Hello Oh hi. Zoe, how are you? Good. Yeah, you're having a good day. Or so so a soso day. Hi, George. George is here again. Yay. Hi, George. How are you? Unhappy? Yeah. You have me today. If you had a good week. Yeah. Yeah, you've had a good week. That's good to hear. That's really good to hear. Hi, Mason. How are you? I'm fine. Yeah. Have you had a good week? No, no, Oh, no, I do like to hear that. Why? If you don't had a good week, Mason, because I always say no. You do do fair. Do you actually do always say that you're like, I had school, I had exams. Hi, Renee. How are you today? Fine. You're fine today. Yeah a good week, a bad week, a soso week. Yeah or is it a mind not made up kind of weak? Am I not made up? Maybe? Hi, Chloe. Is she there? Hi gloe. You're a king. Yeyou struggling to, I was going to say you're struggling to put the camera on. Don't worry, as long as we can hear you. You normally have that on every week. So if you can't get it on Chloe, then don't make that the thing. Reason why you can't be here today. Yeah. So don't worry if you can't get it in itbe. Nice to see you. But if we can't, don't panic. Jden, how are you? Oh, Jadon may not be there yet. Okay, well, we'll say hello to Jaden once he pops on. Well, welcome, welcome. Guess what? It is next week, guys. What celebration is happening? Christmas I'm so excited. Has everyone sent their list? Well, Yeah where is my truth? Actually, what I promise you and a wherever, when we finish today's lesson, I will take you all downstairs and I will show you my tree. Yeah I'll take my filters off and I'll take you downstairs to my living room. And we'll have at the end of the lesson and we'll have a little look at my my Christmas tree. Yeah there's a secret duck in there as well if you you might be able to see on the camera. I'll take you down there at the end, I promise. Yeah. Hi jdiare. You okay? Oh well, you're you're very well as I was going to say, you're always quite well. Lightning right today, guys. We've got our debate. We've also got our chaering again today. Now George and Mason did a fantastic job of chaering last week. The week before, I think it was now. So on my list, I still have to chair Zoe, Renee, Chloe and jden. So we'll try again and get through as many as possible. But again, if you don't do today then it will roll on. So you'll all get an opportunity to chair. Okay, I promise you. So Georgia makes a new vote chair today as you've already done it a couple of weeks ago. So it will either be itbe one of the other four, okay, so we'll go through all those chair procedures when we get there. But let's get ourselves into our discussion today. And we know about this already. We've done loads of this and you've all shown that you can do it. Jaden comes with pages of it. Convincing your audience needs arguments, it needs support, it needs evidence. Okay? Otherwise it's just your opinion on a page. So argument, Yeah supporting your side of the topic. So example that schools give too much homework. The essence of an argument. Students have too much homework to do that. They do not have enough time for sports or activities. Is this enough for a debate? Hands up if we think this is enough? Nobody. Well done. You've got the correct answer. What's wrong with this? Why is this not enough for a debate? Anybody know why this is not enough for my debating? Why would he not win with this opinions? Yeah. Got no reasons. I've got no reason. I've got no evidence. Just you're just making you're just making a statement. Yeah, I could make a statement any day. So point, what are you trying to say in one sentence? Explanation what you want to say, evidence, give something to back it up here and connect it. Maybe link back to the motion or link back to a bigger problem that it causes. You guys have been doing this over the last twelve weeks, so I have no doubt that you'll be able to implement this in today's. So this house would make all schools co educational. Co educational schools help children to learn how to get on with the opposite gender. If children spend all their time at school with their own gender, they will never understand the opposite gender. This will seriously disadvantage them in later life when they will have to live and work with people of the opposite gender. A woman who has been educated entirely in girls schools will find it very hard to assert herself if she ends up working in a male dominated profession. Had she had years of having to do this in class, she will be much better prepared. And then I'm linking it. Schools should be preparing children for life, and single sex schools obviously do not do this. This is why they should not be allowed to exist. Made my point. I made my explanation. I've made my evidence. I've made my link. Okay. How many arguments do we need? Third speaker. Second speaker needs at least two arguments. Okay? So that means you need four, five or six arguments for your team. Okay. And what evidence and examples? Real, not hypothetical, don't make them up. Yeah Princess Peach from Mario cartes is not someone that is going to give a very good example. So we must make sure that it's real. Okay? They should be general, not personal. Yeah, I hate homework. So it shouldn't happen. Doesn't mean it's a great argument and significant. They should be a big example, not a small one. Okay? We should get rid of plastics. Don't talk about a chocolate bar. Talk about actually the big plastics that are causing a big problem. And today's motion, we're going to be putting all of those ideas together. And obviously we're gonna to begin with a conversation about we should eat less meat. That's today's topic. Let's start us off, but let's start today with Jaden. I don't think, Jaden, you haven't started a debate off an age. It's a debate. It's it's a jden. Give us your opinion. What do you think? Do you think we should eat less meat? Mind not made up. Your mind is not made up currently. Okay. But I support but I support the affirmative to let to eat less meat better. Okay, so you're more on the affirmative side, but it's good because I did say let's make sure we got both sides because you are going to be potentially debating depends on any debates we get around which how many rounds we get today. So you could be on both sides. So let's hear your affirmative reason first, jade. And let's kick off there. Why do you think people should eat less meat? Things. There is all the things with the economy and all of the financial terms also it's with our health and with the animals welfare, according some jsome experts. Yeah animal wilfare. Because what happens to some of these animals? Jaden, they just be caged and they have no release to the wild. So they just her life will be fighting each other being food for the humans and almost 80, 80000 80000 billion chicks were cuto make the teens for cats and dogs a pets mm, that's quite a lot of chickens, isn't it? 18000 billion of these and also some wasted animals that can happen. Okay, this is a really good way to start us off. Okay, kloe, what do you think? Agree with jad's points. Got another point. Think no, it's fine. Actually I think. I am. At disagree. Humans needed health to survive and also like animals, but some animals are also eating meat. So there would be so many animals would being like killed or like being eaten. Oh, okay, yes. We're talking about the I suppose you talk about the food chain here. If we don't eat cows, and cows might eat other animals and and you know we don't actually stop other animals being eaten, so it keeps the population down around. Okay. So we're talking about the food chain, the cycle of life. That's a good thing to think about. We said it again. And also food webs they needed to eat. Yeah food we need to eat. And meat gives us nutrients. We can't say that that isn't a thing. Okay? Meat does give us health benefits. Some medical conditions need you to eat certain types of meat to keep your body healthy. However, in 2025, there is an argument to say that scientists have found other ways to get that nutrients into our body. And also think about we're not debating banning meat. We're debating whether we should eat less of it. And we've got to think about that on a global scale as well. How do you get people to eat less meat? That's another problem we have to think about. George, what do you think. I think we should eat, let's meet at, because eating, let's meat, global warming, global warming. And a major cause of global warming is deforestation. Forests are often cut down to create space for livestock farms. If we don't, if we don't, if we don't eat meat or reduce the eeating of meat, we will reduce the product of carbon dioxide. Excellent. This is a very big thing that nobody thinks about a lot. Well done, George. Yes, another thing to think about got closed circle life. But this one's a great one as well. This idea of deforestation to make way for livestock because perhaps we're eating too much meat, maybe we're making more than we need. We could be wasting it as well. George is a great, great idea. Okay, Zoe, let's hear your views. What do you think. We should not meet to meet because and may call global warming sense that like some cow and cow when they could make carbon diode so it could cause global warming. Yeah, it's got this big soup. Cows a lot, they start a lot and they make a gas called methane gas. And if you've got a large amount of cows farting in a field, they're going to make all this methane gas, okay? And that methane gas is going to not only go into the atmosphere, but it will also go into your stomachs as well, because they're breathing in all of these toxic fumes, all this gas. Okay. So this is a big reason for maybe eating less meat because it's causing a big environmental impact. Also plastic that we wrap it in the transport to take it to the supermarket. Yeah. And how much of that is needed? How much of that is actually being eaten and not chucked away in the bin? Okay. Hmm, something to think about. Okay, Mason, what do you think having listened to your classmates, what do you think what you say about micro classic? Because you know that I'm going to sort of talk about the water cycles. So in the micro classistic, people pollute pollusome sorow bottles into the sea and the sea and the sea like evaporates and goes into the air and the water condenses and falls down onto the grass and the grass are eaten by them a cup. So so actually we are also eating a so actually it's a this is an even this is an even bigger problem Mason this you've now gone to the to another source of a problem here is is that not only is are they creating pollution, but they're potentially eating harmful sort of bits of plastic that potentially are harming us that are not good either. Yeah, because actually, if you do something on a big scale, if you do something in this massive way, the trouble is is that everything affects everything. Yeah but it's big business. It makes a lot of money. Yeah, it's a big, big factor of the economy. People start eating less meat farmers start making less money. Economies start making less money. There's impacts on the other side. There's problems if weeat less. Renee, please give us your thoughts. What do you think? I'm not sure, because, well, if we eat too much meat like it is already said, we we will. We will make we will make global warming. Even worse than it is never. But if we eat to less meat, it will also prevent us from being healthy. Exactly. So if we don't eat enough meat, if we don't get enough meat in the diet, then we can be unhealthy that way. Yeah, excellent. So so and also, like I said, there is an impact. Yeah and a lot of people rely on, like I said, there are medical conditions out there. I am actually a person that has has a medical thing that needs me to eat red meat on a regular basis to ensure that I have enough energy because I have something whereby I've got blood cells that are too big, okay? And so by eating red meat, my blood cells say the right size. So mine, me, actually, sometimes I need it to regulate. So actually, if I ate less meat, I could be unhealthy. So we've got to be really careful about what we're saying here. You know how much less meat is a good idea? Do we acknowledge on the negative team that, yes, maybe we should all be eating less meat, but it needs to be done in the right way? Yeah. Is the affirmative team going as far as saying, let's ban it all, let's actually get rid of meat altogether? We should only be eating it once a week? Yeah. Should we be making sure that maybe as we grow our children, as you guys are growing up, do we need to change your diet? Is an adult more at risk if we just take loads of meat or out of their diet? And which meat is worse? Beef, lamb, cows? We got to think about that. Yeah what is going to be a worse option? Well done, all of you. I'm very excited for we're going to come up with today. Right. Let's put you all back up here, right? So other things to consider in this debate today. Oh, we've got homework. Other things to consider in this debate today is the economic impact. Okay, what eating less me will actually do to our diet, can you make people eat less meat? How do you implement that? How do you stop that? Because farmers are always going to produce it. People are always going to buy it. So how do you make it? This could be a very difficult problem. Equally, is it going to solve your pollution problem if I eat less meat? Is is the pollution issue really going to go away or is it not going to make that much of an impact? Think about that as well. When you're on the negative side today, is it really gonna na solve our problem? Don't know. Yeah or on the affirmative team, maybe you're saying a little bit yes, Mason. I just want to make a joke. I think the cow will agree with the negative on their body. The patterthe know Frederick the cow might. Yes. Frederick the, yes, really? Frederick the cow, Yeah, might agree that we should eat less meat youlike to live. Wouldn't he youlike to have a little, a little bit of living? Who else thinks that Frederick the cow might be quite happy? Yeah, I think he would as well. That's it's a good point. It's a good point. They're misare the animals happy. Are we looking after the animals? Very well, that's the other thing. Is it cruel to all these animals? George was saying earlier, you know, that we've got them all caged up. So is this a problem? Okay, let's put you in teams and I'm going to get my spinner out okay, I'm going to get my little spinaround. I will give you some time to to get yourself prepared once you know what teams you want but I want to first of all who so we know George and Mason will not be chairing but let's find out who will be chairing today. Chloe. Chloe is gonna chair for our first round today. Chloe all for everything you need on is there going to be your audience? I will be the audience because Oh, I know there will need to be an audience. Mason you are correct. The six of you now so you know, will need to be an audience member as well for this round. You are 100% right. Mason, right. To make it fair because we're gonna do, we're gonna at least get two rounds of this. So the people on the affirmative team, the two people on the affirmative team, George, you have made it over to the affirmative team and will be the team captain of the affirmative team for this round. And joining George will be Mason got Mason and George team going on. Okay, on the negative team today we will have this this round. By the way, Chloe will Chloe's chair so it can't be Chloe. Renee will be going on to the negative team as the first speaker. And then we're going to have with Renee, but Carby Mason, he's already on the affirmative team and the copy George is also on the amenof deep, the copy clis. She's a it can't be Renee. She's already on the negative dude. Oh no, about amazing. So Zoe. Right but everyone's going have of time jadden will definitely be in the next round of debating okay so you won't share next you will debate next because you will now be the audience. Well look George is already ready so I'm gonna give you a few minutes I'm gonna give five everybody five minutes okay Chloe do feel free because you will also debate next because I want everyone to debate today. So Chloe also you will go on to the agree team Chloe. No, the disagree team Chloe, when you have your debate in a moment in the next round so you can prepare your disagree. Okay, Chloe, that makes sense for you. And jden, you can prepare an agree argument because you'll definitely be on the agree team in the next round, okay? So just everyone knows what they're doing. Okay, lovely, let's do. And then Renee or Zoe, let's do our little thing because the person who will be in the chair position next round, so I can give you what you're going to be doing, Renee will chair the next round. So Zoe, in the next round you will do the agree team. So you need to prepare your negative and affirmative. Okay, right. Let me just move you around just so that you can see Chloe going to pop you back up there just so you can see everything and you can make get your two minutes to get ready, make your notes. You can use the notes on the board as well. And then we're going to start I want at least two rounds today. And jden, Chloe and myself will be having a discussion at the end of it. What do you need? Mason? What can't you say? I want you see the negative. They're negative. All fine. Okay. So you and George on the affirmative, Renee and Zoe on the negative. Yes. Do look at that negative though, georand Mason, because you never know, there could be counter arguments. You could think of ree Zowe, maybe think about what that affirmative team might speak about. George is in a fine position because he's got all his affirmative speech ready. So George, maybe think about those rebuttals. You've got time to think about what could you be what could the other team be talking about? How are you going to rebuttle them? Maybe. So we I'm going to start writing up the chair stuff for you. I finished writing amazing, right? Just let everybody catch up. So if you've done any, you're ready. Maybe reread it, check it. Second. 我的天天哪。不不,那个超啊。That's up there for you, Chloe. I'll do two minutes there this week because then we should get two rounds of debating in today. And then sybiand jadden, I have noted then that you guys will chair next week. I've got a minute half. I can see that Georgia Mason already, they've got the game phases on ready for debating. The girls are seriously writing. Renee's got all her lovely post it notes ready. Zoe looks ready as well. Actually. How are you doing, Mina? If you need the time, that's absolutely fine. Okay, we've got one minute till our debate. Yes, Mason. Playless, you're just having to play with it. Well, I've learned any trick, guys, anybody that is waiting, I've learned any trick this week. I don't know if it will work for us. Hang on. I need to take this background off. I think there we go. Look, I'm in my little space, my Harry Potter, and I have a brand new thing that I can do now. Is it this one? I look like I'm like in some kind of like futuristic space. I'm very excited by this. It's quite cool, isn't it? You can do. I knew all these ones before, but I found this one. You mm, look at that. Okay? I'm just magic. I do this. I'm just, I'm just magical. Mason, I'm just very magical. Anyway, I'm going to go to space. I think, I think space will be good for this debate. Right? Here we go. Let's put you all into your places. So we've got Renee, we've got Zoe, we've got dud. We've got Mason. We've got our chair. Please be upstanding for our chair. What is that? You need to recharge Mason. Whatever that was. You need to recharge. The robots told you to recharge. Brilliant. And we've got Jaden, who is in the audience with me. Okay. No battery precharge. This is so funny. Do you need to recharge Mason? 哇哎呦这,好。Okay, Chloe, I will do the timer for you, but chair Chloe, it's okay christcharge, sorry. Okay, Chloe, it's over to you. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's debate. We are discussing the topic. We should eat less meat. Affirmative team speakers are George and Mathan, and the negative team speakers are Renee and Zoe. You have two minutes and 30s each. George, your time starts now. Today I'm talking about the topic, should we eat less meat? I think we should eat less meat. It is for three and for three reasons. First of all, eating less meat slows global warming. Global temperatures has have already risen by 0.745Celsius. And further increase to two Celsius could make 30% of the land species sixteenth. A main cause of this warming is this forestation. Tourists are often cut down to create space for livestock farms. Trees absorb carbon dioxide against that trap heat, so cutting them down means more carbon dioxide stays in the air. By eating less meat, we reduces the demand of for livestock farms. And and second, eating less meat protects endangered species. Many animals are on the brink of extinction because of meat consumption. Less species like Arabian orcs are hunted for their meat, while marine animals like sharks are overfish for dishes like shark bean soup. Additionally, the forestation for livestock farms destroys the habitat where animals live. Reducing meat intake lowers the of these harmful activities, giving endangered species a chance to survive and preserving biodiversity. The last point, eating less meat avoids cruel animal treatment. 90% of farms live in crowded on sanitary factory farms. Royal chickens raise for meat roll so fast that their legs often break under their own weight. They can barely move in their small cages. No living being should suffer this pain. Eating less meat means fewer animals are subjected to such real conditions. Allows us to treat our creators with kindness and respite. That's all. Thank you, the speaker, George and ree. Your time starts now. We think that we could still it's meat, even though if it's in fetime fewer amount, because firstly, humans need me to keep a healthy diet, to keep healthy. Some some people have, some people have illnesses that if you do not eat meat, you can, it can prevent you from having enough energy or maybe some other sources of of living. Also, if we don't eat much meat, then. Farmers will not able to live, won't be able to live because think they ay make a living by, they make your living. Bye. Selling meats. And if people don't eat meats, there won't be any people buying meats. If they won't be any people buying, then. The farmers can't earn living, and they might. And they might hunger to death. In conclusion, I think that we can still eat meat even if it is in a smaller amount. Thank you, speaker Renee and Mason, your time now. Muted. So hello, my name is Mason and today I'm our support a ship team. We should eat less first animals are be caged. Actually 1000 800 billion chicks are used for dogs and cats. And it is really, really crufor. The also microbe plastic. And the water is dissoland. And after evaporation they go up into the sky and after condensation they go down and goes into the dirt. There gross grass. And when the cows and sheep and goats and pigs eat grass, they they sort of eat plastic also pollution, pollution with farts of cows, sheep and goats can some is also very cruel to the earth. And global warming can be used after the frustation used to create space for livestock farms. If we don't eat, if we don't eat meat, like we can reduce the eating of, we can save earth also, also going back to microroplastic pollution or global warming. These are all sorts of pollution. And this will really cause us to to get into danger. We all want to make earth嗯healthy,sort of healthy and do not destroy. So so in my opinion, I think we should eat. Let me thank you. Thank you, speaker Mason. Zoe, your time starts now. I think that we should still eat meat. And on following point, so firstly, according to the food pyramid, meat is also important for the health which make have protein and you should also and also nutrition for meat and also iron, vitamin be twelve and vitamin d. You could be strong and have energy if you balance your diet and it could also safe and and leave stock for farms if you eat them. But if you don't me no people will want to buy them. If people doesn't want to buy them, then maybe then maybe there will be no money for the former mer who at the the animals. And there's also no point by having the earth healthy if you don't, if people don't survive without eating meat. So I am conclusion, I think, that we should still eat meat. Thank you. And do you have any questions? We have two minutes. Jden, do you have any questions? Do you want to go first? I have no, you have no questions che. I also have no questions from the audience either. Okay, audience and China, it's time to vote, right? Okay, lovely speakers. Me, Jaden and Chloe are popping off to another room to deliberate. We'll be back in a few moments so to sit tight, okay. Jaden and gloe, hello. Okay, who do we reckon? Who do we reckon? Had the best debate there because there was so much we had like Zoe's thing, all about the energy in the food prose really good, the B12. But I also really liked I really liked Mason's idea of like the micro plastics and George's whole idea about like endangered species and biodiversity. What do you think, Cory and jadem? Well. I think George use. Some words. George readagree and Medison give examples. So we there was examples. So we think more examples. We think maybe that in what do you think, Lara, who do you think was better? Who do you think has clinched the win for you? Who do you think has got the win for you? I think they also like the two teams got very great. Like my I think George, I think I think George, I think the affirmative team. Yeah should we go back and say, like Yeah, we thought that both teams did pretty well. We thought they both had very good arguments, but it was clinched. Like the one that won for us is George's argument about about biodiversity. Okay, Chloe, you're gonna to go in and you're gonna to announce that winner. Okay, right here we go. Okay, okay, we are back. Okay, check loe over to you to announce the winner. The two teams have got really great like arguments that we think that the affirmative team had won because like Georgi's examples and idea and point. Yeah we really like the biodiversity angle, George, and also the idea of the mico plastics from Mason. But Zoe and ree, what we really liked about your debate was this the nutritional and the energy aspect that you had. But we do think the biodiversity just went enwell done. George and Mason, office winners. Okay, it's time to mix our teams a Renee, just like, no, no, no, right? Renee is going to go into the chair position. We are going to put Chloe in to our position here. Mason is going to come join me in the audience. We are now going to put Jaddan's definitely gonna to go over to here into the agree team. George has popped off. Where's George? God, Zoe, I'm gonna swap you now into the affirmative there he's back. And George is now gonna swap over into the negative team. Okay, don't worry. If you've not prepared as much for this debate, that's fine. There's lots of things on the board for you georjust. So we now have a whole different set of teams. Mason, maybe think about a couple of questions we might want to ask them or grill them on afterwards. Okay. All right, let's bothis round. Okay, Renee chair. Renee, it's not my gig. It's yours. Over to you, Renee. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's debate. We are discussing the topic we should eat less meat. Afmaaffirmative speakers are Zoe and jden. Negative speakers are Chloe and George. You have twelve minutes, 30s each, though your time starts now. I think that we should eat less meat because meat is unhealthy and may make you and if that if someone is a vegetarian, they cannot eat meat. And also some religions also have the the Coto not eat meat and also raw meat can make people's sick if it's not fresh and come can cause global warming since cocause meththane gas and if you eat need animals will die and they and it could also if we eat less meat we could help for livestock farms and actually if you, if the farms are very much people eat less meat then it may help global warming. So in conclusion, I think that we should eat less meat. Hello you. Your time starts now. In my opinion, I think that we should still eat the same amount of meat first. I think that meat can sometimes help your body health. And it has a food chain or a food web. Animals needed to eat meat and we needed to eat meat. So even though the meat contains fat, but doesn't fat contains like things or things like good for your body and go for your health. And would you want to be dead or in death by just eating lesser meat? We we won't, right? We needed the money and the economy to like survive in this world, like Shanghai or different places like London. We needed so much money to buy things for our health, and we needed money to buy other things that we needed, just like we need meat and different food. So we needed meat and money to survive, and we won't be healthy if we don't eat meat because it provides some medical health. And some people, like teacher Lisa, we needed to have a great amount of a need to survive. In conclusion, we needed meby our house, but we also need to keep them out on to survive in our lives. Thank you. See den your time starts now. So hello everyone. My name is Shaden. Today I support the notion that we should eat last meat first. I should let you this is not video. We've all heard the arguments against me. And yet in the eu and the us, only between 16% of people don't eat it. So that's it's like a noise gig on some jdid. Yeah I think that the house of the processed meat is just like equals to group one, and the red meat just equals the group two a. And so guys, you know that also in the house department that 3050 kilo of the red meat per week is okay. And so it's the same thing with the environment. If we eat too much meat and all of the animals must be devoted to your warehouse to eat, there are 15 global g and so it equals 1001, 15000 gallons of water and loads of loads of the hay. And the factory farming must let the animal welfare be well. Okay, now let's talk about the economic department. My favorite term, the financial personal health expense, the expenwould be processed meat is for the cowe program, just like in the charstorsignature selection. And we need to just be the same for the animals. One kilo of these cost, well, $10 to $15 in the uk now is a public health care cost excessive, right? Meat, processed meat intake, increase the the risk of the triby diseases of more than $410000000000 per year. So the government subthe burden. Now most countries are subsito livestock farming to be, to keep the price quite low. The farming need to support the prices. The uk spends yearly 20000 billion dollars on the meat. Well, monwell monreas a chair. You're keep everyone on time. Yeah don't ever apologize for stopping someone at the time, jade and everyone knows what time they've got to stop. Yeah, well done. When they Carry on, your time starts. Now I must disagree with the with jfirst. I am going to have some counter ments first. Some people says that let's meet six endangered species, but endangered species faces from multiple factors, including habitat losses from all human activities, pollution and invasive species, not just meat production. Cutting down a meat alone will solve these complex problems. We won't say solve these complex problems. We need broader, more comprehensive solutions to protect biodiversity, rather than focusing on reducing meat intake. And some people like jsays that that some some farms possdisease, but only sustainable Cal farming leads to leads to diseases. Sustainable meat farming you use, see scientific farming, farming methods, and does not evoloke to diseases. The solutions, the solutions of diseases is to do some scientific researches and and I will have some some points too. First first me at to provide essential, they eat daily, easily absorbed nutrients. The iron in meat is two, two, three times easier for our bodies to use than the iron implants. This helps stop iron shortage, also called irnia. Many kids who don't eat meat have these problems. 30%, but only 10% of kids who eat meat do. For example, a ten year old girl with anmia got better by just eating a little chicken every day. For kids, pregnant woman and poor families, meat is a good source of nutrition that is hard to replace. And we can't hear you, Renee. Okay, go on then, Renee. Thank you. If you have any questions, we'll have two minutes to ask. No question. I have a question. I have a question to each of you. So Zoe, so what about a food chain? Will a break? I want to ask you because I do also you mentioned about like you mentioned about global warming and pollution, but like about the of the diet of you break or. I don't really understand that. I can't hear what you saying. Basically Mason is asking, it's asking Chloe will when she's talking about the food cycle by eating less meat, will it break the food chain? So he's asking he's asking Chloe, will it break the food chain or would it just change it slightly? What do you think, Chloe? I'm asking Zoe now. Chloe. Oh, sorry, Zoe. Yeah. It could cause global warming because of the gas so that it could cause dii'm called born dogs. Okay. So the second question for Chloe, can you talk about some can you what about pollution? Like is is there this benefits for pollution or is just for like disagree? Can you say the like the last part again, maybe maybe you can just say, can you talk about pollution, the benefits of pollution? The benefits of pollution is like we can eat less meat, but if we eat less meat, Oh wait, pollution. We can actually help the pollution by we can. Using different kind of. Like using a weight less other because actually meat is the things the things of one that you needed every day. Okay, like for George, I want ask like wanabi crew to kill animals. You says that it is cruel to to kill animals, but if we have some sustainable American farming, the farmers won't kill the won't kill the animals for them. I won't kill the animals and the animals will have welfare too. Okay, okay, so I actually forgot my question for Jesus, so I don't have a question for Jaden. That's not a problem. Okay, Renee. The audience and chairs tend to vote, it is time for us to vote. Okay, right? Gonna to make sure I keep the right people in this room and take the right people with me. Okay, goodbye we go right, hang on. Okay, what do you think? What do we think? Who do we think that was? A really tough debate. I think because Jaden had loads of evidence, George has loads of evidence. Chloe made a good point about sort of the idea of the food chain and Yeah and then but Zoe made a really good point about the sort of like the pollution and stuff. So who do you think convinced you more? Mason? You asked quite a lot of questions. So I feel like you were swaying towards one or the other. Which one were you more convinced by? Be the anddraah. So we're going with jyeah, but this is the thing. They're on different teams. So which team are we gonna give it to? Yeah, he did. And flowy jden it che with jand Chloe at the right different sides of the demones. Chloe we're gonna give it to George and Chloe we're gonna give it to the negative team. Okay, are you ready? While we're gonna go back in, Renee, you're going to give our feedback. We're going to give it to the negative team. All right here we gain them. Okay, Renee, please give us the results. A result is that the negative side is the winner because I think that to Chloe, well, I think that she had well made use that structure. Hey, the structure was really good. Yeah. And George has some excellent opinions done. Well done, Renee for chairing as well. Renee, never, ever, ever be scared to stop someone in a debate. Yeah if their time is up, their time is up. All right. And that's absolutely part of debating. Yeah jdenzoit was actually really tough. We really struggled in that room because we really felt like each and every one of you in that round had something to offer. Like zoyou were talking so much about the pollution. Jaded, you talabout this Charles Darwin, George, you brought in some of those kind of the aspects of of all those kind of like you know how animals will help, won't be a problem with of deforestation. You kind of also counted your own argument. And Chloe, we really liked the fact that you were talking about actually how meat was for energy. And you used me as a live example, which was really quite clever to use. So it was it was really quite exactly, but it was a, this was a really tough debate because it could have gone either way. And so I think it's a commenyou know, it's a commendation. And actually, Mason, I've got to say, as an audience member, those questions were fantastic. They were really pinpointed at each person. It showed that you would actively listen because sometimes being an audience can be hard. You can switch off, right? And part of debating is how do you stay engaged with what people are saying? How do you make sure that you're going na be part of this debate? So I'm really impressed with all of you in incredible work, always incredible work. So we didn't really get a final. It was a draw, really. And negative and affirmative team ₩1 round in this. So I think we're still none the wiser. We still don't know if we should eat less meat or not. We don't know. Next week we're gonna to be looking at, is digital art just as worthy as classical painting? So we're talking, is it doing it on your laptop as good as drawing it when your hand? This will be quite an interesting one. I don't know if there's any artist in the house. I'm not an artist. I can't draw anybody. Boddraw anybody. Can anybody do art? Zoe, you can do a bit of art. Anyone? An artist? No, no, it's an artist. Well, this will be it. Oh, you can, Chloe, or I'll be very interested to hear what you think about this. So prepare next week's argument. You guys say it again, Mason. Sure. Well done. You guys are amazing. Absolutely incredible. Honestly, incredible Christmas tree. Oh my Christmas tree. I did promise the Christmas tree tonight. Okay, right. Well, God is just gonna pop my camera off for 2s. I'm gonna take you all downstairs, gonna walk down the stairs and I don't wanto fall down the stairs and you all laugh at me for falling down the stairs. Right off we go. I'm going downstairs, you're coming down my house with some Holly on the stairs. Like just if I fall over, then you'll all laugh at me and I won't be able to live it down. Okay, right. Let's have a look. I need to take that all off, right? Hopefully this will work. End of class. Treat a, there's my Christmas tree. Don't if you can all see it. Okay. And I don't know if you can see in there's a secret little duck in there as well. Look. Yeah, we've got some stockings. Hang on, stockings a bit. But Yeah, there's my Christmas tree next to my tv. There's a Christmas street. Rion, my house is so dark. Rean E, I have such a dark house. Enjoy the rest of your week. Merry Christmas all. Have a wonderful Christmas. You're amazing. And I'll see you after. Bye, 哦拜拜,拜。
处理时间: 29151 秒 | 字符数: 39,660
AI分析
完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
"header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
"course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
"course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
"course_subtitle_en": "Debate Session Analysis - LS04DB-B",
"course_subtitle_cn": "辩论环节分析 - LS04DB-B",
"course_name_en": "LS04DB-B",
"course_name_cn": "LS04DB-B",
"course_topic_en": "Debate: We should eat less meat",
"course_topic_cn": "辩论主题:我们应该少吃肉",
"course_date_en": "1218 (Implied)",
"course_date_cn": "12月18日(推断)",
"student_name": "Zoe, George, Mason, Renee, Chloe, Jaden",
"teaching_focus_en": "Conducting a formal debate focusing on structuring arguments (point, explanation, evidence, link) and managing debate procedures (chairing, audience engagement).",
"teaching_focus_cn": "进行正式辩论,重点关注论点的构建(观点、解释、证据、连接)和辩论流程的管理(主席、观众参与)。",
"teaching_objectives": [
{
"en": "Students will effectively construct and deliver arguments with supporting evidence for a given motion.",
"cn": "学生将能针对既定动议,有效地构建并阐述带有支持性证据的论点。"
},
{
"en": "Students will practice roles in a formal debate setting, including speaking, chairing, and audience participation.",
"cn": "学生将在正式辩论环境中练习发言、主持和观众参与等角色。"
}
],
"timeline_activities": [
{
"time": "Start",
"title_en": "Attendance and Greetings",
"title_cn": "点名与问候",
"description_en": "Checking in with students, noting feelings about the week, and discussing the upcoming Christmas break and the teacher's Christmas tree.",
"description_cn": "与学生交流,询问本周感受,并讨论即将到来的圣诞假期和教师的圣诞树。"
},
{
"time": "Warm-up\/Review",
"title_en": "Debate Structure Review",
"title_cn": "辩论结构回顾",
"description_en": "Reviewing the essential elements of a strong argument: Point, Explanation, Evidence, Link (PEEL structure), emphasizing the need for real, general, and significant evidence.",
"description_cn": "回顾强有力论点的要素:观点、解释、证据、连接(PEEL结构),强调需要真实、普遍和重大的证据。"
},
{
"time": "Main Activity 1",
"title_en": "Round 1 Debate: We Should Eat Less Meat",
"title_cn": "第一轮辩论:我们应该少吃肉",
"description_en": "Round 1 with Chloe as Chair. Teams: Affirmative (George & Mason), Negative (Renee & Zoe). Discussion covered health, economy, animal welfare, and environmental impact (deforestation, methane, microplastics).",
"description_cn": "第一轮辩论,Chloe担任主席。正方(George & Mason),反方(Renee & Zoe)。讨论涵盖健康、经济、动物福利和环境影响(毁林、甲烷、微塑料)。"
},
{
"time": "Evaluation & Rotation",
"title_en": "Round 1 Voting and Team Rotation",
"title_cn": "第一轮投票与队伍轮换",
"description_en": "Teacher, Jaden, and Chloe deliberate; Affirmative team (George\/Mason) is deemed the winner for the first round. Teams are reconfigured for Round 2, with Renee chairing.",
"description_cn": "教师、Jaden和Chloe进行评议;第一轮评为正方(George\/Mason)获胜。队伍重新分组进行第二轮,Renee担任主席。"
},
{
"time": "Main Activity 2",
"title_en": "Round 2 Debate: We Should Eat Less Meat",
"title_cn": "第二轮辩论:我们应该少吃肉",
"description_en": "Round 2 with Renee as Chair. Teams: Affirmative (Zoe & Jaden), Negative (Chloe & George). Focus on counter-arguments, economic impact, and health needs (teacher's example).",
"description_cn": "第二轮辩论,Renee担任主席。正方(Zoe & Jaden),反方(Chloe & George)。重点是反驳、经济影响和健康需求(教师的个人例子)。"
},
{
"time": "Conclusion",
"title_en": "Final Voting & Wrap-up",
"title_cn": "最终投票与总结",
"description_en": "Round 2 result was a draw. Teacher praised student engagement, especially Mason's audience questions. Announced next week's topic and showed students the Christmas tree.",
"description_cn": "第二轮结果为平局。教师赞扬了学生的参与度,特别是Mason的提问。宣布了下周主题,并向学生展示了圣诞树。"
}
],
"vocabulary_en": "Debate, motion, argument, support, evidence, opinion, affirmative, negative, deforestation, biodiversity, methane gas, microplastic, co-educational, factory farms, economic impact, rebuttal.",
"vocabulary_cn": "辩论,动议,论点,支持,证据,观点,正方,反方,毁林,生物多样性,甲烷气体,微塑料,男女同校,工厂化农场,经济影响,反驳。",
"concepts_en": "The necessity of evidence (not just opinion) in argumentation; the structure of a formal debate; environmental arguments regarding meat consumption (deforestation, methane); the role of diet in personal health (iron, B12).",
"concepts_cn": "论证中证据的必要性(而非仅仅是观点);正式辩论的结构;关于肉类消费的环境论点(毁林、甲烷);饮食在个人健康中的作用(铁、B12)。",
"skills_practiced_en": "Argument formulation, evidence sourcing, rebuttal, active listening, formal presentation, role-taking (Chairing).",
"skills_practiced_cn": "论点构建,证据搜集,反驳,积极倾听,正式陈述,角色扮演(主持)。",
"teaching_resources": [
{
"en": "Whiteboard\/Digital Notes on Argument Structure (Point, Explanation, Evidence, Link)",
"cn": "关于论点结构的白板\/电子笔记(观点、解释、证据、连接)"
},
{
"en": "Debate Motion: 'This house would eat less meat'",
"cn": "辩论动议:“我们应该少吃肉”"
}
],
"participation_assessment": [
{
"en": "High overall engagement, with students actively contributing points for both sides of the motion across two rounds.",
"cn": "整体参与度高,学生在两轮辩论中积极为动议的正反两方贡献观点。"
},
{
"en": "Mason showed excellent engagement as an audience member, asking precise and relevant questions.",
"cn": "Mason作为观众表现出极佳的参与度,提出了精确且相关的问题。"
}
],
"comprehension_assessment": [
{
"en": "Students demonstrated good comprehension of complex environmental and economic concepts related to meat production.",
"cn": "学生对肉类生产相关的复杂环境和经济概念表现出良好的理解。"
},
{
"en": "Students generally grasped the need for counter-arguments and rebuttal during the second round.",
"cn": "学生普遍理解了在第二轮中进行反驳和反论点的必要性。"
}
],
"oral_assessment": [
{
"en": "George delivered a very well-structured opening speech in Round 1, clearly outlining his points.",
"cn": "George在第一轮中发表了结构清晰的开篇陈词,清楚地概述了他的论点。"
},
{
"en": "Jaden introduced specific data points (e.g., water usage, health cost) in Round 2, showing preparation.",
"cn": "Jaden在第二轮中引入了具体的统计数据(如水资源使用、医疗成本),显示了准备工作。"
}
],
"written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Focus on oral presentation and impromptu response).",
"written_assessment_cn": "不适用(重点在于口头陈述和即兴反应)。",
"student_strengths": [
{
"en": "Strong grasp of environmental impacts (George, Zoe, Jaden).",
"cn": "对环境影响的理解深刻(George, Zoe, Jaden)。"
},
{
"en": "Ability to articulate personal health\/dietary needs as a counter-argument (Renee, Chloe).",
"cn": "能够将个人健康\/饮食需求阐述为反驳论点(Renee, Chloe)。"
},
{
"en": "Effective role-playing as Chair, managing time strictly (Renee, Chloe).",
"cn": "能够有效地扮演主席角色,严格控制时间(Renee, Chloe)。"
}
],
"improvement_areas": [
{
"en": "Consistency in linking evidence back to the main point (Link element in PEEL).",
"cn": "确保证据与主要观点连接的一致性(PEEL结构中的‘连接’部分)。"
},
{
"en": "Clarity when responding to questions under time pressure (some cross-talk or repetition observed).",
"cn": "在时间压力下回答问题时保持清晰度(观察到一些插话或重复)。"
},
{
"en": "Ensuring arguments are general and evidence is real, avoiding purely hypothetical or personal statements in formal sections.",
"cn": "确保论点具有普遍性,证据真实,避免在正式陈述中使用纯粹的假设性或个人化陈述。"
}
],
"teaching_effectiveness": [
{
"en": "The debate format effectively challenged students to think critically from multiple perspectives.",
"cn": "辩论形式有效地挑战了学生从多个角度进行批判性思考的能力。"
},
{
"en": "The rotation of roles (Chair, Speaker, Audience) ensured comprehensive skill development.",
"cn": "角色轮换(主席、发言人、观众)确保了全面的技能发展。"
}
],
"pace_management": [
{
"en": "The teacher managed the pace well, though the deliberation process took time, it was used effectively for preparing next rounds.",
"cn": "教师对节奏管理得当,尽管评议过程耗时,但被有效地用于准备下一轮辩论。"
},
{
"en": "The strict adherence to time limits during speeches was positively reinforced by the Chair, which is crucial for debate.",
"cn": "主席对发言时间限制的严格执行得到了积极的强化,这对辩论至关重要。"
}
],
"classroom_atmosphere_en": "Highly engaged, competitive but supportive, with moments of levity (e.g., the 'Frederick the cow' joke and the Christmas tree reveal).",
"classroom_atmosphere_cn": "高度投入、竞争性强但相互支持,并穿插了轻松的时刻(例如,“弗雷德里克那头牛”的笑话和圣诞树的展示)。",
"objective_achievement": [
{
"en": "Objective 1 was largely met, as students presented structured arguments, though quality varied.",
"cn": "目标1基本达成,学生们展示了结构化的论点,尽管质量有所不同。"
},
{
"en": "Objective 2 was met through the successful rotation of chairing and speaking roles.",
"cn": "通过成功轮换主持和发言角色,目标2得以达成。"
}
],
"teaching_strengths": {
"identified_strengths": [
{
"en": "The teacher skillfully navigated complex scoring\/voting, ensuring fairness and maximum participation.",
"cn": "教师熟练地处理了复杂的评分\/投票环节,确保了公平性和最大程度的参与。"
},
{
"en": "Excellent integration of positive reinforcement, praising specific strong arguments (biodiversity, microplastics, personal health needs).",
"cn": "积极反馈的绝佳整合,表扬了具体的强有力论点(生物多样性、微塑料、个人健康需求)。"
}
],
"effective_methods": [
{
"en": "Forcing students to argue both sides by rotating teams, which builds flexibility.",
"cn": "通过轮换队伍,强迫学生为双方辩护,这培养了灵活性。"
},
{
"en": "Using the audience role (especially Mason's questioning) as a tool to maintain engagement.",
"cn": "将观众角色(特别是Mason的提问)用作保持参与度的工具。"
}
],
"positive_feedback": [
{
"en": "Praise for specific strong arguments presented by George (biodiversity) and Mason (microplastics).",
"cn": "赞扬了George(生物多样性)和Mason(微塑料)提出的具体有力论点。"
},
{
"en": "Positive affirmation to Renee regarding the necessity of stopping speakers at time limits.",
"cn": "对Renee在停止超时发言方面的必要性给予了积极肯定。"
}
]
},
"specific_suggestions": [
{
"icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
"category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
"category_cn": "发音与阅读",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Focus on clear articulation of technical terms during formal speeches to ensure complex data (like statistics) is clearly understood.",
"cn": "在正式发言中,重点关注技术术语的清晰发音,以确保复杂的统计数据能被清晰理解。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-comments",
"category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
"category_cn": "口语与交流",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "When rebutting, practice concisely summarizing the opponent's point before presenting the counter-argument to improve flow.",
"cn": "反驳时,练习在提出反驳论点前,先简洁地总结对方的观点,以改善流畅性。"
},
{
"en": "For future chairpersons, ensure smooth transition questions between speakers and the audience Q&A period.",
"cn": "对于未来的主席,确保发言人之间以及观众问答环节之间的过渡问题流畅自然。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-chart-line",
"category_en": "Argument Structure",
"category_cn": "论点结构",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Ensure the 'Link' component (connecting the evidence back to the motion) is explicitly stated, rather than implied.",
"cn": "确保‘连接’部分(将证据与动议联系起来)明确说明,而不是暗示。"
}
]
}
],
"next_focus": [
{
"en": "Debate: Is digital art just as worthy as classical painting?",
"cn": "辩论:数字艺术是否和古典绘画同等有价值?"
},
{
"en": "Practicing arguments for a subjective topic requiring students to define 'worthy'.",
"cn": "练习针对一个主观性强的主题(要求学生定义“有价值”)构建论点。"
}
],
"homework_resources": [
{
"en": "Research foundational concepts in art history (classical vs. digital mediums) to prepare arguments for the next session.",
"cn": "研究艺术史的基础概念(古典与数字媒介),为下一堂课做准备。"
},
{
"en": "Review notes on evidence sourcing to ensure high-quality, general evidence for the next debate.",
"cn": "复习证据搜集笔记,确保下一场辩论中提供高质量、普遍性的证据。"
}
]
}