Okay. Let me just pull up some videos for today. The resources and then you get started. Let's wait a couple minutes for Scarlett to join us as well. Okay, okay, okay. 在用的将他们立旁。这简直是非。咋了吗？啊，没有我在这团火呢，然后在干啥呢？上课呢？哦，走走走，要上课。妈妈上课吗？上课呢？Since scarlet has not joined us, then I guess we can get started. So today is less than 16, so there's about four lessons left to our program. So we're nearing the end now. So today we'll be learning about the third speakers. Do you know what this means? No, maybe I don't know. No. Okay, so within debates, typically there's three speakers on each side. And then the third speaker, they're the ones that have a specific role to them. So the first speaker, I'll talk about this later, but the first speaker, they introduce an argument, the second speaker introduces an argument, and the third speaker, they have a very significant specific role. So today we're going to learn about what their roare and a debate. Okay, so this is specifically the role of a third speaker. So third speakers, the key thing to remember in third speakers is that you must not introduce any new material or argument. Okay? So imagine there's a first speaker. Imagine, let me put this out better proposition. You have one, two, three speakers. Okay, that's the proposition. Opposition, same thing we're looking at first, second and third speakers. Okay, imagine this is the big opposition to opposition. So the first speaker would impfirst argument, first speaker of the opposition would introduce the other argument. Second speaker, second speaker, they would introduce their own arguments. And then the third speaker, they will not introduce any new artists, okay? The reason for this rule is that it is unfair to the other side as they have no opportunity to debuit, okay. For instance, if the third speaker introduces new material because the third speaker of the opposition is the last speaker to speak, then no one will be able to or argue against what the third speaker of the opposition says. That's why we're not able to introduce new arguments as the third speaker. Yes. Question, but can the can the third speaker of proposition add any new materials? No. So because the third speaker of opposition is not allowed, the proposition also connect, also also cannot because they're even though the other opposition speaker can has the opportunity to rebut because one side cannot, then the other side cannot. So it's that way. It's fair. Does that make sense? So so in search t speaker, the only thing you can say is that you are wrong because of something. You can't add any new things. Exactly. Yeah, perfect. You can only reintroduce what others have talked about before. Great. So there are certain responsibilities that come with being a third speaker. So you want to attack the other teams 's points that they've made. So again, if we have brought one, two, three, let's keep these in mind. And then. Oh, what you do? If you were the proposition third speaker, you would attack the first and the second speakers 's points of the opposition. Okay? So you're attacking their points, but at the same time you're supporting the arguments of your team. So 12, so you can go deeper into why the arguments point and two are strong and valid, and at the same time argue that the opposition speaker, 12 is wrong. Does that make sense? Yes, okay, great. So Oh, okay, awesome. Scarlet has just joined us. Awesome. Bye, scarlet. Okay, so I'll just go back for now. So toscarlet will be learning about third speakers. So third speakers are the third speakers on the opposition and the proposition. They're the ones going through, okay. As I said, usually if we look at there's top left here in its bay, we have the first speaker of the opposition, the proposition first speaker of the opposition, second speaker. The proposition second speaker of the opposition, third speaker, the proposition third speaker of the opposition, right. 愛想出凄。Okay, and then. Okay. In any case, moving on. So Jasper, as I was saying, we want to reinforce and not introduce new arguments. So again, no new arguments, but before reinforcing your team case, you want to remind them about all the great arguments your team had said. Okay, what does mean like conclusion? Yes, you want to summarize what your other teams have said. You want to repeat what they said and reinforce. So go even deeper into why those arguments are correct. Okay? So for instance, an example of a star. Ladies and gentlemen, today I will summarize the debate and explain why my team should win. First. I will rebut the other team's arguments and I will my team's points and explain why they still stand at the end of the debate. Do you see how this is a third speaker speech? Does that make sense? Okay, why does that make sense? How do you see that this is a third speaker speech, Jasper? Because I don't have any new things. Yeah, exactly. It doesn't add any things. It's going to summarize the prior points of the first and second speaker. Right? Awesome. Okay, starlet, argue with this. Okay. So I hope you could hear all of that. The third speaker, their role, all you need in next marletthe role of the third speaker is to not introduce any of your arguments. You want to summarize the arguments of your two teammates who just spoke before you, okay? So you don't introduce any year argument, reinforce and you support the arguments from your two other teammates. Okay. Does that make sense about. Okay, awesome. So this is an example of what a third speaker would start with. Okay, let's right here all of this. Okay, so now I'll show you a short video. This right you? Hopefully the video goes. Screens and education. That's not communication. Screens and education. That's not communication. Good afternoon, chairperson, adjudicator and fellow debaters. The. For our debate is that children spend too much time in front of. Great, we, the affirmative team, firmly believe ed. But this statement is obviously. It start screens education. That's not communication. Good afternoon, chairperson adjudicatand fellow debaters. The topic for our debate is that children spend too much time in front of screens. We, the affirmative team, firmly believe that this statement is obviously first and second. Speaker, you attempted to convince the audience that in the future, children will have a need for screens, but that is incorrect because we are saying that children do spend too much time in and organize it in such a way that it's clear, logical in a time environment. Okay. Does that make sense to we want to take everything that has been said in the debate from the proposition, from the opposition site and organize it in a way that's clear and logical under time pressure. Okay. So how do we prepare for this world? Here are three things. Okay. Firstly, you help your teammates develop a case. Okay? So you help them develop some sort of a case. Help them create some arguments, help them come up with ways that they can support the theory. Okay? Then you read a summary of all your teammates arguments, okay? And then finally you brainstorm rebuttals in preparation, okay? So some of the skills that you need, some, okay, so these are the three skills, okay? You need to be an excellent listener, quick thinker, organize everything under time pressure. And you have to prepare three things, help your teammates develop the case, write a summary of both teams and brainstorm roboters, okay. Scarla, are you still here? Yes, okay, awesome. Okay, more specific schools. You need to be an efficient note taker. Again, you're going to be writing all the arguments of your teammates, so you have to be very, very good at note taking for care. Second, you also have to identify the points of claships. Okay? So within debates, they're old claships. There will be some arguments that are stronger than others. So you have to be able to identify these arguments so that you can bring them up at the end of the debate as the third speaker. Then finally, tly, you need to be good at summarizing. You have to be good at summarizing everything that has been said. Okay, cool. So that is everything from biside to dei'm. Sure. You guys really want to know that it big motion through today. So that a big motion is professional athletes are overpaid care. This is the topic for today. Does everyone understand what the motion it's about? Okay, so it just means professional athletes, football players, famous rugby players, famous badminton players, ping pong players, they're being paid too much, okay? Overpaid too much, they're being paid too large salads, okay? So that is the topic. So Jasper, you will be the proposition. Scarlet, you will be the opposite here. So let end me smile it. You are opposition. So you believe that special athletes are not overbethat. They get paid with good amount care. Jasper, you are in the opposition. You believe that professional athletes are being paid too much. Okay. Are both of you guys clear on what side you are on? So Jasper? Yeah. So Jasper, you think that professional athletes like football players, ping Fong players, badminton players, they get paid too much, they earn too much money, okay? Is that okay with you, Jasper? Yeah, so that is your side. And then scarlet, she will disagree and she will say it. I believe professional athletes are paid the right amount of money, are paid good, but you think they're paid too much. Okay. So another thing that I'd like for both of you is to write as if you are a third speaker. Okay? So you can pretend that you're summarizing this speech, okay? You can say my two first speakers said this, this and this, and this is why. Okay? Is that okay with both of you? Scarlet? Yes. What about Jasper? Yes. Did I hear you, Jasper? Is that okay with you? Okay, so make sure that you're pretending to be a third speaker. Okay, cool. Then I will give you guys about 30 minutes to prepare for this to be okay. I'm looking for three minutes from yoube. Okay, awesome. If you guys have any questions, let me know. About five minutes left, guys. Remember, I'm looking for debates in third person's perspective. So in the perspective of a third speaker, okay. Hey, I think that was enough time. So scarlet, is your camera working? It doesn't appear to work on my end. Scarlet. Oh, okay, perfect. Okay, it's working now. So since you're the Oh, Jasper is the proposition. So we'll get Jasper to start the debate. So Jasper, are you here with us? Jasper, great. Awesome. So whenever you are ready, you can start. Yep, overpaid. Three, two, one, go. Hello, ladies and gentlemen. Sper the proposition. And I think that professional outlets are overpaid. Because first they only just play around and they do nothing, just play some games and enjoy them, and then they will get lots of money. And that's not fair. And also. They didn't like. It starts not fair and also you can do this, everyone can do this. So just not only just. Thanks for listening. I don't have really much reasons, you know. Yeah Jasper, you still had 30 minutes so. Yeah I was hoping for a little bit more this time. So you know when you have 30 minutes to prepare, just make sure that you're spending those 30 minutes on something that's productive and something that's relevant to class. Okay? So you should really have gotten three minutes if you were prepping for 30 minutes, right? Okay, I just caught thinking any. Yeah I mean, maybe you could have one argument, could have been other professions or more should be we should be paid more. And you could have used a comparison to like some professional athletes get paid more than doctor, but doctors do something that's more important than professional athletes, right? It can be those sorts of comparisons. Like it can those sorts of arguments, a comparison argument as well. Okay. And if you don't know, just just ask. You know I'm here to help. So Yeah, I think you know what you could have done better, maybe time management for next time. No, I don't think that I can ask you for any helps. Why not? So I can Yeah, Yeah, of course. Yeah, that's what I'm here for. So Yeah, feel Jasper, next time feel free if you have any questions, if you wanna ask for like some ideas, Yeah, I'll that's what I'm here for. So if you're experiencing a bit of trouble, just let me know and I can help out. Okay, where's scarlet? Scarlet keeps disappearing. What else can you think of for arguments of your side after professional athletes are being overpaid? This is your time to think of other arguments. What else could potentially be an argument for this? Hard, okay, listen, listen to what Scarlett will say in her debate and then let me know if you have anything to argue against scarlet. Okay, scarlet, it is your terms. So whenever you are ready, the three minutes can start. Okay, good morning. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, everyone. I'm the third speaker of the opposition. I don't think pro are over paid. First, athletes work really hard every day. They run and jump and practice their sports for a long time. Sometimes athlegets hurt, but they still keep trying. Their jobs are so hard and difficult. Second, athletes makes us happy. When we watch athletes play games, we laugh and cheloudly. Athletes also teach us to never give up. They are our good examples. Third, people who paid the money are love. Like they all love athlegames. We watch athleon tv, buy their team shirts and talk talk about their games with friends. So let's get paid because they work hard and bring us joy. It's fair. If let's earn their money by working hard, they are not overpaid at all. Thank you for listening. Yeah, awesome job. Yeah so I really liked how you put yourself in the shoes of a third speaker. You talked about how it should be fair because they're bring they're bringing this entertainment and joy. So Yeah, I really liked all your arguments and you stuck to the prompts of well done today specifically. Maybe a next step could have been to make it even longer. So you could have summarized in more detail sort of the arguments of those before you you could have pretended so Yeah I'm really happy with with what you've come up with today. It showed that you understood what their speaker's role is in a debate. So well done, Scotland. Jasper, were you able to think of any anything that scarlet said that you disagreed with? Thank Scarlett she said that they are they're are playing for because of their because they love sports Yeah but some of them some of them just play for money. Yeah another great Yeah you could you could have used that in your debate so you could have said some professional athletes, yes they they are good but they only play for money, right? And that is not what sports should be. Sports should not be about the money. It should be about the talent. And so if we make professional athletes pay less, it be more about the talent and less about the money. But Yeah. So Jasper, feel free next time. Use rebuttals, use a bunch of different arguments. You know, the goal here, both of you, Scarlett and Jasper, is to develop our debating skills. So if you have questions, if you're in need of ideas, let me know. You know I'm here when you guys are preparing, feel free to ask me a question, shoot me a question on anything you're concerned about. You don't know the answer to, you know, I'm sure to help. Okay, that is offered today. Thank you so much. And see you guys next week. Thank you, Jasper. Thank you, scarlet. Bye. Bye.