Hello, camera. Huh? Oh, I was not. Oh, Oh, there we no, I think you've made it a bigger Internet, sir. Stopping and starting Hannah. Yeah, I know it was sort. How are you today? Hannah? Are you okay? Yeah. And last second I was just doing my machine like this. Wow. Do you like making stuff? Hannah? Do you like drawing? Yeah, Yeah. What's your favorite thing to draw? Like Japan characters. I keep my cartoons. Yeah, that's really cool. Hi, Daniel. How are you? Dancing. He's dancing. I know I can't hear me dancing. Dancing. We can't hear you, Daniel. Daniel, I can't hear you. Di care you? You're muting and maybe they're sorting something out. Hang on. Hey, how are you and dual? Oh no, we still can't hear you, Daniel. We still can't hear anything from you, Daniel. Oh no. Yeah, we still can't hear you, I'm afraid. Hi, three. You're okay. Yeah, Yeah. How are you today? Three, good. I can't see myself. Okay. Now, can you hear me? I can't hear you. I, we can't see either three. There we go. Hey, now I can see you. Yes, I can. I can hear duyou now as well. Yes, Hannah. I did. You guys know that today Lisa is late for class? Yeah, I wasn't late for class. I came out my last class straight to this class. Class. I wasn't late for class. I was back on time. Hani came out my last class and straight into this class. We were here with dead on ten. You are not you are not good because you've been late for one minute was this late? I was a class on time. It flags me a funday. Hannah, what have you been up to this week? You can what? Okay. Work at of Friday I didn't have class or I went to I went to another city called yaneng and then we that trip is for four hours. We go on the car and we go for four hours to get here. Wow, four hours and then yes, and then the next day and I go to sleep and the next day I want to see, I have, I want to see other people sensing and that there was a friend that is, I have a friend that is eight years old, but he go to friends for a ten year old race. I forgot after watching her. Then we we went to see the see the like standing and then which next? Which then I eat my, eat my like dinner and I went jusleep. And the next day I woke up at at 6:00 because I have a fenrace. And that race was on like 8:00. Wow, that's really early. Then I have the team race and the personal race. In the personal race, I've get the, the, the place 13. But at the like, the like the team team race, I get the number two. Well done, Hanna, which I have a like. Trophy silver silver. Melsilver, that's really cool. Daniel, what's your week being like if you had a good week? Yes, and and and I think I think like this weekweekend, I'm we're going to climb a mountain and I'm not sure what it is. And I think last weekend, I first on Saturday I went to a park and then then on Sunday we went camping. Wow, camping. Oh, I love camping. That's sounds. Oh, that's really cool. Honey, you put your medtal in. Look at that. That's incredible. Camping and love camping at three. Well, I know it's really cool. Hannah. And three, what have you done this week? Nursing nothing after all that, we've got to three and it's nothing. Did you stay home this week for to the fun fair? Did you go on all the rides? Yeah. And there's also this really cool place in the community that you can go inside. And wow, winter wonderland. Yes, we have that in London. We have a little winter wonderland that is so right, let's get started guys. That is so cool Hannah. That is a beautiful, beautiful medal. And today guys, we're thinking starting off you're on mute Hanna if you're talking to us and we are looking at affirmative speech and signposting. We've been doing loads of signposting already but today is just to take a little look at this first speaker in a bit more detail. Okay, so we're gonna to think about the responsibility of this first speaker because it's quite an important role and it can be quite a hard role to do really well yes Daniel look when you my face at the mouse pad and the mouse and okay okay so we've got the first speaker in the debate okay they introduce the topic it's very important they have to introduce the topic and they have to think about the whole teams case so we have to think about our problem we have to think about our plan, we have to think about our points. Okay? So the role of the first speaker well they've got to state the problem first of what's going to be quite a big problem. It's got to be quite an urgent problem and it's got to be something that requires a media intervention. Ban mobile phones because it's causing distraction. Span tv as it's dangerous for our children. Okay, so we want to have a problem. Ban plastic it's creating awful environments. We want to think about what our problem is and why the affirmative team, the agree team wants it fixed. Okay, so here we have, we should ban pub smoking in public places. So three, what's the problem? Why do we want this vwhat is the problem with smoking in public places and I mean, cigarettes because because it will make our lgs we feel very bad. And and also we we will the other passengers or people will won't like the smell of the that stuff smoyeah, as it causes unhealthy nuand. They can't cope with the smoke they are breathing. You know, so as the affirmative speaker, the first speaker, you're going to stiwe the affirmative team believe that we should ban smoking in public places as it is bad for passengers and the public as it causes unhealthiness and they can't cope with the smoke they are breathing in. Well done. Three. Okay, excellent three. It's gone very big. Excellent, Hannah. What's perhaps missing from this opening? Nice. What else do you think we need to add into this opening? What are public places? What do you define? What do you think are public places? I can't see what did you write? So I haven't written anything. Hannah. So what do you think a public place is? I think the fluplace is is a place that everyone can go. Can you give me some examples? For example, for example, mom said that a park is a public in place because everyone can go there and everyone can have fun. And please, like good air is up. Yeah, perfect. Well done, Hannah. So we need to add that in because we haven't defined any of our terms, we've not defined anything of our motion. So we, the affirmative team, believe that we should ban smoking in public places. Smoking refers to cigarettes. And public places. We are thinking about parks, supermarkets and public transport where everyone can go and use the area. We believe. It is bad for passengers and the public as it causes unhealnow. I've changed what this is. Yeah. So now I've changed my argument much stronger. So I've defined my terms. I've defined what I mean by cigarettes and smoking. I've defined what I mean by public places. I've given my motion and I've also given my reasons. Okay. My problem, we, the affirmative team, believe that we should ban smoking in public places. Smoking refers to cigarettes and public places. We are thinking about parks, supermarkets and public transport. When everyone can go and use the area, we believe it is bad for passengers and the public as it causes unhealthiness and they can't cope with the smoke. People breain, let's listen when we're talking. Otherwise, words, we're not going to remember this. All right, Hannah, if we can have your camera on, it will be much better for us. If there's a reason it's off, please do let us know. Okay, amazing. I think it's because she saw you put yours down on. I'm copering. Okay? Limare we listening? Who's shouting up? Daniels shouting. Just突然I think something's going on with his。Okay? Something's happened with the laughter. Okay, Daniel, away. Oh, my gosh. Okay. 听到,just wait for Daniel to thought out was completed so we can all do it together. Okay are you okay, Daniel? Yeah, can you hear us now? Yes, yes, I can amazing. Just suddenly like went out. That's okay. Don't worry. You did the right thing. You got your mum. Okay, right. So Daniel, now we're gonna think about introducing the step. So introduce the tea's plan. What do you want to do to resolve this problem? Yeah. So what you're going to be involved? So for example, maybe what the government to be involved and what are they going to do? Government bans or forms of cigarettes and anything that has tobacco in it. So Daniel, what could be your first plan? What could you first ask people to do to make a ban of smoking? Likes like I remind people that there can be don't smoke in public areas. I mean, people that they're how are you going to make that a ban though? How are you going to get people to do that? Yeah, we could remind them, but how are we going to remind them? How are we going to get people on board with this idea? Well, we can put up signs that say do not smoke in public areas or something, signs in public area to stop people from smoking. Yes, Anna. But I think now we have the, we have the sign to stop smoking, but someone don't listen to them. So, so it's I think it's not useful. Okay. So what do you think could be the plan than Hannah? What would be a better plan than what could we put as a second point, what would be a better plan? We. If it was me, I will put them, like I'll put some people, like I'll put other cameras, and which, if you saw the people smoking, you can talk to them and say, excuse me, and the police and and the president told us to stop letting you guys smoke, and maybe that will stop them. And show they are being watched. Okay, this is a good plan. Yeah this idea of police and cameras, three, what could be another plan that we could have to stop other people from selling the cigarette? Now, this is a really good one. Yeah. Thirdly, we would want to encourage you to stop selling these products so that they can't be used in public areas. That's a really good one because that's stopping it from the very beginning. Okay. Can we think of any others, Daniel, can we think of any other points that would be good to put forward any other plan welike? What else could we do to maybe we can. Maybe we can like. We can we can. We can we can we can ban smoking by I don't know, installing some kind of device that senses smoke. Who wants a sense of smoke? It like pours the water on the smoke and that they will not get fire. There were three. She's just it's just three, Daniel. She's just disconnected. Don't worry me. Okay, so I'll worry about who's in class. I want need to worry about your point. Okay. So finally, ban smoking by installing some device, the senof smoke and then it gives the smoker a shock maybe. Okay, that's quite extreme, but I like the idea. Okay. And then obviously we want to reiterate these points, okay? We want to use here the evidence. All right, so nice points that we've got there. Well done. So our plan, sorry. And then we want to argue, we want na make sure we've got proof. Okay. So government bans all forms of cigarettes and anything that has tobacco in it. It will prove individuals help and make siliving a safer and maybe a more equal place. So I could take, let's take this one. I want to take threes. Thirdly, because this is a great point about banning products. So to make my heart even bigger, thirdly, we would want to encourage you to stop selling these products so they can't be used in public areas. I would want, we would want because, look, as a team, we would want the government to make harsh punishments for those who do not listen to the rules. An expert from the government said. By banning cigarettes. We can improve overall health in that community. So now not only have I expanded my point of made my point bigger by saying I'd like the government to do this and harsh punishments, I'm also giving an expert opinion from someone. Okay, so we can research this and we can state what other people have said makes our argument much, much stronger. And finally then we can have our conclusion. Yes, you okay, Daniel? Okay I just accidentally Oh okay remember you're okay perfect. And also then we can also have this idea of our finally or our conclusion which I'm just gonna to put over here for a second okay, so then we can say in one conclusion I we believe that banning smoking in public places. Improves health, makes cleaner streets and means we are all able to live in peace. Thank you. Okay. Yes, Hannah, I forget what I do. I see that's okay. So here we are. We have our full debate. Okay? We don't always have to write these out either. We can use our notes, which I'm going to show you how to do today as well. So we can have then our full debate with all of our clear ideas answering that question for the first speaker. The first speaker is the only one that really creates a debate before the debate. You can't do it for second speaker. And third, you can only make little notes, reason, because you have to rebuttle the other side and you don't know what the other side will say. But the first speaker on the affirmative team can write their speech out in full because they are the first person to speak in the debate, and their words are what starts our debate. You are setting out the terms. You're setting out what the motion is. You're setting out what you are asking the public or asking the judges or asking the government to do. Everyone after you has to fight for their points. They have to say, first speaker said this, but I don't agree. Second speaker said this, so I don't agree. Okay? But the first speaker is really, really important in a debate. If the first speaker is not good on the affirmative team, your whole debate could be ruined. Okay? So it's a very, very, very important role. Sir Daniel, can you please now deliver our debate about banning smoking? Firstly, we would like to remind people, there should be very beginning. From the very beginning, we benefit. We, the firmative team, believe that we should best rookate public crisis. Smoking refers to, what is that word again, cigarettes. Cigarettes in public places. We were thinking about park, supermarket and public transport where everyone can go and use the area. We believe it is bad for passengers in the public as it causes unhealthiness and they can't cope the smoking they are breathing in. Okay, Daniel, basically, we would like to remind people that there should be no smoking in public places by putting signs up in the public area to stop people from smoking. I think that's it. Firstly, secondly, we could insta and have someone who could call, could police the cameras and could give them a warning and show they are being watched. Thirdly, we would want to encourage you to stop selling these products so that they can be used in public areas. We would want the government to make harsh punishments for those who do not listen to the rules. An expert from the government said, by banning cigarettes, we can improve overall health in the community. Finally, ban smoking by installing some device that senses smoke and then gives the smoke or a shock. In conclusion, we believe that banning smoking in public places improves health, makes cleaner streets and means we are all able to live in peace. Thank you. Okay. So we've got our motion. We've got our ideas, our defining of our words. We've got our first point, our second point, our third point, we've even got a fourth point and then conclusion we want na leave them with the benefits of banning it. Okay, and this here is a strong opening first speech. Okay, thank you for reading that first part. Daniel Weldon, Hannah, Daniel and three working together to make this speech and we're going to be using this format today for your speeches. Hey, we're gonna to be making affirmative speeches now. Signposting is when we're using first, secondly and thirdly or numbering. So number one, number two, three, you already do this in your arguments. You've been signposting for weeks, so I'm not going to go into too much detail as you already do this. Okay. Other good sentences you can use in your debate. Importantly in particular, it is important to highlight that Yeah, however, in contrast, in comparison, another point to consider, for example or instance, this can be illustrated by however, so you can use these when you are rebutattling or when you're making your first speech. So we don't have the same sentences over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. Yeah. So I'm going to take a picture of these so you can have these for yourself in a moment. Okay. I mean, I don't know what I happened. Okay, can you hear me now? I can Daniel and you doing that. So Daniel, I turned your microphone off because you were doing a lot of banging. Yeah so sometimes I can mute if we've got a lot of banging going on. Alright, right. So today's children should choose what they want to learn in school. And Hannah, I'm going come to you first. What do you think? No, no contract first job. Okay, Hannah, why now? Okay, Press first. Where children what's this? If children choose what they want to learn in school, then maybe something more people want to say, like, I want pe class Cal day or b plus music or all the same. They like, well, then amn, they don't, don't. Some people will think that that's freedom, but so they don't like it, but they can't learn knowledge in school. And schools have what if what is taking on? Like take parents, take money to parents, use money to change on schools, but they learn nothing except all their favorites and math, English and science. They can learn something like our usual thing. Hey, thank you, Hannah. 33, please. Let me say something that my school has these two special classes on Tuesday that are on these two classes. We choose what we wanted to do on these two classes. And like the school gave us some situation, some some some like like some choices. The school gave us some choices and we choose what we wanted to do, like partering and making cards and stuff, creative things. Okay. And what what did you think of this three? Did you think this was or not? Believe it or not, we even have the kind of class that that watches a movie and tells the teacher, what does the movie about. So we have two whole classes watching movies and telling the teacher, what's the movie about. Okay. And what do you think of this three? Because you're actually doing it. And what do you think? Do you think it's really useful? Do you like it is there are good points to being able to choose your own lessons? Yes, yes. Okay. Why tell us three tell us why you think it's worth it because it makes our children, the children in my class always have, I do this that look like look like cream but isn't cream and can't be eaten. So we use the cream to make stuff like cakes and little things. Wow. Okay, so at three I'm gonna take it as you actually think using your own lessons is a good thing. Yes. Right before we come to you Hani, just want to hear from Daniel. Daniel what do you think in this? Do do you think choosing is a is what do you think? Yes, yes, because because if if children don't choose what they want to learn in school they might they might and in learning the subjects that they don't like, they might they might not listen and waste your time. And in subjects that they like, they will, they will listen and they will learn more easily. Yes, that was okay. But Hannah, go on. I changed my mind. I think also it's good. Okay, okay, but we're gonna to have a conversation about negative because I do think that there is a there's definitely an argument on both sides here because I'm about to challenge Daniel and then three because I hear what you're saying and and three, you're doing it. You're doing it on a small scale. You've got two lessons, two classes a week, okay, that you get to choose, do you think, what if though I said you could choose whatever you want to learn in school and you pick all the easy subjects and you don't pick any of the hard subjects, what's gonna to happen then? Will that be difficult to get a job? I want to learn anything, okay? So why is that gonna? What can be the problem with that, Daniel? If I only wanto learn my stuff, only wanto learn pe, I only want na learn computer games. I only want to learn dancing. I only want to learn what happens. And if I don't learn English or maths, or Chinese, or science, or geography or history, why can that be a problem? I think, I think you, you, you won't get enough knowledge and you get done. So if we, if we get done so some shorts are negative. Some children may only choose easy subjects or hands on subjects when not me. So that means only doing things with their hands or physical. Yeah and this then means handle subject, which means they won't have enough knowledge for proper jobs. That could be a problem if I just got to choose what I only wanted to do. Yeah at three. At my school the the choosing the choosing. The choosing give us suggestions and we can only choose the suggestions and and can't get the easy the two easy ones. Okay? So schools could put in place suggestions and choice can be or like choices and you can only choose those choices. Yeah that scores that last. Okay? So you still have to do an element of some choices. So we're putting them into categories really. So you either have to take geography, history or English. So for example, okay, I can see how that could be a good good thing for the affirmative team. And in when they have learned when we do the classes, do the teachers somehow try to skip those geography and stuff into the classes? So using other subjects within the subject you actually like, that's a clever idea, isn't it? So using geography and history in an English class, you might enjoy English, but you don't want to do a full history class, but you could bring history into English. Okay, that's a good point through. So actually we could put other subjects into the subjects you like. Yeah a computer science class could be all about researching geographical ideas and maybe would teach that way. Okay, okay, okay. Hannah, what do you think you feel like? You have you changed your mind? Are you wanting to be for you thinking, no, actually maybe we should. Okay. So why have you now changed your mind? Why have three and Daniel changed your mind? Because because there's more point to say here. And for example, like they said, they can have like regular class and they can have only work two times that they can have the class they like. Okay, however, guys, do we think we should be doing this for five? Daniel, let's listen. We don't need to see your eye. Okay? And what if though, guys, we don't need to see your eye either. Three, they're very beautiful eyes. They're very nice eyes, but let's leave them. Okay, what if they should we be doing this from primary school? Like how would you know what subject you liked if you didn't take all the subject? Do you think this has to happen at a certain age? What if I you just got into school and was like, I just want to play all day, that's what I want to learn. That could be a problem. So do you think there needs to be an age limit? Do you need think there needs to be a time where we do have to learn everything? Yes, Anna, I think there should be a turn, but like a time limit, only one or two class and they can have this. And after this, we need to learn the subject. We we need to learn what we want. Whenever Yeah whenever. There needs to be core classes involved. Daniel, what do you think? Do you think that as soon as you go to school you should just pick what you want? Or do you think there needs to be a moment and age a year that you get to choose. Thing, I think we can only do it in primary school and not in kindergarten because kindergarten we need to learn the basics, how it's done or how the what aniel, no guys, we're gonna, we're just gonna focus. We're gonna focus. You guys are very good debaters. We're not gonna do it. Breasinging, Yeah, we're not just gonna go there. I still going to get our debate today. Is it okay? You're very good debate. Yes I not aliens today let's focus say okay, you guys are doing amazing so we need to learn the basics. Okay, Daniel, this a really good point. So you think primary school they can choose what they want. Okay, Daniel, I'll come back to you when when you want to participate fully. Okay, so three, what do you think? Do you think we need to learn the basics? Do you think there's a time and a year that we should be choosing? Or do you think we can choose whenever we want? There there's this. Maybe there should be some special stuff like stuff like the movie thing that should be should be put in the younger or older grades. Okay, alright, okay, okay, okay. I personally, I think that we should be choosing our subjects to we're in secondary school. What do you think about that, Hanna? Check out why why Hannah? Because that time we're not too old and not too small, and we already finished learning our basics, which we can learn n some kind of thing you like, but not too many, and gives us time to limit. So I actually think that goes on the negative side here, because this is saying that children should choose what they want to learn at school. We need to define that. You know, this is from a certain age. So you know if your affirmative team are saying, Yeah, soon as they're at a kindergarten and they can make these choices, well, on the negative team, we should be saying they shouldn't be making these choices until secondary school as they should be learning every subject in primary to figure out what they like and what they don't like. Yeah, okay. So Daniel, what what else can you think of what else? It's perhaps an issue with choosing our own subject or what is a positive of choosing our own subjects, okay? We if you choose the subjects you like, you will you will learn them, you will remember them, and you can learn faster and more efficiently. Okay. And why do you think this that's on the that's on the this side. Yes. And why why do you think that. Because because if we learn subjects that we don't like, for example, perhaps math, we we can, we cannot, we, we we will get bored and we won't like learning it and we will not, we will not remember what we learned. And it's just a waste of time. I'm over there, a waste of time in there. Okay, right. That's a really good point. Yes, Hannah. Then another idea like another informativity first first children don't have because they don't like, which they won't listen at dyour, say, but also and also if they don't want to cause anyone, it won't school, you won't love to school. If they don't like to go to school, that also is a waste of time. They're don't listen. They're not listening to the teachers, not they're not being able to actually learn anything of use, maybe just having the subjects that they like. Okay, this is good discussion. Welweland dworld and Hannah. Yes, okay. Otherwise we're not going to have time today to to properly getting into our into art teams. Okay, so we've been talking about this as we've been going our topic well, our topic, Hannah, children should choose what they want to learn in school, which is the topic we've just been talking about. I am actually going to leave the notes up for us today. So we're going to do something a little bit different. It's not going to be a full blown debate. You're only going to have a few minutes to think about either side. Okay, what's going to happen? Is this going to be, for example, a showdown between dletters again, three, don't put me that thing like this. Okay. So okay, are we listening? All, so what we're going be doing it's Daniel is going to make his claim as the affirmative team is gonna to make a sentence. Daniel, you shouldn't be making a huge speech. You should make a statement. Rthen needs to respond to that statement, a rebuttal. Then three will make her statement. Daniel will rebuttle. Three will rebuttle. Daniel will rebuttle. Okay, Hannah, you have a very important Hannah, let's listen. Listen guys, guys, we're not listening. We're just going to take a moment. We're not listening today. Okay, I want to do lots of fun things with you, but I can't if we're not listening, we're talking over each other, we're pushing our laptops down, we're putting our eyes up to the screen, we're shouting, let's just take a moment we're so much better than this. Okay, so we're just going to listen. I will not forget you per promise. Yeah, you'll all be involved. So what's gonna to happen is Daniel's gonna to make his speech. Well, he's gonna make a.3, you're gonna to rebuttle Daniel rebuttle three b butles, okay, therebe a timer. Once the timer is over, Hannah will get to choose who she believes made the better argument in our tennis, okay? Then whoever wins that challenge will come into the middle and then Hannah will sort places with them, okay? So then Hannah will rebuttle, three will rebuttle, and Daniel gets to choose the winner of the rebuttle tennis, okay? And then obviously we'll have three choosing the winner of the rebuttle tennis. Okay, so it's gonna to work a bit differently all so hands up if you would like to be on the affirmative team first. Oh Daniel Sandra was up first. Okay, who would like to go on the negative team first? Oh no one should we do our randomizer then let's do our randomiser make it fair. So here we go. You'll have a chance to be on affirmative as well. Hannah, you're gonna you're gonna do both. Yeah I promise. Okay, so Hannah will be a first time round will be on the negative. Daniel will be on our affirmative first and three you'll be listening ready to make your decision. Each round will happen for. Three minutes, 40 minutes, three minutes, 40 minutes. Goodness, now three minutes we could do. Now don't even forget, get round every three if I do for lathree. So Daniel, remember, you are not doing a full speech. You are stating a first point. Okay? And then it's like you're knocking it over to have over it here. 这电了是怎了?Okay, you okay? Dulare you okay? We're just checking your rule, right? Okay, you're okay. Yeah, I think my television just blacked out. You certainly just did something. Okay. So what will happen is Daniel, you want make a point and you're not doing a full speech. You're not speaking for two minutes. You're making one point and then you're batting it over to Hannah. Hannah, you were then saying your point and batting it over to Daniel. Okay, so we're not doing a full speech. All right so you just want na make your first point so affirmative team will start yes Hannah no question like like after Daniel said his statement I said my or I'll rebuttle him Yeah you can say well hand is up to you can rebuttle him or you can say the statement it's up to you Hannah. Okay you ready? We're gonna give it a go. Don't worry if it all goes a little bit wrong let's stop and we can restart. Okay, right, Daniel, ready? Okay, you're right. Daniel, your time. Well, Hannah and Daniel, your time starts now. Daniel, your first point, please. They students should choose what they want to learn in school because if they they get board glasses that they don't like and it will be a waste of time. So if they choose what they want to learn, they will learn more. They will learn better. And if you learn aniel, Daniel will done. Let Hannah, let Hannah respond. Let Hannah respond. Hannah respond to Daniel. Okay, so as did said if it's a waste of time, but some some people love the class they like so they they might have listened to this class and also they have one day they can have a little bit of the class they like and all the rest of them are the class, the normal class and that will make the children like school because they can have the class they like. But yes sometimes they only have one class or two. So it's okay because they they have the class they like in school and also they can learn the things they like, then they can send hansend it over hanokay Daniel, respond to Hannah. I think I'm going to go to my next statement. Okay okay. If you like, if you learn the, if you learn the things you like in school, then you can learn more efficiently and quickly, and then, and then you can also get knowledge. Okay, I'm not but like this, but sometimes they like music, but they can't do anything. They don't have your job, they can't learn knowledge. And and if they, I like, as I said, if they have one class, it can be girls happy and learn. And and if they have, they can have jobs to go. Send it back to Daniel. Okay let's what the okay if they if they choose what they want to learn at they can they they can be more happier and they have they can have more freedom so they will like to go to school. Okay okay not on a lawn like I if I said always this is the point every time you can have one or two clucks one day or one week to make it fun. Well done. It's not, it's not easy going. First, some rebutstle tenus. Well done, Hannah and Daniel k three, who convinced you? Who had bigger arguments for you three. Let me think. Let me think, let me think, let me think. Daniel. Daniel, okay, reasons. What's your reasons? Three, why giving it to Daniel? Because Daniel said the classes can allow us to have fun in school. Daniel, okay, right. Let's put Daniel here. Let's put Hannah over here. Let's put the negative. Let's put three. Okay, Hannah, you're going to be starting this rebuttle of Daniel. You were going to be choosing the winner. Three, you're going be rebutttling over there on your negative side. Okay, our match, two children should choose what they want to learn in school. Hannah, it's your you to start your time, starokay. So first they have the what they like, what they like what in school. They can have their further school and they can have lot more or not less in school. That's a, that's a point like when somebody has a point when somebody has to say that they like and they can also have to, they can also have the with the knowledge inside style like what they like. Then they can both learn and play in a in class. And when we have that, that's okay. Said it to sweet. I didn't agree with that because children, children, if children have choose what they want for school, theychoose the easy part. And if they all choose the easy part, they want they want to learn the knowledge and Chinese and and math and science and stuff. So that's why I think they shouldn't be, there shouldn't be any choosing classes for the school. And also and also passing on to you, but but as you, I said that we can have both we can have the lessons they like but in the lessons they like they can we can also put some of those like knowledge they like some of those really real knowledge they like then they can have like both learn and both say but use that only of the things all they like but at that and I say we can put aumn we can have both fun at have those class but one or two class a day or a week to put them all to make them real, like learn something from them and the rest of them that MaaS and Chinese, but they won't pay attention math, Chinese then, because they're thinking so much about the fun classes and they will only pay attention at the fun part of the fun classes. I don't agree, even even if the teachers Manato skip some like like math and science and stuff into the fun classes, the classes the children choose, the children won't pay attention in them either. I don't I don't think so, because a teacher can remind them, well done. Well done. That was excellent. We've got over Bert. Well done, Daniel. Who's convinced you in that argument? I'm gonna describe that person okay I'm not going say literally okay she she is a girl obviously we're not Daniel we're get Daniel Daniel we're not gonna we're gonna okay find this right so three okay why three? But then she said she said when hanhannah said they can they can do they can do some of the classes that they don't want just some of them but three, during those classes the children are too busy thinking of the fun stuff so they won't pay attention and I agree with that. Okay, okay, well done. Three I am actually gonna to say though Hannah, some of your sort of ideas here were you were being very balanced in your argument, which I really liked actually the counter argument of saying, do you know what we have some of these ideas, we can have these fun classes but we still got to learn the course subjects and I think you thought ought very well for trying to find that balance. So I'm going to ward mine to Hannah. I think that was a really good argument. You two are fantastic. Yeah. Okay, Hannah, she now gets to listen to you two in you swapibecause. We've already had that side. Okay, three is now on the affirmative. Daniel is now on the negative. Hannah will now decide when she hears this rebuttal. Tennis, she's the umpire, okay? Children should choose what they want to learn in school. Three, please take it away. Children should choose what they wanted to learn in school, because the stuff will make them happy, and the children will learn, will learn more like art, art stuff and cutting papers, and stuff that they can learn, like nose craft. And they can also in the classes, they can also make their own decisions about, and they can learn more about what they will choose when they grow up in the future. Hey, Daniel. Okay. Wait, wait, just a sec. There's a silly app over here that is okay blocking my way to start. But if children. But if children choose what they learn in school, they they won't they won't get the knowledge they they need. And also if the student like science, he he also needed to do math because science science contains math. And this is referred to every subject you learn, links and whatever. Okay, sending it over to the three number. Oh well, I don't understand what you're talking about. And what do you mean? What okay, what I meant was. If for example, a student like to learn science, he also had to do math because because doing science needs math. For example, this is a really easy one. You have so many ducks in the pond and then some flew away for the self. And how many ducks are there? And also you Yeah. Okay. Yeah, go on three. So stop being into into if you want, if you need to. So he's talking about them being connected through so that if you do maths, then you have to do science, because if you do science, you need to do maths to be able to do science. He's talking about how they are connected. Yeah, I learned that. I learned that when I was doing my ixl, like like there was a problem and then I had to do loads of math and then I had to answer its science. Hey, three pretty zy. So does that do anything to what we're talking about? Yes. Yes. So this so they need to learn other subjects. Yeah, but they can too long other subjects in those subjects they choose because with the school will give them choand. They all only learn the choices the school give out. And the choices in the school give out might have some that are related to math and science and stuff. But it's would be fun because they learn in the math and science and stuff you well did, Hannah, who are you awarding it to? That's a hard choice. Everyone says that d, it is a hard choice though, isn't it, especially when people debate well. Yes, Yeah, I'll make I'll make this. But you could do the choice when you were when they were debating, and I don't think you were listening. So what choice are you making? Maybe. Is it three or me? Is it me or three? Daniel, let's let Hannah have a moment. Everyone else at a moment. It's a draw. Okay, Hannah, why are you making it a draw? Yeah they could they both have great reasons. Ms and like it's a trouble because everyone has great rhythms and they they've got a good like some some like some good things to talk about and the sink the butter is like both together. Very well done. Okay thank you very much. Well done mommy the tv close again Oh no dear okay three Hannah and Daniel some nice rebutattling today okay we're gonna be looking at children should get paid after they do school work. All three of you are able to rebuttle really well. Your discussion is fantastic, okay? But we need to make sure that we're not using our books for binoculars when people are speaking. We need to not talk over anyone, okay? Because debating is all about active listening as well, okay? That's part of a skill we're learning. It's about listening to others talking and making sure that we're hearing what they're saying so we can we can respond, okay? If we're shouting, then we can't hear them. And that's not always the best in debating, okay? And you guys have got some strong ideas. You work very beautifully as a class. You are able to critically think better than most classes that I have the pleasure of teaching. Yeah you guys think about all angles, all areas. You think about positive, you think about negative, you think about experts, you think about scenarios, you think about examples. So I just wanna make sure that we're listening to each other are okay, because that's gonna to make you even better. Yeah because you have the potential to be fantastic. Awesome debate us. Okay, so I just want you to practice that for next week. All right, well done. Have a wonderful rest of your week and prepare. Children should get paid for housework. And bye Hannah. Bye Daniel by three. Have a nice week. Bye.
处理时间: 29086 秒 | 字符数: 41,463
AI分析
完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
"header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
"course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
"course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
"course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Debate Structure and Signposting",
"course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 辩论结构与引导词",
"course_name_en": "UIE-LS01DB-A",
"course_name_cn": "UIE-LS01DB-A 课程",
"course_topic_en": "Affirmative Speech and Signposting in Debating; Topic: Children should choose what they want to learn in school.",
"course_topic_cn": "辩论中的正方陈述与引导词;主题:孩子们应该选择他们在学校想学什么。",
"course_date_en": "November 17th (Inferred)",
"course_date_cn": "11月17日 (推测)",
"student_name": "Hannah, Daniel, Three",
"teaching_focus_en": "Deep dive into the role of the First Speaker in an affirmative debate team, focusing on introducing the problem, defining terms, setting out the plan, and utilizing signposting language. Practicing structured rebuttal tennis.",
"teaching_focus_cn": "深入探讨正方一辩在辩论中的角色,重点关注介绍问题、定义术语、阐述计划和使用引导词。练习结构化的驳论网球赛。",
"teaching_objectives": [
{
"en": "Students will be able to define the key roles and responsibilities of the affirmative first speaker.",
"cn": "学生将能够定义正方一辩的关键角色和职责。"
},
{
"en": "Students will practice structuring an opening affirmative speech, including problem statement, definition, and plan.",
"cn": "学生将练习构建开场正方陈述,包括问题陈述、定义和计划。"
},
{
"en": "Students will practice using signposting language ('firstly,' 'secondly,' 'however,' etc.) effectively in debates.",
"cn": "学生将练习在辩论中有效使用引导词(如“首先”、“其次”、“然而”等)。"
}
],
"timeline_activities": [
{
"time": "Initial Check-in",
"title_en": "Student Updates and Technical Check",
"title_cn": "学生近况汇报与技术检查",
"description_en": "Addressing technical issues (Daniel\/Three) and hearing about students' recent activities (Hannah's race, Daniel's camping, Three's fun fair).",
"description_cn": "处理技术问题(Daniel\/Three)并听取学生们最近的活动(Hannah的比赛,Daniel的露营,Three的游乐园)。"
},
{
"time": "Debate Structure Lesson",
"title_en": "First Speaker Role and Affirmative Speech Outline",
"title_cn": "一辩角色与正方陈述大纲",
"description_en": "Teacher explains the structure: state problem (urgent, requiring intervention), define terms, outline the plan, and give reasons\/evidence. Example used: Banning smoking in public places.",
"description_cn": "老师讲解结构:陈述问题(紧迫、需要干预)、定义术语、阐述计划并给出理由\/证据。示例:禁止在公共场所吸烟。"
},
{
"time": "Signposting Introduction",
"title_en": "Introduction to Signposting Language",
"title_cn": "引导词介绍",
"description_en": "Reviewing and providing useful transition phrases for debates (e.g., 'importantly,' 'however,' 'in contrast').",
"description_cn": "复习并提供辩论中实用的过渡短语(例如,“重要的是”、“然而”、“相比之下”)。"
},
{
"time": "Debate Round 1 (Topic: Student Choice)",
"title_en": "Rebuttal Tennis - Round 1 (Affirmative\/Negative)",
"title_cn": "驳论网球赛 - 第一轮(正方\/反方)",
"description_en": "Students debate the motion: 'Children should choose what they want to learn in school.' Focus on short statements and rebuttals. Three judges the winner.",
"description_cn": "学生就“孩子们应该选择他们在学校想学什么”进行辩论。重点是简短的陈述和反驳。Three 评判获胜者。"
},
{
"time": "Debate Round 2 (Topic: Student Choice)",
"title_en": "Rebuttal Tennis - Round 2 (Swapped Sides)",
"title_cn": "驳论网球赛 - 第二轮(角色互换)",
"description_en": "Roles swapped. Hannah acts as the final judge for this round.",
"description_cn": "角色互换。Hannah 担任本轮的最终裁判。"
},
{
"time": "Wrap-up and Feedback",
"title_en": "Post-Debate Reflection and Next Topic Preview",
"title_cn": "总结反思与下一主题预览",
"description_en": "Teacher praises critical thinking skills but reminds students about active listening during cross-talk. New topic previewed: 'Children should get paid for housework.'",
"description_cn": "老师表扬了批判性思维能力,但提醒学生在互相争论时要积极倾听。预览新主题:“孩子应该为家务劳动获得报酬。”"
}
],
"vocabulary_en": "Debate, Affirmative, Signposting, Rebuttal, Motion, Public Places, Tobacco, Intervention, Counter-argument, Verdict, Efficiently",
"vocabulary_cn": "辩论,正方,引导词,反驳,动议,公共场所,烟草,干预,反驳论点,判决,高效地",
"concepts_en": "The specific structure of the First Affirmative Speaker's speech (Problem -> Plan -> Points); The importance of defining terms; Active Listening in debating.",
"concepts_cn": "正方一辩演讲的具体结构(问题 -> 计划 -> 论点);定义术语的重要性;辩论中的积极倾听。",
"skills_practiced_en": "Structuring argumentative speeches, using transition words, active listening, and constructing immediate rebuttals in a fast-paced format.",
"skills_practiced_cn": "构建论证性演讲,使用过渡词,积极倾听,以及在快节奏形式中构建即时反驳。",
"teaching_resources": [
{
"en": "Examples of strong opening statements (Smoking Ban)",
"cn": "强有力的开场陈述示例(禁烟议题)"
},
{
"en": "List of useful debate signposting phrases",
"cn": "有用的辩论引导词短语列表"
}
],
"participation_assessment": [
{
"en": "High engagement from all three students, particularly in the structured debate rounds.",
"cn": "所有三名学生参与度很高,尤其是在结构化的辩论环节中。"
},
{
"en": "Students demonstrated strong willingness to debate both sides of an issue.",
"cn": "学生们展现了对辩论一个问题正反两方面的强烈意愿。"
}
],
"comprehension_assessment": [
{
"en": "Students demonstrated clear understanding of the First Speaker's role and the necessity of defining terms.",
"cn": "学生们清晰地理解了一辩的角色以及定义术语的必要性。"
},
{
"en": "Students successfully applied learned signposting structures during the rebuttal tennis.",
"cn": "学生们在驳论网球赛中成功运用了所学的引导词结构。"
}
],
"oral_assessment": [
{
"en": "Hannah and Three provided well-reasoned arguments, often incorporating scenarios (e.g., how schools could integrate subjects).",
"cn": "Hannah 和 Three 提供了充分合理的论据,经常结合具体情景(例如学校如何整合学科)。"
},
{
"en": "Daniel showed improvement in structuring his points sequentially during the second debate round.",
"cn": "Daniel 在第二轮辩论中,在按顺序组织论点方面有所进步。"
}
],
"written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Focus on oral debate structure)",
"written_assessment_cn": "不适用(重点是口头辩论结构)",
"student_strengths": [
{
"en": "Excellent critical thinking; students explored nuances and counter-arguments effectively.",
"cn": "出色的批判性思维;学生们有效地探索了细微差别和反驳论点。"
},
{
"en": "Strong teamwork observed during the construction of the sample opening speech.",
"cn": "在构建示例开场陈述时观察到很强的团队合作能力。"
},
{
"en": "Good ability to maintain positions even when challenged (Daniel and Three in the second round).",
"cn": "在受到挑战时仍能保持立场的良好能力(第二轮中 Daniel 和 Three)。"
}
],
"improvement_areas": [
{
"en": "Active listening and avoiding talking over peers during fast-paced rebuttal exchanges.",
"cn": "在快节奏的反驳交流中,需要加强积极倾听,避免打断同伴。"
},
{
"en": "Need to stick to the format (e.g., Daniel initially attempted a full speech instead of a single point in the tennis game).",
"cn": "需要遵守既定格式(例如,Daniel 在网球赛中最初尝试进行完整演讲而不是单个论点)。"
},
{
"en": "Reducing distractions (e.g., camera\/audio issues, using books as binoculars).",
"cn": "减少分心行为(例如,摄像头\/音频问题,将书本当作双筒望远镜)。"
}
],
"teaching_effectiveness": [
{
"en": "The use of a clear, pre-written example (smoking ban) helped solidify the theoretical structure of the opening speech.",
"cn": "使用清晰的预先写好的示例(禁烟)有助于巩固开场陈述的理论结构。"
},
{
"en": "The Rebuttal Tennis format successfully encouraged quick thinking and engagement with the opponent's points.",
"cn": "驳论网球赛的形式成功地鼓励了快速思考和回应对手的论点。"
}
],
"pace_management": [
{
"en": "The initial technical warm-up slowed the start; however, the pacing during the structured debate rounds was fast and appropriately challenging.",
"cn": "最初的技术热身环节减慢了开始速度;然而,在结构化辩论环节中,节奏很快且具有适当的挑战性。"
},
{
"en": "Teacher effectively paused and reset the class when focus was lost.",
"cn": "当学生注意力不集中时,老师有效地暂停并重置了课堂。"
}
],
"classroom_atmosphere_en": "Energetic, highly interactive, and intellectually stimulating, though occasionally disrupted by technical glitches and crosstalk.",
"classroom_atmosphere_cn": "充满活力、高度互动且具有智力上的启发性,尽管偶尔会被技术故障和相互争论打断。",
"objective_achievement": [
{
"en": "Objective 1 (Role Understanding): Largely achieved, demonstrated by applying the structure.",
"cn": "目标1(角色理解):基本达成,通过应用结构得以证明。"
},
{
"en": "Objective 2 & 3 (Practice Speech Structure & Signposting): Successfully practiced during both debate rounds.",
"cn": "目标2和3(练习演讲结构与引导词):在两次辩论赛中都成功练习了。"
}
],
"teaching_strengths": {
"identified_strengths": [
{
"en": "Masterful classroom management in resetting student focus without discouraging participation.",
"cn": "高超的课堂管理能力,能在不挫伤参与积极性的情况下重新集中学生注意力。"
},
{
"en": "Ability to pivot between theory (first speaker structure) and application (rebuttal tennis) seamlessly.",
"cn": "能够在理论(一辩结构)和实践(驳论网球赛)之间无缝切换的能力。"
}
],
"effective_methods": [
{
"en": "Providing a detailed model speech\/structure before the practical application.",
"cn": "在实际应用之前提供详细的示范演讲\/结构。"
},
{
"en": "Using a competitive yet supportive 'tennis' format to drive quick argumentation.",
"cn": "使用竞争性但支持性的“网球”模式来推动快速论证。"
}
],
"positive_feedback": [
{
"en": "Teacher praised students' strong critical thinking skills as being 'better than most classes.'",
"cn": "老师称赞学生们强大的批判性思维能力‘比大多数班级都要好’。"
},
{
"en": "Hannah's balanced approach in the first rebuttal round was explicitly highlighted as a strength.",
"cn": "Hannah 在第一轮反驳中采取的平衡方法被明确强调为优势。"
}
]
},
"specific_suggestions": [
{
"icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
"category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
"category_cn": "发音与阅读",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Continue practicing clear articulation, especially when speaking quickly during rebuttals, to ensure all words are understood.",
"cn": "继续练习清晰的发音,尤其是在反驳环节中快速发言时,以确保所有词汇都能被理解。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-comments",
"category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
"category_cn": "口语与交流",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Focus on active listening by practicing pausing for 1-2 seconds before responding to ensure the speaker has finished their point.",
"cn": "通过练习在回应前暂停 1-2 秒来确保说话者说完其观点,从而专注于积极倾听。"
},
{
"en": "When practicing debate structures, strictly adhere to the allotted time\/format (e.g., one statement vs. a full speech) to build discipline.",
"cn": "在练习辩论结构时,严格遵守分配的时间\/格式(例如,一个陈述而非完整演讲),以培养纪律性。"
}
]
}
],
"next_focus": [
{
"en": "Applying the First Speaker structure to the negative team's opening statement.",
"cn": "将一辩的结构应用于反方(Negative Team)的开场陈述。"
},
{
"en": "Preparing for the next debate topic: 'Children should get paid for housework.'",
"cn": "为下一个辩论主题做准备:“孩子们应该为家务劳动获得报酬。”"
}
],
"homework_resources": [
{
"en": "Review the list of signposting phrases and prepare 3 unique examples for the next debate.",
"cn": "复习引导词短语列表,并为下一次辩论准备 3 个独特的例句。"
}
]
}