1117 VJ DB B G2

已完成

创建时间: 2025-11-18 05:45:37

更新时间: 2025-11-18 06:16:28

源文件: f0.mp4

文件大小: 0.00 MB

字数统计: 14,843 字

标签:
暂无标签
处理统计

STT耗时: 29051 秒

分析耗时: 15 秒

处理流程
文件上传 完成

文件名: f0.mp4
大小: 0.00 MB

试听当前项目录音
URL直链 f0.mp4
时长: 检测中...
视频加载中,请稍候... (来自外部URL,可能需要较长时间)
语音识别 (STT)
完成
Hi, Jasper. How are you today? B, what have you been up to on a Monday? Did you have school? What have you been doing? Did you have school today? Yeah, nice. Let's just wait a couple more moments for Scarlett to join us and then we can get started. Okay, let's get started today. So Jasper, could you turn your camera a bit lower so I can see your face? That would be great. Okay, perfect. Okay, so today we're not gonna learn any new content, we'll just be doing debating practice. So therebe one short prep debate and one long prep date. Okay, have you guys do you guys remember what to do in long prep and short prep debates? Do you remember what's the difference between short prep debate and long prep debate? So what's the difference in your opinion? We can now go to Internet in short prep debate. And also not using any tools that helps you find facts. Yeah, exactly. And then for long prep, you can prep in advance so you can look online, you can have a bunch of tools. Exactly. So those are the differences between short prep debate and long prep debate. Okay. So that's all you need to know for today. We'll have two debates, super simple. And Yeah, so the first motion for today is this house would ban dangerous sports, okay. And this is a short prep debate motion. So you have about 15 minutes. 15 minutes to prep for this. Okay. Do you want to be the proposition or the opposition you get to pick as Scarlett's not here? Proposition is you agree with the motion, opposition you disagree with the motion. Which side do you want, Jasper? Opposition opposition okay cool, then you will be the opposition, I will message. Okay, Yeah, you're the opposition. Great. Okay, then I will start the 15 minute timer, and then you can present remember, this is no exterior resources as this is a short practice. Let me know if you have any questions and try and make your speech up to three minutes long. Hi Scarlett. Thanks for joining us. Okay, Yeah so today we finished with all the content. Now we'll be only focusing on the debating portion tions. So in today's lesson we'll have two debating sessions. The first one will be short prep debate and then the second one will be long prep debate. So right now we're currently doing the short prep debate motion. And so the motion is this house would ban dangerous sports. So you guys have approximately 13 minutes to prep for this debate. Remember, this is short prep motion. So you cannot use online resources, Internet. You only use the features of short prep debates. Okay? Right now the opposition is jaspered. And so you will be the proposition. So you believe that this house should ban dangerous sports. Does that make sense, scarlet? So what like what types of like what types of skills do we use in this debate? Yeah. So the skills are essentially the same. You can use rhetorical questions, you can use repetition. The only difference is this is a short prep debate. So you cannot use online tools. Okay? So no searching up information, no finding statistics. This is all just your own head. Super fast. You have ten minutes to prepare. So Yeah and then we'll do a long version debate and there you'll be able to research research information. So that's the only difference. But in terms of techniques and skills, all the same repetition, emotive language, rhetorical questions up to you. Okay, I know. About two minutes left and then we will start the debate. Okay, that is time. Is everyone ready to present? Jasper. Are you ready to present Oh scarletts here as well. Okay, great. Since scarlet you are the proposition, then you can start first. So whenever you okay, let's start. Okay, so Hey everyone, my name is Garland and I agree that we should ban dangerous words. These are the following reasons that I agree. So first do dangerous sports like now snow wboarding keeps us safe? Of course not. Kids break spoones or get cuts from these sports. Banning them stops these injuries. Second, we want them, their family to worry. We, who wants their family to get worried? If I get her t, my mom will be sad. Dangerous boards don't just hurt us, they hurt the people who care us, right? Third, we have lots of safe safe sports, right? Basketball, swimming, running and like some safe kind of like or football like these sports, they are fun and don't risk our health. We don't need dangerous swans. Some might say it's my try toys, but it is a good choice to pick something that don't hurt us and keep us health. So then we don't get like broken legs or it doesn't hurt us. So last, let's spend dangerous sports for our safety, our families and a better fun. Thank you. Great. Thank you so much, Scarlett. Yeah, I really liyour speech. I liked how you added a lot of contrast and reflection, like some might say, others may say this. You also talked about how I think you involved a rhetorical question in there, and that was great as well. So Yeah, really well done. I think your next step is being more clear in your structure. I think I've said this a couple times, so making sure that you say, okay, so I have three arguments for this motion. My first one is this. My second one is this. My third one is this. Starting with the first one, I believe that dangerous sports are dangerous and should not be made public. Instead, they should be banned because it is a health hazard, right? My second point is this. Overall, due to these three points, I believe etcetera et c et c. But overall, really nice job. Well done, scarlet. Okay, up to you, Jasper. You are up next. So here is three minutes whenever you are ready. Hi, everyone. My name is Jessica, and I think that this house would would not ban the dangerous sports because first first is not that you need to do the dangerous board, is that you choose to do the dangerous board. Someone the tenders for he or she will tell us families and birthey say sorry. 17。Sorry, yes, that was scarlet. Could you mute your profile please? Okay. That is not that you that is not that you need to lose. Is okay now Yeah. It is not that you need to do the dangerous sports that you choose to do. It is dangerous. But like when somebody do dangerous work, they will say to themselves, Yeah, okay. And they will tell their families, and they will, if they agree that they can do. If they don't, he or she won't. And also. It calls dangerous sports just because you may get deaf when you get namsports, but not the very high limit like the highest English ger sport is 20 or 30%. But that's still high for your light and also. A few band dangerous sports, like there's still somebody like dangerous sports. What can they do? Thanks for listening. Yeah, very nice job, Jasper. I think it was hard again because there were en't interruptions in the middle. But apart from that, I think you did a really good job at. Still keeping up with it, not letting that fayou again. I think my advice for you would be the same as scarlet, which is will be the same as scarlet, which is to focus on structure. So in front of you, if you have a notebook, when you're writing ideas down, try and write like my first argument, my second argument, my third argument, just so you're very clear as to what your arguments are and so that it makes a lot of sense when you're saying it. Does that make sense, Jasper? Okay, so I was saying as advice for next time is have a notebook in front of you and like scarlet, this is advice for both of you. Make your structure more clear. So have my first argument. Is this my second argument? Is this? My third argument is this. In conclusion, with all these three arguments, I believe that this house should ban dangerous sports. Okay? So be very clear as to what your arguments are when you're presenting. You can be very clear. You can say, I have three arguments. The first one is this, second one is this. Third one is this. Does that make sense? Yes, okay, cool. So I'm looking to see that in this next debate. Okay, so I'm looking to see three distinct arguments. Okay, so this is our topic for our second debate. Children should be allowed to get a tattoo. Okay, this is a bit of a harder topic, so I'll give you about 25 minutes to prepare for this topic. Okay, or 20 minutes. Let's go with 20 minutes. So who wants to be the proposition? Jasper, you want to be proposition. No, we have to pick. Okay, great. So scarlet is the proposition. And I don't want to agree that. I want to be like I disagree that. Scarlet, I think you can. I think you can challenge yourself and go for proposition. Scarlet, you can do it. I believe in you. Okay, so great. Scarlet, you're the proposition. Jasper, you're the opposition. Okay, so you guys have 20 minutes to prepare. Again, same thing. Three minute speeches. But really this time I'm looking for quality and not quantity. So make sure that you're saying what your three points are, okay? And be very, very clear, that's what I'm looking for from both of you, Jasper and Scarlett. Okay, cool. So I'll start the time ing now. Good. Let me know if you have any questions as well. I'm here to help. About three minutes left. Okay, that is time. Are you ready to present Jasper? Well I think scarlet prepare first. Yes, scarlet should be first, but unfortunately she is not here. So if you want, I can give you a couple more minutes to prepare, maybe like two minutes if needed. Yeah, okay, okay. So two more minutes. Remember, try and make your speech have a very clear structure. So say if you have two arguments or three arguments, but be very clear about what each argument is. Oh, okay, perfect. Scarlet is back. Okay, scarlet, so great. So would you like to start us off with the deep date? Wait a second. Okay, let's start hi everyone. I'm scarlet and I disagree that children should be allowed to a tattoo. Let's talk about why. To start with my first point, tattoo are permanent permanent kids changed their mind a lot. Do you think a ten years old children knows that they what they're like when they are. Cartoon now they might hate it later and they can't take it off easily. Moving on to my second argument. Tattoos are bad for kids bodies. Do you know tattoos use needles and ink? Kids children's skin is still growing, so tattoos can hurt their skin or even make them sick. Our bodies aren't ready for that. Now for my third reason, kids need adult help to kids need adults help to make big choices. Can a kid really understand all problems? Tattoo cough, no. Parents and teachers help us pick save good things and tattoos aren't one of them. Some might like a hetorical questions. Some might say kids should have freedom, but it's freedom to do something that hurts you or your regret. Good freedom, no real freedom is making start smart choices, not rocky ones. A conclusion to wrap this up. My first point was that the tattoos last forever. My second point was they're harm for kids body. And my third was kids need adult help. Let's say not to let kids do a tattoo. Thank you to listening. Thank you to listen to my debate. Yeah, very nice work on scarlet. A couple things. Okay, I really liked how this time you talked about the structure a bit more. In your conclusion, you said my first point was this. My second point was this, and so all of this taken into account, I believe children should not be allowed to get a tattoo. So that was really good and definitely an improvement off of last ti's debate. Another thing that I liked was you were able to speak for longer. So that's always great to speak for a longer period of time. I think for this debate, certain things to keep in mind, you don't need to announce that you're doing a rhetorical question. So you don't need to say, okay, a rhetorical question is da, da, da, da, da. Or you don't need to say, my conclusion is you can just go straight in so you can say, how would people feel looking at a child with tattoos, looking at that suffering? Do people not feel bad? Right? We assume that it's a rhetorical question. You don't need to say it to the audience that it's a rhetorical question. Same with the conclusion. You can say, given all of these arguments in conclusion, I believe ettera et cec et cec. Okay? You don't need to say, okay, moving on to my conclusion. You can just go straight into it, right? Because in debates, you want to be clear, concise, short to the point. Okay? But great job, scarlet. Pretty nice job. Okay, up to you, Jasper. You are next. Your time starts now. Hello, everyone. My name is Jasper, and I believe that children should be allowed to take. Sorry. Because. First, taking tattoos, your choice, like you can tell your parents that you're going to take in tattoo, then if they agree, then it's okay. And. Also, the, there is some children there who likes tattoo, and those children who likes tattoo can do nothing if you don't. Yeah and also. Like taking tattoo is not really a bad thing. Like some like it doesn't really hurt your skin. It is just putting some color on your skin. And. Thanks for listening. Yeah, okay. So Jasper, a couple things. Okay, first off, I think you didn't notice, but you were the opposition for today's debate, so you should have been arguing the opposite. So children should not be allowed to get tattoos, but that's fine. No worries. Scarto do the children. I should not to get the tattoos. Yeah, I think both of you switch sides. So no worries. That's why I didn't mind it. So just remember that proposition, scarlet, means that you're agreeing, Jasper. Opposition means that you're disagreeing. But I noticed that both of you change. So no worries. Okay, I really liked how you labeled your arguyou said firstly, secondly, thirdly. That was great. And it showed again that you were listening to what I was saying last. Read the last a bit. So that was really great. Well done, Jasper. A couple things. I think your main task now is really developing your answers. You wanna be getting to the two, three minute mark, right? Not the one minute mark. So really making sure that every argument that you're putting forward, you're going into as much depth as possible, as much detail as possible, and really lengthening your arguments to make sure that all of the areas are covered in that argument. Does that make sense, Jasper? Yes, okay, cool. So make sure you're working on that, Jasper. You're trying to detail more your arguments, scarlet. You are trying to be more concise and short. So actually, you guys have opposite tasks, Jasper. You're trying to say more and be more elaborate, develop more your arguments, scarlet. You're trying to really be more concise and make the information a lot more important. So you don't need to say this rhetorical question. This conclusion just goes straight. Okay? That is the end of today's class. Thank you so much, and I will see you guys next week. Dbye Jasper. Bye, scarlet.
处理时间: 29051 秒 | 字符数: 14,843
AI分析 完成
分析结果 (可编辑,支持美化与着色)
{
    "header_icon": "fas fa-crown",
    "course_title_en": "Language Course Summary",
    "course_title_cn": "语言课程总结",
    "course_subtitle_en": "1v1 English Lesson - Debating Practice",
    "course_subtitle_cn": "1v1 英语课程 - 辩论练习",
    "course_name_en": "VJ DB B G2",
    "course_name_cn": "VJ DB B G2",
    "course_topic_en": "Debating Practice: Ban Dangerous Sports \/ Children and Tattoos",
    "course_topic_cn": "辩论练习:禁止危险运动 \/ 儿童纹身",
    "course_date_en": "November 17th (Implied by title '1117')",
    "course_date_cn": "11月17日 (由标题 '1117' 推断)",
    "student_name": "Jasper and Scarlett",
    "teaching_focus_en": "Practicing short prep and long prep debate formats, focusing on argument structure, clarity, and conciseness.",
    "teaching_focus_cn": "练习短准备和长准备辩论形式,重点关注论点结构、清晰度和简洁性。",
    "teaching_objectives": [
        {
            "en": "Understand the difference between short prep and long prep debates.",
            "cn": "理解短准备和长准备辩论的区别。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Practice constructing and delivering arguments in a debate setting.",
            "cn": "在辩论环境中练习构建和陈述论点。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Improve clarity and structure in presenting arguments.",
            "cn": "提高论点陈述的清晰度和结构。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Develop skills in engaging with opposing arguments.",
            "cn": "培养应对反方论点的能力。"
        }
    ],
    "timeline_activities": [
        {
            "time": "Start of class",
            "title_en": "Welcome and Warm-up",
            "title_cn": "欢迎与热身",
            "description_en": "Teacher greets Jasper, checks on his day, and waits for Scarlett to join.",
            "description_cn": "老师问候Jasper,询问他今天的活动,并等待Scarlett加入。"
        },
        {
            "time": "5-10 mins",
            "title_en": "Introduction to Debate Formats",
            "title_cn": "辩论形式介绍",
            "description_en": "Teacher explains the difference between short prep (no external resources) and long prep (can use resources) debates.",
            "description_cn": "老师解释短准备(禁止外部资源)和长准备(允许使用资源)辩论的区别。"
        },
        {
            "time": "15 mins prep + 3 mins speech",
            "title_en": "Short Prep Debate 1: Ban Dangerous Sports",
            "title_cn": "短准备辩论1:禁止危险运动",
            "description_en": "Students choose sides (Jasper: Opposition, Scarlett: Proposition) and prepare arguments. Scarlett presents first, followed by Jasper.",
            "description_cn": "学生选择立场(Jasper:反方,Scarlett:正方)并准备论点。Scarlett先发言,然后是Jasper。"
        },
        {
            "time": "20 mins prep + 3 mins speech",
            "title_en": "Long Prep Debate 2: Children Should Be Allowed to Get a Tattoo",
            "title_cn": "长准备辩论2:允许儿童纹身",
            "description_en": "Students choose sides (Scarlett: Proposition, Jasper: Opposition - though sides may have switched during delivery) and prepare arguments. Feedback provided on structure and length.",
            "description_cn": "学生选择立场(Scarlett:正方,Jasper:反方 - 尽管发言时立场可能有所切换)并准备论点。对结构和时长提供反馈。"
        },
        {
            "time": "End of class",
            "title_en": "Class Wrap-up",
            "title_cn": "课程总结",
            "description_en": "Teacher summarizes the differing focus areas for Jasper (developing arguments) and Scarlett (conciseness).",
            "description_cn": "老师总结Jasper(发展论点)和Scarlett(简洁性)的不同重点。"
        }
    ],
    "vocabulary_en": "Proposition, Opposition, Motion, Debate, Dangerous Sports, Ban, Injuries, Health Hazard, Permanent, Structure, Arguments, Rhetorical Question, Repetition, Emotive Language, Concise, Elaborate, Detailing, Tattoo, Freedom, Choice, Regret, Permanent, Skin, Needles, Ink.",
    "vocabulary_cn": "正方, 反方, 动议, 辩论, 危险运动, 禁止, 伤害, 健康危害, 永久的, 结构, 论点, 反问句, 重复, 情感语言, 简洁的, 详尽的, 纹身, 自由, 选择, 后悔, 永久的, 皮肤, 针头, 墨水。",
    "concepts_en": "Debate structure (Introduction, arguments, conclusion), Preparation strategies (short prep vs. long prep), Persuasive language techniques, Argument development, Side-taking in debates (Proposition vs. Opposition).",
    "concepts_cn": "辩论结构(开场白、论点、结论)、准备策略(短准备 vs. 长准备)、说服性语言技巧、论点发展、辩论中的立场(正方 vs. 反方)。",
    "skills_practiced_en": "Constructing arguments, Public speaking, Active listening, Critical thinking, Time management during preparation, Adapting to different debate formats.",
    "skills_practiced_cn": "构建论点、公开演讲、积极倾听、批判性思维、准备过程中的时间管理、适应不同辩论形式。",
    "teaching_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Whiteboard\/Screen for displaying motions and timers.",
            "cn": "用于显示动议和计时器的白板\/屏幕。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Online communication platform with chat function for instructions and side assignments.",
            "cn": "具有聊天功能的在线交流平台,用于发布指令和分配立场。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Timer for preparation periods.",
            "cn": "准备时段的计时器。"
        }
    ],
    "participation_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Both students actively participated in the debate activities.",
            "cn": "两位学生都积极参与了辩论活动。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Jasper initially seemed hesitant but engaged well once the debates started.",
            "cn": "Jasper起初似乎有些犹豫,但在辩论开始后参与度很高。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Scarlett demonstrated consistent engagement throughout the lesson.",
            "cn": "Scarlett在整个课程中表现出持续的参与度。"
        }
    ],
    "comprehension_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Students understood the core differences between short prep and long prep debates.",
            "cn": "学生理解了短准备和长准备辩论的核心区别。"
        },
        {
            "en": "They grasped the concept of taking a specific side (proposition\/opposition).",
            "cn": "他们理解了采取特定立场(正方\/反方)的概念。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Some confusion arose regarding side switching, but it was managed by the teacher.",
            "cn": "在立场切换方面出现了一些混淆,但老师进行了管理。"
        }
    ],
    "oral_assessment": [
        {
            "en": "Both students delivered speeches within the allocated time.",
            "cn": "两位学生都在规定时间内发表了演讲。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Scarlett's delivery was generally clear and well-paced, with good use of concluding summaries.",
            "cn": "Scarlett的陈述总体清晰且节奏适中,很好地运用了总结。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Jasper's delivery was slightly shorter but showed improvement in structuring arguments ('firstly', 'secondly').",
            "cn": "Jasper的陈述稍短,但在论点结构('首先','其次')方面有所进步。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Both could benefit from more fluent transitions and less reliance on noting rhetorical questions or conclusions explicitly.",
            "cn": "两人都可以从更流畅的过渡以及减少对明确说明反问句或结论的依赖中受益。"
        }
    ],
    "written_assessment_en": "N\/A - The lesson focused on oral debate practice.",
    "written_assessment_cn": "不适用 - 本课程侧重于口头辩论练习。",
    "student_strengths": [
        {
            "en": "Scarlett: Good clarity in speech, effective use of summarizing points, improved structure awareness.",
            "cn": "Scarlett:口语清晰,善于总结要点,结构意识有所提高。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Jasper: Ability to follow instructions, improvement in argument labeling, willingness to engage.",
            "cn": "Jasper:能够遵循指示,论点标记有所改进,乐于参与。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Both: Ability to adapt to different debate topics and formats.",
            "cn": "两人:能够适应不同的辩论主题和形式。"
        }
    ],
    "improvement_areas": [
        {
            "en": "Scarlett: Needs to be more concise, avoid explicitly stating 'rhetorical question' or 'conclusion'.",
            "cn": "Scarlett:需要更简洁,避免明确说明“反问句”或“结论”。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Jasper: Needs to elaborate more on arguments, increase speech length and depth.",
            "cn": "Jasper:需要更详细地阐述论点,增加演讲时长和深度。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Both: Developing smoother transitions between points, ensuring consistent adherence to assigned roles (proposition\/opposition).",
            "cn": "两人:在观点之间发展更顺畅的过渡,确保一致遵守分配的角色(正方\/反方)。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_effectiveness": [
        {
            "en": "The lesson effectively simulated debate scenarios and provided targeted feedback.",
            "cn": "课程有效地模拟了辩论场景并提供了有针对性的反馈。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The teacher skillfully managed preparation times and speech delivery.",
            "cn": "老师熟练地管理了准备时间与演讲的交付。"
        },
        {
            "en": "The differentiation in feedback for Scarlett and Jasper based on their needs was appropriate.",
            "cn": "根据Scarlett和Jasper的不同需求提供的差异化反馈是恰当的。"
        }
    ],
    "pace_management": [
        {
            "en": "The teacher managed the class pace well, allocating appropriate time for prep and speaking.",
            "cn": "老师很好地管理了课堂节奏,为准备和发言分配了适当的时间。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Timers were used effectively to keep the activities on track.",
            "cn": "计时器被有效地用于使活动按计划进行。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Slight delays occurred due to student absence (Scarlett initially) and side-switching confusion, but were handled smoothly.",
            "cn": "由于学生缺席(Scarlett初始缺席)和立场切换混淆导致了轻微延迟,但处理得很顺利。"
        }
    ],
    "classroom_atmosphere_en": "The classroom atmosphere was positive and encouraging, with the teacher providing constructive feedback and motivating students.",
    "classroom_atmosphere_cn": "课堂氛围积极且富有鼓励性,老师提供了建设性的反馈并激励学生。",
    "objective_achievement": [
        {
            "en": "Students demonstrated understanding of debate formats and practiced constructing arguments.",
            "cn": "学生们展示了对辩论形式的理解并练习了构建论点。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Improvement in structure was evident, especially for Scarlett in the second debate.",
            "cn": "结构方面的进步是显而易见的,特别是Scarlett在第二场辩论中。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Further development is needed in argument depth (Jasper) and conciseness (Scarlett) to fully meet objectives.",
            "cn": "为了全面实现目标,还需要在论点深度(Jasper)和简洁性(Scarlett)方面进一步发展。"
        }
    ],
    "teaching_strengths": {
        "identified_strengths": [
            {
                "en": "Clear explanation of debate formats and rules.",
                "cn": "清晰地解释了辩论形式和规则。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Effective use of timers for time management.",
                "cn": "有效地利用计时器进行时间管理。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Targeted and constructive feedback for each student.",
                "cn": "为每个学生提供有针对性且建设性的反馈。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Ability to manage unexpected situations like side switching.",
                "cn": "能够处理意料之外的情况,例如立场切换。"
            }
        ],
        "effective_methods": [
            {
                "en": "Explaining differences between short and long prep debates.",
                "cn": "解释短准备和长准备辩论之间的区别。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Assigning specific roles (proposition\/opposition) and providing clear instructions.",
                "cn": "分配特定角色(正方\/反方)并提供清晰的指示。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Providing immediate feedback after each speech, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.",
                "cn": "每次发言后立即提供反馈,强调优点和需要改进的方面。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Differentiating instruction and feedback based on individual student needs (Jasper vs. Scarlett).",
                "cn": "根据个体学生需求(Jasper vs. Scarlett)进行差异化教学和反馈。"
            }
        ],
        "positive_feedback": [
            {
                "en": "Teacher praised Scarlett's use of contrast and rhetorical questions.",
                "cn": "老师称赞Scarlett运用对比和反问句。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Teacher acknowledged Jasper's effort in following instructions and structuring arguments.",
                "cn": "老师肯定了Jasper在遵循指示和构建论点方面的努力。"
            },
            {
                "en": "Teacher encouraged students by highlighting improvements and setting clear expectations for the next debate.",
                "cn": "老师通过强调进步并为下一场辩论设定明确的期望来鼓励学生。"
            }
        ]
    },
    "specific_suggestions": [
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-volume-up",
            "category_en": "Pronunciation & Reading",
            "category_cn": "发音与阅读",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Continue practicing clear articulation and pacing during speeches.",
                    "cn": "继续练习演讲过程中的清晰发音和节奏。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "Focus on natural intonation rather than explicitly stating speech components like 'rhetorical question'.",
                    "cn": "专注于自然语调,而不是明确说明“反问句”等演讲组成部分。"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-comments",
            "category_en": "Speaking & Communication",
            "category_cn": "口语与交流",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Jasper: Expand on each argument with more details, examples, and reasoning to reach the target speech duration.",
                    "cn": "Jasper:用更多的细节、例子和推理来扩展每个论点,以达到目标演讲时长。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "Scarlett: Practice delivering points more concisely and directly, integrating the conclusion smoothly without explicit announcement.",
                    "cn": "Scarlett:练习更简洁、直接地陈述观点,并在不明确宣布的情况下顺利融入结论。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "Both: Work on smoother transitions between arguments to improve the flow of the speech.",
                    "cn": "两人:努力在论点之间进行更顺畅的过渡,以改善演讲的流畅性。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "Both: Ensure clear understanding and adherence to the assigned role (Proposition or Opposition) at the start of each debate.",
                    "cn": "两人:确保在每场辩论开始时清楚理解并遵守分配的角色(正方或反方)。"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "icon": "fas fa-book-open",
            "category_en": "Structure & Logic",
            "category_cn": "结构与逻辑",
            "suggestions": [
                {
                    "en": "Both: Continue using a clear structure (e.g., 'First argument is...', 'Second argument is...') but aim to internalize this rather than announcing it.",
                    "cn": "两人:继续使用清晰的结构(例如,“第一个论点是...”,“第二个论点是...”),但目标是内化这种结构,而不是宣布它。"
                },
                {
                    "en": "Jasper: Focus on developing 2-3 well-supported arguments for each debate.",
                    "cn": "Jasper:专注于为每场辩论发展2-3个有充分支持的论点。"
                }
            ]
        }
    ],
    "next_focus": [
        {
            "en": "Continue practicing debate skills with varied topics.",
            "cn": "继续练习不同主题的辩论技巧。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Focus on Jasper developing argument depth and Scarlett improving conciseness and flow.",
            "cn": "重点关注Jasper发展论点深度,Scarlett提高简洁性和流畅性。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Introduce longer preparation times for long prep debates to allow for more in-depth research.",
            "cn": "为长准备辩论引入更长的准备时间,以进行更深入的研究。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Potentially introduce counter-arguments and rebuttals.",
            "cn": "可能引入反驳和辩驳。"
        }
    ],
    "homework_resources": [
        {
            "en": "Review notes on debate structure and persuasive techniques.",
            "cn": "复习关于辩论结构和说服技巧的笔记。"
        },
        {
            "en": "For Jasper: Find articles or videos on a chosen topic and practice expanding arguments from them.",
            "cn": "对于Jasper:查找关于选定主题的文章或视频,并练习从中扩展论点。"
        },
        {
            "en": "For Scarlett: Practice summarizing arguments and speeches concisely.",
            "cn": "对于Scarlett:练习简洁地总结论点和演讲。"
        },
        {
            "en": "Recommended resource: Watch examples of formal debates (e.g., TED Debates, parliamentary debates) to observe structure and delivery.",
            "cn": "推荐资源:观看正式辩论的示例(例如,TED辩论、议会辩论),以观察结构和表达方式。"
        }
    ]
}
处理时间: 15 秒
HTML报告 完成

生成时间: 2025-11-18 06:16:28

查看报告 下载报告
返回列表