Hi. Hello. Hi. Nice to meet you. How do you pronounce your name? Is it tiger? Yeah. Hi, tiger. Nice to meet you. My name's ed. Die. Hello. How old are you? Hey, are you eight? Well, I'm 19. Nice to meet you. So tell me a bit about yourself. What have you done today, tiger? Nothing, nothing. They you just have a relaxing day. Yeah. Was it nice? Good. I'm glad. So today we're just going to be continuing with the critical thinking and debating lessons. So we're going to be talking about lesson 17. So the conclusion. So just to get a bit more information about you and what you currently know, what is a debate? The argument. Like. Yeah and how many teams are there? Typically no two exactly. There's typically the affirmative team or the agree team and then there's typically the negative team or the disagree team. So debates are exactly what you said, that argument. So trying to come up with a solution for a certain motion. So the motion is the topic of the debate. So in this lesson, we're gonna to be talking about conclusions in a debate. So what goes at the end of a debate as well as look through a type of motion and trying to think of the agree and disagree sides of that motion, is that okay? Yeah, thumbs up if that's okay. Thumbs up. Cool. And if you have any questions at any point, please do ask me if you don't know what a word means, or if I'm going too fast or I'm going too slow, please don't be afraid to tell me. And especially if there's a word that you don't know, I'll be happy to help you know the meaning. Is that okay? Okay, cool. So. Conclusions. So tiger, why do you think we need a conclusion every time? Make argument. What else do you think a conclusion can do? You don't the person don't know your opinion if you don't say out loud because for your own opinion yes, exactly. So if you don't say what you what you think, what your opinion is, what your stis so what size you are on on the debate you're not gonna to be able to get that through to the judges or the audience, right? That's those are very great reasons tiger just to strengthen your argument, make it stronger and sort of show what size you're on and why. So conclusions are very poor a part of a debate because they wrap up what you've been discussing in your speech. So again, there's typically in a debate the introduction, the body with the main points and then a conclusion, right? Have you learned a bit about introductions and what goes in the main part of your speech? Yeah. So what about the introduction? What is the introduction? Why important introduction is the same as the conclusion book and you say what side you're on? Yeah exactly. So I didn't quite catch that last part. Could you say that again? For me it's the same. It's like it's to introduce Yeah, exactly. So it's just to sort of start off your debate by saying what your what your team is, so which side you're on, whether you agree or disagree with emotion, sort of explain what you're gonna to talk about in the debate. So again, there's typically three speakers. And again, just to sort of outline what your team is going to talk about, the conclusion is sort of like a parallel to de with two introductions to parallel means they're very, very similar. But the conclusion is at the end of the debate, the introduction in the beginning. And the conclusion is sort of a summary what you of what you have said instead of saying what you're going to say because you've already said it as well as talking about sort of giving a reason why this is important. So again, it's just to summarize or wrap up what you've already discussed. So the role of effective conclusions. So tiger, could you please read this sentence for me? And must how how the audience ans have concentrated on how carefully they have listened. Audiences and adjudiators can still be swayed by an effective appeal to the, to emotion and punsummary of the main idea. Very well done, tiger. I'm very, very impressed by your pronunciation. Very well done. So the role of effective conclusion. So tiger, what do you think effective means? Like working? Yeah, exactly. It's a very good definition. It works. It does what it's meant to do. Rit does it well. So what you've said here, no matter how hard the audience have concentrated and how carefully they've listened, so even if the audience gives you their utmost attention, completely focuses on you, audiences and adjudicators can still be swayed by an effective appeal to a motion or a punchy summary. So what this is basically saying is that the two main things that often work in a conclusion is one, appealing to emotion. So what do you think appeal to emotion means? Tiger, now, what means appeaappeal means sort of to rely on or to use. In this case, appeal to emotion means you're trying to target or use people's emotions so they can agree with you. So in this case, appeal. So in this case, appeal can mean to use or to rely on to target. So in this case, appeal to emotion would be trying to use people's emotions as a way to make them think, as a way to make them on your side. So for example, if I was talking about speed limits, right? So what are speed limits? Tiger? There's speed limits. When you drive cars Yeah, exactly. So it's when you're driving a car and it says how fast you can go, right? So say there's a debate about reducing the the maximum speed you can go at, so making it that you can only go slower as opposed to faster, right? So say, for example, maybe a typical speed limit would be 40 miles per hour. So that would be in an area where there's houses, there's street lamps, but I might want a motion where I reduce that to 30 miles per hour, which is a lot shorter, a lot slower of a speed, right? And I might be on the side who wants to, who agrees with that and wants to reduce the speed. What point do you think I could make to appeal to people's emotions, or use people's emotions, or make them feel an emotion that will make them agree with me? Sions. Parconclusions, sorry, can you repeat that for me? I can't understand what word you're saying. Conclusions? Yeah. So this would be part of a conclusion. Yeah, exactly. But what is there a specific example you could give me for something I could say in specifically about speed limits and about reducing the speed limit to appeal to people's emotions of why they should reduce the speed limit? What do you think could happen if the speed limits too high? So if people go too fast, bump into traffic? Yeah you're bump into Yeah exactly. So you could bump other cars, you could bump into people. So what I could say to debate on why I think the speed limit should be reduced is by saying, by talking about, for example, casualties. So events where people have gotten gotten injured or they've died or they've been seriously hurt. And I could bring that up as my evidence and say, we want to try and make sure that this doesn't happen again. That would be appealing to emotion, because I'm appealing to people's sense of humanity, of wanting to help other people and make sure other people don't get hurt. So by appealing to emotion, so sadness, empathy, right, feeling like you're understanding what someone else is feeling, I can make them agree with me. Does that make sense? Yeah. So that's one way you can do that in a conclusion. Another one is a punchy summary of a main idea. So tiger, what do you think punchy summary means? So punchy all this really means. So if you think of, for example, if you're punching someone, right, all this means is it has an impact, right? Yeah Yeah so it has an impact or it's quite forceful, right? So a punchy summary is a summary that makes an impact or is quite forceful of forces an idea into the audience's mind. So that's another way to do it. To make ways you can make your summary punchy is by being very straightforward, being very honest, using simple sentences to sort of have a punchy effect. So it's very, very simple. It can be understood well or having sort of surprising information or ideas or sentences, something just to create an impact in the audience. And if you have an impact, you're more easily remembered. Does that make sense? So could you recap for me, tiger? What are the two things you can do in a conclusion? Some two main things you can do in a conclusion to make it effective that we've talked about, to make a punchy summary and to make an appeal to emotions. Yeah. So appeal to emotion. Using people's emotions, they mean the same thing. But yes, very well done, tiger. So this is the role of an effective conclusion. It's not to waffle self indulgently. It's not to hyperboalized, but to succinctly and powerfully remind your audience of your central point. So let's look at this a bit closer. There are a lot of new words in here. So waffle self indulgently. What do you think this phrase means, tiger? So waffling. So oftentimes in speeches or debates, when someone when someone waffles, it means they go on and on and on so they do not have a point. So if you ever have a speech and someone says that you're waffling, it means that you're running on and on. You're not really saying anything that has a point self indulgently. So I don't know if you've heard of the word self indulgent before, but indulgent is to sort of do what you want without limits. So self indulgent is to allow yourself to do what you want without limits. Let me write that down. So could you repeat for me what these two words mean and if you don't understand their meaning? To waffle on and on and on. You do not have a point. Self indulgent. Do what you want without limits. Yeah, the very well answer. Do you understand those two meanings? Tiger, Yeah. Yeah. So when I say waffle self indulgently, all this means is I go on without a point to whatever time I want or how long, however long I wanted waffle for. So what this is saying here is in a conclusion, you should not go on without a point. There should be a certain limit to how much you can say. Also, you can't hyperbolize. Have you heard of this word before? Se you know so hyperboze there's also known as as hyperbole, but hyperboze just means. To exaggerate something, right? So you might want to get across to the audience that what you're talking about is very, very important, but you can't exaggerate or hyperbose to the point that what you're saying is not. So, for example, in a conclusion, I cannot say if we don't ban cigarettes. So cigarettes are something that people smoke and it's known as to be quite bad for your health, right? But if I was trying to argue to get ban cigarettes or get rid of cigarettes, I can't just say, if we don't get rid of cigarettes, everyone will die. Do you think that's an exaggeration? Yeah how come? Because if because it's really light. Like out out planting because some people some people don't like smoke cigarettes batadright though some people don't. So when I say everyone will die, well, some people don't smoke cigarettes. Some people who do smoke cigarettes maybe only do it once in a while so they don't have any that bad health health problems. Maybe you'll get a really bad health problem, but you won't die, right? So even if your topic is really, really important and it will have really important impacts, it's important not to exaggerate because you don't want to be a liar. You don't want to be not truthful, right? You want, you can be impactful, you can show emotion, you can create, you can make sentences that are very impactful, but don't exaggerate is what this is saying. So what we've learned so far, don't waffle self indulgently, don't go on without a point. There has to be a limit to how much you can say in a conclusion. Don't hyperbose. So don't exaggerate instead, succinctly and powerfully, right? Do you know what succinctly means? Succinctly, all this means. Is concisely or. Do you know what concisely means or concise? No, so succinctly, all this means is to say in a short way, so it's clear. So if I say something succinctly, I don't go on forever. I get to the point that also simply means powerfully as well. So I say something powerfully. I make it have an impact. You have to say your conclusion succinctly and powerfully to remind your audience of your central point. Does this make sense? Yes or no, sorry. Yes. Yeah. Is there anything you're confused about at all or no? Okay. So I know there was a lot of information in this one slide and a lot of different words, but I hope you remember some of the meanings. I hope you have a bit more information about what this slide means because we went through it together. So what should you do? So could you read these three points to me, tiger? One, be aware that your confusion can't be too long nor too hacktonight. What? So hack. So the way that I pronounce it is hack need. It just means it's overused. It's not original. So let me just write that down. It's overused slash, not original. So hackneed hackknight, I've heard it pronounce both ways, but Yeah, hackneed or hackknight, all that means is overused. It's it's not original. Does that make sense? Again, your audience is your attention. Mm, mm. Try to find something else, quote an idea, a triplet, or any kind of penline that thumbs up your, or it's always a good idea to scrapt your conclusion before the debate. So let's go through this slide together. So first, what do you think? If you had to give a summary of this first point, what would you say this is talking about? Your conclusion do not need to be too long. So all this first part is saying is make sure that your conclusion is not too long. So if it's too long, it can be boring. It's not gonna to have a clear point. It's not gonna to be as effective. So not only make it not too long, but also make sure the points that you're used are somewhat original or somewhat unique. Don't say very overused points that everyone's heard before, because then it's not going to be interesting. That's the first point. What about the second point, tiger? And the second point? Like use use different, use different like ctuations Yeah use different types sentenyeah exactly. Yeah, exactly. So using different techniques, whether that's grammar, punctuation, sentences are exactly right. It's just trying to find something. So it could be a quote. So maybe you're quoting a famous person or maybe you're quoting someone who isn't is an expert in whatever you're talking about an idea. So triple triplet is a technique. So it's a type of grammar, a type of grammar, punctuation, technique or anything that sort of sums up your approach in a unique way. So again, as some sort of puncy line, right? So for example, slogans are a type of punchy line. Have you heard of a slogan before? So slogans are something that are used in advertising and all is is a short, punchy sentence that sort of. Advertisse of someone's product. So for example, I'll give you some examples of common slogans. You might have heard of these before. So Nike or Nike, just do it. McDonald's, I'm loving it, right? These are all phrases that when you're at these certain companies, you might hear this slogan, right? And it's designed to, whenever you hear that, to make you think of the brand so you can buy it. The reason I'm saying this is because these are known as punchy. These are punchscthese are punchy phrases that are very effective in making you want to buy the product, right, to buy whatever they're selling. So pchyline, it could be something as simple as three words at the end of your conclusion. It's just something that sort of gets across what you want to say. Does that make sense? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And finally, what does this, what do you think this last point means? Tiger? It is always good idea to script your conclusion before the day. It's like always good to write to your conclusion before that you speak. Yeah exactly. So to Yeah exactly. Very well done tiger script to conclusion. That's just another way of saying to plan right or to write it down before right. Why do you think it's important to write to write things down before your actual debate? Because you might I have a strong conclusion, you might have time to think. Yeah, exactly. So so you have time to think beforehand, using that time effectively to plan something, especially have if you have a good idea that you know you might forget writing that down so you don't forget it. And it's also just a way of helping you under pressure, right? Because in a in a debate, right, it's it's your orspeaking. It's an oral debate. It's an oral performance. You're speaking out loud in front of many, many people, your team, the other team, the audience, judges. It can be very nervreckon. It can make you very nervous. So planning before the debate or scripting before the debate can help to make sure that you don't forget what you're saying. Does that make sense? Yeah. Okay. Cool. So these are some examples of starter sentences for a conclusion. So do you know what starter sentences are? Tiger? Yeah. What are they to start on a paragraph sentence? Yeah, a very well done tiget. Very well, very good definition. So concluding starters, these are all examples of what you can use in your own debate to start off a conclusion. So in summary, finally, all this taken into account, pardon, Moreover, Yeah, all this taken into account in conclusion, for these reasons, all in all, in short, ultimately, these are all examples of types of starters for a kind conclusion. So for example, as you finish your debate in conclusion, this house or this team believes blah, blah, or all in all this, this team believes blah, blah, blah. It's just what to say at the beginning of your conclusion. Does that make sense? Yeah, okay, cool. So do you have the worksheet with you or no? Tiger, do you have the worksheet with you, or do you just have a pen and paper en paper? Could you write down all these sentence starters for me? Okay, Yeah Yeah. Yeah, okay, cool, have you finished? Okay, cool. Well done, tiger. So those are all the different senand starters. You can use these, all of them. All of them are good. All of them you can use in a conclusion or any sort of summary. So today's motion. So again, what does emotion mean? Tiger, something that you talk about, the main thing that you talk about. Yeah, exactly, tiger. It's the main thing that you talk about. It's the sort of the topic of the debate. So this motion for today is gaming or esort should be considered a sport. So what do you think about this motion? First off. Should game considered ders as a. Defining. Sorry, pardon the fine name. You do you want me to define a word? Sorry. You just define the motion. Yeah so you define the motion. So you say whether you agree with it or you don't agree with it or what exactly you're talking about. So for example, the affirmative team, what will the affirmative team say? Will they think gaming should be considered a sport or they should not be considered? Should? Yeah and then what will the negative scene think should not? Yeah. And when you define emotion, you, in this case, you define what gaming includes. So what types of gaming are there? What are the sort of the boundaries or the maximum, minimum of what gaming is or one esort is, and what a sport is considered. So for example, sports could be basketball, football, netball, hockey, etcetera. But this motion is arguing that gaming or esporshould be considered a natural sport. So first off, do you agree or disagree with this motion? Tiger, I agree. Don't agree. How come? Because when you're game me, you're just staring at the school. Ling, very nice, very nice words that are dribbling in basketball. Yeah, very well done. So what you're saying is it shouldn't be considered a sport, because a sport should have some sort of physical activity or exercise. Is that what you're saying? Yeah. Yeah, that's a very good point. Engayou're, just staring at your screens and moving a little bit. Yeah, you're just moving your thumbs, right? Yeah Yeah, that's a very good point. So that would be a good point for the negative team, right? So before we think any more about the agree disagree teams and what points they could make, I'm gonna to show you some videos about this motion just to give you a bit more knowledge or ideas for this topic. Is that okay? Let me just share my screen with you. Okay, can you see this? Yeah, okay. Here's a question. Are video games a sport? I'd like to say a sport is something in which skill separates you from everybody else. We call it essports, online competitive sports. We asked these guys because they get paid to play them. My name is Bryce Bates, and I'm a professional starcraft two player. I' M Benjamin James Baker, also known as to Muslim. I'm my specialty of soccer. Theatbates and Baker are professional video beavers. They live together in this house in northern California. It's called the lair, where they spend twelve hours a day pounding keyboards. With respect, I think the question, is this a sport? Not is this the stupidest question in the context of sanbecause. I think arguing about whether something is a sport or not ultimately comes down to whether you think it's cool and whether you think it belongs in the cool kids club. Alex Garfield is the chief executive officer of evil geniuses, the team that calls the layer home their legitimate competitive activity. I don't really care whether someone, you know, validates it as a sport or not. I think the culture itself validates itself and that validation can come with big money. Oh nice. The winners of the international for dota two just split a $1.4 million prize pool. You know, so there is money to be had in this sport. One the and a deep fan base. It is e's thousands travel to lulive virtual combat and worldwide, millions more. Log on to see webcasts from competitions like this one from Seattle. Yeah I have a huge, huge fan base that I never thought I'd have. I mean, if I went down the college route, I could be in office right now making a decent living. But here I am traveling the world, playing video games for a living, and I don't have any regrets whatsoever. If the money and fans aren't enough, consider this. The us government recently allowed a foreign gamer entry to the country on the same visa given to traditional professional athletes. We're the Michael Jordans of the video games that we play, and it really just comes down to day in, day out. We're sitting here playing this game twelve hours a day, seven days a week on end, and I'm just going na put more time into it and I'm just gon na be a better player because of it. So, tiger, what do you think of that video? They're just pounding keepers, not doing anything. Yeah so you still think that that based on that video, even though they've shared their perspective, you don't really think it's a sport because it's just the clarkety noise of the keyboards. Yeah what do you think about so if I was on the other team, right? So say you were on the negative team and you thought esports should not be considered a real sport because there's no sort of physical activity or exercise involved. It's all just clicking on your keys, so it shouldn't be considered a real spot. I could bring up how in that video, 11 important thing we learned is that in the United States, the government gave a PaaS for so foreign athletes are allowed to come in to the United States under certain conditions because they're an athlete. In 2013, the government allowed foreign gamers to have the same abilities, we'll have the same accessibility as athletic or Actual Actual athletes. So they were able to come in into the us under the same right as actual athletes. What would you think about that statement? I think it's over. Look, like really crazy. You think it's crazy. So you don't think Donald Trump is a really crazy person. Donald Trump is a really crazy person. So you still think that even with that lot, so even with that, and even with the us allowing in 2013 foreign games to come in under the same rights as as actual foreign athletes. You still think that should not be seen as evidence for why it should be considered a real sport? Yeah. Yeah Yeah okay so that was the first video overall what would you think of this first video if you had to have you had to sum it up in a few in a few words or a sentence just a summary of like two gamers what they like their life are like Yeah Yeah that's is okay cool and last video this is just a sports it's starting without me. This is just a sports review of esports technology journalist Julia Hardy, and I'm laughing because I can't think of anything less interesting, though I'm totally in the minority. First of all, explain how you can make a profession now, space, how do they actually get paid? So okay, obviously there are different pripots for different games and they vary inside size. So next weekend is the call of duty world championships. The prize pot for that is $1 million. So the top team will take away dollar hundred, zero. Maybe I could get interested. Industry, you're interested, right? So there's a lot of money to be had there. But also, for example, one of the most well known American teams, team optic, they're not the best, but they are the most well known. They will stream all their practice sessions. I mean, these guys are playing eight hours a day theystream their practice sessions and theyearn revenue from that. So you can stream via twitch or you know can do YouTube videos, YouTube streaming, this kind of thing, or there are other platforms that stream it. So they get additional revenue effectively. All their practice sessions they monetize is very clever. Live houses optic are known for sort of they've got their kind of like manager and the owner of the team who kind of checks on them, make sure they're all right. They're quite you know Young guys. They get the right nutrition as someone comes in, gives yoga, you know, really eight hours a day. That can't be good for you. Or staring at a screen. Well, you know, to be honest with you, like in my job, I stare at a screen for pretty much eight hours a day. I hope you better a computer. Do you know we all are pretty sedentary as it goes? I mean, the way you need to think of it is, personally, I can't watch football. I find it incredibly boring. It's a bit Green thing, people running up and down. I find it utterly tedious actually watching, you know, competitive esporyou have your favorite team, you watch them just like youwatch a football match. And actually, let's be honest, it's going to be a lot more visually interesting than a football match. A lot more fun things going on. That was one of the line in the piece that we played there that it's following in the footsteps of football. But it can it truly be a spectator ball? It already is. 71 million watched it last year. They reckon it's going to buy 2017 to be 145 million people watching it. I have this argument all the time. People are like, Oh, no one wants to watch anyone play video games. That's so boring. League of legends. I think there was about 18000 people and in the stadium live, and then 32 million watched the final. It's, this is what kids are doing. This is what people want to see and in so what do you think of that video, tiger? What was she basically saying? Like how many people watched get video games and did you say it was quite popular or no? White million? Yeah, that's that's a lot, isn't it, for watching a video game competition. So do you think this could be used as evidence for making it into a real sport or no? And how come? No, because you're just staring at more people buying them and just watching them. Yeah. So you could argue it doesn't matter how many people are watching it because it what only matters is what the actual competitors are doing, right? What the actual gamers are doing Yeah. Okay, so. So those are the two videos just to help you sort of think of points. So what we're going to do now. Let me just get Yeah. So what I'd like you to think of is. So think of the agreed Oh, let me just change the colso. I'd like to do a little brainstorming session on your own for a few minutes. And then once you've done brainstorming, you come back with me and we can talk about your points together. So what I'd like you to do is there's the agree team. So should be should and this would be should be a sport. And disagree team should not. So I'd like you to think of different points for the agree and disagree team to persuade the audience. Does that make sense? Yes. Oh, no. Yeah. Okay. So I'll give you around ten minutes to brainstorm on your own. And then after those ten minutes, we can look through your points together and go through them, make them maybe think of more together. Is that okay? Okay, so I'll give you ten minutes. And Yeah, I would recommend using a piece of paper and pen to brainstorm your ideas. How you doing? You doing okay? Yeah, how close are you to being finished? I got two ideas for this. So ideas are both. So do you want to stop there and then read through it together? Yeah. Okay. So let's start with the agree team. So should what are the two ideas you got for this side? Not much physical movement, vlike running and touching. I the point this is cat too not touch Oh sorry, catching. The second one is like the two are both like linked together. So I said, Donald Trump is a crazy person, so never agree with his laws. Donald Trump is. There's physical movement with you and and like. Okay, so there is some suit. Oh, sorry, I think I mix this around. This would be disagree, sorry. Should not be considered a sport. I'll be on the greside now. Sorry, tiger. There is. Physical measurelike. Like with your arms, like buying with your keyboard. So there is some physical movement. So with your arms, slash hands and what be the next point? I, yes, though foreign rugby sports players were allowed to go into the country later, gamers, which have foreign, well, not to. Okay, so very, very well done tiger. I love the range of ideas here. I particularly like you using the evidence we learned in the video as a supporting point. So let's first look at the agree team or why gaming should be considered a sport. So you talk about how there is some physical movement with your arms and hands. So it requires your hands. So if you think of typing, a lot of people can type really fast. They have to get really efficient with their hands, right? So you could say that it could be considered a sport because you are training your hands to be able to use the keyboard. Well, sorry. Yeah, I just thought you were about to say that. Yeah. Yeah. So that's a very good point there, tiger. Yeah. So there is some physical movement. It might not be your whole body. It might not be running, it might not be catching, but there is some. So if you were on the agree team, you could argue for that. Another point they brought up is like with what was there in the video o the law that allows foreign athletes to enter the country under certain, under a certain document allows foreign gaers as well to do it. So that sort of implies that they're sort of the same. So you could use that as a reason why they should be, why gaming should be considered sport. Any other ideas you can think of for the agree team or why it should be considered a sport? Pardon? Sorry, I can't think that fast. No worries. Do you want me to repeat anything or. No. So do you want to come up with an example idea? And if you if that inspires you, you come up with some more. Yeah, Yeah. Okay. So I'm going to bring an idea from same video that we watched, you could say that whether gaming should be considered a sport depends on what sport is defined as. So if sport is defined as physical movement, then yes, it might not be considered a sport. But in the video, the guy defined sports as just needing skill in a certain area. So should so gaming should be considered a sport if the definition of sport is an activity that needs a lot of skill slash training. Does that make sense? So do you want to move on to the disagree part or do you have any other ideas for agree like no, no. Okay, cool. So now the disagree team or the disagree points. So one, exactly like we said, we both said in the beginning, there is not much physical movement like running or catching. So typically when you think of sports, you think of lots of physical activity. So running, jumping, catching, swimming, those are all different examples of lots of physical movements. So typically it uses a large part of your body. And your next one is of how you don't want to support a person that you don't like. So if, for example, he has certain laws that singaming should be considered support, you don't want to support that, which is quite a funny idea. But Yeah, any other ideas that you can think of? Not earit, so that's think for disagree it should not should not be considered a sport. You could say it might take a lot longer for a person to be amazing at football or rugby then gaming. So maybe we need to understand how long it takes to become an expert at gaming versus football. So we could argue that that there is a lot more training involved in becoming great at football or rugby or other physical sports because it uses your entire body as adjust opposed to just your fingers. That could be something we could think of. Anything else you can think of? I think those are the main things we've covered. So I'm quite proud of your answers here. So very well done. I'm just thinking there's anything else we could talk about. You could also bring up as a rebuttal. Do you know what a rebuttal is? Yeah. Yeah. So as a Buttle, right, if the agree team were to bring up the fact that there are competitions where people pay to see it, you could bring up just because you pay to see something. That does not make it a sport. We could bring that up as a rebuttal overall. Is there anything else youlike to say? Or are you happy with your answers here? I'm happy. Okay. Good. So. So that was it for today's lesson. I hope you had a good lesson and you learned some new information. I know there's a lot of tricky words in there that we had to go and pick apart, but I hope my teaching style was okay for you. I hope I didn't go too fast, too slow. If you have any feedback for me, I would appreciate that. But for the topic for next lesson is if you're continuing with this with this unit is the world is about to end in three days. Do government ments, should government let the world know or not? So if you continue to with this unit be that would be the motion for the next session. Overall, any feedback for me or anything youlike to say? Well, was quite good. That was good. Okay. I'm glad and thank you for being such an engaging student. You're a very, very smart worry tiger. So very, very well done. You had all of these amazing ideas. And your pronounced pronunciation for your your nine, Yeah, I meight when eight year old, your pronunciation is very, very good. I'm very, very impressed with your work today. So I hope you have an amazing rest of your day and good luck with your next lesson. Bye bye. Bye bye.