I like, but in America, there's some riding motorcycle and using guns to shopeople. Yeah. Well, I mean, Yeah and the trouble is, is that they all go have medical insurance. Yeah but they don't pay as much tax. I pay a huge amount of tax. Most of my money goes taxes. So they take a lot of money. The government take a lot of my money to fund the nhs. So again, both arguments are valid. Kind of get what you're saying. Chloe and Stephen. Yeah teacher but teacher in the uk is pond and one pond equals eight are B Yes so the exchange is quite we're quite our money is not great at the moment our money is quite bad at the moment but yes essentially yes Yeah so think about that. Well done excellent job. Nice thoughts for your own selves as well. It would have been very easy for Stephen to have gone to their disagree team because that was the way it was going, but he went with his own ideas. Of course anyone should be allowed to live in any country they want. Oh, okay, Mason, what do you think? Do you think I could should just be able to come to Asia and live in Asia? Yes, I think so. Because like when you go to another country, you could learn their culture and like when you go back to your culture, you could share their culture to like your people. And they will learn from each other and they will be a big benediction between all of the countries. Okay. So Mason, many people would say though that just being able to go wherever, whenever you want to Yeah can cause problems with crime, can cause problems with taking health care, can cause a problem with people don't want to share their cultures. Why do you think it's okay for anybody to go to any country and perhaps not learn their language or not live by their cultural rules? You know, there are no a, there are now aeyes. And like you can use the phone to translate the language. And also if you prepare, like you prepare, you prepare and like prepare like the crime won't come. Like if you prepare something, you're saying it has to have rules. So it has to have you have to have rules to go into, say, I'm afraid, Mason, while your argument began strong, you have now ended up in the disagree camp because this motion, this, of course, is that there aren't any rules. I could just go wherever I like. I could do whatever I want. I could go wherever I like. I could just pop to Italy with no immigration, with no passport. You call, you call the please, call the please. But it means I can't go anywhere. It means I've got rules to abide by. I've got striyou think there there should be rules. We should be filtering it. Basically, it's not a bad thing. It's just showing you how easy it is to change your mind on emotion because sometimes we don't know what we're sort of saying about the motion, right? So I've been able to, I've been able to get you over to the disagree site. Okay. So Jadin, what do you think? Are you agreeing or are you disagreeing with this motion? Well, I'm in the middle, okay? So you'll okay, you can you can be in the middle. I'm going with it. You can be in the middle. Okay. Why you agreeing and disagreeing? Why do you any partially agree and partially disagree? Yes, I personally a brithing that people. People should be allowed to go to the country. They want things, the freedom. They could do something better by having freedom. And people tend to make better choices when they have those ownership and the freedoms and have a better consequences. The intenand, there are no unintended consequences. So people can put release themselves and have an outlet where they could the threat if they had freedom. So I perfectly agree that the people could be allowed to live in the countries they can. And I we just. Sometimes the people might not go to the countries for education, some uses, for normal uses, they might go to the other countries for something else that the government or the other military resources forces to know about, maybe to do something swedon't know those senses of slavery for the to steal something valuable and death things. So the is the the say isn't the robber is not in the police hand and cannot be captured enough. The police didn't have just a little taon the robber so they didn't know where they are. Hey okay jden you've made a good point. I've going to call it mind not made up section. I'm gonna put it in in a mind not made up but good good arguments away. So Steven where are you going? You disagreeing? You agreeing? Are you mine not made up? We've got a new category today. I mind none made up. Dehas been a whole new category in debating mind not made up team, which is not a team, but we're going to go with it today. Okay, Stephen, why are we mind not made up. Because first first go to the country that they want. It's a way to enjoy their cultures and also share their own cultures. But. But they have their own nationality. If if many people want to go to another country, they're their own countries will lose many locals. Then then the people in this country may decrease, okay, they could, okay, so weend up losing some of our workforce maybe. Okay. Nicely hurt, Stephen. Okay, let's been to even. Okay, Chloe, big decision. Where are you going? The mind know it now mine not made up or up to mine not made up again today. Okay, right? Ge is getting to mind not made up, right? Why? Why is your mind not made up chme? Because like I agree with Steven, but but like if I agree with them, then people can, if people can live in the country that they want. They can just enjoy their lives and then they could have a happy life and then they would want to, then when they just travel all around the world, they would might just go to their own home country and then they, and then. He or she could just tell other people but about about the facts about there and then how do they think about that? Like the opinion about that country? And then if the if it's disagreed to let people to can live in countries that they want, is that. People might be really mad and then they can't go to wherever they want and stay there. Then then they kind of will will have a lot of problems. Again, very interesting. Shi, tell you what's even more interesting, Chloe, Stephen and jden, is in some way you ended up disagreeing with this motion more than you did in mind, not made up. And the reason being is because what you were able to label is all the good reasons on why moving around would be enjoyable. You kept using that word, enjoyable. It would be great for people to move around it, be great for people to do whatever they want. Each of you, none of you could say, I completely, wholeheartedly agree, because of the fact of it's too restrictive. We might take locals away. You gave me more negatives than you gave me a positive. But you use the positives to talk about basically what is a counter argument, which is what you kind of want na use. Although it would be enjoyable, although it would be amazing to learn new cultures, the reality of moving about is not always that easy. Police, criminals, passports, culture, taking wolf workforce away, being patriotic. Yeah. So in some ways, although we have a mind not made up, your minds are kind of in the negative camp. Anyway, well done though. Absolutely fantastic. And I'm sorry, Nathan. I did to you what I did to Steven, but absolutely fantastic. Okay, so lovely to hear you all having these opinions as well. These are growing wing. We've got to say big ideas are fundamental. Yeah freedom or not freedom, individual or community, Yeah freedom versus not freedom. People should think for themselves. However, if you have too much freedom, then who's making those choices for a wider group? If you decide, Chloe, that everyone should have a day off every Monday, but then someone thinks that a day off every Wednesday would be nice and we did what you wanted because you wanted to be free wenever do anything. Yeah. So there's there's a balance to be made in some of these kind of arguments. So for example, if a government would impose a 20 mile per hour speed limit in cities, Yeah freedom says as long as people drive safely, they should be allowed to drive whatever speed they like. Having a low speed will limit will make drivers angry and frustrted and therefore likely strive more dangerously. But the opposed freedom, the ones that say no, that city keeping the Rosafe and cities less polluted is more important than letting drivers have their way. The speed limit may encourage more people to give up their cars and walk or cycle instead, which will make for a healthier, greener city. What this is showing you is is every argument, every motion has two sides to it. Yeah every motion can have it. We've talked about our own things, and we've also talked about we'll talk about this if we've got some time at the end, but I want a guide to get to our own big ideas today, which is before you die, would you choose to freeze yourself and deliver it 100 years later? Before we get into this, though, I want you to think about these of tips, five tips to improve your debate. So here we go. Every day, a sea of decisions stretches before us. Some are small and unimportant, but others have a larger impact on our lives. For example, which politician should I vote for? Should I try the latest diet craze, or will email make me a millionaire? We're bombarded with so many decisions that it's impossible to make a perfect choice every time. But there are many ways to improve our chances, and one particularly effective technique is critical thinking. This is a way of approaching a question that allows us to carefully deconstruct a situation, reveal its hidden issues such as bias and manipulation, and make the best decision. If the critical part sounds negative, that's because in a way, it is. Rather than choosing an answer because it feels right. A person who uses critical thinking subjects all available options to scrutiny and skepticism, using the tools at their disposal, theyeliminate everything but the most useful and reliable information. There are many different ways of approaching critical thinking, but here's 15 step process that may help you solve any number of problems. One, formulate your question. In other words, know what you're looking for. This isn't always as straightforward as it sounds. For example, if you're deciding whether to try out the newest diet craze, your reasons for doing so may be obscured by other factors, like claims that you'll see results in just two weeks. But if you approach the situation with a clear view of what you're actually trying to accomplish by dieting, whether that's weight loss, better nutrition, or having more energy, thatequip you to sift through this information critically, find what you're looking for, and decide whether the new fad really suits your needs. Two, gather your information. There's lots of it out there, so having a clear idea of your question will help you determine what's relevant. If you're trying to decide on a diet to improve your nutrition, you may ask an expert for their advice or seek other people's testimonies. Information gathering helps you weigh different options, moving you closer to a decision that meets your goal. Three, apply the information, something you do by asking critical questions. Facing a decision, ask yourself what concepts are at work? What assumptions exist? Is my interpretation of the information logically sound? For example, in an email that promises you millions, you should consider what is shaping my approach to this situation. Do I assume the sender is telling the truth based on the evidence? Is it logical to assume I'll win any money? Four, consider the implications. Imagine its election time, and you've selected a political candidate based on their promise to make it cheaper for drivers to fill up on gas. At first glance, that seems great, but what about the long term environmental effects if gasoline use is less restricted by cost, this could also cause a huge surge in air pollution, an unintended consequence that's important to think about. Five, explore other points of view. Ask yourself why so many people are drawn to the policies of the opposing political candidate, even if you disagree with everything that candidate says. Exploring the full spectrum of viewpoints might explain why some policies that don't seem valid to you appeal to others. This will allow you to explore alternatives, evaluate your own choices, and ultimately help you make more informed decisions. This five step process is just one tool, and it certainly won't eradicate difficult decisions from our lives, but it can help us increase the number of positive choices we make. Critical thinking can give us the tools to sift through a sea of information and find what we're looking for. And if enough of us use it, it has the power to make the world a more reasonable place. Okay, wonderful. We don't need to hear all those credits. Okay? So I want you to apply these today because we're going to do something a little bit different than we usually do. You are still going to debate, but you are not we are not going to talk about this motion beforehand. I would like you to think about it in your your own way. You do not need to be on a particular team. You are individually trying to convince us today. Okay? So a little bit like the exercise we've already warmed up with. Now you might all have the same opinion and that's fine. And then it's my job to try and convince the other side, okay? So you get to choose whichever side you want to be on today. Do not tell me, okay? You are going to make that motion when you come to debate for yourselves in a bit when you make your plea of which side we should all agree with. Jade, and are you gonna to ask if there's a major, major mind up. And not made you mind up section. And what are we going to ask adden? No, no, it was that. And I will allow you today to partially agree and partially disagree. So I will let you be in the middle. Okay? So you can think to yourself, actually I might agree with some things, but you disagree with others. All right, so before you die, would you choose to freeze yourself and deliver it to 100 years later having been frozen? You would stay your age. I think that let's make that quite clear about this idea. You would freeze yourself at the age that you are. And when you came back years later, you would come back in the same age. Okay, so things to consider before you start to plan your debate. Think about what would the world be like in 100 years time? And would you want to be a part of that world? What would be the complications of freezing yourself? How odd would it be to come from 2025 into, you know, 20, 35? Now, 20 hundred 25 to one, 2125? And how weird would that be? What would happen in that world? What would change for you? Would you biologically be okay to be frozen? Would it be a risk to be frozen? Would there be complications with that? Would you prefer not to come back as a child? Would you prefer to wait till you were an adult before you froze yourself? Okay. So this is also that kind of idea as well. Yeah. Or are you going to put yourself as an old lady, an old person? And how would that look if you win 99, then then game back 100 years later? Would that be really difficult? Yeah. So lots of things to think about. So like I said, you can choose. Do you want to be? Yes? Do you wanna be? No, do you wanna be not not made mind up yet? I'll call it that for today. Not made mind up. I'm going to give you four minutes, four minutes for you to prepare whichever side or whichever three sides I've got staokay, and then you're going to present them. Okay, four minutes begins now. No conferring. See if you can change someone's mind. Maybe someone in today's debate decides to go with no, but you actually change their mind and they go, well, actually, I've listened to someone and I think I've now like, ked go on the s team. You will all get two minutes to present your argument. Thank you all so much. Finish. Oh, okay, dude, no worries, we'll just pick for one else. Although I would say didn't have a look at that speech that you've probably already got. Has it got an expert opinion in there? Could you find one? Could you make it even better? Could you have you got an example in there? Could you add an example into your speech? I already added this. Amazing. Have you got an expert? Maybe a scientist is there a scientist that maybe has commented on it? I know. Eight. Yes, Mason, you had your hand up. Is that just you volunteering to go first, Mason? Our volunteer to go first. Okay brilliant all right so mis gonna get first then Jaden then it will be then we'll go Steven then Chloe will do it in that order okay alright right. Mason, do you before you die, would you choose to freeze yourself and deliver it 100 years later? Am mine not made up? First first, like I think yes, because like because I could do a lot of things, like why I wake up, like I could event like new things so people could use or advance some medicines against cancer and and or even I could advance the medicines for everlasting and we can live forever. But I'm now thinking of this Green ing like like like sayou will be freezed. And I think it will be totally cold. So, so like, and I do not want my corps to end up in that like cold lamp. So I will not go into that. And maybe like, why wake up at, like this is a circumstance that it was World War Three when I wake up. And I need to find, and, and I was, I would rather die die than fight. And also, like, alas, like, I think nothing. Their life has to follow the routine of live and death, because like if if all humans, like do this, and we will all live, and like all the animals will extinct because we will hunthem and shoot them, and like the earth, unlike the earth system, will explode and break. So in summary, I am mine, not made of. Okay, a good argument, Mason. Some nice examples. Nice rebuckling to me, to yourself. Okay, Jaden, are you ready before you die? Would you choose to freeze yourself and deliver it 100 years later? Well, hi everyone. My name is shaving today. I'm going to support the prompt. My mind now made up. I personally agree that things perhaps 100 years later there are some alien species in the earth. And sometimes and maybe our humans will outdie. And it will make information more accestable. For example, daily life habits, routines to the 80 species can be something like role models. But personally disagree things. You just freeze yourself and it was freezing. So there's about no degrees here. And according to the book, I contain multitudes, the renowned scientist, the expert who discovered e colleague, the other astreach on that bacteria, if you die, their bacteria is always inside your body. There is something still living there. But I think that at those freezing times your body bacteria will all die out and it return back to okay. And at that time, now after now we have no idea what species grew the world and perhaps we are dead and they were curious and the skeletons will be in the museum. I want I don't want to be in the museum to be pthere by those eyes. So that's why I support I have no idea. Oh, I was going to say you swapped it swapped it between a case so you're not sure which that we're in a not a mind made up version today. Okay, Stephen, are you ready before you die? Would you choose to freeze yourself and deliver it 100 years later? Okay. I don't make my mind up because. Because now this technology is not very mature. It's if I choose to freeze myself. This technology may frozen my sales and and maybe after many years, the scientists find the. The way to cure my disease to make me a ve and and I maybe won't get wake up again because my sales will be will be killed by the cold, but. I want I want to. The technology is bad, is good or bad until. I am going to die so so maybe after some years the scientists will make sure that if they free ze someone, the the person. Must wake up after some many years, interesting debates going on today. Okay, this idea of we keep them back, this frozen idea, this idea of like actually maybe it's not very healthy as well that okay, Chloe, your last one, where are you going? If before you die, would you choose to freeze yourself and deliver it 180 years later? Actually, I would think I did not make my mind up yet because. I think I want to I want to be frozen and go to 100 years later. Then you can see new things, you can learn things and then you can see the the things that they learn in that time. And then, but if you browse yourself, you still, you might want to stay there, but you're you're just going to just die there because you're just before dying. And then people, they might be bad at you and Yeah, I agree I agree with Mason because there might be a war in there and you might not be prepared in there also. So if you want me to tell you my opinion, then I will tell you I won't go because it might be scary and it but actually some people will want to go because there are many things you didn't know and then they know about it. So so I think some people would be wanted to go to there and some people not. So I am in the nomade, my mind, the which I do want to make clear, you wouldn't be able to do in a debate. But how much fun was that to be able to do and not made your wide up the version. Because what was really nice is to hear you all talking about both sides of an argument. And actually you can use that to your advantage because now you've thought about both sides. If you were on a team, whichever side you were on, you could use those as counterarguments very quickly. You've all convinced me that it's not a good idea, if I'm honest. I think what I've been listening to these debates, and I've looked at a few research on why I also think that it's a no and not a yes. Experts say that you can have cell damage, identity loss, and the lack of future chectechnological understandings would be very lost. I think in 100 years time, family would be gone. No one talked about the family. I've got to say, no one talked about the emotional side of being delivered. So yoube alone, you wouldn't necessarily have anyone that you knew. You could make friends, but they might be aliens, or we could be in World War Three or World War four or World War five, couldn't we? Maybe we've lost everything we're back to. We're ahead. People with poor health. Exactly. No one could revive me. Maybe I'd end up frozen for life. So I'm gonna to say that I disagree her with J and I think all four of you convinced me more about disagreeing that you did agreeing. But I think it was very clever. Yeah to show yourselves you can fight on both sides. Yeah you can use your knowledge of yes and no to make compelling arguments. You don't always have to give us all the negatives. On a negative side, you might be able to say why it would be exciting to go and visit a new world, to go and visit the world in 100 year times. I'd be so curious. But World War four could be happening, and I don't want to be a part of that. Yeah, very, very well done. You guys have done an amazing job today. I am so impressed at much more examples in your answers and much more convincing Chloe for you. I want you to think about structure now, how you deliver your debate. You've got some really great ideas. I just want you to think a little bit about how you deliver all the that in a package. Yeah thinking about those ways to start your sentences. Stephen, I want more examples from you now. Okay. I want you to think about maybe expert opinions, maybe examples in everyday life. Could what could happen paint me a picture of the situation. Mason and jadden, same note for you. Two expert opinions. Yeah see if you can find Jaden. You did a really good job on that today. You did do one. It's gonna to say you did a really good one today. So I wanted you to go a little bit further with that. Okay. And again, examples as well. All of you kind of examples is always going to help but each one of you did a better debate today. You did not one debate. We did four debates today. Just say and that's quite a lot to do in the lesson and critical thinking is getting so much better. Haven't we made any category? Not made minup yet? Well, soon, what being have a wonderful, wonderful rest of your evening. Have a wonderful week. I will see you next time when wheel wheel debate pen and papers should be outlawed and replaced with digital products. Let's see what you think about this, and I'll see you next time. Well, than all. Bye.