开呢,你讲话要就是流缓得流畅一点好吗?要流ok。应对教室了吗?应对了,只是老老师马上就要来了。我我我不能的。Hello, girls, you're together. Hello, nice to see you. No, how does this work? I copy it and it begins like this. Oh my goodness. Technology. So you're you're in your own place. Are you Luna? Yes, that's so strange. It looks like, let me just move you. Yeah, it looks like you're together. Does it look like that to you? Yes, very clever. Okay. If you didn't tell me, I wouldn't know. So today we have lesson 14 voising along here. So as usual, I'm going to bring up the debate for today. And we're going to pop that because I think it's always a good idea. This very upsetting one for me and for Cleo. Cleo's not here, so she doesn't have to hear it. There you go. Okay, as usual. Tell me who said the cat? I save the cat. You're saving the cat, the painting. Okay, so Luna saving the cat. And Cassie saving the painting. Okay, difficult one. And this one is something we call sorry, there we go. Something we call hypothetical. Hypothetical means it's not it's not likely to happen what you imagine would happen. So what you would do in an imaginary situation. And those are called hypothetical. And we discuss hypothetical things all the time, because sometimes the imaginary situation becomes a real situation. So it is always important to discuss, and it tells us things about what we feel about life. So this exact situation, a museum on fire, might not happen, but if an important building did go on file, what would we save? So it's still important to have hypothetical discussions. Okay, so let's go back to the beginning. Okay, so we've got a talk about short preparation and long preparation. We talked a little bit about this before whero. She wants to hear the debate because it's an important one for her. So we've got short preparation. That means usually if you if you enter the world debate forum, what happens is they will give you a topic on the day and they will say, okay, you have 15 minutes to prepare for the debate. So you don't have very long at all. And usually you will have a little bit of time to do some research. But most of it you're just going to try to put together a good argument. Long preparation is what we've been doing the whole time. You have around a week, and this is pretty good for research. You can do lots of research because you have much more time. So short preparation, little bit of research, but mostly you're going to try to make your arguments very powerful. That's what you'll focus on because you don't have a lot of time. So arguments very powerful. Oh, so big, okay for this one and for long preparation, you can focus on lots of research to back up your argument because you have more time. So let's make that a little bit smaller this time. To back up your arguments. Okay, and you have both got very good at getting together research as well. Okay, so here it is usually 15 minutes to prepare for the short prep. No time for research, just rely on your brain. Every minute counts. So for the short prep make sure you have these things. Obviously you don't need them with you today, but you are usually quite prepared anyway. So do you have paper and pens with you girls? Yes, good. Good. So paper and pens for this one, because I know that we weren't too prepared. Highlighters, if you can. If not, I usually have them because I'm studying right now. I usually have them on my desk. But if not for today, don't worry. And index cards, these are very good. I also have these exact things because I'm studying and I need to do presentations. There you go. And they are very good because you can write one thing on the front and another thing on the back. So you can write the topic on the front and then something to remind you on the back. And water, water always helps you lubricate your brain. There we go. Oh, you're separate. Now. Now, Luna, you have this. Very beautiful. Oh, Oh, I see what you did. It's a background. Luna, that was a trick. I did not know that I thought youdone something clever with the computer. So I thought you actually had Cassie there. So fantastic. Very good. So you got a good friend there, Cassie. She was pretending you were here. So we've got here policy motions and ideas. So what we're talking about, Cassie, is short prep and long prep. So a policy motion is usually to do with things you can change. So you can change the law, you can change rules, you can change something at school, so you can change a school policy. But an idea you cannot usually change. It's just an idea. So like the cat in the museum, the cat burning in the museum, you this is just an idea. It's not really real and you can't change it. Yes, Cassie. Oh, say again, accidentally touched it. Oh, you accidentally. Okay. So what I was talking about before you arrived, Cassie, is this is now there. Looks like there's three of you. So there's two cassies and one Luna. So what we were talking about is the idea of something hypothetical. So hypothetical it means you are discussing an idea. It's not real. It's not really happening. So this one is hypothetical. There's no gallery on fire, and it's not likely to happen. But it makes us discuss important things. It makes us discuss what's important in life. And is life important? Is art important? These are all important questions. But the situation is completely hypothetical. It's not real. So that is the ideas. The policies are things you can change. Luna, can you read numbers one to six in the policy? What is the debate about? What do we have to? What do they have to? What what will be changed if the motion is passed? Who are the actors? Who is the taholders? What is the mechanism? Many of mechanism. Very good. Well read. So these are all things we can change, like we talked about. And you need to talk about if you're changing something, who is going to change it? Who are the actors? That means the people. Who are the people involved. So if it's a rule at school you want to change, perhaps you have a rule at school that says no mobiles allowed anywhere at school. Some schools Res in the uk did this now. So normal teachers? Yes, exactly. So yes, they are. Some teachers have said no mobiles even in your bag. I don't know how they can check that. But this is in the uk scores. So they said, who are the people involved? So that would be teachers. Well done, Cassie. So teachers and also pupils, because the pupils are the ones that need to abide by the rule. Maybe the head teacher or you say principal in China. So teachers, pupils, principals, these are the actors and who are the stakeholders? Who has the money? Who are the most people at the top? So the people at the top, perhaps the principal would be the stakeholder here. So who is the one that makes the final decision? The ideas is very different because you don't have all these people for an idea. Can you read one to four, Cassie? One, what is the debate about? Two, what do the words and emotion mean? Three, what do they have to prove? Four, what will be changed if promotion is passed? Very good. So you're thinking, what is the debate about? We've got an idea motion today. It's about art. It's about what's important in life. So you go beyond, Oh, it's a cat in a museum, a burning museum. You go beyond that and you say, actually, it's about life. It's about the importance of life. It's about the importance of art and history. So what do the words in emotion mean? Okay, so let's have a look that's more about defining it. These words I think you're pretty okay with. You know what a gallery is. It's a museum also. Yes, exactly. Yes. So it's usually a part of the museum, but sometimes it's the whole museum if it's art. So yes, I think we're okay with all of that. What do we have to prove? So let's think about on both sides, Luna, you're saving the cat. What are you trying to prove to us? Life important. Life is more important. Yes, life is the most important, more important than perhaps money. So we could say that is the main message you want to have. So that's what you're trying to prove, that life is more important than money. Or we could say possessions, possessions, things people own. Okay. And Cassie, what is your main point that you are trying to prove? Artist. History. And so art, it also that with the history, it sort of tells us about ourselves, doesn't it? If you look at Chinese art from many centuries ago, you can see how your ancestors were, what they were doing, what they looked like. So it tells us a lot. And the same for me, if I look at old British paintings, I can see what was happening at the time in when they were painted. So art, maybe we could say this, art tells us about ourselves. And our history, which is important to humanity, isn't an important to humans. So we can try to decide what our main message is. And that also makes your argument a bit stronger. So when you when you do your research, look through everything and then go, okay, I think my message is this, and then you can lead everything towards that. Now this one, if the motion is passed, there is no motion to PaaS in this one. Ours is purely hypothetical. Some ideas, you can PaaS motions, but this one, we can't we can't say you need to save all cats that will die in museums because it's it's too much of an odd situation. Okay, so policy motions, okay, we've looked at all these things. I think we're okay to go on actually. So let's practice with this one. Okay, so this one is meat should be taxed. What does it mean if something is taxed forever? That's bad, but good. Good guess because we've been doing lots of that. What do you think Cassie taxed? You need to pay less. Pay more. So you're both on the right track with your debate motion. So pay more. So tax is something every single country has to pay. When you start working, you need to pay tax. So you may her, your parents complaining. I hear my parents complaining. I complain now because I pay tax. So tax is something that every person who works has to pay. To the government. And what the government do with the money is they put the money to hospitals. So they do good things with it. They put the money to schools. They put the money to cleaning streets, so street cleaning. They put the money to helping some people who need help. So all the taxes go towards life in your country. So now they need to collect the money from people, usually from working. But sometimes in America, they put tax on the clothes. So when you buy a clothes, they say, okay, the t shirt, let's say a nice t shirt, they say, this t shirt is $50. So how do I do us dollars, us dollars like that? So this t shirt is $50, but they sell it for 60 because, lar, ten is tax. So $10 goes to the government. So $10 for every person who buys the t shirt is tax. And that goes to the government, which goes to the people, hopefully not always, unfortunately. So that is tax. So they are saying, actually we should tax meat because some people think meat is very bad. And if it's more expensive, people won't buy it. So if we say the meat is, let me say, in Hong Kong dollars, because I don't know about the yen. So this one here, there we go. There's the meat. Let's say, how much money do you usually pay for meat, do you know? 2020 okay, so we say 20 and would that be ¥20? Maybe okay, we'll say ¥20. And I'm going to make that a bit bigger. That's the usual price. And then actually the government says no, we're gonna tax meit's not healthy and it's bad for the environment and we need more money for the government for people. We're going to make it instead ¥30. So ¥30 because ¥10 for tax, so making it more expensive. So we want to look here. So do you think it's a good idea, by the way? No, why not Luna? Because we need to pay more. Yes. Do you think people are going to be upset by this? Yes, yes, I think, I think, I agree. When it comes to food, Oh, yhow, do I pronounce this? Yuan sorry sorry Yuan Yuan yuan okay, you can teach me some Chinese so yuan so this one okay, so I put here the U make it perfect. Okay, you U an Oh dear. All I know is that the yen is very powerful, but that is about the limit of my knowledge. So 30 uaa and n and we think it's a bad idea. People probably won't want to buy it. What about you, Cassie? Good idea or bad idea? Because if it's a bad idea, I think people has to eat meat to grow like children. And good idea is that maybe if we eat less meat, some people, like the fat ones, will grow thand. It is more healthier. And sometimes if you eat just less meat and pay more, maybe when you need the hospital, you can have a better, you can get a better. Yes, better treatment, I think is the word you're looking for. Treatment very good. Yes, that's that's thinking very deeply there on where the taxes will go. So if you pay more, you're getting you're paying more to the tax, which means better resources. We call this resources means things for hospital als, things for schools. So very good arguments from both of you. Yes, I'm somewhere in the middle, I think as well because for me, I think meat is incredibly bad for the environment. But on the other side, it can be a really good food that's fairly cheap. Depends which meat, but some meat is fairly cheap. You can make lots of meals from it. So families that are not so rich can maybe make a meal for the second day and the third day. So they they will find it very difficult, those kind of families. So I'm somewhere in the middle too. Now we think what will change if we tax meat? What will change with people with supermarkets? 嗯。There will be less people Yeah buying meat. So there will be less people, definitely. So it will work because that's what they want to do, stop people eating so much meat, buying meat. Maybe some will say, okay, I become a vegetarian. And maybe some will say, okay, it's too expensive now I have to buy less meat. Maybe some will say, noi need meat, I'm gonna na have to pay more. Who are the people involved? So who will make the meat expensive? The people who sell the meat? Yes. So you've got not only the supermarkets, but you're right, the owners of the companies who are selling the meat. So what do we call the meat industry? The meat industry, these are the people who own the huge factories that produce all the millions of cows and sheep and chickens, and they are called the the meat industry. So they will not be very happy about this, will they? So because the money doesn't go for them, goes to the government, supermarkets, the meat industry, who else? Who we'll buy the meat? That's right. So we say the public, when it's everybody else, is the public rich? Mostly people who have more money or refuse to stop eating the meat. Anybody else can you think of. The people who likes to eat meat, yes, meat eaters, that will probably go in with the public, maybe the government, because they are the ones taxing it. So we've got here. Fantastic. So the people who eat meat, meat eaters, will be in the public. The rich people will be in the public. The poor people will be in the public. Okay. So who are the stakeholders and what will be the impact? So who are the people with all the money? From this list has who owns all the meat government supermarket. And this one probably these are the billionaires. Those are the people that sell it to the supermarket. So before the supermarket they need to breed the cows and those are the meat industry. So these are the people who are going to lose money because people will stop buying the meat and they also are not getting the extra money. So the meat industry are going to be very unhappy. They are extremely rich, by the way. These are the people who are billionaires. So it's not going to lose them. Not going to be they're not ever going to be poor. So the meat industry will be very angry about this. What could they do to stop it? Not really anything, is there? No, if the government says something has to happen, it has to happen. And so that is going to make them very angry. So the mechanism, how will we do it? How will this happen? Maybe a city started and other cities follow it. Oh, good idea, Cassie. Yes, sometimes that happens, doesn't it? So we could say one city and what what you call this is a trial, could trial the idea so they see how how does it work? Do people buy less meat? Then other cities can follow when they do the studies. I'm doing all this at the moment, research. Could follow. Good idea. So how they would do it. So they would also need to make the price higher in the supermarkets. So so the supermarkets need to change. And also people who have the other markets as well. So the outdoor markets and things like that, everybody who sells meat will need to change. The prices are okay, so there we go. We've answered all of this. Fantastic. Okay. I think I'll get you to read this out. Your hard work. Can you read all of this? Cassie? The red. They will there will be less people buying meat. Supermarkets meet industry, public development, meat industry. One city could trial the idea then other other cities would could follow. The supermarkets need to change and apply price. Very good. Well done. So that's what we've discovered. We don't need these answers. We've got our own. Okay, so the idea is a different thing. Our one, as we know today, is an idea motion. This is an idea. Motion. Money does not bring happiness. Do we agree or disagree? What do you think, Luna? Does money bring happiness? Agree. You agree. And tell me why? Because rich people who think their money is not very more, they want more. But the poor people want the money like the rich people. And the people who have the most money would don't like to have that much money. That's right. Very rich people always want more. That's right, more money. Poor people want to make money. So in the end, nobody's really happy. And the very rich at the top, the very wealthy, we can say, are never happy. That's lots of celebrities. We talked about this before, didn't we? Lots of celebrities seem very unhappy. Some of them are drinking too much, partying way too much and making very bad decisions, even though they have so much money. So it doesn't tend to make people happy. So let's pop that there. Do you know, do you know Taylor Swift? Yes, she is a billionaire now. So she's now a billionaire now, one of the richest people in the world. So yes, she is someone we're gonna to watch because I wonder also how this is gonna to affect her mental health. And Cassie, what do you think? I agree. Okay, tell me why. Because sometimes when you're Young, you're too Young to let go and ride rocosters, and that's fun and it will make you happy. And when you're too old, you can't ride it too. So it's about like before you're working that time, when you're like student, you can go go on. The road coast, but and it makes you happy, but after you after that when you're are working, you don't have the time. But if you have a lot of money, you can't buy the time back, right? Yeah this is 11 thing that people are I like your roller coaster metaphor, by the way. That's really nice. So imagine you're a roller coaster when you are not too Young and not too old. Is the perfect time to ride it, but you don't have that time all the time. So we have a phrase here in the uk, maybe it's an American one, I don't know. It's money equals time, time equals money. So and time equals money. So that is kind of what you're saying, Cassie. It means when you are making money working, it takes a lot of time. So you have no time for anything nice, but if you want all the time, you're not making money. So it's a vicious circle. So it's this one here. Money equals time and time equals money. And that that circle makes people quite unhappy. Oh, I have so much time, but I have no money, or Oh, I have so much money, but I have no time. So very good. Well done. I like your arguments and I like your imaginary situations. These these help us to really think about things so we are gonna to have let's see let's see first of all what is the motion? Okay I'm I'm happy with what you've done with these motions. I think what we'll do is we will look at this one and then if we've got time at the end of this we'll do a bit of the short prep on the money one. So we've had a little bit of discussion then. Okay so we'll do this now. Luna, you are saving the cat. Difficult one for you, Cassie. So let's begin in. Are you ready Luna? Almost almost. Okay, get your notes and let me know. We've got four minutes. Okay? Perfect. Okay. So listening, Cassie, and think about how you might rebut some things. So think about your main message, life is more important. And let's go. One, two, three. Good evening, judand audience, my name is no. I define if a gallery is on fire, I will save the cat, not the famous painting. Our team is for this motion today. All give two main points. One, a cat is alive. Two, saving a cat is easier than saving a famous painting when there's a fire. First, a cat is alive. We can't buy alive with money. And once it's gone, it's gone forever. A painting, however, it's just an object. Even if the original is lost, we can always make make copies. For example, a cat that has been saved will be happy to see you rob, relax and per. These are real warm things a painting come to do, even if it's very expensive. So royal art is. Life is chilly above everything else. Second, saving a cat is easier than saving. Second, saving a cat is easier than saving. A famous painting. When there's a fire, a famous painting is locked in a room. It takes time to save fit. It must get hurt when you are saving. If it's a cat, we can call it quickly. It will run to us, and we don't get, we won't get hurt. If I save the famous painting, I must give it to the gallery, but if I save the cat, I will have it, and it will be mine. The others will save the famous painting. The other side might say, a famous painting is more expensive than the cat, but if you save the cat, it means you're kind. If you save the famous painting, it means you're are greedy. So I will choose the cat, so I will choose to save the cat. Cat is human's good friend. Therefore the motion should stand. Thank you. Lovely. Well done. Okay, so I'm just going to send what I got from you, Luna. Fantastic. As you know, I'm on your side for this one. So this one, I would say my feedback, I think you can extend number one, the cat is alive. I think you can add a lot more into that. So you had some really good reasons here. So first of all, Luna said, a cat is a life. You cannot buy a life with money. Even if the original painting is lost, you can't replace a life. So when my cat died, I can't replace that same cat. The painting, you can get sort of mock ups, can't you? So and a life is a soul. It's purring, its comfort. So I think you could extend these ideas so we could perhaps go into the idea of a soul and the idea of that being something, perhaps you can't touch it, perhaps you can't earn money from it, but it's something humans need. It's something animals need. So a soul is something you cannot touch, feel bye, but it is something that makes us human. If you save another life, which is a human instinct to save a life as a human instinct, it doesn't matter if it's an animal, then you are closer to your humanity. So I think you can extend that. And I agree that a cat also will want to be saved. Painting hasn't got a soul. A soul will want to. Our instinct is to save our lives, isn't it? In bad situations? So a cat will want to be saved. So that was a very good point. Easier, but also the fact that there is something there that needs you. The painting doesn't need us. Okay, so it's not alive. Very good. Luna, let's go on to Cassie. Oh, you've got a difficult one, Cassie, but what I believe in you. Okay, are you ready? Yes, good girl. Okay, so I will write down yours as well. One, 23. Good evening, Joan. Audience, my name is Cassie. Our team is for saving the famous art. Today, I will give you three main points. One, practical rescue relaties. Two, enrace and. Replaceable cultural value and treat physical wave of stewater earin our life. A cat is something that can move and all the is something dead. Hang on the wall. In nature, cats are intelligent. If there's a fire, the cat can follow the visitors out or hide in certain places. And art can't move. It doesn't have hands and feet, so we have to help it. Secondly, lushows that almost all famous paintings paints about the past. If it's destroyed in a fire, it's destroyed forever. And usually famous arts are famous after the artists are dead, so it can't be replaced. Even if the artist is still alive, he can't draw as same as the destroyed one. Famous paintings are very valuable and works more money than a cat. Thira famous painting is very valuable and there 71. If it's destroyed, the damage is drastic. But if your cat said it will only cause your family to be unhappy, the other side might say that everyone thinks life is more important. But imagine you have two children. Both of them are in the ocean. Can you only, you can only save one of them. Which one would you choose? They are both life, absolutely the one who is near to you. It's not about love. It's about what is more likely to succeed, faith or the should. And I reup. If you repeat the art, become too how the brush goes, Luna said that the cat can come to you, and it wants to be safe, but the cat might be too scared to move to you or run into the fire. Therefore, motion. Thank you. Okay, lovely. So I'm going to put the cat might run away or into the fire and it could be dangerous. Lovely. So I'm just posting yours, Cassie. Fantastic as well. Not an easy one to argue because I think most people want to save the cat but so it's always harder when you have to do the opposition. So well done. You did a very good job there. My advice to you, Cassie, is perhaps you could have used an example of a painting. So I put here Mona Lisa, for example. The Mona Lisa is there's no price on it because it's so irreplaceable to the world and it's so important to the world. It's only one original. So you could use an example of a very famous painting, or sunflowers from Vincent van Gogh or something that the whole world knows about. And you are right, because your example, you said millions would be unhappy if these paintings go from the world rather than just one family who lost a cat. So that is almost relating the painting to a soul. So that's very clever because we can say, Oh, paintings don't have souls. You could argue, actually I think they do. So very good, Cassie and Luna. And actually we do have nice amount of time left over, so we're gonna to go on the short research. So first of all, I would always like to show you before we go. Okay, so next time we're going to do some short prep, which I will tell you in the lesson, but we're going to do the long prep for this one. Children should be allowed to get a tattoo. So Luna went first this time. So Cassie, you're gonna to say yes, another difficult one. And Luna, you're gonna to say no, a tattoo. Do you know what tattoo is? Cassie? People things like it's black and it's it hurts but often it doesn't hurt it. Mostly not China, mostly men's have tattoos. That's right. Yes. So tattoos, I'm going show you a very weird picture now because we're saying children should be allowed to get tattoos. Those are tattoos. Looks weird, doesn't it? On such Young kids. So there is these are the tattoos. They mark your body for your life. So people get tattoos to remember things. Sometimes people, someone dies and they want to remember them so they might get a tattoo. Sometimes they want to remember something amazing that happened. So all sorts of different things. Lots of people in my country in the uk have tattoos, women as well sometimes. So it's moved. It used to just be gang people, people with gangs, but now it's not that way anymore. Now lots of people have tattoos. So children should be allowed to get tattoos. Cassie is gonna to say yes, another difficult one for you. And Luna, you're going to say no. So yes. And it's the more obvious responisn't in it. When you see that picture, you think that just looks wrong, doesn't it? I don't know if it's real or not. So what we're going to do is a bit of short prep. So let's practice some short prep. Okay, I think we will go back to the money one. Okay, so we're going to do this one. Money does not bring happiness, and I'm going to give you both a little bit of time to look up an answer. So because Cassie, you've had some difficult ones arguing against what you feel, I think you agree with this. Is that right? Kssiy, yes. Okay. So I'll let you have agree. So Cassie, just because she's had a few difficult runs here, so Cassie, you can stop there, perhaps for the next short prep. Luna, you can choose out for next week. Okay? Money does not bring happiness. And Luna, you're going to say money, it does bring happiness. So what you can do, obviously you can use the Internet, but you'll just, this is one that's quite good for just using your own opinion. You already both came up with some good things. Let me take these away so we can see your reasons. Can we do that? Yes, we can. So these are your reasons that you came up with before. So you can add those in. So you've already done a little bit there and then just work on them. So for you, Luna, you might want to go against those. And you can say actually there is a very good argument for the opposite, Luna, that money does not bring happiness. So or does bring happiness because it tends to only be rich people that say that. Actually, if you spoke to some people in the poorest parts of the world, parts of the Philippines, parts of Africa, parts of India, they would really want money. It will make them happy. They can't eat. So there are people where money will definitely bring them happiness because they're not surviving. So and actually, usually it's the wealthy people that say this because they cannot imagine being not wealthy. So let's have a think about your opinions. And I'm going na give you five minutes to maybe make some notes and think about your argument. If you want to look up on the Internet you can but actually it's not important for this one. This one mostly your opinion. Yes. Luna, did you put your hand up? I okay so I'm going to give you five minutes and then we'll talk about your answers or talk about your what you found. And just make some notes if you want to write your notes on the chat, that's fine. Your mom has a tattoo. Who is that? Is that Luna or Cassie? From Australia. Lovely. Yes, we have lots of women I'm too much of a wimp. I don't like. I don't like pain or blood. But lots of women I know have tattoos as well. It's very normal here. We the star. Oh, lovely star here. Yes, some of them are beautiful, aren't they? I know this one. Yes, lovely. Let me get paper, okay? Very good whercassie, Cassie. She's blanked off for a little while. That's okay for now for a few minutes and we'll come back and we'll see what you've written. So remember, just mostly your opinion, write some notes. Cassie, you can expand on what we talked about, Luna. You can think about perhaps the poorest parts of the world and how they might not agree with this. Why are people always trying to get money if it doesn't bring happiness? And if you feel like you're finished, just let me know. I'm here. The meantime, I may find some evidence for both sides as well. All right, I found some evidence for Cassie. I'm going to try and find some evidence for you, Luna. So you can use this, Cassie. And now I'm going to try and find Luna. So this is from clinical research. Oh, her name is it looks Polish or something so very difficult to pronounce cananchi, which is secura. Don't worry about the pronunciation. I can't I can't do that either. So that's that's something that might help you. Cassie and Luna. I'm just going to look at yours now. Then we've got something that finds the opposite. This is the thing with research. This is what I'm finding. Research can can support almost anything because there's so many researchers out there. Okay. I'm going to just highlight this for you. Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania. And so someone found the opposite to what this one. So this one, he said, Yeah, it does bring you happiness. And actually that there is no limit to the amount of money you can earn as much as you like and you'll just get happier. This one finds the opposite. So the one above for you, Cassie. So this just goes to show research can prove anything. All right, girls, are you ready? How about you, Cassie? Just about okay. So give it a minute or so too. We won't have the actual argument. We'll just talk through some of your reasons. Okay. So Cassie, give me your reasons that it does not bring happiness. Happiness comes from strongly relationship and a sense of purpose, not just money. It comes from a sense of purpose and strong relationships. Lovely, that is for me. I need that sense of purpose, strong relationships and Carry on. Money equals time, and time equals money. The rich people wants more, and the poor once want money, and they both, they both are not happy. If you're too old or too Young, you can't go on the roller coaster. The roller coaster makes you happy, but you can't buy the time back when you're too old, and you can't buy the time forward when you too Young. You can never buy the time of earning money back. This is very, and something you found at a Young age, Cassie. This is very the amount of time we spend in our lives working. It equals all the time that we'll never get back again. So that is something that makes a lot of people quite unhappy. This is why people move to Spain and decide to give up work. And they live in much poorer lives, but they find that they're happier. Things like that always happen. Okay, so yes, very good. So I know you didn't have much time and probably you could go even deeper than that, but that gives you an idea of what you can find in a short time. And how about you, Luna? First, some country are very poor. They can't eat well, but if they have more money, they can buy everything they want, like a food, house and clothes. Rich people. If you are very rich and popular, the thing that you have say every people will think that you say the thing is good. Third, reach people. If they have the. Money, lots of money, and they give some to their poor people. The poor people will thank them very much, and everyone will knows you. So so when you are going to eat or something. You forget to take your purthe. People who are next to you might say, Oh, you who who that has been giving me money, so today I will help you to pay the money. The other side might say, money equals time, time equals money. There's no time to play. But but if. You don't have time to play. You give the money to others that whnever plays. The world will knows you and you will become very popular. Therefore, the motion should stand. Thank you. Okay, lovely. I'm putting it in my word. Sorry, Cassie, were you waving there? Okay, maybe another waving mistake there. Very good. Well done. So money does not bring happiness. Some countries are very poor, need money. Rich people have power. Yes, very. If a rich person gave a poor person money, they would be delighted, not unhappy. And being generous with money helps you, helps you gain happiness. So that's an interesting angle there. You don't have to be greedy. You can give money and that gives happiness to you and other person. So you can give a lot of time to a good cause whilst earning money. Very good. So yes. Cassie, rebut. T, okay, off you go. Nature. People people are jealous in nature. You can't change it. And sometimes being famous is bad because you can't really go out or they will cover you and you can't even have time for yourself. Very good. Yes, that's also the negative side, isn't it? So money, it does create jealousy. And you can then say maybe bad relationships between people because people, celebrities talk about this when they become very, very rich, they lose their friends because the friends don't like it anymore. So that that's also something that would make you unhappy. I saw your conclusion. In conclusion, money is not an all purpose. Very good for happiness. Fantastic. Well done. Look how much you got in just a few minutes. So next time we'll do 15 minutes and I'm sure you'll get even more. Yes, Luna, I'm going to rebirth t two. Okay, rebirth t away. But some people that just like to being being rich, they think I'm the shiniest person in the world. Oh, I'm so good. Everyone knows me so I can help more people than they knows. Oh, that famous people help me. And next time I will help her. Yeah people always talk about when they meet a famous person, don't they? They're always really proud of it. Oh, I met this person. I met this famous person. So it shows that people sort of respect money, which is a little bit sad, but it is it does make people happy even to see other people rich. So very good from both of you. I will I'll keep in mind how much you've done in just a few minutes and we'll do some more short prep next time. For the long prep, children should be allowed to get tattoos. Okay, so I will see you next week. Well done today. Bye bye bye bye two cassies and one Luna.
处理时间: 28988 秒 | 字符数: 37,443
AI分析
完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
"header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
"course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
"course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
"course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Debating Skills Practice",
"course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 辩论技巧练习",
"course_name_en": "Debate Preparation and Practice",
"course_name_cn": "辩论准备与练习",
"course_topic_en": "Hypothetical Debates: Saving Art vs. Life, and Taxing Meat",
"course_topic_cn": "假设性辩论:拯救艺术品 vs. 生命,以及肉类税",
"course_date_en": "November 23rd, 2025",
"course_date_cn": "2025年11月23日",
"student_name": "Luna and Cassie (Two students)",
"teaching_focus_en": "Differentiating between policy and idea motions in debate, understanding short prep vs. long prep formats, and practicing argumentation for hypothetical scenarios.",
"teaching_focus_cn": "区分政策性辩题和观点性辩题,理解短时准备(Short Prep)与长时准备(Long Prep)的区别,并练习假设性情景下的论证。",
"teaching_objectives": [
{
"en": "Students will be able to distinguish between policy motions (changeable rules) and idea motions (imaginary concepts).",
"cn": "学生能够区分政策性辩题(可改变的规则)和观点性辩题(想象的概念)。"
},
{
"en": "Students will practice developing core arguments for both affirmative and negative sides of a debate motion under time constraints.",
"cn": "学生将在时间限制下练习为辩题的正反方构建核心论点。"
},
{
"en": "Students will grasp the fundamental differences in preparation strategy between short prep (relying on quick argumentation) and long prep (relying on research).",
"cn": "学生将掌握短时准备(依赖快速论证)和长时准备(依赖研究)在准备策略上的基本区别。"
}
],
"timeline_activities": [
{
"time": "Start",
"title_en": "Technical Check and Introduction",
"title_cn": "技术检查与介绍",
"description_en": "Teacher addresses initial technical issues (students appearing together) and introduces the session's core topic: the hypothetical debate: 'Saving the cat vs. saving the painting.'",
"description_cn": "老师处理了初步的技术问题(学生看起来在一起),并介绍了本节课的核心主题:假设性辩论‘拯救猫还是拯救画作’。"
},
{
"time": "Initial Concept Review",
"title_en": "Short Prep vs. Long Prep",
"title_cn": "短时准备 vs. 长时准备",
"description_en": "Teacher explains the structure and focus of short preparation (15 mins, focus on powerful arguments) versus long preparation (one week, focus on research).",
"description_cn": "老师解释了短时准备(15分钟,侧重有力论点)与长时准备(一周,侧重研究)的结构和侧重点。"
},
{
"time": "Motion Analysis",
"title_en": "Policy vs. Idea Motions",
"title_cn": "政策性辩题 vs. 观点性辩题",
"description_en": "Analyzing the difference between policy motions (changeable rules, e.g., taxing meat) and idea motions (imaginary, e.g., cat\/painting scenario), including identifying actors and stakeholders.",
"description_cn": "分析政策性辩题(可改变的规则,如征税)和观点性辩题(假设的,如猫\/画作场景)的区别,包括识别参与者和利益相关者。"
},
{
"time": "Practice Debate 1: Cat vs. Painting",
"title_en": "Debate Simulation (Cat vs. Painting)",
"title_cn": "模拟辩论(猫 vs. 画作)",
"description_en": "Luna argues for saving the cat (Life > Possessions). Cassie argues for saving the painting (Cultural Value > Individual Life). Teacher provides feedback on arguments.",
"description_cn": "Luna为救猫辩护(生命 > 财物)。Cassie为保画作辩护(文化价值 > 个体生命)。老师对论点进行反馈。"
},
{
"time": "Practice Debate 2: Meat Tax",
"title_en": "Mini-Debate on Meat Taxation",
"title_cn": "肉类税小型辩论",
"description_en": "Brief analysis of the policy motion 'Meat should be taxed,' discussing impacts, actors, stakeholders, and mechanism.",
"description_cn": "简要分析政策性辩题‘肉类应被征税’,讨论影响、参与者、利益相关者和机制。"
},
{
"time": "Practice Debate 3: Money & Happiness",
"title_en": "Hypothetical Debate (Money ≠ Happiness)",
"title_cn": "假设性辩论(金钱不带来幸福)",
"description_en": "Both students practice arguing for and against 'Money does not bring happiness,' using their initial points and teacher-provided research snippets.",
"description_cn": "两位学生练习为和反驳‘金钱不带来幸福’的观点,运用了他们初始的论点和老师提供的研究片段。"
},
{
"time": "Wrap-up & Next Steps",
"title_en": "Short Prep Practice & Conclusion",
"title_cn": "短时准备练习与总结",
"description_en": "Students briefly practice short prep notes for the next long prep topic: 'Children should be allowed to get a tattoo.'",
"description_cn": "学生对下一堂课的长时准备主题‘儿童应被允许纹身’进行简短的短时准备笔记练习。"
}
],
"vocabulary_en": "Hypothetical, policy motion, idea motion, actors, stakeholders, mechanism, tax, Yuan (currency), possession, rebuttal, vegetarian, industry, trial, roller coaster, billionaire, jealous, purpose, irreplaceable.",
"vocabulary_cn": "假设的, 政策性辩题, 观点性辩题, 参与者, 利益相关者, 机制, 税, 人民币(元), 财产\/所有物, 反驳, 素食者, 行业, 试行, 过山车, 亿万富翁, 嫉妒的, 目的, 不可替代的。",
"concepts_en": "The philosophical debate on prioritizing life (animal) versus irreplaceable cultural artifacts. The economic and social implications of taxation (meat tax). The relationship between wealth, time, and happiness.",
"concepts_cn": "关于优先考虑生命(动物)还是不可替代的文化艺术品的哲学辩论。税收(肉类税)的经济和社会影响。财富、时间与幸福之间的关系。",
"skills_practiced_en": "Structuring debate points, developing arguments under pressure (short prep simulation), rebuttal techniques, using personal analogies (roller coaster metaphor), and clarifying complex policy terms (taxation, stakeholders).",
"skills_practiced_cn": "构建辩论要点、在压力下发展论点(短时准备模拟)、反驳技巧、使用个人类比(过山车隐喻)、澄清复杂的政策术语(税收、利益相关者)。",
"teaching_resources": [
{
"en": "Debate motion handout (Cat vs. Painting)",
"cn": "辩题讲义(猫 vs. 画作)"
},
{
"en": "Meat tax scenario setup (Price points: ¥20 to ¥30)",
"cn": "肉类税场景设置(价格点:20元到30元)"
},
{
"en": "Research snippets on 'Money and Happiness' (for and against)",
"cn": "关于‘金钱与幸福’的研究片段(正反方)"
}
],
"participation_assessment": [
{
"en": "Student demonstrated high engagement, actively participating in all three debate segments.",
"cn": "学生表现出高度参与,积极参与了所有三个辩论环节。"
},
{
"en": "Luna was quick to formulate her core argument in the first debate and effectively used the concept of wealth inequality in the second debate.",
"cn": "Luna在第一场辩论中迅速形成了她的核心论点,并在第二场辩论中有效地运用了贫富差距的概念。"
},
{
"en": "Cassie argued the difficult opposition side twice (saving art, arguing money brings happiness) and showed strong abstract thinking (roller coaster metaphor).",
"cn": "Cassie两次承担了困难的反方立场(保卫艺术品,论证金钱带来幸福),并展现了强大的抽象思维能力(过山车隐喻)。"
}
],
"comprehension_assessment": [
{
"en": "Student clearly understood the difference between hypothetical ideas and actionable policies.",
"cn": "学生清晰理解了假设性观点和可执行政策之间的区别。"
},
{
"en": "The concept of 'tax' was grasped quickly after the teacher's thorough explanation and numerical example.",
"cn": "在老师的详细解释和数字示例后,学生很快理解了‘税’的概念。"
},
{
"en": "Student successfully identified and utilized key concepts like 'stakeholders' and 'mechanism' when analyzing the meat tax motion.",
"cn": "学生在分析肉类税辩题时,成功识别并运用了‘利益相关者’和‘机制’等关键概念。"
}
],
"oral_assessment": [
{
"en": "Fluency needs consistent focus; teacher initially prompted Luna to speak more fluently.",
"cn": "流畅度需要持续关注;老师在开场时提醒Luna讲话要更流畅。"
},
{
"en": "Student successfully maintained a formal debating tone during her speeches, clearly structuring her points.",
"cn": "学生在演讲过程中成功保持了正式的辩论语调,清晰地构建了自己的论点。"
},
{
"en": "Cassie's use of metaphorical language (roller coaster) was effective in conveying complex ideas about time and money.",
"cn": "Cassie使用比喻性语言(过山车)有效地传达了关于时间和金钱的复杂理念。"
}
],
"written_assessment_en": "N\/A (Session focused on spoken preparation and debate practice).",
"written_assessment_cn": "不适用(课程重点在于口头准备和辩论练习)。",
"student_strengths": [
{
"en": "Strong ability to generate immediate, relevant arguments even when defending a position they don't personally agree with.",
"cn": "即使在捍卫自己不赞同的立场时,也能立即产生相关论点的能力很强。"
},
{
"en": "Effective use of personal analogies and emotional appeal (saving life, roller coaster analogy).",
"cn": "有效运用个人类比和情感诉求(拯救生命、过山车类比)。"
},
{
"en": "Good grasp of debate terminology and application to new topics.",
"cn": "对辩论术语的掌握和应用于新主题的能力良好。"
}
],
"improvement_areas": [
{
"en": "Fluency and rhythm of speech should be practiced regularly.",
"cn": "口语的流利度和节奏需要经常练习。"
},
{
"en": "Cassie needs practice in being the affirmative side, as she seemed more comfortable arguing the opposition.",
"cn": "Cassie需要在担任正方时多加练习,她似乎更适应反方立场。"
},
{
"en": "Extending core arguments with deeper philosophical or factual evidence beyond initial statements.",
"cn": "需要将核心论点扩展到超越初始陈述的更深层次的哲学或事实证据。"
}
],
"teaching_effectiveness": [
{
"en": "The teacher effectively used a complex hypothetical scenario (cat vs. painting) to introduce core debate concepts.",
"cn": "老师有效地利用了一个复杂的假设场景(猫 vs. 画作)来介绍核心辩论概念。"
},
{
"en": "The transition between analyzing concepts and immediate debate practice was smooth and engaging.",
"cn": "在概念分析和即时辩论练习之间的过渡流畅且引人入胜。"
},
{
"en": "Providing immediate, constructive feedback helped students refine their arguments mid-session.",
"cn": "即时的建设性反馈帮助学生在课程中途完善了他们的论点。"
}
],
"pace_management": [
{
"en": "The pace was brisk but manageable, successfully covering three different motions.",
"cn": "节奏快速但可控,成功涵盖了三个不同的动议。"
},
{
"en": "The short prep simulation was kept brief (5 minutes), appropriate for practicing note-taking rather than a full argument.",
"cn": "短时准备模拟保持简短(5分钟),适合练习笔记而非完整论证。"
}
],
"classroom_atmosphere_en": "Positive, interactive, and supportive. The initial technical oddity created a moment of lightheartedness, setting a relaxed tone for serious academic discussion.",
"classroom_atmosphere_cn": "积极、互动且支持性强。初步的技术小插曲营造了一个轻松愉快的时刻,为严肃的学术讨论奠定了轻松的基调。",
"objective_achievement": [
{
"en": "Achieved high understanding of policy vs. idea motions through direct comparison.",
"cn": "通过直接对比,高水平地达成了对政策性动议与观点性动议的理解。"
},
{
"en": "Students successfully simulated short preparation techniques under time pressure.",
"cn": "学生成功模拟了时间压力下的短时准备技巧。"
}
],
"teaching_strengths": {
"identified_strengths": [
{
"en": "Excellent use of real-world, high-stakes hypothetical dilemmas to engage students.",
"cn": "善于利用真实、高风险的假设性困境来吸引学生。"
},
{
"en": "Clear scaffolding of complex concepts like 'tax' and 'stakeholders' with concrete examples.",
"cn": "使用具体的例子清晰地搭建了‘税’和‘利益相关者’等复杂概念的脚手架。"
}
],
"effective_methods": [
{
"en": "The 'Who said what?' review at the start of the painting debate helped quickly orient students.",
"cn": "在画作辩论开始时进行的‘谁说了什么?’回顾帮助学生快速定位。"
},
{
"en": "Encouraging students to articulate their 'main message' before debating strengthens argument focus.",
"cn": "鼓励学生在辩论前明确阐述他们的‘核心信息’,以加强论点焦点。"
}
],
"positive_feedback": [
{
"en": "Teacher praised Cassie's effective roller coaster metaphor for money\/time trade-off.",
"cn": "老师称赞了Cassie关于金钱\/时间权衡的过山车比喻非常有效。"
},
{
"en": "Positive reinforcement for Luna's inclusion of the charitable aspect of money in the second debate.",
"cn": "对Luna在第二场辩论中纳入金钱的慈善方面给予了积极肯定。"
}
]
},
"specific_suggestions": [
{
"icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
"category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
"category_cn": "发音与阅读",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "Continue focusing on maintaining a consistent, fluent pace throughout the delivery, as initially prompted.",
"cn": "继续关注在整个陈述过程中保持一致、流畅的语速,正如开场时所提示的那样。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-comments",
"category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
"category_cn": "口语与交流",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "When arguing the opposition (like Cassie in the painting debate), practice synthesizing the opponent's points into the rebuttal more smoothly.",
"cn": "当扮演反方时(如Cassie在画作辩论中),练习更顺畅地将对手的论点融入反驳中。"
}
]
},
{
"icon": "fas fa-lightbulb",
"category_en": "Debate Structure",
"category_cn": "辩论结构",
"suggestions": [
{
"en": "For long prep topics, pre-select one compelling example (e.g., Mona Lisa, Taylor Swift) to illustrate abstract points.",
"cn": "对于长时准备的话题,预先选择一个引人注目的例子(如蒙娜丽莎、泰勒·斯威夫特)来阐述抽象观点。"
}
]
}
],
"next_focus": [
{
"en": "Transitioning to the long preparation format for the next topic.",
"cn": "为下一个主题过渡到长时准备的格式。"
},
{
"en": "Developing in-depth research-backed arguments for the motion: 'Children should be allowed to get a tattoo.'",
"cn": "为‘儿童应被允许纹身’的动议准备有深度、有研究支持的论据。"
}
],
"homework_resources": [
{
"en": "Review the concepts of policy vs. idea motions in preparation for next week's long prep assignment.",
"cn": "复习政策性动议与观点性动议的概念,为下周的长时准备作业做准备。"
},
{
"en": "For the tattoo topic, begin brainstorming initial pros and cons, focusing on the legal and ethical implications.",
"cn": "针对纹身话题,开始头脑风暴初步的利弊,重点关注法律和伦理影响。"
}
]
}