1124 UIE-LS01DB-A

已完成

创建时间: 2026-01-13 03:11:33

更新时间: 2026-01-13 03:51:45

源文件: f0.mp4

文件大小: 0.00 MB

字数统计: 42,249 字

标签:
暂无标签
处理统计

STT耗时: 28875 秒

分析耗时: 10 秒

处理流程
文件上传 完成

文件名: f0.mp4
大小: 0.00 MB

试听当前项目录音
URL直链 f0.mp4
时长: 检测中...
视频加载中,请稍候... (来自外部URL,可能需要较长时间)
语音识别 (STT)
完成
Hello, my welcome today to the the correct critical thinking and the the debate debating what debating? P A big神。着让我走神。那人让我走神,老是会以为我的走神,没有,不会。为什么老师会以为我在走神呢?那你说怎么烦呢?你要不就住这里可以。I'm just. Oh. I hit my body, but t hello shello everyone hi three hi, where's not okay? 33. I cannot hear him. Si definitely cannot hear everyone. What's going on? I cannot hear anyone. I cannot. Can I hear nothing? Okay. Well, do you want to grab someone to help you? Daniel, can you hear everyone now? Yeah. Can you hear us? Yes, yes, I can. Because my mom forgot to turn on. It's okay. Look, I drew this. I drew this old man. I drew this old man over here. And then this guy's head burst with a gfalling the past St, we've got a ghost coming out of someone's, we've got a game scirt, as I would say, ever three. How are you today? I'm fine. Yeah, I love the jumper. Hey, this is a very nice jumper. They got a bow on the front. I've got dogs on mine today. What I do, cats and dogs. It's very nice. I love it through. Daniel, what have you been up to this week? Oh, look at that. Got of pearls. Mine doesn't video a three day week because because answer because guys answer, it's a three day week because Thursday, it's like it's like thanksgiving. Oh, wow. So thanksgiving vings happening. Is it already? Goodness me. Yeah, that's mad. So what do you do for thanksgiving? What you do for your three day week? I think on Thursday and Friday, I'm going out and going out to camping with some of my clamates. Oh, that's gonna be really cool. And what about you three? What have you been up to this week? Nothing, nothing again, that she's been doing nothing. Thanksgiving. Let's give it a three. Do you do you not celebrate thanksgiving? Yeah, Yeah. What did you do for thanksgiving? I do nothing. We did not think the thanskiit. Did you need nice food? No, no. Oh, no, Daniel, you might have to give some celebration thanksgiving to three. And we are Daniel and three. Do you celebrate that once? Yes, I do. You do. Are you excited? You do? You do celebrate Christmas? Do you have time off over Christmas? Or do you have to still go to school? No, you still go to school. I have time off. You have time off. You don't thyou have to have to go to school. Yeah. Oh no. I'm very excited because guess what I'm going to do this weekend? I'm going put my Christmas tree up. I'm very, very excited. I'll to take a picture for you all so you can all see my Christmas tree. And I'm very excited to get to have cookies. Christmas tree cudo you have you already put it up. Well I'm very excited to put my Christmas tree up. Well, hello, right? Three, Daniel. We're going to start Hannak and join. And so today we're going to be looking at negative cases. We're were looking at affirmative cases last week, but now looking at negative cases. Now, unlike affirmative first speakers where a first speaker would write their speech out here, hana, a fair speaker would write a speech out hi hander. Speaking my okay, donkey, no worries, you haven't. What have you got for dinhannah anything exciting? We have, we can outside sit again, Hannah, I couldn't hear you. Then we could eat anything we like. I'll give it a restaurant. Oh, that's very nice. Well, hana, we're just, we've just started. We're talking about if you're the first speaker on the affirmative team, on the agree team, we want to write our speech chat. We've got time to research. We've got time to write our speech out because no one's rebattling you. You don't need to worry about what other people are going to say, because you are making the motion. You are making the argument a negative case. However, you need to do notes. You need to make your notes on cards or on pieces of paper. As people are speaking before the debate, you want to make notes of your research. So that could be expert opinion, that could be statistics, that could be points you might want to raise in your debate, but you wouldn't create a speech for your negative team. Why? Because you haven't got a clue what the affirmative team are going to say. Yeah. So we don't actually know what the affirmawe don't know what we need to rebutwe don't know what we need to prove is wrong. So all we can do is have notes and notes and notes for our negative case. Okay? And we need to develop a negative case by making sure you choose the right position with supportive arguments. Yes. So affirmative in a should debate, affirmative team is proving something, saying there's a problem and it needs to be solved. Yes. However, the negative team is saying, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. There's no problem. There's nothing that needs solving. The affirmative team are making lies. They are wrong. Yeah. So we've got to consider your position. Yeah. Why do you disagree? What is it about what they've said? Do you disagree with? And then your points, okay, making your clear argument. So we must think about what negative stands for in the debate. Are you against the problem? Are you against their way of solving it? Are you against the points and arguments they are making? There is no problem. For example, the plan would fix the problem. So I'm agreinging there's a problem, but your plan is not going to fix this problem. Yeah or the plan will make things worse. Okay, there is a problem, but your plan is an awful plan because it's gonna to make the situation so much worse and you can have multiple positions in a debate. So you could think all three of these if you wanted to, you could say there is no problem, your planrubbish and your plan's gonna to make everything worse. So you're wrong. Sometimes it might just be one thing that you're against rather than the whole motion. Points come up with points or arguments that support the position that your team has taken. So school exams should be banned as a negative team. What position could you stand for, Daniel, here? Like. Like there is no problem. Okay, why is there no problem? Why since so school exams should be banned. I think this causes too much stress. I think I think they're like there is a problem, but your your plan is gonna make it worse. Okay, so Daniel, my plan is to take away all exams and give everybody course work. Why is this plan not gonna to fix anything? Because. Because then students can't learn everything like it's it's reviews, what they have learned, they just learn it. They don't use it. They will get the knowledge will just eventually dry away. Well done. And go back to the teacher. We 25, still learning. Well done, Daniel. And three, we as the affirmative team want to ban exams and only have teachers decide if you are good or not. What could you say to me as the negative team? Wanted the exams to we wanted exams to be banned because exams will give the kids stress and and they don't want to do homework anymore and they will assume and maybe too much stress you'll make them dislike school and don't want to go to school. Okay, so that's not quite an affirmative argument. That's not a negative argument. That's an affirmative argument. Three, but I've just said we as the affirmative team want to ban exams and only have teachers give you grades. What could you rebuttle me? Why could you, as the negative team, say this is bad? This is bad because. The teachers give us grades, and even some of the kids that are left behind on the classes can can have even more and better time keeping up with the new grators. They're even harder. So they should be the exs, so maybe they don't get enough points. Theybe, still onto the, they're great. Well done. Well done three. Great. Well, it's fantastic. High five. That was a perfect answer. Well done. Nice. Rebuttle, excellent three. Not only did you give me the reasons you didn't agree, but then you also built your argument up. You were like, I don't agree with you. This is the reason why, and this is the consequences. That was really good. Okay, Hannah, we, as the affirmative team want to ban exams and just give everyone an a. What could you argue against me, dear? Nah. So such you don't know the how did they learn from the like, from the things like you teach them? You just give them an egsome. People didn't listen to you and some people listen very well. And why do you everyone today T, I know she's quite quiet. She's quite quiet. Three, what she was saying is that she was basically saying, unfortunately, not everyone deserves an a. And so actually that's a big problem, isn't it? Yeah, I can just about here you, Haney are quite quiet but we'll do our best. I'll I'll try and make sure I make notes of Hanna's speech today so you can hear her, okay? Because I hear you through you can't really hear her but we're doing our best and I think Hanna's doing our best in the circumstances as well. God done. Excellent. Three. Yours was the strongest argument. Well done. Yeah. So an extra point to you today that was brilliant. Yeah, well done. Each of you may made it. There is no problem, for example, or there is a problem when it's not gonna to fix your plans and not gonna fix this issue. And equally, we can say your plan is going to make things worse. If you give everyone an a, then everybody's just going to go to top schools Res or the schools Res will be overcrowded and then we have a big problem. Yeah so think about the consequences of these actions today. Should children get paid for doing house work? Now I've had some good discussions about this. Three e's gonna start us off. Three is gonna start us off. Okay. Three, why do and Haney thinks yes, it's about okay, why? Why three? Tell us why. Why do you think yes, because children help their parents and their parents get less work to do and the children also learn how to do work how to do those work that the parent that they need to do when they're grown up. So so they help the their parents and parents will give them money. I helps them learn how to raise money. Nice. Okay, okay. Three very controversial. Okay, so three saying yes, babysitting, things like that, we should get paid for it. Okay. But anhannah, you're gonna strengthen three's argument or or being like go on the negative team. What do you think, Hannah? I am also on there. Okay. And why why do you think we should be paid? Parents who give them power with a spand. Give your money, like the parents will think that children will think that the people. Good. And they they would like to do this work and also go down. And children can know how to save your money. And I use their money in a good places, but we do not get too much money for them. Well, for example, if the bestothe money, it will take a lot of money. Maybe if you just give a little bit of money, I like, although you a small amount of money, which is okay in some ways. Okay, so Hannah, you're talking about the fact that we shouldn't be paying them big big money. We should only pay them a small amount of money but then they understand how to do a job and then how to raise money three so nobody wants to get 50 big okay, love this love and Daniel, what do you think? One or $2a week. Oh, okay, one to $2a spnineteen three that's that is a sensible amount. Yeah one to two. I think, you know. Because and Hannah kind of took my idea, because I was gonna say, if kids get paid for chores, they will become more eager to do chores. Oh, I have another one, okay? Well, I don't think this one is as good as the first one. So if kids get paper, their chores, they will feel more free and they can buy things that are good for their families. I think this is a really good one. Daniel. We can say independence. Yeah, that's quite a good one to have. Actually. Maybe you do feel, I mean, also and also if they get money, they can learn about how to spend the money. And even though we're in the technology age, we can also learn how to buy things and and how how to make your money as adults. Okay, right. This is interesting. Anything else, Daniel? Nothing else. Okay, right? But guys, I'm coming down now, right? Okay, because I am going to go on the negative team because quite frankly, I don't want to pay my child to do house work because I would like to keep my money. And the problem is right, guys, the problem is if I pay you to do house chores, Yeah are you going to learn that you were part of the family and so you have to contribute as well? Like do you think it's important that children understand they live in the house, they must also do housework? Yes, Hannah. Like I think I can open on everything. 啊,现在你在这啊。有。Go, Hannah. So get so much money, sometimes they will get which what parents cannot pay for. And every day you do choand, every day you give money, okay? Pay for it in in some ways, in some ways cannot earn so many money. So as when when they, when first they get money and I, well a few minutes later, a few years or a few months start, they don't have money. Yes, then it won't it won't right your okay so Yeah maybe some people can't afford it that is a really good point on the other Yeah okay but I want us to think as well right three if I pay you for housework then you're not gonna to understand that you're part of the family and so you should do some housework you should contribute to the house shouldn't you if you're living there? Well the money will help us learn the money will help us learn. Do the housework and do the the me teaching the children how to do housework and they will be learning how to do the housework and they will. They will they will know that they have to do the housework. Okay, so you think actually money is what will teach them? But Daniel, can I not motivate you in a different way? What if I give you also and also Yeah and also the money is like a fishing bake and the children are the fish. Oh, I like this. This is good for your debate. Yeah the money is is is a fishing bait and the children is the fish are the fish like this three, this is good. Can and money can lead the children from from getting to do the, starting to do the housework to doing the housework on their own. So you think actually by paying them, by giving them a motivation, then theyjust do it automatically without realizing they're doing it and theyjust help. Okay. Okay. So theory three. And Daniel, the thing is though, I could reward you. Oh, Daniels left. Oh, no, Hannah. And three, we'll pose this question to you instead. Oh, Daniels back. I want to. Daniels back. Hello, Daniel. And I want is to think, though, could I not reward you in a different way? Could I not give you more time in your iPad? Could I not decide to let you stay up later? Why could I not do a reward system rather than money? Because because because if if you get. Wait, are we on are we talking about negatives? Now I'm I'm saying that actually we could just reward them. We could reward children rather than pay them. And I'd want to hear your thoughts to agree with me. Do you disagree with me? But the other rewards, like playing ivd or staying up, they can be back with your body and giving money. They can just let their children buy stuff. And and money won't hurt them or hurt their body or something. And they can even and they can even get money. They can even use their money to buy a birthday present for their mom or dad or something. Oh, that's a good one to say. What you going to say, Hannah? Sorry, Hannah had a hand at first. Yes, Hannah, when you earn the money, you can like when you earn the money, you can buy a cake or or don't. What's your. Okay. So you're not so sure then Hannah, you're not so sure. Okay. Three. What I want to help that with well, what I'm saying. They can also the birthday present can also be like also a sort of help to the parents. There's something like, do you get joy when you've done a piece of housework and you get money for doing that piece of housework, and then you get to spend that money on something you want? Does that make you feel happy? Yeah, Yeah. Why why does it make you feel happy? Yes, Hanna, because. When you you do the work and use it by yourself, you think that that you earn it and you will be happy and you you want to do it and do it. You don't want to stop it. Yeah you don't want to stop that feeling, dude. Yet what were you going to say? Three, you're going to say the same, all something different. Why do you feel happy? Because the parents give you freedom and the kids trusted their parents. Give me freedom. Trust, trust, trust. Everyone gets it gently. But Daniel, I've got to go back to this thing though. Okay? But I could say to you, right, you have to mop the floors today. Okay? I need you to mop the floors in the kitchen. And if you don't, I'm going to take away your iPad time or your PlayStation. Would punishing you not be a great way to motivate you to do your housework? What you understand what you're saying. So Danny, I could say to you, right, Daniel, I wanted to wash the dishes. I wanted to put some washing in today. And if you don't, I am gonna take away your PlayStation. I'm gonna take away your iPad time. You're gonna to go to bed early. What if I just punish you for not doing the housework? Would that not motivate you? Sorry, what did you say? Our last? So would that not motivate you? Would that not make you want to do the chores if you thought you were going to lose something? But, but but if you get money, but if you get money, you can just you you can you can get, you can get more, you can get better things and and and money, enough of money is the best bait. Yes. But what's the problem then with me saying, right, Daniel, you didn't mop the floors and you didn't do the dishes. So you're not having your PlayStation, you're not having your iPad, you're not going out on Saturday with your friends because you didn't do the housework today. Why is that not effective? Yes. Hannah Hanna's waving going. Hannah, what do you think? Why is that not? Why do you not think that's a good idea? It's cheaper for me. I'm when you, you can when you first. They. So they can don't do it by yourself. If it you are my mum, I will talk you myself. Okay, so actually, it's not going to make you want to do it. Okay. What? Three, you feel desperate to tell me. What do you think? Three, tell me what's the problem with my plan is cheaper for me if you take away I paads and they don't work theyjust. They're just like, don't trust you and stuff and theyjust stop doing the iPad and folthey won't have free time and they won't do work. So it looks they're doing work all the time, but they didn't get any pay. So you don't think this is going to make them want to do it? This is perhaps going to make them hate you. Maybe, maybe it's going to be a bigger, you're going to have an argument about it. Is it not really going to make you want to do the house work? Oh, some very good ideas today, and you're all going to be fighting on this negative team today because I want to not only hone your rebuttal skills, but also this negative team idea as well. Okay, so you're gonna to be working today to basically discredit everything that I am going to say. You're gonna to be actively listening a speech and you are all going to use that time to rebuttle and think of those negative arguments. Yes, Hannah, you're going to volunteer to go first. Well, actually, Hannah, you're all going to be working together. Yeah. So we'll obviously leave this up on the board on your discussions. I'm going to show you some of the other options that we can think about. Okay. So it teaches children, as you've said about work, business benefits, it gives us an incentive motivators, makes us happier to want to do the housework, and they understand what it means to have money. However, children might believe they should be paid for everything and could become selfish. Maybe they won't understand as adults that housework is not getting done. I don't get paid to do housework. I have to do it. That's art of being an adult. Children might try to get out of housework by giving up the money. Well, I don't want the money, so I won't bother doing the housework. So whatever. And also, it suggests that housework is a job, and it's failed to teach children what it means being a family and working together. And it could place too much value on money. I'm only doing that if I get paid. I'm only doing that if I get paid again. Could make us a bit selthere. So things that think about today. Okay, so what's going to happen? Well, I'm going to give you guys some time to have a conversation, because you're all going to be fighting this negative case. You do not need to write anything. I'm going to change this motion, Daniel, so don't worry, this motion is gonna to change slightly Yeah so that you guys can be on the negative team and you do not need to write a speech, but you do need to think about your ideas, what you perhaps might need to rebuttle, perhaps why you're gonna to say my argument is rubbish. Yeah, I want you to think about, is it my plan that's wrong? Is it my problem that's wrong or is it the way I want to fix the problem that's wrong? I want you to think about making notes for yourselves. What points are you going to make back? What do you think I might say that you guys need to make sure you show it's wrong? Yeah, we are going to change this slightly. Okay. And I'm changing this to shouldn't children shouldn't get paid for doing housework. So I am going to say they should not that's gonna to be on the affirmative and you guys are now going to be the negative that's going to say they should get paid as you've been fighting already Yeah so I need to see which side you were on so are changing it just so we can have that chance to be on the negative team today right three Daniel Hannah would you like some time to discuss with each other with me not in the room. Okay. Okay, I'm going to put you into a new room. We're not gonna to do very long because it's not writing a speech it's making notes so you're gonna have five minutes of discussion. Okay, use it wisely. I'll see you in five minutes. Hello everybody. My name is jananiel z. I'm going to use a toolbox. Okay, let me put the timer off. I'm gonna to make sure you've got the timer. Five minutes. Guys, remember you want to beat me today. See you in a second. Human man. So what? Everybody. Dice. Oh, lots. The dice is going crazy. Just checking. We've started. Have we started discussing or are we just playing with tools? I can still see. I still see you. So just be mindful. Let's not use the tools that be sensible. Picture the sky, does it or not? No, discuss. Why? Why am I? Why am I drawing dots over here? No, let's just raise and do the right thing. Okay? What are we discussing? Why should. Children呃be pay for do housework because children should get paid for their housework because because if they get paid they will they will become what you going to do chores。One paid. 你在干什么啊不要乱点呐啊。What? Oh know, have what's happened? Where did they go? I have no idea. Down know, what have they got? I just acted denthe, what did you do? Touch something. And then there were got something. Oh, Hannah back rears back. Yeah so don't don't touch it. Yeah Daniel would be my advice. Yeah stop touching the board and just keep doing what you're doing. Yeah I don't need to look at any of the tools. I'm trusting you in the room. Okay. All right. Okay now what should we do? Don't us disappear again and now make you disappear again. So guys you've got two and a half minutes all right, so I would start discussing if not you have to come back in the room. I'll have to hear everything Yeah so I can see when we're we're messing around. So let's not touch any more buttons please all let's be sensible all right. Anna, no, we're disgusting. We're disgusting. We're not writing. Yeah, I know. I just don't know what we're writing. No one just kind of. And where who's who's who is doing that and why are we on the first? Oh, where's Hannah? What? Okay, guys, we'll have to come in here because we're not we're not being sensible in the room and I will only let people go in the room if we're being sensible. Okay? We're not talking. We're pressing with buttons. We're just shouting. We don't know what's going on. Okay, I can still observe this room when you're out of it, and I'm more than happy for you guys to have that time, but we're not gonna to mess around in it, okay? So if you wanna be sensible in there, that is fine, but if not, then you will do it in this room where we can see it. Okay? It's a bit of a shame if we can't do that. So do you think we can do two minutes where you guys can have that discussion together? Do you think we can work together? Okay let's try one small thing right Yeah so we're going be saying we're gonna hard about so remember you were talking about as Hannah said to you we're talking about children you are saying children should get paid for doing housework Daniel okay so you guys are on the negative team that are going to counter argue me okay and you're gonna work as a team to show that my points are wrong I'm gonna to say that they shouldn't get paid you were saying they should Yeah so three I and Hannah were correct in what they were saying alright right so let's lead that discussion all right I'm going to give you two more minutes trusting you. Okay, we should discuss. And Hannah, stop drinking. What's that? See your. Children should get paid for. When they get the money, they like, trust their parents. Let's use the let's use this board, even that. I cannot hear any of you. Okay Hanna your sound is too small and three you two okay we've got one and a half minute here you guys so checking in we're still not quite working together so we'll have to work together in this room okay especially if we can't hear Hannah alright so I can put Hanna's ideas down all so here you've got all your ideas already Yeah your ideas are already on the board so you can discuss who's gonna to be talking about what all so let's try this once more okay we're doing a lot of distracting and not a lot of talking together yes Hannah. I think maybe. What you want to say? Yeah. The thing is there, Hannah, the problem with that is is then you're not working as a team, which is a huge part of debating. So we do need to work with team. But Hannah, why don't you just circle? We've got all this information on the board, Hannah, why don't you? So people can't hear you. I can hear you, but I think Daniel's really struggling today. So Hannah, why don't you circle what you would like to discuss and then three and Daniel can let you know what they all talk about. Yeah. So Hannah, why I will the. Three are coloring this White. Let's listen. Please guys, let's just take a moment. We're gonna to come back into the room. We're gonna take a moment. We're not listening to think Hannah 1s. We're not listening to each other. We're not listening. We're not participating correctly. We're not working as a team, okay? And we're coloring on the board. This is not what you do in this class. You guys are too good for this. Too good. Hannah, what things are you gonna to be talking about? Because no one can hear you so I can tell people what you're saying. I think maybe like we will talk about we will we will say the say the like Green part like this part okay, but Hanna three gets to choose what three wants to talk about. What are you going to talk about, Hannah? Maybe I don't talk about that part. You're going to talk about this part. So Hanna is going to be talking about the reward system Yeah and you're going to be talking about getting enough money and learning how to spend it. Beautiful three what are you going to talk about? Tell the group what you're gonna to talk about thank I'm gonna talk about how the is fishing children the part Oh Yeah, that's a good one isn't it? This part that's a really good one. Three Yeah perfect. Why else you're gonna talk about three? Yeah and one this one below it, parents having freedom and trust yes, that's really good one also the one below it and this one making you feel happy perfect Daniel you know what Hannah and three are gonna to talk about so what are you gonna to talk about Daniel. Think I am going to talk about. Let me just see, of course, take some time. We've got Anna talking about money. I'll talk, I'll talk about the the red part. The red part giving her us where parents give money, not no responsibility, great wealth. Might you talk about Daniel? And then the yes $12 and then the purple one, the first purple one, this one here amazing, much better than aniel Hannah on the dream, much better teamwork. Okay, right. Also remember you have no idea what I'm gonna be talking about so you need to be listening and making your notes. You might want to say you've said this and I don't agree. Okay, should we think about who's going to go first on the negative team? Hannah, okay, who's gonna to go to go first on the negative team? Swee's going to go first now, Swee's going to go second. Three e's going to go second and Daniel's going go last. Okay, my speech is going to be a little bit different. I am going to make my first point. Once I've made my first point, Hanna, you will make yours and a rebuttal. I will then make my second point three you will rebuttle me and make your point. I will make a third point Daniel you will then rebuttle and make your final point on your team. Okay, all right, so let's put this up this debate will last four, ten, twelve minutes so we're gonna just put it as a whole thing together today. Alright, so it's got twelve minutes on the clock are we ready? Okay, I'm going to make my first point Hannah this point is to you. So listen, as you might want to rebuttle make notes, here we go. And good morning, ladies and gentlemen, ladies person and worthy opponent, Hannah, three, and Daniel, I strongly agree that children shouldn't get paid for doing housework first. Housework is a normal part of family life, not a job. Everyone in the family should help at home. Parents cook, clean and work hard every day without being paid. Children should also learn to help because they're part of the family, not because they want money. Thank you, negative speaker Hannah. Okay, so let's first that children is a part of your children which everyone needs to do not for money, but to do right? But sometimes parents don't know how and they will make a mess. So it's just like the same as when you don't. It's better when you don't do it much. What's not to? Where they might take a disaster is bad for. Thank you, speaker Hannah. Have you got any points you would like to raise? Yes, I like maybe I could do a reward system for kids to get iPad every morning and we get five stuff and money was heard. We can use money to get some of those other other children from other. Well done. Thank you very much, speaker Hannah. Okay, back to the affirmative team and my second point on today's debate. Doing housework teaches important life skills. Children learn how to be responsible, organized and independent. If we pay them, they may think that helping others is only worth doing if we've got money. This creates the wrong attitude for our Young children. We want children to learn kindness and teamwork, not just how to earn cash. Over to you, speaker three, can you believe me? Your side and I know that well, because the money is a fishing bay, and the children aren't a fish, and the parents are just the fishermanand, the fish. The parents were just using the money to lead the children from getting paid to being, to doing chores on their own without being paid. And their parents, by giving them money, the parents give the children's trust and freedom, being paid for the job makes the children feel happy, and it can make you feel good. When you do the work and use it by yourself, you feel like you are earned it, like you deserve to have it. Okay. Thank you. Negative speaker three, is there any other points you would like to make to the floor? Yeah, a bit. And also the you can use the the money you earn for stuff like a birthday parisn't that you always want or buy a gift for your friends when it's on his or her birthday. Like you can use it for good things. Hey, thank you very much. Speaker three. Fantastic stically butaffirmative speaker Lisa will make her final point. And third, if children are paid for every small task, they might refuse to help unless they get money. This can create arguments and bad habits. In the future, they need to do things like cleaning their room, cooking, or taking care of their own home without expecting payment. Finally, paying children for housework can be unfair. Some families have more money than others. A child in a rich family might earn a lot, while a child in a poor orer family might earn nothing. This could make children compare themselves and make them feel bad. For all these real reasons, children should learn to help at home, because it is the right thing to do, not because they want to be paid. Thank you. And over to negative speaker Daniel. See, then talking about. A good Birmy rebattle, I don't think I have any rebattle回,okay, we should, we should be paid for doing housework. I mean, children should be paid for her doing housework, because if parents give them money, they can learn, learn responsibility of taking care of the money and how to be a proper adult that takes care of money. And they will like doing the housework and theyknow how to learn the money they helps them to use money and day longer and adults long. Give them too much money. For example, if you give them a little bit each day, there can be more, I can be more ate motivated, and you can learn how to receive money. And if they gets too much in one day, the children are saying, that's enough for me. I'm not doing choanymore. And also they can give them, the children, one or $2, not too much, because your parents don't want to give too much money. Oh, good, have ren's. Children also can help. Yes, children can also help their parents for housework, and their parents can have less work to do. And in repayment, they can give them a little bit money. And the children will also learn to do jobs through responsibility to do jobs after they grow up. And and their parents can give them money that helps them also to learn patients, because they maybe want to buy something that is pretty, that is worth a bit lot of money. And they only get one or $2a week. So they have to learn to save the money too. Okay. Thank you very much, negative speaker Daniel. We're now going to open the floor to questions. Negative speaker three. I actually start to start to help Daniel with his speech like. Oh Yeah, nothing. Nothing. Okay, well, I have some addresses I'd like to rebuttle back. One of them is to Daniel to begin with, as Daniel was talking about this idea of this one to $2 that we're talking about. But my point, Daniel, is that some families will pay one to two. Some families may be getting lar 30 to dolforty for doing housework because they're richer. How do we make sure that it's fair for all children? To make to make the the person who has more daughters do more chores. But I don't think that always happens in family. Some people are going to always end up getting much bigger prices for their dishwashing than those that are poor. Some families can't aren't able to give their children pocket money. So how do we make sure that they learn the same values, the same, they have the same understanding of housework? Surely we should just not pay for housework. Surely we should just teach our children that it's the right thing to do. No because because. They they can give in other other rewards like giving them giving them a free much free time. Okay, thank you very much. Three and Hannah, in your debate, you stated that you know we could have this reward system and that actually giving money was better than using an iPad or giving people time on playstations because they can be unhealthy habits. And Hannah, do you not think that actually that's a better way to ensure that everybody feels motivated without having to give money? Parents give a lot of money to children already. They do birthday presents and theymake sure you have a nice time at New Year. You know, they are always giving you money. Do you think you deserve to have money just for making your own bet? No, I think when you do chofor, you just can't have and money can help. Like you can use money to spend things for money. And also when you get the money, you can like you can be happy. And when you know advice entire money, it's good. Like you'll think that you'll think that it's order by myself and you think it's better than the parents buy. Agree. And and I don't know why wait and when use when courses and give watch video that every time they want reporbut when they work so many it's back their eyes so it's not this is beautiful I want to get money it's not bad for your eyes. Okay. All right. Okay so we've got this idea that it's is eyesight but but Daniel isn't there more to consider? Like can't children become selfish if they think that every task has a money to it as a pocket money to it, then you become selfish and no longer want to help around the house just because you're not getting paid? No, but but you won't get but because if because the parents can just give them little money and if they didn't do their chores in in the right time or they didn't do their chores, well, they they cannot give them money. Okay, so they're gonna withhold that money. But but then what if you've got some children that don't care about the money? What if some children don't care if they get paid or not? Some some kids would say, no, it's okay. I don't want the money. Thank you very much. I would I would rather not have money and I'd rather sit here, play my PlayStation and do nothing to help around the house. Why are we going to solve that problem? Daniel? Money's not going to solve it all. Maybe if if they, if the children do that, their parents can take away their PlayStation or, or, or or punish them to do, to just do more house choours and not let them play their PlayStation or whatever game. Thank you very much. Dyou, what's a very, very, very good answer? Nice rebuttal. And three, in your debate, you talked about this idea of freedom and trust. Why do you think that paying children for housework creates trust and freedom? Because the children get get freedom to by spending money and having money like stuff. Could you give us an example? Parents, because they told them they will have money and they gave them money. Okay. And do you not think that some of the freedom would be learning to look after the house, knowing that you're helping someone rather than knowing you're getting paid? You know for example, I do think that children that are able to look after their own room and tidy their own room when it's their stuff I've bought them. It's their items, it's their responsibility and giving them money for a task that they should have to do in adulthood anyway, don't you think that there is a problem with having spochildren if we just keep paying them for very small tasks? Well, theyto say theyhave to do it anyway. Why just, why don't we just teach them by doing help? Don't we teach them doing it now, leading them how to. Three is frozen. No Froshe froze. She was doing a very good point. And that Hannah back one, three comes by. Hannah, can you tell me you talked about this understanding the responsibility of money. You talked about this idea of like as an adult, then we understand saving for something and maybe buying our own Christmas, like buying our own birthday presents. And why do you think this is important for children to learn? Then when they go up, sometimes small m. They might be sample, but then when they they earn money, they can give it back to the talfor. Thank you. Amazing. Well done. Daniel three. And Hannah, I want give you a round of lause that was amazing. Absolutely amazing. Right? Not only did you start to work as a team, okay, that was really great to see. Working as a team, you were able to rebuttle every single point I came back at you for your speeches were clear. They had different points. And wow, you listened to each other and you listened to my debate as well, and you used that against me. There wasn't one single time I thought, they do not know what they're talking about. That hanof three and Daniel was your best rebuttal debate ever. Yeah, well done. What happened to the ay again? Yes, Hannah. You stretch it out like a like a like a it's me back sorry no makes is gone again Daniel but Hannah talk to me what you saying my I only had one power Oh, still where we had it we've we've got to the end already so you've been amazing. It's probably a good time Hannah. It's just has happened but poor three I hope we can hear us and she can hear how amazing she's done today. And high five, Daniel A high five. Hannah, high five. Three. This was brilliant. Yeah, I'm so proud of you. Your skills are developing to to come back. You didn't stop. Nobody took a breath. He was so quick thinking today you knew exactly how you felt about this motion. Well done. And next week, in the current technological generation, school should use e textbooks. So iPads, laptops, books on your phone instead of paper. So think about that. What should we do instead? Should we be carrying these books around, or should we be doing everything on our computers? Think about both sides of the argument. And because I already got a point, some books are really sick, and then and then I'm not obviously sick and know you've got scary them wherever you go, but that's quite hard, isn't it? And lababit's only this big, and your book is this big. Exactly, exactly. And wow, wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow, wow. You guys have done an amazing stay. Wow, all of you. Sorry, we can't see you three. I hope you can. Wow, wow, wow. I could. I believe it. I cannot do it. You did a move and Hannah left because her iPod stuff they did at Daniel three. Hannah, I will see you next week. Well done. Amazing. Goodbye. Bye bye. And I hope sris, I hope sis in the classroom, I hope I'll srout, I'll dyou again.
处理时间: 28875 秒 | 字符数: 42,249
AI分析 完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
    "header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
    "course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
    "course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
    "course_subtitle_en": "Critical Thinking & Debate Practice - Negative Case Development",
    "course_subtitle_cn": "批判性思维与辩论练习 - 反方立场构建",
    "course_name_en": "UIE-LS01DB-A",
    "course_name_cn": "UIE-LS01DB-A",
    "course_topic_en": "Debate: Should children be paid for doing housework? (Focus on Negative Case)",
    "course_topic_cn": "辩论:儿童做家务应该获得报酬吗?(重点关注反方立场)",
    "course_date_en": "November 24th",
    "course_date_cn": "11月24日",
    "student_name": "Daniel, Hannah, Three",
    "teaching_focus_en": "Understanding and developing arguments for the negative side in a formal debate structure, focusing on rebuttal skills.",
    "teaching_focus_cn": "理解和发展正式辩论中的反方论点,重点在于反驳技巧。",
    "teaching_objectives": [
        {
            "en": "Students will be able to articulate the core positions of a negative debate case (e.g., 'No problem exists,' 'The plan won't fix it,' or 'The plan makes things worse').",
            "cn": "学生将能够阐述反方辩论的核心立场(例如:“不存在问题”、“计划无法解决问题”或“计划会使情况更糟”)。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students will practice active listening and generate relevant rebuttals against the affirmative team's arguments.",
            "cn": "学生将练习积极倾听并针对正方论点产生相关的反驳。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students will work collaboratively as a team to present cohesive negative arguments.",
            "cn": "学生将作为团队,协作展示连贯的反方论点。"
        }
    ],
    "timeline_activities": [
        {
            "time": "Initial Check-in",
            "title_en": "Technical Check and Warm-up",
            "title_cn": "技术检查与热身",
            "description_en": "Addressing audio issues, general conversation about the week (Thanksgiving break, Christmas plans).",
            "description_cn": "解决音频问题,进行本周概况交流(感恩节假期、圣诞计划)。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Content Introduction",
            "title_en": "Negative Case Theory Introduction",
            "title_cn": "反方立场理论介绍",
            "description_en": "Teacher explains the structure of a negative case vs. affirmative case, emphasizing note-taking and strategic disagreement.",
            "description_cn": "教师讲解反方立场与正方立场的结构区别,强调记笔记和策略性反驳。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Motion Analysis & Role Assignment",
            "title_en": "Debate Motion Setup and Team Role Planning",
            "title_cn": "辩题设置与团队角色规划",
            "description_en": "The motion is set: 'Should children be paid for housework?' Students are assigned to the Negative team. Team members plan their speaking order and specific points of focus.",
            "description_cn": "辩题确定为“儿童做家务应获得报酬吗?”学生被分配到反方团队。团队成员规划发言顺序和具体论点侧重点。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Debate Simulation",
            "title_en": "Structured Debate Rounds",
            "title_cn": "结构化辩论回合",
            "description_en": "Teacher presents affirmative points sequentially, followed by assigned negative rebuttals and arguments from Daniel, Hannah, and Three.",
            "description_cn": "教师依次提出正方论点,随后是指定学生(Daniel, Hannah, Three)的反驳和论点陈述。"
        },
        {
            "time": "Q&A and Wrap-up",
            "title_en": "Floor Questions and Teacher Feedback",
            "title_cn": "自由提问与教师反馈",
            "description_en": "Open floor for rebuttals to other students' points. Teacher praises teamwork and rebuttal strength, introduces next week's topic.",
            "description_cn": "开放提问环节,针对其他学生的论点进行反驳。教师表扬团队合作和反驳能力,并介绍下周主题。"
        }
    ],
    "vocabulary_en": "Affirmative, Negative, Rebuttal, Motion, Statistics, Expert Opinion, Contribution, Incentive, Selfish, Overcrowded, Consequences",
    "vocabulary_cn": "正方,反方,反驳,动议\/议题,统计数据,专家意见,贡献,激励,自私,过度拥挤,后果",
    "concepts_en": "Negative Case Strategy (No problem \/ Bad plan), Financial Literacy (Saving\/Spending), Family Contribution vs. Employment.",
    "concepts_cn": "反方立场策略(无问题\/糟糕的计划),金融素养(储蓄\/消费),家庭贡献与雇佣关系。",
    "skills_practiced_en": "Critical thinking, Argument structuring (negative perspective), Listening for weaknesses, Collaborative team debate.",
    "skills_practiced_cn": "批判性思维,论点构建(反方视角),倾听弱点,协作团队辩论。",
    "teaching_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Whiteboard\/Digital Tools for note-taking and role assignment.",
            "cn": "白板\/数字工具用于记笔记和分配角色。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Structured debate format guide (Affirmative point -> Negative rebuttal\/point).",
            "cn": "结构化辩论形式指南(正方论点 -> 反方反驳\/论点)。"
        }
    ],
    "participation_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Initial participation was low due to technical difficulties and distracting behavior during planning.",
            "cn": "由于技术问题和计划阶段的分心行为,初始参与度较低。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Participation significantly improved during the formal debate simulation, demonstrating high engagement.",
            "cn": "在正式辩论模拟期间,参与度显著提高,表现出高度投入。"
        }
    ],
    "comprehension_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Students correctly grasped the core difference between affirmative and negative case construction.",
            "cn": "学生正确理解了正方和反方立场构建的核心区别。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Students successfully applied abstract concepts like 'plan will make things worse' to the concrete topic.",
            "cn": "学生成功地将“计划会使情况更糟”等抽象概念应用于具体主题。"
        }
    ],
    "oral_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Clarity of arguments improved throughout the debate; Daniel maintained strong, consistent delivery.",
            "cn": "论点的清晰度在整个辩论中有所提高;Daniel 保持了有力、一致的表达。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Hannah struggled initially with volume\/clarity but demonstrated excellent conceptual rebuttal.",
            "cn": "Hannah 最初在音量\/清晰度方面有困难,但展示了出色的概念反驳能力。"
        }
    ],
    "written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Focus was oral debate and collaborative note-taking, minimal formal writing observed).",
    "written_assessment_cn": "不适用(重点是口头辩论和协作笔记,观察到的正式书面内容很少)。",
    "student_strengths": [
        {
            "en": "Strong teamwork emerged after initial confusion, with students supporting each other's points.",
            "cn": "初始混乱后展现出强大的团队合作精神,学生们相互支持论点。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Excellent rebuttal skills, especially in challenging the financial fairness and responsibility aspects of the affirmative case.",
            "cn": "出色的反驳技巧,尤其是在质疑正方论点的财务公平性和责任方面。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Creative analogies used effectively (e.g., the 'fishing bait' analogy by Three).",
            "cn": "创造性的类比被有效地使用(例如,Three 提出的“鱼饵”类比)。"
        }
    ],
    "improvement_areas": [
        {
            "en": "Managing technical tools and on-screen distractions during planning phases.",
            "cn": "在计划阶段管理技术工具和屏幕上的干扰因素。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Hannah's vocal projection needs consistent practice to ensure all team members can hear clearly.",
            "cn": "Hannah 的声音响度需要持续练习,以确保所有团队成员都能清晰听到。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Ensuring all speakers adhere strictly to the assigned speaking order during the debate simulation.",
            "cn": "确保所有发言者在辩论模拟中严格遵守指定的发言顺序。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_effectiveness": [
        {
            "en": "The decision to switch the motion mid-class ensured all students got to practice the negative side, maximizing engagement.",
            "cn": "临时更改辩题的决定确保了所有学生都有机会练习反方立场,从而最大化了参与度。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The structured debate format effectively provided scaffolding for complex rebuttal practice.",
            "cn": "结构化的辩论形式有效地提供了复杂反驳练习的支架。"
        }
    ],
    "pace_management": [
        {
            "en": "The initial planning and team coordination phase was slow and required firm redirection due to off-task behavior.",
            "cn": "初始的计划和团队协调阶段由于离题行为而进展缓慢,需要坚定地引导。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The actual debate ran smoothly and efficiently, concluding positively within the time frame.",
            "cn": "实际辩论环节运行顺畅高效,在预定时间内积极结束。"
        }
    ],
    "classroom_atmosphere_en": "The atmosphere transitioned from slightly chaotic and distracted (during setup) to highly focused, energetic, and competitive (during the debate).",
    "classroom_atmosphere_cn": "课堂氛围从(设置期间的)略微混乱和分心,转变为高度专注、充满活力和竞争性(辩论期间)。",
    "objective_achievement": [
        {
            "en": "Students demonstrated a strong grasp of negative positioning through their arguments against payment for chores.",
            "cn": "学生通过反对家务报酬的论点,展示了对反方立场的深刻理解。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Effective collaboration and rebuttal skills were evident, even with initial communication hurdles.",
            "cn": "即使存在最初的沟通障碍,也明显展现了有效的协作和反驳技巧。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_strengths": {
        "identified_strengths": [
            {
                "en": "Dynamic response to technical\/behavioral issues by pivoting the class structure to ensure learning continued.",
                "cn": "动态应对技术\/行为问题,通过调整课程结构确保学习得以继续。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Thorough setup of the debate roles and specific argument expectations before starting.",
                "cn": "在开始之前,对辩论角色和具体论点预期进行了彻底的设置。"
            }
        ],
        "effective_methods": [
            {
                "en": "Switching the motion mid-lesson to allow students to argue the opposite side they initially favored (Negative side).",
                "cn": "在课程中途更换辩题,让学生有机会论证他们最初不倾向的立场(反方)。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Implementing a structured speaking order (Affirmative point -> Negative rebuttal\/point) to force cross-examination listening.",
                "cn": "实施结构化的发言顺序(正方论点 -> 反方反驳\/论点)以强制进行交叉质询式的倾听。"
            }
        ],
        "positive_feedback": [
            {
                "en": "Teacher highly praised the students' final debate performance as their 'best rebuttal debate ever.'",
                "cn": "教师高度赞扬了学生最终的辩论表现,称其为“有史以来最好的反驳辩论”。"
            }
        ]
    },
    "specific_suggestions": [
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
            "category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
            "category_cn": "发音与阅读",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Hannah should practice projecting her voice clearly and consistently, especially when presenting rebuttal points to ensure all participants hear.",
                    "cn": "Hannah 应练习清晰、稳定地投射声音,尤其是在陈述反驳观点时,以确保所有参与者都能听到。"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-comments",
            "category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
            "category_cn": "口语与交流",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "All students must focus on minimizing use of digital tools\/whiteboard scribbling during active discussion\/listening phases to maintain focus.",
                    "cn": "所有学生在积极讨论\/倾听阶段必须专注于最小化使用数字工具\/白板涂鸦,以保持专注。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "Continue practicing formulating 'three ways to disagree' (No problem, Bad plan, Worse consequences) proactively for future negative cases.",
                    "cn": "继续练习主动构建“三种不同意见”(无问题、计划不佳、后果更糟)的论点,为未来的反方立场做准备。"
                }
            ]
        }
    ],
    "next_focus": [
        {
            "en": "Developing affirmative arguments for the next motion: 'In the current technological generation, schools should use e-textbooks instead of paper books.'",
            "cn": "为下一次辩题发展正方论点:“在当前的技术时代,学校应该使用电子教科书而不是纸质书。”"
        },
        {
            "en": "Ensuring Daniel, Hannah, and Three practice alternating roles (Affirmative vs. Negative) for balanced skill development.",
            "cn": "确保 Daniel、Hannah 和 Three 轮换角色(正方与反方),以实现均衡的技能发展。"
        }
    ],
    "homework_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Prepare initial arguments\/notes (both sides) for the e-textbook motion, focusing on the impact on resource inequality.",
            "cn": "为电子教科书的辩题准备初步论点\/笔记(双方),重点关注对资源不平等的冲击。"
        }
    ]
}
处理时间: 10 秒
HTML报告 完成

生成时间: 2026-01-13 03:51:45

查看报告 下载报告
返回列表